| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Trig
United Kingdom64 Posts
On March 26 2011 12:25 Geolich wrote: Actually its not. IdrA is not as good as he/the community thinks, and his childish attitude is a joke. Are you stupid? You're suggesting that humor isn't subjective. Calm down. | ||
|
FliedLice
Germany7494 Posts
On March 26 2011 12:25 xza wrote: 300-400ms is already bad imo. if you put latency in a perspective of an First Person Shooter, it means all the difference in the world. 80 ms will give you like a slight delay under around 0.5 secs, maybe lower. 200 ms is normally like 1-1.5sec delay. 400ms is LOL, shoot, wait 2-3 seconds, then the bullet will register. Doesnt really apply to only micro based players but in general lag does play a huge role. Running away zerglings from forcefields, forcefielding the army properly, stim kiting, EMP, basically any spell-cast is hugely affected because the guy with 80ms is gonna have an upperhand vs the guy with 400 ms. Correct me if that doesn't corrospond like 100% in those cases, but doesn't the "ms" actually stand for "millisecond"? I kinda fail to see how 200ms is 1-1.5seconds :| | ||
|
dunc
Netherlands1105 Posts
On March 26 2011 12:23 Heaton31 wrote: It's not optimal, but these guys need to adapt. Easier said than done? Absolutely, but not impossible. It may not be the most entertaining without great micro and could be watered down, but it's doable and not that difficult. Well I'm not sure why you're saying it's not that difficult. Micro is a huge part of SC2, sadly not huge enough(yet) and there are very few who excel at it. MC and MKP both rely on their insane micro which they obviously cannot put to use the way they do in the GSL. They need to adapt yes, but it's hard to rework your entire playstyle just because playing crossregion is so awful. | ||
|
Tranqje
Belgium89 Posts
On March 26 2011 12:28 Trig wrote: Are you stupid? You're suggesting that humor isn't subjective. Calm down. don't feed the trolls, haters gonna hate and all that ... | ||
|
DiaBoLuS
Germany1638 Posts
On March 26 2011 12:25 xza wrote: 300-400ms is already bad imo. if you put latency in a perspective of an First Person Shooter, it means all the difference in the world. 80 ms will give you like a slight delay under around 0.5 secs, maybe lower. 200 ms is normally like 1-1.5sec delay. 400ms is LOL, shoot, wait 2-3 seconds, then the bullet will register. Doesnt really apply to only micro based players but in general lag does play a huge role. Running away zerglings from forcefields, forcefielding the army properly, stim kiting, EMP, basically any spell-cast is hugely affected because the guy with 80ms is gonna have an upperhand vs the guy with 400 ms. you know that ms standas for milliseconds?^^ god so much bullshit talked here. watch socke vs zenio and tell me how much delay zenio can possibly have. 2 seconds ofc! OMG gonna sleep now, feel bad my fellow socke still has to play at 4:30 am. | ||
|
Namu
United States826 Posts
On March 26 2011 12:27 DiaBoLuS wrote: tell me how to moving shot like zenio did with 1 sec, or move lings when attacked asap. when you have the answer, i might get conviced it is a second. did i ever say it was a second? i said i wouldn't be suprised if it was a full second. and mind you, latency is not a consistent thing. it'll fluctuate through the game, it may be 300 ms one moment, then spike up to 700 ms, etc... | ||
|
RifleCow
Canada637 Posts
| ||
|
Trig
United Kingdom64 Posts
On March 26 2011 12:27 GP wrote: That's why I said different strokes, I don't doubt it depends on the person, and Terran just got a huge stim nerf and Zerg just got a massive infestor buff, I don't buy that shit anymore, I'd rather believe the better player won and not take credit away from the player because of the race he plays. I guess, but infestor buff doesn't really stop 1 base all ins (which is what Idra loses to i'm assuming). | ||
|
LaiShin
Australia978 Posts
| ||
|
nkwd
United States99 Posts
| ||
|
DiaBoLuS
Germany1638 Posts
On March 26 2011 12:30 RifleCow wrote: Are these being played on the US server or EU server? US. not as if it would matter, since US<-->EU seems to be pretty fine. and koreans have 1029 seconds on each server anyway. On March 26 2011 12:30 LaiShin wrote: Is Socke 1-0 up? 1-1 | ||
|
dambros
Brazil432 Posts
On March 26 2011 12:30 LaiShin wrote: Is Socke 1-0 up? 1-1 | ||
|
OrChard
Hong Kong1119 Posts
i love MC QQ | ||
|
GP
United States1056 Posts
On March 26 2011 12:30 Trig wrote: I guess, but infestor buff doesn't really stop 1 base all ins (which is what Idra loses to i'm assuming). Fuck that shit, I've seen Idra lose macro games all the time, and Strelok isn't an all-in player. | ||
|
RifleCow
Canada637 Posts
On March 26 2011 12:31 DiaBoLuS wrote: US. not as if it would matter, since US<-->EU seems to be pretty fine. and koreans have 1029 seconds on each server anyway. Lol, get off the latency discussion man, it doesn't matter that much whether or not there is horrible latency or not. If anything, the advantage if theres latency should be given to EU/US players because they're used to cross region latency unlike the koreans which mostly practice in-house. Thats probably more of an advantage than the inherent latency. Anyways, if its US server you can see the results from anyone's games on their profile on bnet... | ||
|
frequency
Australia1901 Posts
 oGsMC vs  CheckPrime.WE currently being played but without stream - replays to come. | ||
|
Jumbled
1543 Posts
| ||
|
frequency
Australia1901 Posts
On March 26 2011 12:33 Jumbled wrote: What's the deal with this Sheth vs stalife match? Longest games ever or is there another reason it's not done? Sheth won - brackets weren't updated for some silly reason. | ||
|
imbs
United Kingdom320 Posts
| ||
|
FliedLice
Germany7494 Posts
 | ||
| ||
|
|
The PondCast
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
OSC
Replay Cast
Replay Cast
CrankTV Team League
OSC
Replay Cast
RSL Revival
Serral vs Bunny
ByuN vs GgMaChine
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
