• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:13
CEST 03:13
KST 10:13
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call7[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2915Serral wins Maestros of the Game 244ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3
Community News
New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery!22Weekly Cups (August 17-23): Zerg dominate the week2Weekly Cups (August 10-16): SHIN doubles2GSTL Returns in 2026!45Weekly Cups (Aug 3-9): Protoss get shut out7
StarCraft 2
General
SC4ALL II: SC2 Player Announcement 6/8 - Maru How would you feel about frequent/monthly balance patches for SC2? Weekly Cups (August 17-23): Zerg dominate the week PhD study /w SC2 - help with a survey! Geoff 'iNcontroL' Robinson has passed away
Tourneys
2026 GSTL Announcement IntoTheTV X SOOP SC2 League : Weekly & Monthly PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WORTEX 2026 - Hungarian SC2 Finals Budapest
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 540 Dodge This The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 539 Thunder Dome Mutation # 538 Media Blackout
Brood War
General
25 Years Since Brood War Patch 1.08 New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery! BW General Discussion Looking 4 Yaroslav: Enemy, Korchagin, WCG, Ukraine Pros React To: First 'Fastest' Map in ASL History
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro24 Group E Escore Tournament - Season 3 [ASL22] Ro24 Group D [ASL22] Ro24 Group B
Strategy
Replay Review Process - What do you do? Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation Fighting Spirit mining rates Any training maps people recommend?
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread General RTS Discussion Thread Anyone here play Quakeworld back in the day? Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Canadian Politics Mega-thread Dating: How's your luck?
Fan Clubs
The Creator Fan Club MarineLorD Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! Anime Discussion Thread
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Young Players Exit Esports E…
TrAiDoS
LOCKPICKING NOOB
LUCKY_NOOB
Cathedral Of CS And NY pizza a…
FuDDx
Please support my new stand…
Peanutsc
Hello guys!
LIN1s
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 3456 users

Daedalus Point: A Lesson in Map Making - Page 3

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
108 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
aZealot
Profile Blog Joined May 2011
New Zealand5447 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-02-14 23:36:31
February 14 2014 23:35 GMT
#41
On February 15 2014 08:32 Teoita wrote:
edit:
Show nested quote +
Having radically different maps for just the sake of it is a bad idea. For example, I don't think you can ever get out of the basic layout of narrow entrance to the main and choke-able natural in SC2 or bw


It's important to point that out imo.



No, you are right. I made the same point in another thread a while ago after actually looking at recent BW maps.

Without a stable basic layout which works for all 3 races, a map is not playable in any meaningful way.
KT best KT ~ 2014
B-rye88
Profile Joined October 2013
Canada168 Posts
February 14 2014 23:59 GMT
#42
On February 15 2014 08:32 Teoita wrote:
This really isn't the point, although, i'm not going to lie, i was just going to bash the shit out of Daedalus before Nony talked some sense into me. I'm actually truly interested in the possiblity of crazy ass maps in Proleague format, just to test them and see how they play out.

This is really not an us vs Blizzard type thing. Their job is to make the game and the maps, ours is to produce quality content about it.

The whole idea behind these last posts is, actually, that as a team in TL Strat we wanted to diversify our content from exclusively guides and build analysis, to produce something that's faster to write and can interest spectators that don't play the game or don't want to study new builds.

edit:
Show nested quote +
Having radically different maps for just the sake of it is a bad idea. For example, I don't think you can ever get out of the basic layout of narrow entrance to the main and choke-able natural in SC2 or bw


It's important to point that out imo.


There is no reason for this to be particularly true, especially with the new extension mods. Defining either Blizz's or 'the communities' role in this way is self-limiting.
Teoita
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
Italy12247 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-02-15 00:03:29
February 15 2014 00:03 GMT
#43
By "we" i meant the TL Strategy team (and really the sc2 coverage team in general); we damn sure aren't in a position to be putting out patches, let alone mods or entire games, not the entire community (because obviously, that would mean the map making community has no right to exist which is dumb right?).

