• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 21:22
CEST 03:22
KST 10:22
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed18Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Heaven's Balance Suggestions (roast me) Who will win EWC 2025? Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Soulkey Muta Micro Map? BW General Discussion [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion Movie Discussion! [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 661 users

[Q][D] - PvZ Royal Stove

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
Normal
Sabin010
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1892 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-01 19:24:43
December 01 2010 17:25 GMT
#1
Poll: Should Dec 12 - 18 be do the stove week?

Yes - We should devote this week to doing the stove. (49)
 
83%

No - no week will ever be do the stove week. (8)
 
14%

We should have "do the stove week" be some other time. (2)
 
3%

59 total votes

Your vote: Should Dec 12 - 18 be do the stove week?

(Vote): Yes - We should devote this week to doing the stove.
(Vote): No - no week will ever be do the stove week.
(Vote): We should have "do the stove week" be some other time.



Hello Team Liquid.

Here is the basics of the concept. While I have never actually used this build I have a feeling it could be a viable strategy, maybe not for high level play, but a build to mess around with when you're tired of 1 or 2 gate robo or 4-gate. The concept is pretty simple, and requires the following.
1. Get a fast Pheonix to punish all the overlords to allow steps two and three to be effective.
2. Switch to DTs
3. Get a Mother Ship.
________
The crucial part of this is surviving until the Pheonix. Force Fields can hold the ramp only so long, and the build is very gas heavy. The Pheonix had bonus damage to Light. This means they're able to chew threw the Mutalisk, and once in a good mass they take out overlords and overseers with ease, they can even lift the hydras and hit them for bonus damage too.

Once the overseer's are on defense the DTs become much more deadly. Once morphed into Archon we get bonus damage to every Zerg unit. This allows you to hold the zerg from macroing up, while you macro up and set up for step three.

The Mother Ship. In this build it's primary use is for the cloak blanket, and possibly defensive mass recall.

Once the Mother Ship is out, you should be on two fully saturated bases, and just took third while you have a stealth army of DTs and some morphed archons, any follow up is viable, two robos/ HT/ additional StarGates

What are your thoughts on this build?
What are the biggest threats to the build? -other than an infestor highjacking the Mother ship.
What could be done to optimize the strategy? -blink stalkers for the courrupters? That's if they're able to keep a spire up with the DTs wrecking anything trying to stop them/ detect them/ stop the pheonixes from killing overseers.
aquanda
Profile Joined January 2003
United States477 Posts
December 01 2010 17:27 GMT
#2
I think you have to ask Proct's permission to use the term Stove with a build in SC2.
DavidMcF
Profile Joined August 2010
United Kingdom189 Posts
December 01 2010 17:29 GMT
#3
Where are you getting the gas for all this :O
OfficerTJHooker
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada97 Posts
December 01 2010 17:34 GMT
#4
How quickly are you able to produce phoenixes while performing a tech switch to DTs? Not only is that extremely time consuming, but also resource consuming. Dark templars nowhere close to being 'cheap', and they're sort of a hit & miss unit.

Also, wouldn't a zerg plant spore crawlers around his base to prevent phoenix harass? It's counter-productive to the dark templars in the first place.

Mothership... no comment.

This build overall seems very gimmicky. Until you can give me some specifics on how to really deal with the possible responses that the zerg might take, then I can't see this build doing well at all.

Scoot and turn, scoot and turn...
bearjuice
Profile Joined November 2010
United States98 Posts
December 01 2010 17:39 GMT
#5
i just dont like turtling up as the protoss. There are so many ways to lose. I mean what if he pumps out 6 roaches at the beginning, or goes banlings. There is just too much time from start to MoShip for stuff to go wrong. Sure you can turtle like a mofo with cannons everywhere, phoenixes harassing, but if the zerg opponent is any good, im' sure he'll expand set some spore crawlers and simply beat you with numbers and some OK scouting.

I'm not saying it's not possible, just too risky for it to be a viable/useful strategy. I can see this workign with a Fast expand for all the gas you'llneed for this build to work.
"Tis a good day to die!"
bearjuice
Profile Joined November 2010
United States98 Posts
December 01 2010 17:40 GMT
#6
also a note, that you will be forcing your opponent to probably put down a spore crawler or two which negates your dts.
"Tis a good day to die!"
phos4
Profile Joined October 2009
Germany226 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-01 17:51:44
December 01 2010 17:43 GMT
#7
the stove is the most gimmicky build ever but so fun if it works, which usually doesnt happen because it dos not make any sense as it forces the opponent to e response which also counters the next step.

the sc2 version could be more viable with a voidray, but that would prolly take away the spirit.
Uranium
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1077 Posts
December 01 2010 17:48 GMT
#8
On December 02 2010 02:40 bearjuice wrote:
also a note, that you will be forcing your opponent to probably put down a spore crawler or two which negates your dts.

