• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 00:45
CEST 06:45
KST 13:45
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL46Code S RO12 Preview: Cure, Zoun, Solar, Creator4[ASL19] Finals Preview: Daunting Task30
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th12Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0EWC 2025 Regional Qualifier Results26
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview Magnus Carlsen and Fabi review Clem's chess game. Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
Bellum Gens Elite: Stara Zagora 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Master Swan Open (Global Bronze-Master 2) $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
Mihu vs Korea Players Statistics Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans? BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion [BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals NA Team League 6/8/2025 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL20] ProLeague Bracket Stage - Day 2
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Armies of Exigo - YesYes? Nintendo Switch Thread What do you want from future RTS games? Path of Exile
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
LiquidLegends to reintegrate into TL.net
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0 Simple Questions, Simple Answers
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Cleaning My Mechanical Keyboard
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Cognitive styles x game perf…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Poker
Nebuchad
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 22020 users

[G] Gnial's PvT Stalker-Void Ray Strategy

Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy
Post a Reply
1 2 3 4 5 10 11 12 Next All
Gnial
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
Canada907 Posts
Last Edited: 2011-03-07 01:46:01
August 02 2010 11:26 GMT
#1
While this thread was created in August of 2010, the strategy still works and I have seen it used successfully as recently as GSL3 by oGsMC on his road to the championship (see replay section for the game). That said, several parts are out of date such as the discussion on early reapers, phoenixes, zealot-templar being the optimal mid-game transition (colossi are pretty good...) and some other random stuff which fell victim to patches or meta-game changes). I don't play enough to comment on the match-up with the same authority that I could last summer, so rather than updating it I will just leave it as is with the warning you just read!


Guide Updates
+ Show Spoiler +
02/08/10 - Major Edit 1:
Added a warp prism discussion to the Harass > Stalker-Centric Harass section.
Added weakness # 5 - Subtle Timings to the Weaknesses section.
Added weakness # 6 - Marine Ghost to the Weaknesses section.

03/08/10 - Major Edit 2:
Added new replay Gnial vs. Stalk to the Replay > Wins section.
Added new replay Bliss vs. Murder to the Replay > Wins section.
Added Carriers discussion to the Mid-Game Transition section.
Added new replay Bliss vs. Fearless to the Mid-Game Transition > Carriers section.
Added new replay Plexa vs. Figgy to the Replay > Wins section.

06/08/10 - Major Edit 3:
Boosted phoenixes up the spectrum in the Stalker-Centric Harass > High-Ground Vision section
Added discussion of phoenixes against the 1-1-1 build in the same section.
(Team Liquid is awesome BTW - freak thunderstorms on vacation? No problem! Go on TL.net! )

10/08/10 - Major Edit 4:
Added new replay Gnial vs. Rome to the Replay > Wins section.
Added new replay Hat vs. Mintyfresh to the Replay > Wins section.

13/08/10 - Major Edit 5:
Created a new section above the replays section: Commentated Replays
Added 3 links to JHancho's YouTube page to the Commentated Replays section where we discuss the following replays:
Win Gnial v. Taleck
Loss Gnial v. Foo
Win Hat v. Mintyfresh

13/10/10 - Major Edit 6:
Created a new subsection in the replays section: Special Replays: White-Ra
Added 2 new replays and a discussion of a void ray build that White-ra does which is more zealot focused, and which embodies the spirit of this guide: early and continuous pressure.


Table of Contents
+ Show Spoiler +
The Backstory

The General Strategy

1. The Opening

2. The Harass

3. The Midgame Transition

Weaknesses of the Strategy

Commentated Replays

Replays

Wrap-Up


The Backstory:

I'm a former diamond T player from phase 1 of the beta. I saw many protoss players, including many of my SC2 friends, complain that T was over-powered in the PvT matchup.

I set out to prove them wrong almost 2 months ago; this strategy is the result!

This strategy is constructed from some builds I saw in the day9 daily during the beta, a build I saw White-ra do several times in his show matches against TLO in phase 2 of the beta, and some tweaking and refining I have done in YABOT and league games.


The General Strategy:

This strategy is an early game strategy, designed to get you to the midgame with an advantage over your opponent using stalkers and void rays. After that, I will leave you with some ideas to finish off your opponent, but it ultimately comes down to the situation and personal preference.

The goal of this strategy is to abuse the mobility, range and shield regeneration of very early stalkers, void rays, and warp gates to make it very difficult for the terran to attack you or expand, allowing you to expand, tech, or just win outright. It also allows for a fluid, easy transition into zealot/templar for the mid game, and tends to force the T to get an anti-armoured and anti-air mid-game composition, making your zealot/templar even stronger.

