|
On April 24 2011 07:25 Dante08 wrote: Boxer the only Korean left, who'd have thought of that :p Go boxer!
I remember before TSL started and people where making predictions, seemed like there was a consensus that all the Koreans were gonna roll everybody, except Boxer. He was predicted to be the only one that might lose to a foreigner.
He's the only one left, that's so ironic.
|
On April 24 2011 07:27 Qaatar wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2011 07:21 mholden02 wrote: oGsMC does not need anyone making excuses for him. He played great. MC had plenty of time, and all the replays he needed from Thorzain's match with Tyler to study Thorzain's TvP, as well as the "THOR BUILD."
Thorzain didn't use any gimmicky strats, or special unknown builds. 3 games he used standard BIO builds. 1 game he tried a 1 base Rine/Tank/banshee build, and the last game he used his patented Thor build, that MC must have studied, or deserved to lose for lack of preperation.
Lets not downgrade Thorzain's performance with pettiness. He played very standard TvP, and simply outplayed MC. He exhibited mechanics the equal of MC, and enough variety to not be a 1 trick pony. His victory was Impressive, and will go down as one of the greatest matches thus far in SC2 history.
Congratulations to both for giving TSL a thoroughly exciting match, with amazing skill and excitment. - No he didn't. - Not hard to do. No one other than idiots are trying to denigrate Thorzain's accomplishments. HE played great - that's all there is to it. Using words like "amazing skill" and "one of the greatest matches thus far in SC2 history" to describe this, however, is going a bit too far. Reminds me of all of the fawning Boxer is getting for simply winning these days, while exhibiting laughably bad mechanics at times.
If you didn't think game 4 was one of the greatest matches in SC2 history, which game qualifies as such?
Pretty sure everyone else will be able to pinpoint mistakes and flaws in any games you will mention. For such a short time this game has been on, that game 4 was as good as they come.
|
Why can't people accept MC just got outplayed? I'm a Toss player and an MC fan, but I don't let that keep me from seeing Thorzain's skill (Game 4 pretty much solidified that for me). MC lost because he wasn't expecting Thorzain to be that good. It happens. Get over it.
|
On April 24 2011 07:30 nihlon wrote: Thorzain had weeks to prepare against MC. Kas got a few hours in todays lan. That's the biggest difference, not the "LAN is so much more meaningful because of the increased pressure on the players."
To be fair, the same can be said for MC, heck his GSL group was fairly terran heavy and I'm willing to bet that MC has a ton more time to practice than Thorzain.
|
On April 24 2011 07:13 Seagull_ wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2011 07:07 tdt wrote:On April 24 2011 06:40 raga4ka wrote: I think mass Voidrays counter this Thor strategy in the last game . There is no counter there is a thread in strat about it. VR's get wreaked by repairing thors who do splash. Zealots /stalkers can't do any damage to +3 armored up thor. Immortals get wrecked with cannon. HT used to be counter but mana bar was removed. Counter is not letting terran get mass thor with a WG push. MC had the units, he just didn't know the critical little trick where you can lift your own immortals with your phoenix which cancels strike cannons. Imagine if he had done that and rolled thorzain, he'd look absolutely amazing. Nice "trick" to get immortals/phoenix shot at for 10seconds by 8 thors who are getting repaired. This strat has been tried and fails too.
|
On April 24 2011 07:30 TheBanana wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2011 07:25 Dante08 wrote: Boxer the only Korean left, who'd have thought of that :p Go boxer! I remember before TSL started and people where making predictions, seemed like there was a consensus that all the Koreans were gonna roll everybody, except Boxer. He was predicted to be the only one that might lose to a foreigner. He's the only one left, that's so ironic.
Well he hasn't played yet in this round, so it's not really fair to judge how well he did vs MC. If MC played in day 2 and Boxer lost today, then MC would be "the last Korean left" for 1 more day -.-
|
On April 24 2011 07:30 nihlon wrote: Thorzain had weeks to prepare against MC. Kas got a few hours in todays lan. That's the biggest difference, not the "LAN is so much more meaningful because of the increased pressure on the players."
I wouldn't say that LAN is more meaningful as long as the connections are the same, but there is a huge added element of being able to play in a foreign environment, far from the comforts of one's own home.
|
Game 4 was definitely one of the best SC2 games I've watched. Hopefully it will make Tyler feel better about losing to Thorzain
|
|
On April 24 2011 06:40 OneOther wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2011 06:37 jalstar wrote:On April 24 2011 06:35 OneOther wrote: I hate how people like jalstar are derailing this thread away from what Thorzain has done and how entertaining the series was. Shut up dude. Nobody cares whether you think MC is a better player, or how badly Thorzain is going to lose to Kas. Jesus. Stop overhyping players who have done nearly nothing that completely underhyped players (MKP, Polt) have done as well. The pro-foreigner bias is crazy. Are you fucking serious? Why can't you appreciate the fact that a relatively unknown foreign player takes out two former GSL champions in FruitDealer and MC through extremely entertaining games? What is wrong with hyping this? Back in the days we couldn't even fathom with the idea of even the best foreigner beating a top Korean. Thorzain is doing something truly special, and I really don't get what your problem is. It deserves the hype. He has earned it.
