EPTIMO, the purge should be more to discourage laziness and idiocy at the same time encourage crazy new ones. So far i think balance is kept.
[!] A WARNING (Purge) - Page 16
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy |
|
whiterabb1t
Belgium681 Posts
IMO, the purge should be more to discourage laziness and idiocy at the same time encourage crazy new ones. So far i think balance is kept. | ||
|
gongryong
Korea (South)1430 Posts
| ||
|
Mofisto
United Kingdom585 Posts
On April 15 2011 22:01 gongryong wrote: Without a doubt the forum is getting better. The only problem I have with it all is that some people are getting away with a warning/nothing at all (other than their thread closed) when they should be getting bans. I think that unless the mod's get even stricter (as in they follow the rules to a t, and ban people for even the most minor transgressions) the forum will go back to how it used to be, as people will think they can get away with it. Allow minor things to go unpunished and it wont be long before people start pushing their luck and posting trash. | ||
|
H0bgawblin
United States109 Posts
| ||
|
trew
Sweden93 Posts
On April 15 2011 22:01 gongryong wrote: No "Yes, Good job everyone, but I want harsher punishments" option? | ||
|
Saracen
United States5139 Posts
If you argue with a highlighted user/known player without good reason, you will be BANNED. Why? It's a privilege to have these guys posting advice here. They don't gain anything from giving you advice, and treating them with anything less than the respect they deserve only chases them away. So ask yourself this: do you really want pros posting in your threads? If so, be respectful. If not, you probably don't belong here. But fear not, there are plenty of other strategy forums you could be posting in. | ||
|
Umpteen
United Kingdom1570 Posts
| ||
|
Gonff
United States686 Posts
| ||
|
iamke55
United States2806 Posts
| ||
|
Tohrazer
United Kingdom75 Posts
im saying this as a platinum player, i know every game i play has flaws in its fundementals, and right now id fear posting a replay based on that - even if im still confused why i lost despite this, because (for example) the other guys macro was equally flawed i dont disagree that it would be great to have higher quality posts in the strategy forum nor am i claiming to be the most super-able contributor either however this stuck out to me so i decided to write this post regards, | ||
|
Geo.Rion
7377 Posts
On April 18 2011 06:30 iamke55 wrote: I wish there was a purge for LR threads as well... Are you kidding me? Every TSL night produces raughly 3 pages of banned people, how much more moderation do you want in LR threads? | ||
|
L3g3nd_
New Zealand10461 Posts
On April 18 2011 06:30 iamke55 wrote: I wish there was a purge for LR threads as well... im fairly sure i read (i think in the warning part of an LR thread, or maybe twitter) that they are gonna really crack down on the LR threads soon | ||
|
Antisocialmunky
United States5913 Posts
You should change 'argue without good reason' to something more specific. That's too general when you don't define 'good reason.' Maybe something like 'If you cannot backup your point, don't argue [with a blue poster]'. | ||
|
Tudi
Romania127 Posts
Maybe a separate forum where newbies can roam free?  But tbh probably way more trouble than worth. | ||
|
TeNNiS
3 Posts
| ||
|
Drock
United States305 Posts
Thanks! | ||
|
Autofire2
Pakistan290 Posts
I guess if your intent was to encourage below-diamond players to shut up, listen, and improve on their own that's cool, but honestly, if the rules had been this strict when I started posting I'd be a lot worse than I am now, simply because I gained an appreciation for HOW to analyze my play and HOW bad my macro really was. It's very easy to "give yourself a break" in such a difficult game; SC2 is so competitive at even the silver level (for people like me who have never competitively played an RTS) that you don't realize how terrible your seemingly-minor mistakes are. | ||
|
Lea
Sweden120 Posts
If your thread is about a new strategy and you do not have a damn good analysis (with replays) (i.e. I think your thread is too theorycrafty), you can play against me in a BO3 with your strategy. If you lose, you will be BANNED. How do you circumvent the problem if the user in question does not have an account on the US servers, or may lose to you due to other reasons rather than a necessarily flawed build? EDIT Also voicing the idea that maybe adding a subforum directed to help players only might also redirect a lot of unnecessary threats, while still allowing players like the ones posted above me who know about their micro and macro issues but still seek out advice because they also know they failed in other areas but are uncertain how to analyze it at that point. I also realize such a subforum could get messy, but this was also bound to happen when the TL forums opened up to the public and was not only limited to pros, since the majority of the SC2 players are not found in diamond and above. I do believe there must be a solution to be found that does not necessarily disencourage players to not post but still realize they need more help than the knowledge they possess themselves when analyzing a game. | ||
|
infinity21
Canada6683 Posts
On April 19 2011 07:33 Lea wrote: How do you circumvent the problem if the user in question does not have an account on the US servers, or may lose to you due to other reasons rather than a necessarily flawed build? By having a damn good analysis with replays to back it up. I don't think that's out of anyone's capability to complete. | ||
|
BallsOfSteel
United States57 Posts
If I can find another ongoing discussion on the same topic, you will be BANNED. Does this apply to guides too? In most cases, a bad guide won't be ongoing and probably won't apply to the new rules anyways. However, if somebody thinks they can improve on a decent guide where the discussion has slowed , should they be allowed to try? | ||
| ||