The key is to put constant, non-stop pressure on the T starting at about the 4:30 point, preserving your troops while whittling away theirs, and only engaging in a full battle on your own terms.

To do this, get stalkers quickly and send them to your opponent's ramp as soon as they spawn. You should aim to get them there early enough that only a couple of terran units are made. Push up their ramp and take pot shots at the marines/marauder, or their wall if they pull their troops back, and then just fall back and let your shields recharge; rinse and repeat. The key is to try to hurt as many soldiers as possible (since medivacs are a long way off), and to damage the wall so you can snipe scvs if he goes to repair. Keep reinforcing with more stalkers and do more harass.

Avoid making more than 2 gateways until you have a stargate. It is likely that your opponent's build will skew towards marauders and/or tanks since stalkers are so good against marines and hellions. When resources permit it, tech to void ray (I usually begin my stargate when I have between 2 and 4 stalkers). The void rays tend to start popping when I have approximately 6 stalkers and 3 warp gates. The void rays provide an alternative method of harass, can give vision of the ramp to your stalkers, and can shoot the SD's and barracks that are walling the ramp if they have chosen to put them there. It is so easy to micro your void rays when there are a bunch of stalkers underneath that outrange marines, or if the terran has their own wall blocking their way.

If you continue this harass, and avoid committing to close battles with the terran army, you should gain enough of an advantage to be able to safely expand or tech. Not only that, but you shouldn't lose many units if your micro is crisp, ideally leaving you with an economic and army advantage.

I will talk about specific build orders, tactics, and additional complementary units in the three sections below:

1. The Opening
2. The Harass
3. The Mid-Game Transition


1. The Opening:

There are a couple of openings that you can use which allow you to get that early stalker pressure, and transition into the void ray. You can go with a one-gate cyber stalker opening, which allows you to get your first void ray and warp gates out sooner - or a fast dual-stalker opening which allows you to put on a very strong, early harass in exchange for a slightly slower void ray.

Dual-Stalker Build:
+ Show Spoiler +
Below is an opening that was accidentally popularized by day9 during the beta, and is the fastest way to get two stalkers out without horribly crippling your economy. Many people have tried to replicate the build, and I believe the general consensus is that the following is the most effective way to do it, or is at least effective enough to suffice:

+ Show Spoiler +
9 pylon
chrono nexus
12 gate
scout
chrono nexus
14 gas
15 gate
15 core
16 pylon
16 build both stalkers
chrono gateways


This opening is my personal favourite, particularly on maps like kulas ravine. Maps with short rush distances, wide ramps, or flat entrances allow for the pressure to be much more effective. However, this opening has limitations on maps with small or elevated ramps due to the effectiveness of bunkers and the increase in micro difficulty in those scenarios. As well, long rush distances can make a big difference as the production of a single extra unit at such an early part of the game can greatly increase your opponents army effectiveness.

One-Gate Cyber Build:
+ Show Spoiler +
There are several one-gate cyber builds available for protoss. Some of them are discussed in the "general openings" section for protoss on liquipedia:

http://wiki.teamliquid.net/starcraft2/Protoss_Strategy

By going for a one-gate cyber build, the early stalker harass will not be as strong as in the dual-stalker build, but it allows for void rays and warp gates to be obtained earlier. It is often a better opening for maps/positions with short air distances, large rush distances, or small/elevated ramps.


2. The Harass:

Depending on the map, and your enemy's composition, you will want to do either a stalker-centric harass, or a void-ray-centric harass. All that really means is that you will either have a composition skewed more towards stalkers, or more towards void rays, as a response to what your opponent is doing.

Stalker-Centric Harass
+ Show Spoiler +
The stalker-centric build is stronger against a walling or marine-heavy terran. The idea is to get stalkers, with some sort of high-ground vision unit (the void ray), that will allow the stalkers to harass your opponent up a ramp. For my reasoning behind the void ray over the phoenix, observer and hallucinate, see here:
+ Show Spoiler +
My old build, which worked quite well, did not include void rays but instead used hallucinate to give me vision while my stalkers harassed the front. While I could really hurt a walled-in terran, there were a lot of builds that the terran could do that shutdown the straight stalker harass. For that reason, I began to experiment with void rays and found a winner. Not only can void rays provide that vision, but they deal a great deal of damage, cannot take damage from marauders or tanks, and harass from all sides of your opponents base.

Here's the breakdown:

Void ray > Phoenix > Hallucinate > Observer
Warp Prism?