Thorzain played better today. However, I don't see why foreigners are so proud of defeating Koreans in SC2? People couldn't fathom beating a top korean at BW, not SC2. Why does everyone act like it's the biggest upset in the world when a Korean loses in SC2? I'm genuinely baffled.
|
On April 24 2011 07:32 Ocedic wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2011 07:30 TheBanana wrote:On April 24 2011 07:25 Dante08 wrote: Boxer the only Korean left, who'd have thought of that :p Go boxer! I remember before TSL started and people where making predictions, seemed like there was a consensus that all the Koreans were gonna roll everybody, except Boxer. He was predicted to be the only one that might lose to a foreigner. He's the only one left, that's so ironic. Well he hasn't played yet in this round, so it's not really fair to judge how well he did vs MC. If MC played in day 2 and Boxer lost today, then MC would be "the last Korean left" for 1 more day -.-
It's not judged against MC, it's judged against the predictions. Boxer getting to this stage alone makes it ironic even if MC was still in. It just makes it more so now that he's out aswell. And we can actually say Boxer is the only Korean left instead of being the only upset.
|
MC didn't play like the usual MC. He didn't do any kind of 6 warpgate play at all, he only went voids in 1 game. He kept doing weird builds where he would get like every kind of tech within 10 minutes but no upgrades. It just didn't seem like his usual stuff. On the other hand, ThorZaIN did play great today. Good macro, good micro and good strategies, just overall very solid. I think though, if MC played his usual, super aggressive play I think he would've been better off.
|
On April 24 2011 07:30 nihlon wrote: Thorzain had weeks to prepare against MC. Kas got a few hours in todays lan. That's the biggest difference, not the "LAN is so much more meaningful because of the increased pressure on the players." And MC played pretty bad first two with weird expansions and no upgrades instead of usual 4/5/6 gate pressure. Last game is the only thing I question since there is no counter other than not let terran build it.. not saying that's a bad thing either. Some builds should be unstoppable.
|
Not surprised by Thor beating MC in a close 5 games. I will be totally shocked if he beats Kas next week, in a TvT. Great series! GG ThorZaIN, WP!
Game 4 is just soo good, almost BWish. This is the type of games I am looking for in SC2.
|
I feel like MC didn't really get outplayed, it's just that he didn't upgrade his units.
|
On April 24 2011 07:27 Qaatar wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2011 07:21 mholden02 wrote: oGsMC does not need anyone making excuses for him. He played great. MC had plenty of time, and all the replays he needed from Thorzain's match with Tyler to study Thorzain's TvP, as well as the "THOR BUILD."
Thorzain didn't use any gimmicky strats, or special unknown builds. 3 games he used standard BIO builds. 1 game he tried a 1 base Rine/Tank/banshee build, and the last game he used his patented Thor build, that MC must have studied, or deserved to lose for lack of preperation.
Lets not downgrade Thorzain's performance with pettiness. He played very standard TvP, and simply outplayed MC. He exhibited mechanics the equal of MC, and enough variety to not be a 1 trick pony. His victory was Impressive, and will go down as one of the greatest matches thus far in SC2 history.
Congratulations to both for giving TSL a thoroughly exciting match, with amazing skill and excitment. - No he didn't. - Not hard to do. No one other than idiots are trying to denigrate Thorzain's accomplishments. HE played great - that's all there is to it. Using words like "amazing skill" and "one of the greatest matches thus far in SC2 history" to describe this, however, is going a bit too far. Reminds me of all of the fawning Boxer is getting for simply winning these days, while exhibiting laughably bad mechanics at times .
Difference is Boxer would never win a Bo5 against MC
|
On April 24 2011 07:31 dtz wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2011 07:27 Qaatar wrote:On April 24 2011 07:21 mholden02 wrote: oGsMC does not need anyone making excuses for him. He played great. MC had plenty of time, and all the replays he needed from Thorzain's match with Tyler to study Thorzain's TvP, as well as the "THOR BUILD."
Thorzain didn't use any gimmicky strats, or special unknown builds. 3 games he used standard BIO builds. 1 game he tried a 1 base Rine/Tank/banshee build, and the last game he used his patented Thor build, that MC must have studied, or deserved to lose for lack of preperation.
Lets not downgrade Thorzain's performance with pettiness. He played very standard TvP, and simply outplayed MC. He exhibited mechanics the equal of MC, and enough variety to not be a 1 trick pony. His victory was Impressive, and will go down as one of the greatest matches thus far in SC2 history.
