• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:10
CEST 17:10
KST 00:10
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2914Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
Weekly Cups (July 27-Aug 2): SHIN's big week0SC4ALL II: Brood War - $2500 - Dec 5-66SC4ALL II announced - $10,000 prize pool, Dec 5-63PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August)11Neeb returns to progaming; rejoins ONSYDE15
StarCraft 2
General
SC4ALL II: StarCraft 2 Player Announcement 2/8 August World Ranking: Clem climbs to #2 Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Daily SC2 Player Grid - feedback wanted Weekly Cups (July 27-Aug 2): SHIN's big week
Tourneys
Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August) RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event INu's Battles #19 2-Days Event SC4ALL II announced - $10,000 prize pool, Dec 5-6
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 537 Hostile Territory Mutation # 536 Railroad Switch Mutation # 535 Assembly of Vengeance
Brood War
General
Recent recommended BW games BW General Discussion ASL22 General Discussion Making an Online Broodwar Manager Game [Personal Project Share] Terran Defense v0.60
Tourneys
2v2v2v2 Tournament [Megathread] Daily Proleagues SC4ALL II: Brood War - $2500 - Dec 5-6 Escore Tournament - Season 3
Strategy
Any training maps people recommend? Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live! Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club The Scarlett Fan Club The IdrA Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 McBoner: A hockey love story
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
Northern Ireland Global Starcraft The Automated Ban List
Blogs
valeq
valeq
Please support my new stand…
Peanutsc
What is a Gamer?
TrAiDoS
Hello guys!
LIN1s
ASL S22 English Commentary…
namkraft
Poker (part 2)
Nebuchad
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 4866 users

[G] Zerg Guide to Macro-Aggression - Page 8

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Prev 1 6 7 8 9 Next All
Rewok
Profile Joined September 2010
40 Posts
March 16 2012 20:05 GMT
#141
Love this ZvT style.

In one week, I went from Top 50 gold where I was stuck to top 8 platinum. braveZOMBiE.532

My win rate against Terran is like 90%. Now that I've figured out how to hold the initial bunker rush, it's more like 100%.

I just remember being stuck in Gold and then winning like 15 straight vs gold, platinum and eventually diamond.

If your ZvT could use some work, this guide ROCKS.
TangSC
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Canada1866 Posts
March 18 2012 17:32 GMT
#142
On March 17 2012 05:05 Rewok wrote:
Love this ZvT style.

In one week, I went from Top 50 gold where I was stuck to top 8 platinum. braveZOMBiE.532

My win rate against Terran is like 90%. Now that I've figured out how to hold the initial bunker rush, it's more like 100%.

I just remember being stuck in Gold and then winning like 15 straight vs gold, platinum and eventually diamond.

If your ZvT could use some work, this guide ROCKS.

Bunker rushes require you to pull drones from your main and occasionally produce a couple extra zerglings and 1-2 spines. After you hold it, though, you can transition into the roach/ling timing to contain him to 1 base.
Coaching www.allin-academy.com | Team www.All-Inspiration.com
bri9and
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States246 Posts
March 20 2012 19:53 GMT
#143
If they don't fall for that, offer $20 for a surrender and that pretty much secures the win.
I don't have time to play with myself
TangSC
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Canada1866 Posts
March 21 2012 19:50 GMT
#144
On March 21 2012 04:53 bri9and wrote:
If they don't fall for that, offer $20 for a surrender and that pretty much secures the win.

Bit of a silly suggestion, not really related to strategy. I can't imagine anyone would accept such an offer, and anyone who pays 20$ for someone to leave a game would go broke pretty fast.
Coaching www.allin-academy.com | Team www.All-Inspiration.com
bri9and
Profile Blog Joined June 2010
United States246 Posts
March 23 2012 18:06 GMT
#145
Well played sir.. well played.

http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/5499/loltang.jpg

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=32696&currentpage=1076#21526
forevernerdy was just banned by Chill.

That account was created on 2011-10-23 14:05:06 and had 30 posts.

