EPT[GSL] Open S1 - Ro64 Day 1 - Page 88
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
Beren
United States514 Posts
| ||
|
Lightwip
United States5497 Posts
On September 04 2010 21:28 phungus420 wrote: Tastless was obviously rusty, don't fault him though, and him and Artosis make a good team. Also like you point out, how are you supposed to commentate games like these were 1 player is just dominating the other? It's possible, I've seen him do it in one game where Jaedong just crushed Flash with 2 control groups of mutas back in BW. | ||
|
Integra
Sweden5626 Posts
On September 04 2010 21:55 Cedstick wrote: Remember to leave feedback on the GOMTV.net forums if you're signed-up there, by the way, as that's primarily where they'll be reading. Great production value, shitty server-side stuff. Thankfully the seemed to have fixed almost everything for the second series (Maka's), which is good prospects for the following casts. I look forward to Monday! As Integra said, it's kind of a blessing in disguise that they had server load troubles, as that means a ton of people want to watch. It's what you would call a "high quality problem".  | ||
|
Cedstick
Canada3336 Posts
On September 04 2010 21:57 Integra wrote: It's what you would call a "high quality problem". That stings, bro. Like I said, though, they had the HQ stream fixed by the end, so I look forward to proper HQ soon :D The LQ turned out not too bad, anyway, when the streaming-quality issues were fixed. | ||
|
crappen
Norway1546 Posts
On September 04 2010 21:42 Grettin wrote: No wonder you are brainless monkey. First off, why did you purchase the stream at the first place? Should ring a bell atleast a little when you knew it's their FIRST time casting a event like this. It is international so there will be alot viewers. Like they can test their service beforehand when they cannot know how many people will tune in? Every tournament has problems at start. That is a fact. The only thing here is, they either can fix the problems or keep failing like they did back in BW. Should've learned their lesson by now. Except its not like it is their first attempt, that is what people think and are telling me. First impression is important, and I hoped they had got their act together with this deal with blizzard, but no, they suck as usual when it comes to streaming. PS, stop with the namecalling, manner up. | ||
|
Integra
Sweden5626 Posts
On September 04 2010 21:58 Cedstick wrote: That stings, bro. Like I said, though, they had the HQ stream fixed by the end, so I look forward to proper HQ soon :D The LQ turned out not too bad, anyway, when the streaming-quality issues were fixed. Don't miss understand me, even high quality problems are painful, if not more compared to normal problems. | ||
|
torfteufel
Germany86 Posts
man, you must be really REALLY supportive. the only way i could possibly make myself believe it would have been money well spent was considering it a charity thing. in e-sports we trust! in every other regard this is such an insult to the customers...crazy...how can you spoil gomtv that hard?! ps: why would i install the gomplayer if i can just use vlc instead? beats me... | ||
|
Grettin
42412 Posts
On September 04 2010 21:58 crappen wrote: Except its not like it is their first attempt, that is what people think and are telling me. First impression is important, and I hoped they had got their act together with this deal with blizzard, but no, they suck as usual when it comes to streaming. PS, stop with the namecalling, manner up. But you know that its impossible to get best possible start in a tournament like this? So many people watching their broadcast, so many people visiting their website at the same time. There is always problems. They cannot know for sure how their system will and can handle the unknown amount of people there will be tuning in. And yeah, sorry about that. | ||
|
biskit
Australia355 Posts
The level of players skill are a tad disappointing but I'm sure this will get better in the latter tournament as more people gain more experiences playing SC2. | ||
|
Entropic
Canada2837 Posts
| ||
|
torm3ntin
Brazil2534 Posts
| ||
|
Nordla
United States14 Posts