That's what makes it "the stove". The original stove was based around building a scout, which should force turrets, and then transitioning to DTs, which the turrets should have hardcountered...

It's basically a joke build, or something. I don't really understand the dynamics of BW since I'm terribad at it, but here's the original build so you can peruse at your leisure.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=94911
"Sentry imba! You see? YOU SEE??!!" - Sen | "Marauder die die!" - oGsMC | "Oh my god, she texted me back!" - Day[9]
Twitch89
Profile Joined April 2010
Canada24 Posts
December 01 2010 17:52 GMT
#9
If you're planning to morph the DTs anyway, why not go HT-Archon instead?
A part of me swims in the stream, but in truth I'm standing on the shore; the current never takes me downstream.
Sabin010
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1892 Posts
December 01 2010 17:54 GMT
#10
The point is to contain the zerg, while you're free to macro up. Forcing production of spore crawlers allows you to make the zerg play defensively. When a Zerg is on defense he's going to have a hard time expanding, and the DT's are going to force him to bring an overseer if he wants to engage in combat out side of the base.

In the early game it's important to get to get a sentry to hold off early roach pressure at the ramp. Additional sentry should be added to hold the roaches off for as long as possible. Maybe a forge cannon choke then expand at natural could be able to hold this better. Once pheonix are out the nydus shouldn't be a problem.
Chill
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Calgary25980 Posts
December 01 2010 17:59 GMT
#11
On December 02 2010 02:52 Twitch89 wrote:
If you're planning to morph the DTs anyway, why not go HT-Archon instead?

The Stove is an old build from Brood War. It was going Scouts (a terribly underpowered flying unit), into DTs, into Arbiters (a cloaking spellcaster like the Mothership). The build was pretty nonsensical and arguably bad; however, it was so unpredictable that it worked even against top players occasionally. It was the equivalent of a slap in the face.

The Royal Stove required a fourth step: morphing a Dark Archon (extremely underused spellcaster) and using Mind Control (a permanent Neural Parasite) against your opponent. This was like getting slapped in the face while your girlfriend watched and fucked your best friend.
Moderator
Johnranger-123
Profile Blog Joined August 2009
United Kingdom341 Posts
December 01 2010 18:03 GMT
#12
lol at people taking this build seriously xD
Im so gonna try this out on the ladder ^^
Sabin010
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1892 Posts
December 01 2010 18:11 GMT
#13
Void Ray first then get the Twilight Council as soon as you drop the gate would problebly be better. This will allow the DT's to come into play sooner and your void ray is probebly better at harassing alone then a solo pheonix.
FenneK
Profile Joined November 2010
France1231 Posts
December 01 2010 18:13 GMT
#14
I would honestly try to get first hand experience with what you suggest before posting it here, as it's hard to assess how well it works unless you try it.

In theory however, this seems dumb, really dumb. You won't have enough gas, you won't be able to push out of a contain, your phoenixes will incite spore crawlers which counter the DTs.

And seriously, a mothership? Not even HuK manages to pull that off.
good luck have batman
Sabin010
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1892 Posts
December 01 2010 18:29 GMT
#15
The Mother Ship is what makes the build complete. Once you hear "justice has come", you can just say 'gg' because there is no way for the zerg to win now. You're going to be denying his ability to get mobile detection, and even if he just masses up corrupters the archons are going to fuck them up with the splash and bonus damage.
shinogi
Profile Joined May 2010
United Kingdom45 Posts
December 01 2010 18:30 GMT
#16
the DT's to mother ship seems pretty retarded. since the zerg will get overseers or spore crawlers to spot the DT's. more likely spore crawlers in fact as that will also deal with the pheonix. so when your mother ship eventually turns up it will get decloaked and taken out asap. also as others have also pointed out, you have to magically survive to that point.

If you wanna do something wacky, why not go pylon > nexus at the top of your ramp to wall off and pump probes from two nexus to saturate your mineral line super fast and then tech (with two nexus worth of chrono). prob work best on jungle basin since you can take your natural and then use the back entrance to move your army out and take a 3rd.
bowsting
Profile Joined November 2010
United States20 Posts
December 01 2010 18:37 GMT
#17
I won't argue this build as it is so similar to the hilarity of the stove but I would like you to change your name... The royal stove was iced for only the best who can use a dark archon to mc an SCV. Simply call it "the sc2 stove"
Rob28
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada705 Posts
December 01 2010 18:40 GMT
#18
Along with all the other earlier mentioned flaws, I'd add that a rush player will absolutely crush a tech-build like this (let alone the double-tech build this calls for). Not gonna work out great. Put up some replays to validate or else it's just theorycrafting and wishful thinking.
"power overwhelming"... work, dammit, work!
Sabin010
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1892 Posts
December 01 2010 18:40 GMT
#19
you go pylon, gateway, gas, core, gas, research. get stalker get sentry stalker, start a stargate and twilight council. after you start teh voidray get the dark shrine and the second and third gate ways.

