|
On May 09 2011 10:43 Enervate wrote:Show nested quote +On May 09 2011 10:41 Ikaros wrote:On May 09 2011 10:40 Vorenius wrote:On May 09 2011 10:38 sermokala wrote:Poll: Recommend Game 2 Sen Vs ManaBanelings. (146) 89% Yes (15) 9% No (3) 2% 164 total votes Your vote: Recommend Game 2 Sen Vs Mana (Vote): Yes (Vote): No (Vote): Banelings.
While an awesome poll, it's also pretty 'spoilering' for people wondering what matches to watch later data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" No one should read live report if they don't want to get spoiled. The point of a poll is to recommend games to people who haven't seen the games yet. They go in the OP. Just pointing that out. I don't think the poll needs to be changed though.
Didn't know that they put it on op, my bad.
|
On May 09 2011 10:41 Ikaros wrote: No one should read live report if they don't want to get spoiled.
Except the poll gets put in the main thread...pretty huge spoiler
|
I think Mana underestimated the baneling count and thought the greatest danger was blinking away and letting the colossus take the hits. That or he was trying to macro up :x
|
On May 09 2011 10:44 woob wrote: who won MC vs Machine the other night? + Show Spoiler +
|
The patch in Beta where splash was changed to originate from the center of the target instead of from where the impact happened makes banelings useful even against Stalkers. This is good, firstly because I find hard counters detrimental for the game, and secondly, because this shows that Protoss sometimes just can't a-move into battle without paying a thought about unit composition. He needed forcefields, but I did not spot a single FF in the battle, and from what I remember I could spot atleast 3-4 sentries that survived the Nexus-snipe.
EDIT: Also Mana screwed up that attack so bad. He did not micro at all, because with micro and splitting one Stalker takes 8 (?) banelings to kill.
|
On May 09 2011 10:44 woob wrote: who won MC vs Machine the other night? MC
|
Maybe Protoss will begin to spread their army?
|
On May 09 2011 10:41 Ikaros wrote:Show nested quote +On May 09 2011 10:40 Vorenius wrote:On May 09 2011 10:38 sermokala wrote:Poll: Recommend Game 2 Sen Vs ManaBanelings. (146) 89% Yes (15) 9% No (3) 2% 164 total votes Your vote: Recommend Game 2 Sen Vs Mana (Vote): Yes (Vote): No (Vote): Banelings.
While an awesome poll, it's also pretty 'spoilering' for people wondering what matches to watch later data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" No one should read live report if they don't want to get spoiled. I didn't mean myself today. But I often can't stay up to watch these matches and then rely on the recommended games on the OP as I don't really feel like sitting through all 5 games.
I would imagine others use the recommended games in a similar way. And if not what's the point of them at all?
|
On May 09 2011 10:45 Samhax wrote: Maybe Protoss will begin to spread their army?
Easier said than done. Protoss units are pretty weak in small numbers.
|
Someone make GIF of that epic moment, pleaseeeeeeeeeee! :-)
|
On May 09 2011 10:41 loveeholicce wrote:Show nested quote +On May 09 2011 10:38 Backpack wrote:On May 09 2011 10:37 Sandro wrote: What the hell happened to those stalkers!??!?! Well protoss is clearly so OP that a zerg with no corruptors can't stand a chance against 5 colossi deathball oh wait... Protoss is so clearly OP every time protoss loses we have to make a huge deal about it and extrapolate information about balance? How about sen was the better player, and mana needed to retain his sentry count so he could put up some forcefields instead of letting banelings walk up to his army. On a serious note though, it's nice to see zergs winning a lot more, gives some hope for when I play this matchup : D
Im just trying to balance out the huge deal zergs make when protoss wins ^^
|
On May 09 2011 10:43 Beef Noodles wrote: Why talk about balance?
Truth is that Sen is imba.
Just look at BW. No one beats Sen.
Sen was undefeated even after Mondi beat him.
Lol time to bust out the Sen/Chuck Norris jokes
|
Hmmm stream is kinda laggy
|
"the Sheth amount of drones".. 0 < J < Sheth <= Infinity.
|
On May 09 2011 10:46 Backpack wrote:Show nested quote +On May 09 2011 10:41 loveeholicce wrote:On May 09 2011 10:38 Backpack wrote:On May 09 2011 10:37 Sandro wrote: What the hell happened to those stalkers!??!?! Well protoss is clearly so OP that a zerg with no corruptors can't stand a chance against 5 colossi deathball oh wait... Protoss is so clearly OP every time protoss loses we have to make a huge deal about it and extrapolate information about balance? How about sen was the better player, and mana needed to retain his sentry count so he could put up some forcefields instead of letting banelings walk up to his army. On a serious note though, it's nice to see zergs winning a lot more, gives some hope for when I play this matchup : D Im just trying to balance out the huge deal zergs make when protoss wins ^^ you mean the huge deal zergs used to make? it's died down quite a lot recently.
|
On May 09 2011 10:45 Samhax wrote: Maybe Protoss will begin to spread their army?
I do agree some Stalife-esque blink micro could nullify banelings, but I don't expect that to happen for a while. This is the first time I've seen such a ridiculous surround to make spreading necessary.
|
On May 09 2011 10:46 Backpack wrote:Show nested quote +On May 09 2011 10:41 loveeholicce wrote:On May 09 2011 10:38 Backpack wrote:On May 09 2011 10:37 Sandro wrote: What the hell happened to those stalkers!??!?! Well protoss is clearly so OP that a zerg with no corruptors can't stand a chance against 5 colossi deathball oh wait... Protoss is so clearly OP every time protoss loses we have to make a huge deal about it and extrapolate information about balance? How about sen was the better player, and mana needed to retain his sentry count so he could put up some forcefields instead of letting banelings walk up to his army. On a serious note though, it's nice to see zergs winning a lot more, gives some hope for when I play this matchup : D Im just trying to balance out the huge deal zergs make when protoss wins ^^
Stop stereotyping, all races have whiners and not every Zerg complains about balance.
Disgruntled people often make the most noise that's all.
|
On May 09 2011 10:45 branflakes14 wrote:Show nested quote +On May 09 2011 10:45 Samhax wrote: Maybe Protoss will begin to spread their army? Easier said than done. Protoss units are pretty weak in small numbers.
By spread i mean like spread marines against banelings
|
On May 09 2011 10:46 Backpack wrote:Show nested quote +On May 09 2011 10:41 loveeholicce wrote:On May 09 2011 10:38 Backpack wrote:On May 09 2011 10:37 Sandro wrote: What the hell happened to those stalkers!??!?! Well protoss is clearly so OP that a zerg with no corruptors can't stand a chance against 5 colossi deathball oh wait... Protoss is so clearly OP every time protoss loses we have to make a huge deal about it and extrapolate information about balance? How about sen was the better player, and mana needed to retain his sentry count so he could put up some forcefields instead of letting banelings walk up to his army. On a serious note though, it's nice to see zergs winning a lot more, gives some hope for when I play this matchup : D Im just trying to balance out the huge deal zergs make when protoss wins ^^ Whining about people whining doesn't really help anything either though.
Oh god, now I'm whining about whine about whiners. :s
|
Zenio using Spanishiwa's (Ice Fisher) build. Yay <3
|
|
|
|