EPT
Interesting play from CatZ - gg, and onto game 3
NASL Week 4 Day 4 - Page 36
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
AimForTheBushes
United States1760 Posts
Interesting play from CatZ - gg, and onto game 3 | ||
|
darthfoley
United States8004 Posts
| ||
|
whiterabbit
2675 Posts
| ||
|
Ezze
Canada934 Posts
| ||
|
Exhale-
Canada103 Posts
| ||
|
Toadvine
Poland2234 Posts
| ||
|
Pajegetc
United States3158 Posts
On May 08 2011 12:15 jmbthirteen wrote: 21k viewers, first time at 20k since the first night? No, Last time Idra played they popped over 20k viewers. | ||
|
Al Bundy
7257 Posts
| ||
|
CyanAska
Estonia40 Posts
| ||
|
DiaBoLuS
Germany1638 Posts
On May 08 2011 12:15 sermokala wrote: because its greedy and loses to any 4 gate / 6 gate pressure maybe?^^ | ||
|
Hollis
United States505 Posts
On May 08 2011 12:14 Scribble wrote: The impending BL/Baneling bomb gave me an idea. Blink stalkers are a huge issue against Brood Lords, but what if you left a small cluster of banelings right below the Broods so that if Stalkers blink up they're immediately on top of the banes? Sounds like an excellent idea tbqh, spread the word. | ||
|
garlicface
Canada4196 Posts
On May 08 2011 12:14 Scribble wrote: The impending BL/Baneling bomb gave me an idea. Blink stalkers are a huge issue against Brood Lords, but what if you left a small cluster of banelings right below the Broods so that if Stalkers blink up they're immediately on top of the banes? Sounds pretty iffy. It could be good, but how many banes do you need to kill a stalker? I think lings + fungals are better for guarding BLs. Unrelated, but another nifty trick in ZvP is 2-3 corrupters + 1 overseer for hunting observers. | ||
|
Azarkon
United States21060 Posts
On May 08 2011 12:16 CyanAska wrote: Baneling drops are insanely good. But against Protoss players of that level, I don't think it is really possible without landing those fungal growths that basically force the opponent to either loose half his army without retaliating or loose everything :/ Baneling drops are great for protecting broodlords. Why sit roaches under them when you can float overlords (loaded with banelings) alongside them? If stalkers blink in, they're dead. | ||
|
DiaBoLuS
Germany1638 Posts
On May 08 2011 12:15 Ghostpvp wrote: I agree with you Geoff. I hope zergs keep thinking mutas are horrible. so much agree... the only thing you can do is to allin and hope for a win | ||
|
MonsieurGrimm
Canada2441 Posts
On May 08 2011 12:15 Dommk wrote: Bah, got the feeling that Hasu was playing better overall, just wasn't quite sure the perfect way to handle it, Catz playing really sloppy, losing like 12 muta for one Colossus, 50% of his baneling drops died to storm  agree with this, protoss doesn't have an answer for this quite yet I feel. but I'm sure they'll find one :D | ||
mpf189
332 Posts
On May 08 2011 12:16 Pajegetc wrote: No, Last time Idra played they popped over 20k viewers. I imagine when Idra commentates the games next week, they will get a ton of viewers. | ||
|
stanik
Canada213 Posts
Backwater Gultch should be pronounced Backwater Glutch? Joke I am missing? | ||
|
siri
Portugal129 Posts
the only reason the zerg won the game was because the amount of greediness he had unfortunately protoss cant scout if zerg is being greedy or not and at the same time punish it | ||
|
Awesomeness
Germany1361 Posts
On May 08 2011 12:16 Exhale- wrote: Man that map is so shitty for zergs, its actually digusting that so many tournaments are using it in the map pool. Great play by CatZ though. So how do you get a 3rd base as a protoss vs. mutas there? | ||
CosmicSpiral
United States15275 Posts
On May 08 2011 12:17 MonsieurGrimm wrote: agree with this, protoss doesn't have an answer for this quite yet I feel. but I'm sure they'll find one :D It's called the 5/6 gateway push. That's the reason we don't see muta play in ZvP much these days. | ||
| ||