Observer Observers are a great scouting unit and will help deal with any banshee pushes that your opponent may do...but you need to get expensive tech to use them - the robotics facility. You would essentially be spending 50/100 for the observer + the cost of the robotics facility. Great for scouting, but doesn't compliment the stalker harass.

Hallucinate I really like this one since it is so cheap, it lets you stay on gateways units, and lets you get more sentries. Those sentries can not only hallucinate a scout, fake armies, etc. but they can also be used to contain the terran with force fields. You also end up with a larger ground army this way. However, it lacks the harassing potential that phoenixes and void rays have, and allows the terran to sit back a little bit more comfortably.

Phoenix You need several of them to harass well, but to get the phoenixes you need stargate tech, then the 100's of gas and minerals to get the phoenixes, so you better make any harass good enough to offset the smaller army size you will have compared to if you had gotten hallucinate. Generally speaking it doesn't make sense to spend the same amount of money on phoenixes that you could spend on void rays, when they are not dangerous enough to scare a terran into staying in their base. Never mind that they are useless against bio - why use a 150/100 unit to lift a 100/25 marauder that is armoured, when you could just blast them with a void ray? However, that said, there are certain instances when phoenixes may be preferable to void rays - namely if your opponent goes with a 1-1-1 build. Not only that, but if you do the 2-gate into void ray build, you will easily be able to tell if your opponent is going 1-1-1 well before the stargate finishes...so just make a phoenix instead of a void ray. I am admitting right now that I have not tried phoenixes much in PvT as protoss, but many people have sworn to me that phoenixes are great against the 1-1-1 build. It seems intuitive, since phoenixes are strong against vikings and medivacs, and can lift tanks, putting 2/3 of the 1-1-1 structures out of commission. (I really like this idea since enough terrans have read this guide, that when I play PvT some terrans begin fast-teching to starports in anticipation of my void ray before I even throw down a stargate.) Meta-game aside, it seems like the concept has potential, and I would love if anyone who has made this work (or had it fail horribly) could send me their replays to help support the discussion!

Void Ray Void rays can provide the vision for stalkers, they can provide solid harass around the base while drawing units away from the front where your stalkers are, are pretty meaty, and can pack a punch. Not only that, but stalkers can support the void ray very easily. Simply put your stalkers at the bottom of the cliff, and use your void ray to attack things on the top of the cliff. Your opponent has to be very careful, since if the void ray gets charged up, and you manage to snipe a few marines with your stalkers, it could be GG right there. Also, since your main army is stalkers, it is great to force your opponent to make missile turrets and marines, skewing his composition favourably for your stalkers. They don't know how many void rays you plan on making, so they have to play defensively against that anti air. And you never know - the stargate tech makes it easier to get a MOTHER SHIP!

Warp Prism It was suggested in the comments that a warp prism may be an effective scouting unit. My first reaction was, "Robotics facilities are expensive and warp prisms have low health!" but, after considering it for a bit, it could be kind of neat to harass the front with stalkers, then pick them up and drop them behind the minerals, and then back around. Or simply warp a zealot to send at their scvs and force them away from the front. Food for thought eh? You could also deal with banshees more effectively. I'll reserve judgement until I see it in action.


With the stalker-centric strategy, just keep constant pressure on the front, with the void ray (or maybe 2 void rays) poking around, and you should be able to expand or tech to blink/charge/templars safely. Make sure to keep everything alive! If the terran tries to push out at your stalkers, send the void ray to his minerals, and he has to choose between chasing your stalkers or losing his economy. Likewise, if he is chasing your void ray, just pull it back and put as much pressure on the front as you can safely do. He won't be attacking you if he is chasing a void ray around his base. Remember to keep macroing!

Void-Ray-Centric Harass
+ Show Spoiler +
The void-ray-centric harass should be played the exact same way as the stalker-centric harass. However, you should reduce the number of stalkers you make to accommodate a constant void ray pump out of the stargate.

The additional void rays could win you the game - but remember that the intension of this build is not to outright win the game (although the opportunity seems to present itself enough). You should instead try to secure yourself a future advantage by killing some units/structures, skewing their composition, and keeping the void rays alive. Remember that if the terran knows you have void rays somewhere on the map, he has to play more defensive and has to account for them in his unit composition.


3. The Mid-Game Transition:

If you keep harassing and reinforcing your stalker army, you should find yourself in a safe enough position to try to tech or expand. Note that your opponent is stuck on one base and has no map control, so you are not under any huge pressure to expand. If you can instead get a tech or composition advantage, you may be better off than if you go for an expand.