Reason: You seriously made a second account to ask yourself questions in your own thread Tang? Come on bro.
I don't have time to play with myself
TangSC
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Canada1866 Posts
March 23 2012 18:11 GMT
#146
On March 24 2012 03:06 bri9and wrote:
Well played sir.. well played.

http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/5499/loltang.jpg

http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=32696&currentpage=1076#21526
Show nested quote +
forevernerdy was just banned by Chill.

That account was created on 2011-10-23 14:05:06 and had 30 posts.

Reason: You seriously made a second account to ask yourself questions in your own thread Tang? Come on bro.

Do some research on the poster of that topic on reddit, it's just a line taken out of context of the greater joke. Please post the entire replay, so we can all see!

Also, Chill unbanned that account, it was banned because a Uwaterloo friend and I have the same IP when we're on campus.

I appreciate your desire to keep the SC2 community honest though! It would be shameful if someone actually paid their way into Grand Master, or created an account to bump their own threads on TL.
Coaching www.allin-academy.com | Team www.All-Inspiration.com
WolfintheSheep
Profile Joined June 2011
Canada14127 Posts
March 23 2012 18:34 GMT
#147
On January 28 2012 02:59 TangSC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 27 2012 11:23 XChoke wrote:
I don't understand why people have some hate against the OP because of his stylistic choice of play. I personal play a similar style using an intial army to contain while gaining map control. Yes Banshee's/drops are quite a common response but it's so predictable that you just get those extra queens and a spine crawler or two a little earlier...

Why do so many Zergs think that any build that doesn't optimize economy is "all in"? Tell that Leenock! I believe the OP is actually advocating quite a balanced play style that contains/pressures the opponent while he safely macro's behind it. How is this not a good transition or any less valid than droning to 70+?

I agree XChoke, I think there's a double-standard in StarCraft where Terran and Protoss players are expected to do pressure builds but if a Zerg player tries to pressure it's suddenly cheese. I hope more people open up to the variety of strategies in SC2!

Imagine a Terran or Protoss player pulls 10-15 workers with every pressure build that they do. That's usually around the number of drones you're cutting with your builds on every offensive, and that's why they're all-ins.

If your builds were built around keeping an equivalent economy with your opponent, then you might be able to call it pressure. But there is no double-standard - If Terran and Protoss cut worker production, or pull workers, then they're doing an all-in. It would be a double-standard not to say the same about Zerg.
Average means I'm better than half of you.
TangSC
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Canada1866 Posts
March 23 2012 18:50 GMT
#148
On March 24 2012 03:34 WolfintheSheep wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 28 2012 02:59 TangSC wrote:
On January 27 2012 11:23 XChoke wrote:
I don't understand why people have some hate against the OP because of his stylistic choice of play. I personal play a similar style using an intial army to contain while gaining map control. Yes Banshee's/drops are quite a common response but it's so predictable that you just get those extra queens and a spine crawler or two a little earlier...

Why do so many Zergs think that any build that doesn't optimize economy is "all in"? Tell that Leenock! I believe the OP is actually advocating quite a balanced play style that contains/pressures the opponent while he safely macro's behind it. How is this not a good transition or any less valid than droning to 70+?

I agree XChoke, I think there's a double-standard in StarCraft where Terran and Protoss players are expected to do pressure builds but if a Zerg player tries to pressure it's suddenly cheese. I hope more people open up to the variety of strategies in SC2!

Imagine a Terran or Protoss player pulls 10-15 workers with every pressure build that they do. That's usually around the number of drones you're cutting with your builds on every offensive, and that's why they're all-ins.

If your builds were built around keeping an equivalent economy with your opponent, then you might be able to call it pressure. But there is no double-standard - If Terran and Protoss cut worker production, or pull workers, then they're doing an all-in. It would be a double-standard not to say the same about Zerg.

I like that you're analyzing it critically! But I would disagree with a few points.

First, you cannot compare executing a timing attack that uses 15 larva with protoss/terran players pulling 10/15 workers. Using workers as part of a timing attack immediately cuts your income in half! Not to mention lost mining time of moving across the map. With a roach/ling timing you're droning into the mid game, securing one fully-saturated base and an expansion with a few drones (it takes roughly 22-26 drones to be able to support 2hatch/2queen drone production).

