Please revamp the TL forum rules to include a rule to autoban anyone inserting a balance comment in any non starcraft 2 strategy thread. It really detracts from the enjoyment of appreciating other topics like HOW FREAKIN AWESOME BOTH PLAYERS WERE TODAY IN THE BLIZZCON EXHIBITION MATCH BETWEEN THE EMPEROR AND THE FRUIT DEALER.
A Concerned TLer, yoshinori~
This. Every time anyone beats anyone is a non-mirror matchup, there are people btiching about balance. If a Terran does a blue flame hellion drop and kills a ton of workers, or a thor drop and devastates an expo with one unit, or a fantastic tank push that utterly contains their opponent, or just masses mmm and rolls over his opponent--"Terran's OP". If a Zerg player is a macro machine and pumps insane amounts of units and overwhelms his opponent--"Zerg's OP". If a Toss player completely owns a superior force with expert forcefields, or annihilates an entire force with a couple colossi or HTs--"Protoss is OP".
It is so fucking old, and people seriously need to stfu. Fruit demolished a damn good macro terran in ITR back when Zerg was "UP", so why should anyone be surprised he beat a terran with lesser macro (albeit with very good micro) now that Zerg have gotten a slight buff? He is very probably the best player in the world, and he is *absolutely* the best ZvT player in the world. He plays *flawlessly*. Boxer played well, but not flawlessly. So he lost. Deal with it.
Please revamp the TL forum rules to include a rule to autoban anyone inserting a balance comment in any non starcraft 2 strategy thread. It really detracts from the enjoyment of appreciating other topics like HOW FREAKIN AWESOME BOTH PLAYERS WERE TODAY IN THE BLIZZCON EXHIBITION MATCH BETWEEN THE EMPEROR AND THE FRUIT DEALER.
A Concerned TLer, yoshinori~
This. Every time anyone beats anyone is a non-mirror matchup, there are people btiching about balance. If a Terran does a blue flame hellion drop and kills a ton of workers, or a thor drop and devastates an expo with one unit, or a fantastic tank push that utterly contains their opponent, or just masses mmm and rolls over his opponent--"Terran's OP". If a Zerg player is a macro machine and pumps insane amounts of units and overwhelms his opponent--"Zerg's OP". If a Toss player completely owns a superior force with expert forcefields, or annihilates an entire force with a couple carriers or HTs--"Protoss is OP".
It is so fucking old, and people seriously need to stfu. Fruit demolished a damn good macro terran in ITR back when Zerg was "UP", so why should anyone be surprised he beat a terran with lesser macro (albeit with very good micro) now that Zerg have gotten a slight buff? He is very probably the best player in the world, and he is *absolutely* the best ZvT player in the world. He plays *flawlessly*. Boxer played well, but not flawlessly. So he lost. Deal with it.
Yes, everyone can look bad against FD. But seriously, Boxer's micro and positioning was amazing. Probably what he has been nailing down since he started SC2. Eventually his macro will be up there as well.
any news on Huk vs Soft and Huk/Soft vs Maka? Judging by the fact that dimaga has played his games vs fenix already i suppose those shouldve been done too?