I consider the mid-game core of any protoss PvT to be chargelots, templars and armour upgrades. It is beyond the scope of this guide to discuss why, but in short I find the cost effectiveness of the army, the mobility, and the fluidity of the transitions to be superb.

Below are a series of mid-game transition tactics that can be used to compliment the mid-game transition towards chargelots, templars and armour upgrades.

Sentry Tactics
+ Show Spoiler +
The stalker-void ray harass is extremely effective in keeping the terran from pushing out. The stalkers wear away at the army while the void rays keep the terran in the back of their base. However, it rarely goes completely as planned. As an additional fail-safe against a timing attack it is a good idea to get one or two sentries to accompany the stalkers. When I'm playing and I'm really in the zone, I will be harassing with the void ray and macroing while mostly just staring at their ramp. When I have to move the screen away I stare at the mini-map and keep my finger hovered over the hotkey to move back to my sentries. The moment I see them try to move down their ramp, I cut the front 1/4 or 1/3 of their army off with a force field. This allows the stalkers to clean up those units that are cut off, without having to worry about their army being larger than yours, or a better mix

Alternatively, if they do manage to break through your contain, you can respond by sending your void rays at their command center and mineral line. They will have to choose between calling off the attack to defend, sending some units back and proceeding with a weakened attack, or attacking and risking losing their base. If they choose to attack, warp in the sentries at your base and try to block them out of your ramp.

Fun Fact: According to day9, if you have 6 sentries, the combined energy regeneration will allow you to force field a small ramp indefinitely.

Robotics Facility
+ Show Spoiler +
While a robotics facility is too expensive to get in the early game while going stalker-void ray, it is a critical structure to get for the mid-game in order to maximize your vision and your mobility because of two units: the observer and the warp prism.

Everyone knows about the usefulness of observers; enough said.

Warp prisms are a unit that I have rarely seen my opponents use. The best evidence that they are good and worth getting is White-ra. I have watched many White-ra replays, and he gets one pretty much every single PvT game that lasts longer than 12 minutes, and he does severe harass damage with it and templars.

Blink
+ Show Spoiler +
I used to consider blink to be a necessary step between getting void rays and chargelots, as it allows you to use your stalkers that are already on the field much more effectively. However, I have been convinced both by reader feedback and my own experiences that there are some maps and compositions that make blink an uneconomical choice.

Blink is always useful for kiting bio-balls, blinking into their base after they push out, etc. However, it is often more useful to get charge and templars faster instead of getting blink. I tend to only get blink on select maps such as metalopolis and kulas ravine. These maps have bases that are easily accessible to blink stalkers from multiple directions, and long rush distances for my opponents to take before reaching my base.

Compare those maps to a map like steppes of war. Trying to blink up in steppes of war is like a death sentence since your stalkers are probably going to have to blink near the enemy army, and the enemy army can easily block the one escape route. After they mop up your stalkers, they can then quickly rush across into your base before you can replenish your forces with the short rush distance.

Now I know some of you want to get blink just because it is so damn fun. But is losing fun? NO!!! So don't get blink if it won't be as good as charge.

Carriers
+ Show Spoiler +
Several people have suggested that a carrier transition would be easier than a chargelot-templar transition, and if "easier" means that you don't have to invest as much money in tech structures and research, then I have to agree. Not only that, but my limited experience with carriers have suggested that they are cost-neutral against vikings, and we all know that they can decimate tanks and marauders.

I think it would all come down to your opponent's composition. Fortunately, because of the stalker-void ray harass, you should have an idea of what your opponent is making. If your opponent manages to get 1 or 2 vikings out with some tanks, and doesn't have many marines, it seems like it could be a good idea. However, it seems to me that if your opponent is able to deal with stalker-void ray, he probably already has the units available to deal with carriers supported by a weak gateway army.

Unfortunately, since I have only really used carriers in 2v2, I am stuck theory-crafting about them which I generally don't like to do. I would prefer to back it up with replays. If anyone has any replays of transitioning into carrier, send them my way - win or lose - and I'll post them in the replays section.

As an aside, I was provided with a sweet, awesome replay by Bliss (TL-aka sYz-Adrenaline). It shows a neat opening that he uses against Terran, which is a variation of the dual-stalker harass, but it doesn't transition into stargate tech. For that reason, I haven't included it in the replays section - but I have included it here for your enjoyment. It is definitely worth watching.

http://www.mediafire.com/?kydq9fydevt3flw


Weaknesses of the Strategy

Now, while I've only lost a few times - and often just because I was being an idiot - I have picked up on some weaknesses that this build has.

