EPTextended series is so anti-climatic for the final. I didn't see the 2 games they played so it's all new to me. I want to see a best of 7. Not best of WTF extended series.
[MLG] Dallas Day 3 - Page 816
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Stay on-topic please. Off-topic arguments derailing the thread will not be tolerated. Next spam post about eagles = ban. We get it, you're funny Take the eagle stuff here stop with the bw vs wc3 bullshit please | ||
|
KASPpraetorianGuard
14 Posts
extended series is so anti-climatic for the final. I didn't see the 2 games they played so it's all new to me. I want to see a best of 7. Not best of WTF extended series. | ||
|
Node
United States2159 Posts
| ||
|
TemplarCo.
Mexico2870 Posts
| ||
|
DarkPlasmaBall
United States46223 Posts
| ||
|
godemperor
Belgium2043 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
On April 04 2011 09:21 Jakkerr wrote: I don't wanna burst ur protoss OP bubbles but select could have won that game EASILY. Colossi take a loooong time to build, when select won the battle and pushed kiwi's 3rd he should have just backed up. Protoss can warp in 10 units at the same time indeed but those units suck vs a big group of terran units. Instead Select runs in, suicides his army + all his VIKINGS. He could have just gone back and come 2 mins later with a HUGE army and be up vs 3 colossi at most. I completely agree on the Viking part. He should have kept those viking alive and make a couple ravens. Instead he suicided the vikings and then build more vikings... | ||
bkrow
Australia8532 Posts
On April 04 2011 09:23 cujo2k wrote: O_O I like the extended series concept since it means that every single game in the tournament is meaningful, and throwing games or not revealing your full strategy would probably never be a good idea >< Don't know why so many people are bitching about it since it's not like Naniwa hasn't earned his 2-0 lead vs Kiwi. I think it's a much better concept than automatically awarding someone a bo5 series lead since they're from the winners bracket instead of the losers bracket. They are TWO different series; under DIFFERENT circumstances.. The PENALTY for losing against an opponent is going into the LOSERS bracket where you have struggle your way through; but then you come up against the guy again and instead of "well done you battled through so much shit in the losers bracket - good on you" it's "well done - now beat him 4 times before he beats you twice!" It pretty much serves as a double penalty.. | ||
|
tarath
United States377 Posts
On April 04 2011 09:23 Zim23 wrote: Don't know why people are discussing extended series. We all went into this MLG knowing extended series would be there. It's a non-story. Same could be said of the stream not working since it always fails for a significant chunk of mlg | ||
|
Hrrrrm
United States2081 Posts
On April 04 2011 09:23 cujo2k wrote: O_O I like the extended series concept since it means that every single game in the tournament is meaningful, and throwing games or not revealing your full strategy would probably never be a good idea >< Don't know why so many people are bitching about it since it's not like Naniwa hasn't earned his 2-0 lead vs Kiwi. I think it's a much better concept than automatically awarding someone a bo5 series lead since they're from the winners bracket instead of the losers bracket. He earned the 2-0 and then ADVANCED. That's the reward. Why stop the award at games? Why not start him off with extra minerals and extra units? That's right because it's series is meant to be it's OWN thing and not some part of a bigger picture. MLG's format is already garbage, extended series just adds to it a bit more. | ||
|
LoCaD
Germany1634 Posts
| ||
|
RaiZ
2813 Posts
On April 04 2011 09:16 bwally wrote: Robos are good for making stalkers/zealots/dts i guess He's talking about supply. 3 robo making colossus is 18 instant supply. Add in 10 or maybe more gateway (didn't count how many of them were) + the probes. I think it's pretty safe to say he has enough building to max supply even at 100/200 food (if there isn't already 100 food because of many probes + units sitting around all over the map). | ||
|
kaztah
Norway1221 Posts
On April 04 2011 09:23 cujo2k wrote: O_O I like the extended series concept since it means that every single game in the tournament is meaningful, and throwing games or not revealing your full strategy would probably never be a good idea >< Don't know why so many people are bitching about it since it's not like Naniwa hasn't earned his 2-0 lead vs Kiwi. I think it's a much better concept than automatically awarding someone a bo5 series lead since they're from the winners bracket instead of the losers bracket. How is that a better concept? The entire point of winner and losers bracket is that every players has "2 lifes" in the tournament. Why shouldn't the guy who went completely undefeated get an advantage? He has the option of losing a series like every other player in the tournament, the only difference is that he does it in the final. | ||
|
RykuX
1200 Posts
| ||
|
DayJP
Brazil477 Posts
I really would like to see more of the fan favorites like incontrol, ret, tyler, huk, idra, more of kiwikaki, etc, and I cant via replays because I dont have access to the MLG map pool =( | ||
|
Apolo
Portugal1259 Posts
| ||
|
Fleshy
United States28 Posts
On April 04 2011 09:23 Ghoststrikes wrote: YOu people don't understand, how fair would it be to Naniwa, if it weren't for the extended series, that he could have gone 24-0 until then finals then lose 2 out of 3 and be 2nd place? He needs to be awarded this sort of advantage, he deserves it, as everyone who comes out of the winner bracket in any tournament. maybe he should be allowed to pick all the maps for the series XD | ||
|
oo inflame oo
United States286 Posts
A player who is 24-0 should have an advantage over someone who has come from losers, sorry. | ||
|
Ezze
Canada934 Posts
| ||
|
bITt.mAN
Switzerland3693 Posts
| ||
|
Byo
Canada212 Posts
| ||
| ||