I understand that you see StarCraft II as a game that revolves around "keeping an equivalent economy with your opponent". Many people would agree with you, and I think your answer is partically right: maintaining equal or greater economy with your opponent is a significant factor and it's one way to approach your decision-making. But you have to take into consideration other factors too, like map control and safety to drone, scouting information, damage done to opponent, and additional defenses built by opponent.

There are a wide variety of economic and aggressive transitions available to those who properly execute Roach/Ling timing attacks.
Coaching www.allin-academy.com | Team www.All-Inspiration.com
Proxee
Profile Joined September 2011
63 Posts
March 30 2012 19:29 GMT
#149
This build is Very much NOT an all-in. It can be used that way, or u could just go for a macro game. And also I'm sick of these double standard for zerg players, Protoss/Terran do early timing attacks and its stratgey, Zerg does an early timing attack and its Just cheese. Tang's guides are very useful for learning. Just because u can opt to do an all-in doesn't mean its an All-in.
TangSC
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Canada1866 Posts
April 03 2012 21:05 GMT
#150
On March 31 2012 04:29 Proxee wrote:
This build is Very much NOT an all-in. It can be used that way, or u could just go for a macro game. And also I'm sick of these double standard for zerg players, Protoss/Terran do early timing attacks and its stratgey, Zerg does an early timing attack and its Just cheese. Tang's guides are very useful for learning. Just because u can opt to do an all-in doesn't mean its an All-in.

I agree with you about double standards, people overestimate how badly zerg needs 60+ drones and 3 fully saturated bases. Of course going for as strong of an economy and unit composition in the late game is a great strategy/mindset, but it's not the only one - There are a lot of ways to be dangerous in the early/midgame.
Coaching www.allin-academy.com | Team www.All-Inspiration.com
bmore_bulldog
Profile Joined April 2012
18 Posts
April 12 2012 16:38 GMT
#151
Aggressive builds are a critical part of the game. They're annoying when you're starting out, but in higher level play they're necessary to punish greedy builds and to keep your opponent guessing. I don't understand the hate Tang gets for pushing this style. It's as though macro play is the only acceptable form of SC2. I find it illuminating to compare this thread to the thread about foreigner vs. Korean play styles, and the aggression favored by the latter.

Now, if Tang actually paid people to drop or used fake accounts, that's another thing, but for now I'll take his word that he didn't.
Glitch890
Profile Joined July 2011
22 Posts
April 23 2012 01:13 GMT
#152
Great guide, definitely going to try this.

I also find it interesting that when P or T (especially T) plays aggressively, no one bats an eye, but when Zerg does it all of a sudden your a cheesy noob.
Th1rdEye
Profile Blog Joined December 2006
United States1074 Posts
April 23 2012 01:31 GMT
#153
Nice guide.. Not sure who bumped this, but definitely a good read. The small execution tips are quite important, and overlooked by many players
from the days of: TheMarine [NC]...YellOw [H.O.T.]-Forever99 OgOgO [_MuMyung_] ChRh PlayGrrrr.... SlayerS_`BoxeR` [Oops]Reach [ReD]NaDa [DF]zergboy..!! Pusan[S.G] Nal_rA GARIMTO SSamJJang ChoJJa JinSu Silent_Control iloveoov H_PauL_WII JulyZerg [DaK]JoYo
TangSC
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Canada1866 Posts
April 23 2012 15:45 GMT
#154
On April 23 2012 10:13 Glitch890 wrote:
I also find it interesting that when P or T (especially T) plays aggressively, no one bats an eye, but when Zerg does it all of a sudden your a cheesy noob.

It has been that way since beta I'm afraid, but I've seen so many pros (Nestea/Losira/Drg) go for 2base timings and transition into 3-4 base standard macro. The thing that bothers me the most is that people even criticize players for choosing all-in styles, they can be as effective as any.
Coaching www.allin-academy.com | Team www.All-Inspiration.com
zZzJinzZz
Profile Joined August 2011
United States13 Posts
April 23 2012 15:56 GMT
#155
Nice build :D
Sithelin123
Profile Joined August 2011
Canada168 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-29 21:06:09
April 29 2012 21:05 GMT
#156
I'm a new Zerg player and I'm definitely going to pick this up as my go-to ZvT style. Very impressive build and thank you very much. I have a ton of practice to do before I get this right though.