Weakness # 1 - Bunkers at an open ramp.
+ Show Spoiler +
A large part of stalker harass is being able to shoot at units that cannot be healed, or shoot at structures that are on the edges and can't shoot back. Rather than wall off, some terrans opt to build only a bunker at their ramp. This means that there are no buildings which can be harassed from cliff edges other than the bunker which, unfortunately, can be repaired and does shoot back.

Response: I usually respond to the bunker by setting up a perimeter, getting a couple sentries to help contain at the ramp, and getting those void rays out as fast as I possibly can. The void rays can be used to help draw units away from the ramp and out of the bunkers, but if they find other ways to deal with your void ray harass you really can't do much damage. In that case, you should resign yourself to a contain, poke around to see what scouting info you can get, and macro/tech.

Weakness # 2 - Long rush distances.
+ Show Spoiler +
Getting a few shots off with your first couple stalkers before they have to replenish shields is really important in gaining momentum for your reinforcing stalkers to build on. Unfortunately, if the rush distances are long, and your build order isn't perfectly crisp, your stalkers may arrive at your opponents base by as late as 5:00. At that point, the terran is likely to have a large enough force to deal with your stalkers somewhat effectively. Just like if the terran gets a bunker, you likely won't deal enough damage to kill many (or any) units, or force your opponent to skew their army towards an anti-stalker composition.

Response: Prepare to contain rather than to harass with your stalkers, and get the void rays out quickly. Remember that any counter pushes have to go a long way to go back to you, so consider expanding earlier or getting blink.

Weakness # 3 - BANSHEES!!!
+ Show Spoiler +
Banshees are the biggest "hard counter" to this build in my experience, since this build doesn't really allow for an easy transition towards detection. Common feedback that I hear from people is that they started trying to play with this strategy, were winning a lot, then they ran into someone who went banshees and mopped the floor with them. Fortunately, in order for the terran to get banshees, they need to divert a great deal of resources and time to the stargate, tech lab, banshee and cloak research. In every game I have played where my opponent has gone banshees, I have managed to break their front with the stalkers and void rays. If he chooses to defend with his banshees you have time to tech to detection and your void rays can keep destroying his base. However, a couple of my games turned into quasi-base trades as he sent the banshees immediately to my mineral line and I had literally nothing that was capable of dealing with them.

Response: Use your void ray to scout while you harass. You may be able to catch it early-ish and get a forge or robotics facility. Also, increase the pressure. Even if the banshee comes out and kills your stalkers, you still have void rays to continue putting the pressure on, so if you commit to void rays and use the brief timing window before the banshees come out to kill all of his anti-air, you could be pretty well situated to take the game.

Weakness # 4 - Reapers?
+ Show Spoiler +
People seem to theorycraft that this build is weak against reapers - in particular people think the dual-stalker opening is weak against reapers. Fast stalker builds are the strongest anti-reaper rush build a protoss can do. Note that you get 2 stalkers out with the dual-stalker build at the same speed as if you 12-gated and went fast stalker. There are reaper rushes that can arrive before the stalkers come out - but that is no different than if you do any other build as protoss. If terran decides to all-in reaper rush with an 8 or 10 rax or something, I can lose a lot of probes and STILL have an economic advantage, and STILL get those stalkers out to harass.

Weakness # 5 - Subtle Timings
+ Show Spoiler +
This weakness isn't determined by what your opponent does, but is somewhat of a restriction that the strategy places on you. When playing this build out, it often comes down to some very subtle timings. If you look at the replay of when I lost to Foo, my stalkers don't arrive at my opponents base until about the 4:55 mark, 5 seconds after his marauder popped out to compliment his marines and only just before concussive shells is researched. Note that the ideal time to arrive is around the 4:30 to 4:40 mark, not only because their army will not be as large, but because key research such as concussive grenades are that much further off allowing you to do more aggressive harass. The same goes for tanks and vikings - it is possible to get the void ray there before they get siege or a viking if you delay and harass with stalkers, or power to the void ray more quickly. In several of the replays where I win, the stalker harass forces the starport to be delayed, or I power to a quick void ray to beat out the starport completely. However, getting the void ray there sooner doesn't work as well if you haven't whittled down their marines - so you have to find a balance.

Response: First and foremost, make sure your build opening is very crisp. Harassing with an early probe can buy you some precious seconds, but don't do a sophisticated probe harass if it means you might forget to put probes in gas, or build your second pylon. Then, stick to the plan. Don't be overly aggressive with your units - try to keep them alive - and harass where you can.