Sorry for the poor wording.
ModeratorProtoss all-ins are like a wok. You can throw whatever you want in there and it will turn out alright.
B-rye88
Profile Joined October 2013
Canada168 Posts
February 15 2014 00:09 GMT
#44
On February 15 2014 09:03 Teoita wrote:
By "we" i meant the TL Strategy team (and really the sc2 coverage team in general); we damn sure aren't in a position to be putting out patches, let alone mods or entire games, not the entire community (because obviously, that would mean the map making community has no right to exist which is dumb right?).

Sorry for the poor wording.


Makes sense.
mostevil
Profile Joined February 2011
United Kingdom611 Posts
February 15 2014 00:11 GMT
#45
On February 15 2014 08:59 B-rye88 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 15 2014 08:32 Teoita wrote:
This really isn't the point, although, i'm not going to lie, i was just going to bash the shit out of Daedalus before Nony talked some sense into me. I'm actually truly interested in the possiblity of crazy ass maps in Proleague format, just to test them and see how they play out.

This is really not an us vs Blizzard type thing. Their job is to make the game and the maps, ours is to produce quality content about it.

The whole idea behind these last posts is, actually, that as a team in TL Strat we wanted to diversify our content from exclusively guides and build analysis, to produce something that's faster to write and can interest spectators that don't play the game or don't want to study new builds.

edit:
Having radically different maps for just the sake of it is a bad idea. For example, I don't think you can ever get out of the basic layout of narrow entrance to the main and choke-able natural in SC2 or bw


It's important to point that out imo.


There is no reason for this to be particularly true, especially with the new extension mods. Defining either Blizz's or 'the communities' role in this way is self-limiting.

Agreed. It's also a very narrow interpretation of what I was saying. I'm not talking about radically different, but more than simply aesthetically different. Currently the only things you can really safely play with in map design are beyond the third base, which is more than enough to turtle to max off. Incidentally from my reading you pretty much do bash the shit out of it, but in a well reasoned fashion. Rightly so in this case, its very hard to make solid counterpoints to the map doesn't work.
我的媽和她的瘋狂的外甥都
ArTiFaKs
Profile Joined September 2013
United States1229 Posts
February 15 2014 00:30 GMT
#46
This is great guys, would love to see more of this in the future. And of course thanks to NoNy who is always willing to discuss whatever is brought to his attention, and almost always surprises everyone with the way he looks at things! <3 NoNy

One of the major points people were trying to make about this map is, that since it is so different and trying to drastically change the standard play in a matchup like PvZ, that designated time to test, and study how the results of the play were going was absolutely necessary before throwing it into a map pool of a tournament like Code A, especially where there were no vetoes available.
1 week of ladder time is nowhere near enough time for people to figure out a map like this. And it's really a shame due to the high stakes of the tournament and the players careers riding on it.
There are things known, and things unknown, and in-between are the doors.
igay
Profile Blog Joined November 2011
Australia1178 Posts
February 15 2014 01:03 GMT
#47
On February 15 2014 06:48 Sjokola wrote:
Much love for Nony! Time to come back to TL?


i don't know that he ever truly left
MVP <3 MKP <3 DRG <3
MavivaM
Profile Joined November 2011
1535 Posts
February 15 2014 01:12 GMT
#48
Lately the staff has posted a lot of awesomeness, between the pro impressions regarding the patch and this analysis on a map.
I think that by far this is the most correct approach to the current sc2 problems, critical analysis provided by data but without the usual obvious bias that somehow invalidates even valid points.