We need less serious commentary, and more of this stuff: (WOW. Watching that video again blew my mind. Today's commentary was so, so, sooo horrible compared to what Tasteless used to be capable of. There'd be at least 7-8 moments every game when he'd make me burst out in laughter. In today's commentary, I actually started feeling bored near the end. Terrible, terrible damage.) Why don't casters understand that we watch their streams partly because we are entertained by their typically hilarious commentary? When we want to analyze and improve our own game-play, we prefer to watch replays, listen to long-winded analysis from our favorite players/analysts, etc. We like that. But, when it's a LIVE event, we want to sit the fuck back and watch the streams as though watching television - we don't necessarily care about learning in these occasions, we just want to yell in excitement or laugh our hearts out - we want to be fucking ENTERTAINED. Tasteless, if you are reading this, next game you cast, just say whatever you want and whatever pops in mind. Talk about hot Korean fan girls. Tell Artosis you want mansex. Etc etc. We will love you for it. | ||
|
Shatter
United States1401 Posts
On September 04 2010 21:56 Beren wrote: I thought he did too but Tasteless is just a little rusty. Seemed, like he got lost mid-sentence sometimes with the "uhs" and overusing "as you can see." But both are phenomenal casters, the first casts in a tournament are always a little off. i guess im alone when I say "artosis did a better job" ??? | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On September 04 2010 21:56 Beren wrote: i guess im alone when I say "artosis did a better job" ??? Not at all. Currently Tasteless is like the fifth best SC2 caster if that | ||
|
SkelA
Macedonia13081 Posts
First of all the stream stabilty was terrible i think i switched like 50 times through the TL streams in theese few hours. Not mentioning the quality watching SC2 in LQ is really a turnoff. The games were below average and Tastosis casting was well .... bad. My conclusion : Not worth watching but probably gonna tune in when Idra, TLO, Torch, Artosis will be playing. | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On September 04 2010 22:01 Grettin wrote: But you know that its impossible to get best possible start in a tournament like this? So many people watching their broadcast, so many people visiting their website at the same time. There is always problems. They cannot know for sure how their system will and can handle the unknown amount of people there will be tuning in. And yeah, sorry about that. Yeah, there certainly have been problems like this before in similiar tournaments. Somehow, the problems always were in tournaments hosted by GomTV, though. | ||
|
sodapop
Sweden189 Posts
Isn't it weird that the organization arranging a major sports event also manages the video broadcast? Isn't the norm that they just sell the rights to someone else? And then those parts arrange the payment for the service any way they usually do with either subscriptions or commercials. Seems to me that this solution would be even better for online shows than it is for "real tv". On the topic of the games: I liked them. Not particularily even but that's what you should expect - it's the top 64! I can't think of any sport where even #8 in the world would stand a chance against #1 (however, I can't think outside the box of athletics). | ||
|
papaz
Sweden4149 Posts
casters was mediocre at best. and the observer in first game. LOL oh well, this was just the first day. it can hardly get any worse. | ||
|
crappen
Norway1546 Posts
On September 04 2010 22:01 Grettin wrote: But you know that its impossible to get best possible start in a tournament like this? So many people watching their broadcast, so many people visiting their website at the same time. There is always problems. They cannot know for sure how their system will and can handle the unknown amount of people there will be tuning in. And yeah, sorry about that. Im a little curious, how do you know it is impossible to make a smooth start? I for one, believe in dedication and being well prepared, and yes, I believe gomtv had plenty of time and the experience to make this first event go smooth. They could take a look at many other events to monitor and estimate how many was watching MLG and IEM. If GomTV throw money at the problem, that would be a start, I feel they where holding back and was too shy to give us a smooth start. Bottom line, I think they where too afraid to pump money into this event. But money they want, oh yes, preferable 50dollar a month or more. And that is the impression I am left with, sadly. | ||
|
SkelA
Macedonia13081 Posts
On September 04 2010 22:16 papaz wrote: a rough start to the tourney. casters was mediocre at best. and the observer in first game. LOL oh well, this was just the first day. it can hardly get any worse. How about disconect in the middle of the game Bnet 0.2 ftw  | ||
| ||