Weakness # 6 - Marine-Ghost?
+ Show Spoiler +
Marine-Ghost is a strong build that the terran can do to break a contain and get an early timing attack on you. That being said, if your opponent goes marine-ghost it is still completely up to you to dictate just how effective that marine/ghost attack is - my opponents tried going marine-ghost against me several times in the beta and I won every time. A quick look at the advantages you have over marine-ghost are as follows:

Early Harass

Marines get ravaged by stalkers in the early harass. In most of the games where my opponent tried to go for marine-ghost, I broke through his wall before the first ghost was finished being produced. Stalkers out-range marines, and have a shield that regenerates. If your opponent doesn't wall, but places a bunker, you can see if it is possible to run your stalkers past the bunker. Its simply a matter of running your stalkers around the base kiting the marines (he will, of course, unload the bunker) and then the next couple stalkers can come and deal with the bunker, or join the stalkers already in the base. If you are in doubt as to whether a kiting mission will work, you should probably play it safe.

The Contain

In a contain you should never clump your units or sentries together. Make a loose concave around the bottom of the ramp, keeping your units away from his cliff, and separate your sentries. He will need to use multiple emps, and even then if he targets the sentries (and you don't get a force field off) your stalkers will still be fine.

Kiting the Bio Ball

Note that when your opponent pushes out, he is still at his base and has to travel a long way to get to yours. You can kite his marines, using the stalker's increased range and movement speed, to wear them down as they go, positioning the injured stalkers so that they don't take fire - or just sending them back to the base to regen. If the marines stim, even better! You can just separate your stalkers and send them in different directions. Even if you lose 1 or 2 stalkers, forcing him to stim long before he reaches your base means that he will be arriving with a weakened army.

Void Ray

When he pushes out, you can send your void ray to his barracks or his minerals. If the void ray charges up fully, it will be able to kill every marine and ghost that spawns with ease. It should be easy enough to charge up when the enemy's army is busy trying to deal with your stalker harass. If the marines/ghosts decide to go back, you can chase them with stalkers and simply move your void ray away.

If he decides to continue with the attack, you gain a micro advantage. You don't need to micro a void ray that is sitting over your opponents critical structures, you can just leave it to destroy things and check in on it occassionally. This allows you to focus just on the bio ball and your stalkers. Your opponent, on the other hand, has to micro his bio-ball and somehow try to deal with a void ray destroying all his stuff.


Commentated Replays

JHancho was kind enough to invite me to commentate some of my replays with him, which works great for us since now we have some commentated replays for educational purposes.

1. Lost Temple: Gnial vs. Taleck
http://www.youtube.com/user/JHancho#p/u/2/gatmM3LrCR8

2. Scrap Station: Gnial vs. Foo
http://www.youtube.com/user/JHancho#p/u/1/X50hIThv1z8

3. Desert Oasis: Hat vs. Mintyfresh
http://www.youtube.com/user/JHancho#p/u/0/TcF25WjRj2o

4. YABOT by Aylear



Replays
Note: Listed ratings are at the time I posted the replay. Since most of these replays were posted very soon after release, many of these players are actually rated much higher.

The Wins:

Gnial Replays
+ Show Spoiler +
I tend to play a hyper-aggressive style, trying to keep constant pressure on the entire time.

1. Lost Temple: Gnial vs. Taleck - 315 Diamond
http://www.mediafire.com/?e3s86qokbpbcp2z

2. Scrap Station: Gnial vs. Trump - 670 Diamond
http://www.mediafire.com/?r2on38k6wqm5psy

3. Steppes of War: Gnial vs. Stimaholic - 435 Diamond
http://www.mediafire.com/?fhi49efvjjydgz2

4. Steppes of War: Gnial vs. YYYs - 230 Diamond
http://www.mediafire.com/?cbw2gh26siei4hf

5. Lost Temple: Gnial vs. Mordo - 240 Diamond
http://www.mediafire.com/?9i4tz48ck32a8n2

6. Desert Oasis: Gnial vs. Stalk - 350 Plat (75% win percentage)
http://www.mediafire.com/?p0t41tfmlwb0tvl

7. Kulas Ravine: Gnial vs. Roam - 405 Plat
http://www.mediafire.com/?6i1pdbbbbuue5d7

sYz-Adrenaline Replays
+ Show Spoiler +
sYz-Adrenaline has a unique opening in which he opts to get zealots before building stalkers to harass.

1. Delta Quadrant: Bliss vs. Murder
http://www.mediafire.com/?0gkmc501scz6kxh

Plexa Replays
+ Show Spoiler +
Plexa plays a more passive intro, opting for an economy based 1-gate cyber opening into early game stalkers.

1. Delta Quadrant: Plexa vs. Figgy
http://www.teamliquid.net/staff/Plexa/sc2_reps/Delta_Quadrant.sc2replay

K Love Replays
+ Show Spoiler +
K Love has posted a replay which follows the general recipe of the posted build, using a economic 2-gate stalker opening into void rays. He uses a neat proxy pylon tactic which most of the time won't be possible, but it is only a slight adjustment to build that proxy pylon below the cliff and use a void ray to give vision of the high ground to warp zealots or stalkers behind your opponents wall. It will have the same effect, and will be a valid tactic much more often than the hidden probe.

1. Desert Oasis: Hat vs. Mintyfresh
http://www.mediafire.com/?t9xnt5fka23v5cf

The Losses:

Gnial Replays
+ Show Spoiler +
This replay shows how a slight error in timings can compound over time to, possibly, put you in an army size or composition disadvantage if the terran goes for an early game timing attack. Things went wrong starting from the stalker harass, which arrives at ~5:00, and it just goes down hill from there. Compare the army that met my stalkers at 5:00 to the army that would have been there had I arrived on time at ~4:40. Perhaps I should opt for a 1-gate cyber build on scrap station.

1. Scrap Station: Gnial vs. Foo - 400 Diamond
http://www.mediafire.com/?zrqxj558siax0xe


Special Replays: White-Ra
+ Show Spoiler +
White-ra has a similar build that is less stalker-focused and more zealot focused. He reserves his build for maps/positions with the following features:

i) Long rush distance.
ii) Short air distance.
iii) Discrete pylon locations to provide warp-in range onto opponent's cliff.

He opts for a 1-gate opening. Rather than waiting for stalkers, he quickly builds a zealot and immediately sends it to harass. Then, upon completing the cyber core, he builds a stalker and sends it to support the zealot in its harass.

He then builds a stargate and gets a void ray as quickly as possible. Using a proxy-pylon within range of his opponents cliff, he charges up in advance and warps zealots into his opponents base. While stalkers are great for harassing and assaulting the terran front, the terrain is different inside the base. Once inside the base zealots become an extremely effective complement for the void ray. Zealots have much higher DPS and have more health, so they can tank better and can do more damage should the Terran try to target fire the void ray.

Here is a replay of this build winning vs Ilovemilky:
http://www.mediafire.com/?c8d8dh3me9u942q

Here is a replay of this build losing vs Strelok:
http://www.mediafire.com/?xos35x6izil6o5t

Note that although he lost, there were some pretty severe micro errors that cost White-ra two (arguably three) void rays unnecessarily. Since his void rays were lost, there was nothing preventing strelok from counter attacking with his full force which, coupled with White-ra's aggressive teching and expanding, made the attack easily successful. Try to look at the potential of this build if white-ra had not made those errors, and like me you may see the promise in this variation of the build.


Special Replay: oGsMC
+ Show Spoiler +

From GSL3: RO8 Set 1 between MarineKingPrime.we (arguably the best marine-handling Terran in the world) and oGsMC. Watch and enjoy with the talented casting of Tastosis.
http://www.gomtv.net/2010gslopens3/vod/1451


Just like all of you, I want to make my game and my strategies better. If you have any suggestions, general comments, or relevant replays, send em my way!


Wrap-Up:

This strategy provides a solid way to get you into the mid game. Not only do you feel safe with a fairly large army and map control, but it provides you with various opportunities to win the game outright in the first 12 minutes. If your opponent builds a reaper first, builds too many marines early, doesn't get enough marines, goes hellions, or tries a fast expand, you are pretty much guaranteed to come away with a significant advantage. Not only that, you get to use two of the most fun units in the game - stalkers and void rays - and you get to do lots of fun micro.

Happy hunting Protoss
1, eh? 2, eh? 3, eh?
TheOracle
Profile Joined May 2010
Australia256 Posts
August 02 2010 11:40 GMT
#2
Sounds very interesting, and right now I don't have the time to read 100% of it in complete detail, but it seems to be solid and something new. Aside from banshees I don't think there is a magic counter to this, like you said. However isn't the standard (or at least one of the more common builds in TvP), the 1/1/1 opening, the strongest against this? Assuming it is played as I usually play it (Rax w/ reactor, fact w/ techlab, starport w/ techlab), it is very easy to swap the rax and starport to pump vikings to counter the void rays, and marauders to counter the stalkers, as well as the obvious tanks for more anti-ground.

But I do agree that it is very strong against most of the builds you mentioned (Low marines, FE, hellions, etc)

With reaper harass I think people are thinking of a very fast reaper (i.e. before the stalker starts really) which will do just as well as against any other 1gate core build, or very well against the 2 gate into core which you also mentioned (150 minerals worth of delay on that core could lose you the game then and there if its a 7 proxy rax)

Also I can see (Gretorps?) mass stimmed marine w/ ghost doing reasonably well also, as the EMP is so effective against stalkers, and allows the marines to deal with void rays far better than they normally could.
Kraelog
Profile Joined April 2010
Belgium194 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-02 11:59:15
August 02 2010 11:58 GMT
#3
It does seem like a very viable strategy. Banshees are a hard counter but like you said, only if you didn't scout the starport+techlab. However, since it mainly rely's on the power the shield recharge, isn't it quite weak against a Ghost +x Bio army? A standard GMM build with 2reactor rax & 1 tech lab rax destroys groups of stalkers very easily. And with the massive marine production a few Void rays are not that hard to neutralize.
Catch]22
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Sweden2683 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-02 12:18:50
August 02 2010 12:11 GMT
#4
Love it, will try when i get home.

Also, i think you're underestimating the ability of phoenix to harass, sure they wont bother the MM army or help you that much against the wall, BUT they are great (once you have more than 1, pref 2) at killing SCVs since they are so fast, they can just dart in and out and snipe them, something void rays cant do as easily.

Distracting the marines from the wall in a safe manner help you harass the wall more easily etc... But the basic idea is sound.
Copes
Profile Joined March 2010
Canada80 Posts
August 02 2010 12:11 GMT
#5
Right now I only have one strategy I find effective down here in Gold against Terrans. While I consider them my easiest matchup, I think that in the future my current build is going to get blocked by better players. I've ready through this strat and really like the sound of it. I'm going to give it a try at the lower levels and see if I can't master it myself. Thank you for posting this, I look forward to seeing the feedback and will hopefully post some of my own.
huyNh
Profile Joined March 2010
Canada366 Posts
August 02 2010 12:15 GMT
#6
you should 1/1/1 -> fast viking into the list of weaknesses too. tanks deal with the stalker harass at the front while marines + viking deal with voidrays. that's what foo did in that replay where you lost.
huyNh.703
Back
Profile Joined May 2010
Canada505 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-02 12:23:14
August 02 2010 12:22 GMT
#7
Your early stalker harass/pressure in your beta posts completely changed the way I PvT. You are indeed génial.
TheFinalWord
Profile Joined May 2010
Australia790 Posts
August 02 2010 12:25 GMT
#8
Gah my worst nightmare as a terran player, well at least when I walled off at the ramp. I do the bunker thing now while massing marines and seems to fight this off fairly well. I'm just wondering, how much point is there to this build when it can be easily countered by a bunker on the ramp?
MagicUnicorn
Profile Joined February 2010
Belgium47 Posts
August 02 2010 12:29 GMT
#9
i did this strat after release and went 8:0 against terran the 1/1/1 tanks u can counter with phönixes out of your stargate

the bio ball and the stim you just stall like he said and tech to zspeed and storm but be carefull not to loose stuff

and the bunker in front doesnt mean u cant contain and void harras

overall an unbeliveabel fun strat
Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-02 12:45:27
August 02 2010 12:33 GMT
#10
Now THIS is how you make a thread :D
Checking the replays now

EDIT: You clearly know what you are doing PvT which is good This build will REALLY struggle against any kind of 3rax stuff. But as your replays demonstrate, it's ridiculously good against 1-1-1. The game you lost you really only lost because you were being too aggressive and your micro failed you, VRs should have been able to deal with his push relatively easily.

So yea, this strategy is only really weak to marauder pressure imo.

I wouldn't say it's perfect, it is an all in strategy after all. But with clever play it's a pretty cool weapon. I'll give this a go against Corinthos when I get a chance to
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
Xanatoss
Profile Joined May 2010
Germany539 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-02 12:52:39
August 02 2010 12:52 GMT
#11
Well written. Although I am not a huge fan of Stalkers (due to my lacking mechanics and my view that 2 stalkers without blink are just a faster moving but otherwise worse immortal vs Groundunits) I will give it a try, because I am tired of defensive-mode until I get Charge vs Terran.
The chair slowly turns around. You see his face, but it can't be. He's not supposed to be here. