EPT
Assembly Winter 2011 - Day 2 - Page 8
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
It's ok to be excited that your favorite player won. Please keep it manner! | ||
|
Azarkon
United States21060 Posts
| ||
|
pyrestrike
United States235 Posts
>_< qxc coulda used a couple ravens, pdd would've neutralized those stalkers if only long enough to take out a significant portion of that fight! | ||
|
Alphaes
United States651 Posts
| ||
|
DerNebel
Denmark648 Posts
WP Hasu, awesome HT play. | ||
|
rapture
Germany645 Posts
| ||
|
Telcontar
United Kingdom16710 Posts
| ||
|
HolydaKing
21254 Posts
On February 12 2011 18:58 pyrestrike wrote: + Show Spoiler + >_< qxc coulda used a couple ravens, pdd would've neutralized those stalkers if only long enough to take out a significant portion of that fight! that's true, good idea. | ||
|
Weavel
Finland9224 Posts
On February 12 2011 18:58 Horse...falcon wrote: I'm not expert, but he could have emp'd his own battlecruisers so that feedback wouldn't work. geez what can you do TvP lategame? | ||
|
seupac
Canada148 Posts
| ||
|
Asha
United Kingdom38257 Posts
On February 12 2011 18:59 Telcontar wrote: Probaby should've emp'd all his BCs before engaging. This Takes like a billion storms to drop a bc, and it's not like the stalkers themselves are super effective | ||
|
Telcontar
United Kingdom16710 Posts
On February 12 2011 18:59 seupac wrote: where is the qxc stream? http://www.teamliquid.net/video/streams/Khaldor | ||
|
Redox
Germany24794 Posts
On February 12 2011 18:59 Telcontar wrote: Probaby should've emp'd all his BCs before engaging. This. He had the ghosts. The battle was quite close, without energy on BCs he might have won it. | ||
|
Scrandom
Canada2819 Posts
On February 12 2011 18:57 Rampager wrote: Just a suggestion: Right click on the stream, click Settings, click the left-most tab (the computer screen) and untick Enable Hardware Acceleration. You may have to restart your browser. On February 12 2011 18:56 Steamroller wrote: Try right click the video ---> settings ----> adobe flash player setting ---> untick hardware acceleration. Thank you guys so much, that fixed it. Been dealing with that for awhile | ||
|
Cripp
Germany165 Posts
| ||
|
Entropic
Canada2837 Posts
On February 12 2011 19:00 Asha` wrote: This Takes like a billion storms to drop a bc, same with stalkers stalkers are efficient vs bc's now, since the bc dmg nerf. Anyways, lategame just have 20 gateways and warpin round after round of stalkers, just like Hasu did there | ||
|
cyprin
United States1105 Posts
Pretty relentless aggression all game long with bio/tank against gateway/colossi. tlo forced cancel the third | ||
|
Horse...falcon
United States1851 Posts
maybe a 5-6 tanks sieged up in back to wreck stalkers when they blink up | ||
|
HowardRoark
1146 Posts
| ||
|
Steamroller
Finland756 Posts
On February 12 2011 18:54 Mioraka wrote: they arent the most balanced maps in the world, but the game between mvp and Squirtle definitely seems promising. Bigger maps=longer and more dramatic games=better entertainment value. Besides, one cant really make a claim on balance until a few weeks later, when then changes are actually figured out Tbh i find too long macro games kinda boring where both just changes their maxed out armies. Game like Bomber vs IMMvp was way more better. | ||
|
InCKutte
Denmark99 Posts
On February 12 2011 18:58 pyrestrike wrote: + Show Spoiler + >_< qxc coulda used a couple ravens, pdd would've neutralized those stalkers if only long enough to take out a significant portion of that fight! Would be hard with all those templars for feedback, and hasu could always just blink away if he was in a bad position | ||
| ||