If there's a way to reach Blizzard it's this one.
Great job

I suggest for you in the future to let the mapmakers stormbrain about maps and such and then post an article: it would be a good way to highlight what's probably the most ignored problem of the game.
The mapmaking threads don't get much recognition, sadly...
Your Opinion has been counted. Only 3 more Opinions needed for a reddit thread.
Shellshock
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States97276 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-02-15 01:19:50
February 15 2014 01:19 GMT
#49
Is there any intent to analyze the map or any other map for a different matchup? I like that you did this for Daedalus but it's not like ZvP was the only problem matchup on this map. According to TLPD zerg had a 75% win rate (6-2 small sample size but still ~70% win rate for zerg through all tournaments although it includes some foreigner vs korean matches) vs Terran on this map too in the GSL. Would you just attribute it to the same circumstances?
Moderatorhttp://i.imgur.com/U4xwqmD.png
TL+ Member
NewSunshine
Profile Joined July 2011
United States5938 Posts
February 15 2014 01:36 GMT
#50
Don't worry guys, all you have to do is get on Blizzard's ass about putting our maps on ladder - the good maps. They don't all have to be mine, either :p
"If you find yourself feeling lost, take pride in the accuracy of your feelings." - Night Vale
tokinho
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States792 Posts
February 15 2014 02:05 GMT
#51
Just becausein GSL terran only won 1/6 (link)+ Show Spoiler +
(http://www.gomtv.net/records/index.gom?searchType=3&race=Z&vsrace=T&season=0&leaguetype=0&leagueid=0&gamever=ALL&mapid=38785)

and 0/4 (link)+ Show Spoiler +
(http://www.gomtv.net/records/index.gom?searchType=3&race=P&vsrace=T&season=0&leaguetype=0&leagueid=0&gamever=ALL&mapid=38785)
doesn't mean the map is bad.

It could be just that terran is bad overall.. did you think of that?
Smile
Shellshock
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States97276 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-02-15 02:10:34
February 15 2014 02:10 GMT
#52
Maybe the terran are bad in your opinion. I never said the map was the problem. I just asked if they were going to analyze it in another matchup besides just PvZ especially because numbers indicate that this may not be the only problem matchup on the map. I don't think my reasoning was unfounded.
Moderatorhttp://i.imgur.com/U4xwqmD.png
TL+ Member
Stolker
Profile Joined March 2013
United States96 Posts
February 15 2014 02:10 GMT
#53
On February 15 2014 11:05 tokinho wrote:
Just becausein GSL terran only won 1/6 (link)+ Show Spoiler +
(http://www.gomtv.net/records/index.gom?searchType=3&race=Z&vsrace=T&season=0&leaguetype=0&leagueid=0&gamever=ALL&mapid=38785)

and 0/4 (link)+ Show Spoiler +
(http://www.gomtv.net/records/index.gom?searchType=3&race=P&vsrace=T&season=0&leaguetype=0&leagueid=0&gamever=ALL&mapid=38785)
doesn't mean the map is bad.

It could be just that terran is bad overall.. did you think of that?

Exact my theory. It's not that the map is bad, it's just only current protoss players are really good
dUTtrOACh
Profile Joined December 2010
Canada2339 Posts
February 15 2014 03:33 GMT
#54
Great analysis and insight into the must-haves of a balanced map. Daedalus 1.0 really was a terribly imbalanced map; glad it got the fix it needed in PvZ.
twitch.tv/duttroach
stuchiu
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-02-15 04:05:25
February 15 2014 04:03 GMT
#55
On February 15 2014 10:19 Shellshock wrote:
Is there any intent to analyze the map or any other map for a different matchup? I like that you did this for Daedalus but it's not like ZvP was the only problem matchup on this map. According to TLPD zerg had a 75% win rate (6-2 small sample size but still ~70% win rate for zerg through all tournaments although it includes some foreigner vs korean matches) vs Terran on this map too in the GSL. Would you just attribute it to the same circumstances?


I can just do a quick one right now.

There are a total of 7 reasons why ZvT is in favor of Zerg on this map:

1) Large area in the three base origin. Specifically the distance from the main to the natural, the natural to the wall, the wall to the third in terms of walking distance is longer than Steppes of War. This makes it hard to cover all 3 bases (In comparison to its contemporary maps like say Frost 1 tank can cover main and natural or one force can cover all 3).