Congratulations to both for giving TSL a thoroughly exciting match, with amazing skill and excitment. - No he didn't. - Not hard to do. No one other than idiots are trying to denigrate Thorzain's accomplishments. HE played great - that's all there is to it. Using words like "amazing skill" and "one of the greatest matches thus far in SC2 history" to describe this, however, is going a bit too far. Reminds me of all of the fawning Boxer is getting for simply winning these days, while exhibiting laughably bad mechanics at times. If you didn't think game 4 was one of the greatest matches in SC2 history, which game qualifies as such? Pretty sure everyone else will be able to pinpoint mistakes and flaws in any games you will mention. For such a short time this game has been on, that game 4 was as good as they come.
Right, and I can come back with the example that one game doesn't mean anything. Everyone was going crazy over the game Squirtle played against mvp. What's he doing now? I wasn't saying that individually, a couple of the games weren't great. I was merely point out that the EXTRAPOLATION some people are using, in order to magnify the overall skill level of players based on one or a couple of games, is idiotic.
|
On April 24 2011 07:36 K3Nyy wrote: I feel like MC didn't really get outplayed, it's just that he didn't upgrade his units.
upgrades are part of the game lad.
|
On April 24 2011 07:31 dtz wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2011 07:27 Qaatar wrote:On April 24 2011 07:21 mholden02 wrote: oGsMC does not need anyone making excuses for him. He played great. MC had plenty of time, and all the replays he needed from Thorzain's match with Tyler to study Thorzain's TvP, as well as the "THOR BUILD."
Thorzain didn't use any gimmicky strats, or special unknown builds. 3 games he used standard BIO builds. 1 game he tried a 1 base Rine/Tank/banshee build, and the last game he used his patented Thor build, that MC must have studied, or deserved to lose for lack of preperation.
Lets not downgrade Thorzain's performance with pettiness. He played very standard TvP, and simply outplayed MC. He exhibited mechanics the equal of MC, and enough variety to not be a 1 trick pony. His victory was Impressive, and will go down as one of the greatest matches thus far in SC2 history.
Congratulations to both for giving TSL a thoroughly exciting match, with amazing skill and excitment. - No he didn't. - Not hard to do. No one other than idiots are trying to denigrate Thorzain's accomplishments. HE played great - that's all there is to it. Using words like "amazing skill" and "one of the greatest matches thus far in SC2 history" to describe this, however, is going a bit too far. Reminds me of all of the fawning Boxer is getting for simply winning these days, while exhibiting laughably bad mechanics at times. If you didn't think game 4 was one of the greatest matches in SC2 history, which game qualifies as such? Pretty sure everyone else will be able to pinpoint mistakes and flaws in any games you will mention. For such a short time this game has been on, that game 4 was as good as they come.
Yeah, I really want to know what matches he's been seeing, they sound amazing.
|
On April 24 2011 07:37 Qaatar wrote:Show nested quote +On April 24 2011 07:31 dtz wrote:On April 24 2011 07:27 Qaatar wrote:On April 24 2011 07:21 mholden02 wrote: oGsMC does not need anyone making excuses for him. He played great. MC had plenty of time, and all the replays he needed from Thorzain's match with Tyler to study Thorzain's TvP, as well as the "THOR BUILD."
Thorzain didn't use any gimmicky strats, or special unknown builds. 3 games he used standard BIO builds. 1 game he tried a 1 base Rine/Tank/banshee build, and the last game he used his patented Thor build, that MC must have studied, or deserved to lose for lack of preperation.
Lets not downgrade Thorzain's performance with pettiness. He played very standard TvP, and simply outplayed MC. He exhibited mechanics the equal of MC, and enough variety to not be a 1 trick pony. His victory was Impressive, and will go down as one of the greatest matches thus far in SC2 history.
Congratulations to both for giving TSL a thoroughly exciting match, with amazing skill and excitment. - No he didn't. - Not hard to do. No one other than idiots are trying to denigrate Thorzain's accomplishments. HE played great - that's all there is to it. Using words like "amazing skill" and "one of the greatest matches thus far in SC2 history" to describe this, however, is going a bit too far. Reminds me of all of the fawning Boxer is getting for simply winning these days, while exhibiting laughably bad mechanics at times. If you didn't think game 4 was one of the greatest matches in SC2 history, which game qualifies as such? Pretty sure everyone else will be able to pinpoint mistakes and flaws in any games you will mention. For such a short time this game has been on, that game 4 was as good as they come. Right, and I can come back with the example that one game doesn't mean anything. Everyone was going crazy over the game Squirtle played against mvp. What's he doing now? I wasn't saying that individually, a couple of the games weren't great. I was merely point out that the EXTRAPOLATION some people are using, in order to magnify the overall skill level of players based on one or a couple of games, is idiotic.
That was a Bo1, this was a Bo5 and Thorzain impressed in his other TSL games as well.
|
|
|
|