Tang ALL of your guides are extremely amazing and IMO the best guides in this forum.
GodOfWarAReS
Profile Blog Joined February 2012
Germany105 Posts
April 29 2012 21:16 GMT
#157
seriously this is sooo risky. there are plenty of buildorders which will just CRUSH yours. maybe against most builds of the terran you will have a huge advantage after your push... but its a strategy game, so be able to react to everything without getting too much of a disadvantage...
bankai
Profile Joined November 2010
362 Posts
April 30 2012 02:05 GMT
#158
Hi all, not sure if this question has been asked already so forgive me if it has:
- Is there a reason for the slight difference in this BO compared to the original Tang thread on the ZvT Roach all-in or is it? In Phase 1 in this one, you build lings up to 60/60 supply, but in the other thread you only build lings up to 52/60 supply.
- The basic BO in Step 1 does not seem to mention drone scouting - at what point should I send my drone out? I prefer 9 normally so I can get inside the terran wall-off to scout gas or not.

Thanks for your help everyone
Tenken
Profile Joined March 2011
United States17 Posts
April 30 2012 03:06 GMT
#159
On April 24 2012 00:45 TangSC wrote:
Show nested quote +
On April 23 2012 10:13 Glitch890 wrote:
I also find it interesting that when P or T (especially T) plays aggressively, no one bats an eye, but when Zerg does it all of a sudden your a cheesy noob.

It has been that way since beta I'm afraid, but I've seen so many pros (Nestea/Losira/Drg) go for 2base timings and transition into 3-4 base standard macro. The thing that bothers me the most is that people even criticize players for choosing all-in styles, they can be as effective as any.


The difference is that they are actually good at the game where as your game is lacking past the 10 minute mark.
ETisME
Profile Blog Joined April 2011
12821 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-04-30 04:07:20
April 30 2012 04:06 GMT
#160
the question is, are the units going to worth all the investment? I can see it taking down hellions, map control but how about dealing damages? (maybe getting some depots down or a few marines + scv pull?)
that's really my main and only concern, probably the one guide from Tang that I might do because it looks more macro based and easier to transition.
其疾如风,其徐如林,侵掠如火,不动如山,难知如阴,动如雷震。
Prev 1 6 7 8 9 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 8h 50m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft: Brood War
Calm 9406
Bisu 1324
EffOrt 719
Shuttle 644
Jaedong 614
Mini 484
BeSt 384
hero 79
Hyun 63
Sharp 41
[ Show more ]
sorry 38
Sexy 36
Terrorterran 35
Hm[arnc] 33
soO 25
Shine 20
zelot 20
Rock 19
IntoTheRainbow 13
Dota 2
Gorgc15391
Dendi1076
syndereN330
BananaSlamJamma239
Counter-Strike
byalli947
fl0m582
Other Games
singsing1922
B2W.Neo1018
hiko845
FrodaN430
Mlord373
Liquid`VortiX199
elazer158
Trikslyr19
Organizations
Other Games
BasetradeTV69
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 17
Kim Chul Min (afreeca) 15
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Shameless 25
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV439
League of Legends
• Nemesis2566
Upcoming Events
PiGosaur Cup
8h 50m
Replay Cast
17h 50m
Kung Fu Cup
19h 50m
Replay Cast
1d 8h
The PondCast
1d 18h
INu's Battles
1d 19h
Percival vs Cure
Classic vs Clem
Replay Cast
2 days
Escore
2 days
IntoTheTV X SOOP
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
herO vs SHIN
Clem vs Solar
Serral vs Rogue
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
4 days
WardiTV Weekly
5 days
The Patches Monday
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
PiG Sty Festival
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-08-03
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
RSL Revival: Season 6
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5
Escore Tournament S3: W6
Escore Tournament S3: W7
CSLAN 4
ASL Season 22
Escore Tournament S3: W8
Acropolis #5 - TRS
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1
Thunderpick World Champ.
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.