2) A wide open space with semi large open air gaps leads to 3 things:
2a) Overlord coverage that cannot be punished along the 4 main avenues of attack.
2b) Easy area to spread creep. Even now when you can spread creep onto ramps, it is still easier for Zerg players to spread it in areas that are large flat surfaces.
2c) Lack of Corridors. Generally speaking, Terran wants to fight Zerg in an area filled with valleys, ramps with a medium sized room so they cannot be completely surrounded but still have room to micro (Like say Heavy Rain). On this map, Its too large for Terran to effectively engage unless it's on the extremes right or let sides of the map.

3) Watchtowers. While not as bad as say TDA, the watchertowers are almost always controlled by Zergs in ZvT. In this case the two side watchtowers help the zerg in zoning for drop ships, an especially important tactic on a map with a head to push central area like ths.

4) Base/map layout -> Look at the map and ask where you can safetly 2 rax where your scv cannot be attacked and not be scouted. Then ask yourself where you would place the bunker. This map is a 2rax and 8/8/8 hell. The closest you can put it without being scouted is either on the far side of the natural (Where you're praying to get lucky) or the closest crack near the zerg which is still farther than Steppes of War. And then there are no good places to put a bunker, especially with the ramp that gives zerg a natural advantage. For 8/8/8, you want it as close to the zerg's main cliff as possible, which is the third, but its a double jump and in the natural scouting path of an overlord. To make matters worse, the first overlord is on a natural path to scouting any scvs that want to proxy in the main (Unlike say Heavy Rain or Yeonsu).

5) Wide open 3rd. While not as prevalent as it is in ZvP, Zergs can still put on massive pressure on Terran thirds that are wide open. Doing a bunker/ mine defense is no use as the area is too large and the tank defense is both clunky and inefficent as they can easily roll into your nat assuming you somehow defended the third against a Hyun style 3 base roach bane allin. This exasperates the 6th point.

6) 4th base positions - This is just inherently bad for Terran. Zerg will always have a natural 4th that expands away from the Terran and is protected by a watchtower and ramp. For Terran they can try to expand towards it, but the distance from the 4th to the third is massive if they expand towards the Zerg 4th, and leaves the 3rd open. If they expand away, it leaves the natural open.

7) Clear Cut Drop Paths. This is related to points 2a, 3 and 6. Basically this is like Antiga without the 4th gold in the center with the ramp. Basically there are two drop paths the Terran can use. Either top right or Bot left. This map isn't big enough for Terran to cut diagonally across like say Whirlwind or TDA and isn't small enough like Antiga for them to get in anyway.
Moderator
ETisME
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
12855 Posts
February 15 2014 04:04 GMT
#56
I would love a bit more analysis on the TvZ as well, I felt the games were really good, lots of ling baneling runbys etc
其疾如风,其徐如林,侵掠如火,不动如山,难知如阴,动如雷震。
MattD
Profile Joined March 2013
United Kingdom83 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-02-15 04:11:50
February 15 2014 04:11 GMT
#57
zvz is absolutely fucking abysmal on this map because of the rush distance, and the fact you can't scout the main gas
Whitewing
Profile Joined October 2010
United States7483 Posts
February 15 2014 04:34 GMT
#58
On February 15 2014 13:03 stuchiu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 15 2014 10:19 Shellshock wrote:
Is there any intent to analyze the map or any other map for a different matchup? I like that you did this for Daedalus but it's not like ZvP was the only problem matchup on this map. According to TLPD zerg had a 75% win rate (6-2 small sample size but still ~70% win rate for zerg through all tournaments although it includes some foreigner vs korean matches) vs Terran on this map too in the GSL. Would you just attribute it to the same circumstances?


I can just do a quick one right now.

There are a total of 7 reasons why ZvT is in favor of Zerg on this map:

1) Large area in the three base origin. Specifically the distance from the main to the natural, the natural to the wall, the wall to the third in terms of walking distance is longer than Steppes of War. This makes it hard to cover all 3 bases (In comparison to its contemporary maps like say Frost 1 tank can cover main and natural or one force can cover all 3).

2) A wide open space with semi large open air gaps leads to 3 things:
2a) Overlord coverage that cannot be punished along the 4 main avenues of attack.
2b) Easy area to spread creep. Even now when you can spread creep onto ramps, it is still easier for Zerg players to spread it in areas that are large flat surfaces.
2c) Lack of Corridors. Generally speaking, Terran wants to fight Zerg in an area filled with valleys, ramps with a medium sized room so they cannot be completely surrounded but still have room to micro (Like say Heavy Rain). On this map, Its too large for Terran to effectively engage unless it's on the extremes right or let sides of the map.

3) Watchtowers. While not as bad as say TDA, the watchertowers are almost always controlled by Zergs in ZvT. In this case the two side watchtowers help the zerg in zoning for drop ships, an especially important tactic on a map with a head to push central area like ths.

4) Base/map layout -> Look at the map and ask where you can safetly 2 rax where your scv cannot be attacked and not be scouted. Then ask yourself where you would place the bunker. This map is a 2rax and 8/8/8 hell. The closest you can put it without being scouted is either on the far side of the natural (Where you're praying to get lucky) or the closest crack near the zerg which is still farther than Steppes of War. And then there are no good places to put a bunker, especially with the ramp that gives zerg a natural advantage. For 8/8/8, you want it as close to the zerg's main cliff as possible, which is the third, but its a double jump and in the natural scouting path of an overlord. To make matters worse, the first overlord is on a natural path to scouting any scvs that want to proxy in the main (Unlike say Heavy Rain or Yeonsu).

5) Wide open 3rd. While not as prevalent as it is in ZvP, Zergs can still put on massive pressure on Terran thirds that are wide open. Doing a bunker/ mine defense is no use as the area is too large and the tank defense is both clunky and inefficent as they can easily roll into your nat assuming you somehow defended the third against a Hyun style 3 base roach bane allin. This exasperates the 6th point.

6) 4th base positions - This is just inherently bad for Terran. Zerg will always have a natural 4th that expands away from the Terran and is protected by a watchtower and ramp. For Terran they can try to expand towards it, but the distance from the 4th to the third is massive if they expand towards the Zerg 4th, and leaves the 3rd open. If they expand away, it leaves the natural open.

7) Clear Cut Drop Paths. This is related to points 2a, 3 and 6. Basically this is like Antiga without the 4th gold in the center with the ramp. Basically there are two drop paths the Terran can use. Either top right or Bot left. This map isn't big enough for Terran to cut diagonally across like say Whirlwind or TDA and isn't small enough like Antiga for them to get in anyway.


However, the short rush distance would suggest that terran will have extremely powerful 2 base pushes should they choose to commit to that kind of strategy.
Strategy"You know I fucking hate the way you play, right?" ~SC2John
stuchiu
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
Fiddler's Green42661 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-02-15 04:38:46
February 15 2014 04:38 GMT
#59
On February 15 2014 13:34 Whitewing wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 15 2014 13:03 stuchiu wrote:
On February 15 2014 10:19 Shellshock wrote:
Is there any intent to analyze the map or any other map for a different matchup? I like that you did this for Daedalus but it's not like ZvP was the only problem matchup on this map. According to TLPD zerg had a 75% win rate (6-2 small sample size but still ~70% win rate for zerg through all tournaments although it includes some foreigner vs korean matches) vs Terran on this map too in the GSL. Would you just attribute it to the same circumstances?


I can just do a quick one right now.