I'm sure HuK would win if he executed this build. I did something very similar to this against a Terran on Scrap Station. I went for a quick void ray against a cloaked banshee. Got the mother ship mass recalled into his base and it came down to a base race which I was able to win because of the cannons in his base, and my void ray was able to chase down all his floating buildings. If I had got the DTs instead of the fleet beacon I still win because of cannons in my base.
EtherealDeath
Profile Blog Joined July 2007
United States8366 Posts
December 01 2010 18:46 GMT
#20
On December 02 2010 02:59 Chill wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 02 2010 02:52 Twitch89 wrote:
If you're planning to morph the DTs anyway, why not go HT-Archon instead?

The Stove is an old build from Brood War. It was going Scouts (a terribly underpowered flying unit), into DTs, into Arbiters (a cloaking spellcaster like the Mothership). The build was pretty nonsensical and arguably bad; however, it was so unpredictable that it worked even against top players occasionally. It was the equivalent of a slap in the face.

The Royal Stove required a fourth step: morphing a Dark Archon (extremely underused spellcaster) and using Mind Control (a permanent Neural Parasite) against your opponent. This was like getting slapped in the face while your girlfriend watched and fucked your best friend.


Lol golden description, makes me want to use this against some poor zerg...
sikyon
Profile Joined June 2010
Canada1045 Posts
December 01 2010 18:49 GMT
#21
On December 02 2010 02:59 Chill wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 02 2010 02:52 Twitch89 wrote:
If you're planning to morph the DTs anyway, why not go HT-Archon instead?

The Stove is an old build from Brood War. It was going Scouts (a terribly underpowered flying unit), into DTs, into Arbiters (a cloaking spellcaster like the Mothership). The build was pretty nonsensical and arguably bad; however, it was so unpredictable that it worked even against top players occasionally. It was the equivalent of a slap in the face.

The Royal Stove required a fourth step: morphing a Dark Archon (extremely underused spellcaster) and using Mind Control (a permanent Neural Parasite) against your opponent. This was like getting slapped in the face while your girlfriend watched and fucked your best friend.


That sounds amazing :O (except for the girlfriend part)

I've always wondered how viable pheonix into DT's were...
Weken
Profile Joined November 2010
United Kingdom580 Posts
December 01 2010 18:53 GMT
#22
On December 02 2010 02:25 Sabin010 wrote:
2. Switch to DTs
3. Get a Mother Ship.


This just made me lol for like 5 minutes

seriously i see no way of this build working againsed a good player who dosnt muck up badly. Fristly you are vunrable at the beggining becasue you have no real proper defensive units and you are compleatly relying on ff.

When the phenioxes come out you still can defend very well. Then you get DTs which may contain him becasue your phenioxes can snipe the overlords however me can easily defend becasue the zerg will already have some spores up becasue of the phenioxes so they will prolly do no damage.

Then you get a mothership and some archons. Hmm ok firstly archons arn't a core army unitand are only used when ht are out of energy. Finaly the mothership, err despite the thread going around about it being used in pvp getting a mothership randomly isnt going to be that good because there best ability is to create a clacking field. hmm there might have detection considring you have just used dts and they will have spores because you have phenioxes.

So congrats you have just created only of the worst builds that you can do on SC2.
Chill
Profile Blog Joined January 2005
Calgary25980 Posts
December 01 2010 18:54 GMT
#23
GUYS, this isn't a real build. Why are you analyzing it? It's a joke that makes you giddy if you pull it off in Broodwar, and he's searching for the SC2 equivalent. That's it.
Moderator
aquanda
Profile Joined January 2003
United States477 Posts
December 01 2010 19:10 GMT
#24
Void ray would give u a free expansion against non muta (get 1 pheonix with the void to discourage), and then get dt to kill the zergs 3rd. You're now even on bases and how you play from here is up to you. Seems pretty solid honestly, unless he gets spores to counter voids instead of hydra or queens. I'm gonna test, but without mothership.
burninglegionx
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada22 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-01 19:20:46
December 01 2010 19:14 GMT
#25
we should have a "do the stove" week and see how many poor Zs we can kill with this build.

I've experimented with 1base, 2gate-star phoenix -> DT -> expo with 3rd gate + forge + cannon.

But mass hydras + 3~4 overseers just rape this (this was before roach range buff. I believe early roach pressure will hurt a lot too).


edit:

just theorycrafting, but this might be a fun 2v2 PP vs ZZ build: one player 1base 2star spam phoenixes

while the other protoss goes fast dts. Then send some resources over to the stargating player to get fleet beacon + mother ship asap.
On your PC, the units seem to perform quite poorly. I think there might be something nearby the PC that is causing this problem for you. You may need a mirror to find out what it is. :D
aquanda
Profile Joined January 2003
United States477 Posts
December 01 2010 19:26 GMT
#26
Yah I just tested it against a decent Z and it didn't really do anything. Oh well.
Sabin010
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1892 Posts
December 01 2010 19:28 GMT
#27
Did you get the Mother Ship?
Antisocialmunky
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States5912 Posts
December 01 2010 19:40 GMT
#28
On December 02 2010 02:59 Chill wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 02 2010 02:52 Twitch89 wrote:
If you're planning to morph the DTs anyway, why not go HT-Archon instead?

The Stove is an old build from Brood War. It was going Scouts (a terribly underpowered flying unit), into DTs, into Arbiters (a cloaking spellcaster like the Mothership). The build was pretty nonsensical and arguably bad; however, it was so unpredictable that it worked even against top players occasionally. It was the equivalent of a slap in the face.

The Royal Stove required a fourth step: morphing a Dark Archon (extremely underused spellcaster) and using Mind Control (a permanent Neural Parasite) against your opponent. This was like getting slapped in the face while your girlfriend watched and fucked your best friend.


So what's the metaphor for the the point where you MC a SCV and tech to siege tanks and start recalling cloaked sieged tanks?
[゚n゚] SSSSssssssSSsss ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
Marine/Raven Guide:http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=163605
Grend
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
1600 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-01 20:03:00
December 01 2010 19:40 GMT
#29
I tried it too, but he was too bad for it to have any point.
Oh and recalling cloaked siege tanks = Royal Stove.
♞ Against the Wind - Bob Seger ♞
aquanda
Profile Joined January 2003
United States477 Posts
December 01 2010 20:36 GMT
#30
No, of course I didn't get a mothership...the build was killed as soon as he got an overseer. he had 4 queens and hydras in production when my DTs got there.
Gemini_19
Profile Joined June 2010
United States1238 Posts
December 01 2010 20:43 GMT
#31
This thread just made my day. I have got to attempt this xD

All hail the Stove!!!
@GGemini19 GM Protoss | http://www.twitch.tv/geminisc2 | I <333 HerO & Trap | Check out my Build of the Week series on /r/allthingsprotoss, TL, or Spawning Tool
Grebliv
Profile Joined May 2006
Iceland800 Posts
December 01 2010 20:45 GMT
#32
lol at people calling this gimmicky, standard as it gets folks
ESV Mapmaking!
JonnyLaw
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States3482 Posts
December 01 2010 20:54 GMT
#33
On December 02 2010 03:54 Chill wrote:
GUYS, this isn't a real build. Why are you analyzing it? It's a joke that makes you giddy if you pull it off in Broodwar, and he's searching for the SC2 equivalent. That's it.


There are decent DT/phoenix builds.

There a lot of threads about them.

DTs delay long enough to get HTs on the field.

HTs for feedback on overseers + phoenixes mean keeping overseers alive is very hard. DTs do great damage if they don't die first. They absolutely destroy hydras. Colossus get boring.

Sorry to derail. Doing this exceedingly fast and getting a mothershi, well, awesome.
Sabin010
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1892 Posts
December 01 2010 21:11 GMT
#34
Has anybody done this. I'd like to see a replay of the stove.
palanq
Profile Blog Joined December 2004
United States761 Posts
December 01 2010 21:49 GMT
#35
where is the option that we declare every week to be stove week
time flies like an arrow; fruit flies like a banana
windsupernova
Profile Joined October 2010
Mexico5280 Posts
December 02 2010 00:58 GMT
#36
LOL @ the people analyzing the stove.

I'll be sure to do this all this week when I play against Z. Maybe against Terran too
"Its easy, just trust your CPU".-Boxer on being good at games
Bonham
Profile Joined November 2010
Canada655 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-02 01:26:08
December 02 2010 01:23 GMT
#37
Where does the name stove come from?

Edit: nm, looked at original build thread.
Darthturtle
Profile Joined May 2009
United States718 Posts
December 02 2010 02:10 GMT
#38
On December 02 2010 04:40 Antisocialmunky wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 02 2010 02:59 Chill wrote:
On December 02 2010 02:52 Twitch89 wrote:
If you're planning to morph the DTs anyway, why not go HT-Archon instead?

The Stove is an old build from Brood War. It was going Scouts (a terribly underpowered flying unit), into DTs, into Arbiters (a cloaking spellcaster like the Mothership). The build was pretty nonsensical and arguably bad; however, it was so unpredictable that it worked even against top players occasionally. It was the equivalent of a slap in the face.

The Royal Stove required a fourth step: morphing a Dark Archon (extremely underused spellcaster) and using Mind Control (a permanent Neural Parasite) against your opponent. This was like getting slapped in the face while your girlfriend watched and fucked your best friend.


So what's the metaphor for the the point where you MC a SCV and tech to siege tanks and start recalling cloaked sieged tanks?


That is the royal stove.

Although traditionally, the sometimes-forgotten fifth step was to transition into losing your whole fucking base and then trying desperately to win with just Terran units, and then leave the game saying you should've won that.
mangsky
Profile Joined September 2010
51 Posts
December 02 2010 05:02 GMT
#39
yeah skip the DT, anyway
you do not want him to invest in detection at this point
lest it render your mothership useless
lyAsakura
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States1414 Posts
December 02 2010 05:09 GMT
#40
On December 02 2010 14:02 mangsky wrote:
yeah skip the DT, anyway
you do not want him to invest in detection at this point
lest it render your mothership useless


That is the point.
You want your units to be as crappy as possible to make victory so much more sweet.
WeMade FOX would be a deadly SC2 team.
bobbob
Profile Joined December 2009
United States368 Posts
December 02 2010 05:10 GMT
#41
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=94911
^^This is the guide to the stove. You know how bad scouts are in the campaign? That's basically how good they were in BW.
http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=88624
^^This was the report of the royal stove.
Ftrunkz
Profile Blog Joined April 2007
Australia2474 Posts
December 02 2010 05:16 GMT
#42
the amount of people that don't realize the point of this build and are arguing that its not viable etc. makes me a bit sad
@NvPinder on twitter | Member of Gamecom Nv | http://www.clan-ta.com | http://www.youtube.com/user/ftrunkz | http://www.twitchtv.com/xghpinder
GHOSTCLAW
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
United States17042 Posts
December 02 2010 05:30 GMT
#43
On December 02 2010 02:59 Chill wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 02 2010 02:52 Twitch89 wrote:
If you're planning to morph the DTs anyway, why not go HT-Archon instead?

The Stove is an old build from Brood War. It was going Scouts (a terribly underpowered flying unit), into DTs, into Arbiters (a cloaking spellcaster like the Mothership). The build was pretty nonsensical and arguably bad; however, it was so unpredictable that it worked even against top players occasionally. It was the equivalent of a slap in the face.

The Royal Stove required a fourth step: morphing a Dark Archon (extremely underused spellcaster) and using Mind Control (a permanent Neural Parasite) against your opponent. This was like getting slapped in the face while your girlfriend watched and fucked your best friend.


Love the description ^^

I was doing a varient of this through beta, but it was really just "as cheesy as you can get as protoss". Proxy 3 voidray rush into DT into mothership, and you just expand if any of the steps are successful. I had a friend who did cannon rush into proxy voidray, and both the builds were pretty fun ^^
PhotographerLiquipedia. Drop me a pm if you've got questions/need help.
GHOSTCLAW
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
United States17042 Posts
December 02 2010 05:31 GMT
#44
On December 02 2010 04:40 Antisocialmunky wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 02 2010 02:59 Chill wrote:
On December 02 2010 02:52 Twitch89 wrote:
If you're planning to morph the DTs anyway, why not go HT-Archon instead?

The Stove is an old build from Brood War. It was going Scouts (a terribly underpowered flying unit), into DTs, into Arbiters (a cloaking spellcaster like the Mothership). The build was pretty nonsensical and arguably bad; however, it was so unpredictable that it worked even against top players occasionally. It was the equivalent of a slap in the face.

The Royal Stove required a fourth step: morphing a Dark Archon (extremely underused spellcaster) and using Mind Control (a permanent Neural Parasite) against your opponent. This was like getting slapped in the face while your girlfriend watched and fucked your best friend.


So what's the metaphor for the the point where you MC a SCV and tech to siege tanks and start recalling cloaked sieged tanks?



Uhh That's when you tie your girlfriend up, have her watch, and fuck her best friend?
PhotographerLiquipedia. Drop me a pm if you've got questions/need help.
rauk
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
United States2228 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-02 06:18:32
December 02 2010 06:02 GMT
#45
i fail to see how you can stove without a scout equivalent. none of the protoss units are straight up terrible, besides maybe the mothership.

i take that back. i demand a royal stove build order that requires you to go carrier, DT, then mothership.
DiracMonopole
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1555 Posts
December 02 2010 06:23 GMT
#46
My understanding was the royal stove involved the use of a dark archon to mind control an SCV and then use arbiters to recall sieged up siege tanks.

In that vein, I propose that the SC2 royal stove involve using an infestor to mind control an scv, build siege tanks and then use nydus canals to move them around.
Aquafresh
Profile Joined May 2007
United States824 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-02 06:26:06
December 02 2010 06:25 GMT
#47
So the stove has come to Sc2? It feels a bit off. On one hand DT follow up into Mothership is suitably terrible and pretty unexpected, but opening Phoenix won't induce the necessary WTFs that a freaking fast Scout would. The WTF factor was key to the original.
nalgene
Profile Joined October 2010
Canada2153 Posts
December 02 2010 06:30 GMT
#48
Archons and blackhole? that'd be kinda wtf if someone dies to it?
it would do a lot of AoE damage to the units if they get caught


too bad DT's can form a DA to use maelstorm to go with this...
Year 2500 Greater Israel ( Bahrain, Cyprus, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Oman, Gaza Strip, West Bank, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, Yemen )
rauk
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
United States2228 Posts
December 02 2010 06:40 GMT
#49
On December 02 2010 15:25 Aquafresh wrote:
So the stove has come to Sc2? It feels a bit off. On one hand DT follow up into Mothership is suitably terrible and pretty unexpected, but opening Phoenix won't induce the necessary WTFs that a freaking fast Scout would. The WTF factor was key to the original.


that's why i said it has to be fast carriers into dt.
Obscura.304
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
150 Posts
December 02 2010 07:01 GMT
#50
On December 02 2010 15:23 DiracMonopole wrote:
My understanding was the royal stove involved the use of a dark archon to mind control an SCV and then use arbiters to recall sieged up siege tanks.

In that vein, I propose that the SC2 royal stove involve using an infestor to mind control an scv, build siege tanks and then use nydus canals to move them around.

Better still- get into a 2v2 as Zerg, against a Terran/Protoss team. Neural Parasite an SCV and a Probe, build a Mothership and Siege Tanks, and Mass Recall the Sieged Tanks.

Closer, in a way, to the original Royal Stove. Plus, how cool is it to have high-tech units from all 3 races at once?
DiracMonopole
Profile Joined May 2010
United States1555 Posts
December 02 2010 07:12 GMT
#51
Ah yes, that is better than mine. Your ally should be terran, just because its harder to build things with parasited scvs than probes.
rauk
Profile Blog Joined February 2009
United States2228 Posts
December 02 2010 07:29 GMT
#52
you can't mass recall allied units. i've tried it before with ZP team and it didn't recall banelings, only the probes.
Wetty
Profile Joined November 2010
Australia419 Posts
December 02 2010 07:42 GMT
#53
Ive actually encountered a similar build on the ladder... They opened 3 gate pressure, transitioned into phoenixs to shutdown my mutas, then got DT's which are incredibly powerful if they have the ability to kill every overseer on the field with their phoenixs... Still, just turtled with some spore crawls then pushed out with a tonne of overseers and won. But i was completely stressing for awhile when i couldnt engage outside of my base because of the DT threat.
Sabin010
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1892 Posts
December 02 2010 13:52 GMT
#54
Well I did the stove until I got put back into bronze league, but I did manage one win on delta quadrant against a terran. I'll post the replay tonight. I'm pretty sure it turned into a 25- warp gate getting HT DT blinkers and chargelots 5-star gate massin carriers 4-robo massing colossi 6 base 200 supply noobfest.

Killing drop ships with the mother ship = win.
GoldenH
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
1115 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-02 14:59:31
December 02 2010 14:55 GMT
#55
Really losing to mass blink stalkers is embarassing enough. I don't mean blink stalker harass. I mean if you never build anything but blink stalkers.

Not going to try this build. Because it's just not interesting - if you survive to make DTs, it's only because you already beat him with pure phoenix and just couldn't destroy his buildings, since buildings counter phoenix (:p). He'd probably type GG faster than you could build the mothership.

Mass Sentry + Mothership + mass Probe recall, that would be pretty embarassing.
"(Dudes are) not going to say "Buy this game — I cried at the end". (...) I suppose the secret is to find a game that makes you shoot eight million fuckin' dudes and then cry about how awesome it is to shoot eight million fuckin' dudes." - Tim Rogers
slip.
Profile Joined July 2010
United States50 Posts
December 02 2010 15:01 GMT
#56
On December 02 2010 02:59 Chill wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 02 2010 02:52 Twitch89 wrote:
If you're planning to morph the DTs anyway, why not go HT-Archon instead?

The Stove is an old build from Brood War. It was going Scouts (a terribly underpowered flying unit), into DTs, into Arbiters (a cloaking spellcaster like the Mothership). The build was pretty nonsensical and arguably bad; however, it was so unpredictable that it worked even against top players occasionally. It was the equivalent of a slap in the face.

The Royal Stove required a fourth step: morphing a Dark Archon (extremely underused spellcaster) and using Mind Control (a permanent Neural Parasite) against your opponent. This was like getting slapped in the face while your girlfriend watched and fucked your best friend.


Probably the best explanation of The Stove ever......EVER
smoke-->drink-->craft
Sabin010
Profile Joined September 2010
United States1892 Posts
December 02 2010 15:02 GMT
#57
You only get one pheonix because you need the gas for DT tech, and fleet beacon, and mother ship. You're going to need the gas to get a sentry for ff-ing the ramp too. This isn't like we open with 5 pheonix and actually go out harassing. The one pheonix is supposed to make the opponent lol, and push out. So you get one DT at the bottem of the ramp when he pushes, and start chrono boosting the mothership. then you ff the ramp and the dt kills guys until the detection comes in, but you get the pheonix to kill any mobile detection.
NinjaAUS
Profile Joined October 2010
Australia133 Posts
December 02 2010 15:07 GMT
#58
Hahah oh god i do not want to face this it sounds worse than the pheonix > dt > chargelot > ht stuff
bobcat
Profile Joined May 2010
United States488 Posts
December 02 2010 15:13 GMT
#59
On December 02 2010 02:52 Twitch89 wrote:
If you're planning to morph the DTs anyway, why not go HT-Archon instead?


Because it wouldn't be the stove. There are plenty of ways to make this strategy better, for example, turtle up, mass void rays, use phoenixes to deny scouting.
"I just want to see bobcat wrist deep in someone's mother's anus" 165 votes
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
December 02 2010 15:16 GMT
#60
Perhaps the stove can't be accurately converted from P in SC1 to P in SC2.
Perhaps a Viking -> Ghost -> BC build in TvZ is a better comparison.
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
Dante08
Profile Blog Joined February 2008
Singapore4126 Posts
December 02 2010 15:28 GMT
#61
Someone please sk this build and post the replay, it would so awesome!
Cerebrate.Monthly
Profile Joined November 2010
United States21 Posts
December 02 2010 15:28 GMT
#62
On December 02 2010 02:59 Chill wrote:
The Stove is an old build from Brood War. It was going Scouts (a terribly underpowered flying unit), into DTs, into Arbiters (a cloaking spellcaster like the Mothership). The build was pretty nonsensical and arguably bad; however, it was so unpredictable that it worked even against top players occasionally. It was the equivalent of a slap in the face.

The Royal Stove required a fourth step: morphing a Dark Archon (extremely underused spellcaster) and using Mind Control (a permanent Neural Parasite) against your opponent. This was like getting slapped in the face while your girlfriend watched and fucked your best friend.


About as clear-cut as it could get, I'm deeply saddened by the number of people who started going into build analysis without looking at the 'purpose'.

Like someone else mentioned, this strategy described here isn't a Royal Stove because there is no more mind control ability available to Protoss compared to Brood War. Rather just a SC2 Variant of Chef's Stove.

I'm waiting for the first few replays of the SC2 Stove regardless just for the pure entertainment value and consequent shaming of the victim.
"There is nothing cooler than being passionate about the things you love." -Day[9]
GoldenH
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
1115 Posts
December 02 2010 17:14 GMT
#63
How'd I do.

[image loading]
"(Dudes are) not going to say "Buy this game — I cried at the end". (...) I suppose the secret is to find a game that makes you shoot eight million fuckin' dudes and then cry about how awesome it is to shoot eight million fuckin' dudes." - Tim Rogers
Obscura.304
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
150 Posts
December 03 2010 01:24 GMT
#64
On December 02 2010 16:29 rauk wrote:
you can't mass recall allied units. i've tried it before with ZP team and it didn't recall banelings, only the probes.

But, if a Zerg player controls both a mothership and siege tanks that they've built (i.e., they've NP'd both a probe AND an SCV, and started from scratch with 2 races instead of just 1), can the mothership recall a sieged tank?
Craton
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
United States17250 Posts
December 03 2010 23:48 GMT
#65
I think the question just becomes "can you recall an NP'd unit," in that case.
twitch.tv/cratonz
Mataza
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Germany5364 Posts
December 04 2010 00:06 GMT
#66
The question should be more "Does a NPed scv finish your command center or do you need to NP it for 100 seconds?"
If nobody hates you, you´re doing something wrong. However someone hating you doesn´t make you right
swanized
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
Canada2480 Posts
December 04 2010 00:16 GMT
#67
On December 02 2010 02:59 Chill wrote:
Show nested quote +
On December 02 2010 02:52 Twitch89 wrote:
If you're planning to morph the DTs anyway, why not go HT-Archon instead?

The Stove is an old build from Brood War. It was going Scouts (a terribly underpowered flying unit), into DTs, into Arbiters (a cloaking spellcaster like the Mothership). The build was pretty nonsensical and arguably bad; however, it was so unpredictable that it worked even against top players occasionally. It was the equivalent of a slap in the face.

The Royal Stove required a fourth step: morphing a Dark Archon (extremely underused spellcaster) and using Mind Control (a permanent Neural Parasite) against your opponent. This was like getting slapped in the face while your girlfriend watched and fucked your best friend.


I thought royal stove involved mind controlling a worker too?
Writer
GoldenH
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
1115 Posts
December 04 2010 01:37 GMT
#68
On December 04 2010 09:06 Mataza wrote:
The question should be more "Does a NPed scv finish your command center or do you need to NP it for 100 seconds?"


No you need to NP it like 9-10 times, it just runs away. Fortunately it does not cancel the construction.

Not sure what happens if you morph a building with a drone though.
"(Dudes are) not going to say "Buy this game — I cried at the end". (...) I suppose the secret is to find a game that makes you shoot eight million fuckin' dudes and then cry about how awesome it is to shoot eight million fuckin' dudes." - Tim Rogers
swanized
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
Canada2480 Posts
December 04 2010 02:49 GMT
#69
I literally CAN'T believe how many people thought this build was serious
Writer
petzergling
Profile Blog Joined August 2008
538 Posts
December 04 2010 02:51 GMT
#70
the whole point of the stove was that scouts suck

this defeats the purpose...
Mod Edit: Don't bold your entire post
majestouch
Profile Joined December 2010
United States395 Posts
December 04 2010 03:12 GMT
#71
so is the mothership for cloaking the dts? all jokes aside, i wana see sum1 try this for like a day9 funday monday if it meets the requirements of it.
PaleBlueDot
Profile Joined January 2009
United States263 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-04 06:48:52
December 04 2010 06:48 GMT
#72
Isn't transitioning from DT's (invisible units to take advantage of their current lack of detection caused by the phoenix opening and/or forcing spors) to the Mothership ( an easily destroyable arbiter, especially when focused on ) a very bad thing considering they'll most likely have excess detection made available when you were aggressive with DT's? If you don't do a lot of damage with DT's, wont they have the invis part pretty much dealt with and the mothership useless at that point? (and no, I dont think vortex alone makes the mothership worth it.) Even for a joke, how is this funny?
Veteran of pre-Masters Medivac Alamo
Mataza
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
Germany5364 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-04 14:46:27
December 04 2010 12:57 GMT
#73
The real point is, there is no scout. The scout was a laughable big version of the wraith without cloak for a hefty price of 275/125.
The ground to air attack was 8, and the attack was slow.
A marine attacked 2 times without stim for every attack of the scout. So the scout was worth around half a marine for damage to ground purposes.

The stove guide even says you have to do a fuckload of damage to make the scout worthwhile. Then when you also tech to dts you need to do a fuckload of damage to make the dts worthwhile. And so forth.
All we can achieve right now is a goodminded stove-copy.

The spiritual successor of the scout is the voidray, no? Price is similar, though the vr is good instead of bad.
However the build is still very bad, after going vr switching to dts is about the least intuitive way of playing. And vrs dont encourage single turrets but clusters of them or anti air units.
I think I am going to do it right now.

[edit]
I tried it 2 times and of course it didn´t work. Anyway, it felt to be quite similar to the stove relays I´ve seen.
Though I am by no means good with protoss, here is what I did(I won´t detail everything, like when warpgate tech etc.):

tell him you are going to pwn his sorry ass
8 pylon
10 gate
11 gas
core after gate
I threw in a double gas steal, for bad manners mainly.
stargate -> 1 voidray, chronoboost it
asap twilight council and dark shrine and fleet beacon
try to build pylons so i can warp in on his high ground
1 volley of dts, sight with voidray
build mothership ->recall an army in his base.

My execution was crisp, in the sense that feces get crisp when dry. My unit control is shitty, I instantly lost my voidray to stalkers, also he had observers by the time I had dts. The mass recall was pretty good though.
[/edit]
If nobody hates you, you´re doing something wrong. However someone hating you doesn´t make you right
Obscura.304
Profile Blog Joined September 2010
150 Posts
December 05 2010 04:38 GMT
#74
I finally have an answer to the question of tank recall- YES!

If a Zerg player neural parasites an SCV, builds a CC for another SCV, techs to siege tanks, neural parasites a Probe, builds a nexus, techs and gets a mothership, that mothership CAN recall sieged tanks!

http://www.sc2replayed.com/replays/112584-ffa-terran-protoss-zerg-metalopolis

Thanks to LegoShrimp for his help with this!
MiKTeX
Profile Blog Joined October 2010
United States234 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-12-05 09:55:56
December 05 2010 09:16 GMT
#75
nickpicky sidenote: its impossible to do the 'royal' stove since there are no dark archons to mind control scvs to make siege tanks

so you can only do the stove in sc2 and not the royal one as the thread title says



but seriously the stove is #1 build
Normal
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 8h 38m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 242
Livibee 135
RuFF_SC2 127
ProTech75
Ketroc 41
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 13264
Icarus 2
Dota 2
monkeys_forever1199
NeuroSwarm116
Super Smash Bros
AZ_Axe155
Other Games
tarik_tv24402
summit1g15585
ViBE215
JimRising 110
Trikslyr93
WinterStarcraft38
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick2156
BasetradeTV26
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta52
• musti20045 36
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
8h 38m
Online Event
14h 38m
BSL 2v2 ProLeague S3
16h 38m
Esports World Cup
2 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
3 days
Esports World Cup
4 days
Esports World Cup
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 ACS Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.