There are a total of 7 reasons why ZvT is in favor of Zerg on this map:

1) Large area in the three base origin. Specifically the distance from the main to the natural, the natural to the wall, the wall to the third in terms of walking distance is longer than Steppes of War. This makes it hard to cover all 3 bases (In comparison to its contemporary maps like say Frost 1 tank can cover main and natural or one force can cover all 3).

2) A wide open space with semi large open air gaps leads to 3 things:
2a) Overlord coverage that cannot be punished along the 4 main avenues of attack.
2b) Easy area to spread creep. Even now when you can spread creep onto ramps, it is still easier for Zerg players to spread it in areas that are large flat surfaces.
2c) Lack of Corridors. Generally speaking, Terran wants to fight Zerg in an area filled with valleys, ramps with a medium sized room so they cannot be completely surrounded but still have room to micro (Like say Heavy Rain). On this map, Its too large for Terran to effectively engage unless it's on the extremes right or let sides of the map.

3) Watchtowers. While not as bad as say TDA, the watchertowers are almost always controlled by Zergs in ZvT. In this case the two side watchtowers help the zerg in zoning for drop ships, an especially important tactic on a map with a head to push central area like ths.

4) Base/map layout -> Look at the map and ask where you can safetly 2 rax where your scv cannot be attacked and not be scouted. Then ask yourself where you would place the bunker. This map is a 2rax and 8/8/8 hell. The closest you can put it without being scouted is either on the far side of the natural (Where you're praying to get lucky) or the closest crack near the zerg which is still farther than Steppes of War. And then there are no good places to put a bunker, especially with the ramp that gives zerg a natural advantage. For 8/8/8, you want it as close to the zerg's main cliff as possible, which is the third, but its a double jump and in the natural scouting path of an overlord. To make matters worse, the first overlord is on a natural path to scouting any scvs that want to proxy in the main (Unlike say Heavy Rain or Yeonsu).

5) Wide open 3rd. While not as prevalent as it is in ZvP, Zergs can still put on massive pressure on Terran thirds that are wide open. Doing a bunker/ mine defense is no use as the area is too large and the tank defense is both clunky and inefficent as they can easily roll into your nat assuming you somehow defended the third against a Hyun style 3 base roach bane allin. This exasperates the 6th point.

6) 4th base positions - This is just inherently bad for Terran. Zerg will always have a natural 4th that expands away from the Terran and is protected by a watchtower and ramp. For Terran they can try to expand towards it, but the distance from the 4th to the third is massive if they expand towards the Zerg 4th, and leaves the 3rd open. If they expand away, it leaves the natural open.

7) Clear Cut Drop Paths. This is related to points 2a, 3 and 6. Basically this is like Antiga without the 4th gold in the center with the ramp. Basically there are two drop paths the Terran can use. Either top right or Bot left. This map isn't big enough for Terran to cut diagonally across like say Whirlwind or TDA and isn't small enough like Antiga for them to get in anyway.


However, the short rush distance would suggest that terran will have extremely powerful 2 base pushes should they choose to commit to that kind of strategy.


There are no good 2 base pushes anymore after the queen change or Sting would be top tier.
Moderator
Shellshock
Profile Blog Joined March 2011
United States97276 Posts
February 15 2014 04:39 GMT
#60
On February 15 2014 13:03 stuchiu wrote:
Show nested quote +
On February 15 2014 10:19 Shellshock wrote:
Is there any intent to analyze the map or any other map for a different matchup? I like that you did this for Daedalus but it's not like ZvP was the only problem matchup on this map. According to TLPD zerg had a 75% win rate (6-2 small sample size but still ~70% win rate for zerg through all tournaments although it includes some foreigner vs korean matches) vs Terran on this map too in the GSL. Would you just attribute it to the same circumstances?


I can just do a quick one right now.

There are a total of 7 reasons why ZvT is in favor of Zerg on this map:

1) Large area in the three base origin. Specifically the distance from the main to the natural, the natural to the wall, the wall to the third in terms of walking distance is longer than Steppes of War. This makes it hard to cover all 3 bases (In comparison to its contemporary maps like say Frost 1 tank can cover main and natural or one force can cover all 3).

2) A wide open space with semi large open air gaps leads to 3 things:
2a) Overlord coverage that cannot be punished along the 4 main avenues of attack.
2b) Easy area to spread creep. Even now when you can spread creep onto ramps, it is still easier for Zerg players to spread it in areas that are large flat surfaces.
2c) Lack of Corridors. Generally speaking, Terran wants to fight Zerg in an area filled with valleys, ramps with a medium sized room so they cannot be completely surrounded but still have room to micro (Like say Heavy Rain). On this map, Its too large for Terran to effectively engage unless it's on the extremes right or let sides of the map.

3) Watchtowers. While not as bad as say TDA, the watchertowers are almost always controlled by Zergs in ZvT. In this case the two side watchtowers help the zerg in zoning for drop ships, an especially important tactic on a map with a head to push central area like ths.

4) Base/map layout -> Look at the map and ask where you can safetly 2 rax where your scv cannot be attacked and not be scouted. Then ask yourself where you would place the bunker. This map is a 2rax and 8/8/8 hell. The closest you can put it without being scouted is either on the far side of the natural (Where you're praying to get lucky) or the closest crack near the zerg which is still farther than Steppes of War. And then there are no good places to put a bunker, especially with the ramp that gives zerg a natural advantage. For 8/8/8, you want it as close to the zerg's main cliff as possible, which is the third, but its a double jump and in the natural scouting path of an overlord. To make matters worse, the first overlord is on a natural path to scouting any scvs that want to proxy in the main (Unlike say Heavy Rain or Yeonsu).

5) Wide open 3rd. While not as prevalent as it is in ZvP, Zergs can still put on massive pressure on Terran thirds that are wide open. Doing a bunker/ mine defense is no use as the area is too large and the tank defense is both clunky and inefficent as they can easily roll into your nat assuming you somehow defended the third against a Hyun style 3 base roach bane allin. This exasperates the 6th point.

6) 4th base positions - This is just inherently bad for Terran. Zerg will always have a natural 4th that expands away from the Terran and is protected by a watchtower and ramp. For Terran they can try to expand towards it, but the distance from the 4th to the third is massive if they expand towards the Zerg 4th, and leaves the 3rd open. If they expand away, it leaves the natural open.

7) Clear Cut Drop Paths. This is related to points 2a, 3 and 6. Basically this is like Antiga without the 4th gold in the center with the ramp. Basically there are two drop paths the Terran can use. Either top right or Bot left. This map isn't big enough for Terran to cut diagonally across like say Whirlwind or TDA and isn't small enough like Antiga for them to get in anyway.

Thank you
Moderatorhttp://i.imgur.com/U4xwqmD.png
TL+ Member
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
PiGosaur Cup
00:00
#96
PiGStarcraft389
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
PiGStarcraft399
ViBE160
ProTech124
JuggernautJason58
EnDerr 6
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 2584
GuemChi 1888
Artosis 587
910 54
Dota 2
monkeys_forever470
febbydoto10
League of Legends
Doublelift5076
Counter-Strike
summit1g3548
minikerr131
taco 112
adren_tv67
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox1142
Mew2King167
Other Games
Liquid`RaSZi2532
Day[9].tv658
shahzam512
C9.Mang0390
Livibee114
Maynarde86
Trikslyr60
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV33
[ Show 11 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• OhrlRock 3
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 11
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Other Games
• Day9tv658
Upcoming Events
Afreeca Starleague
8h 47m
Mini vs Calm
Queen vs EffOrt
Patches Events
14h 47m
Replay Cast
22h 47m
The PondCast
1d 8h
Replay Cast
1d 22h
Escore
2 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
2 days
Korean StarCraft League
3 days
GSL
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
GSL
6 days
PiGosaur Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.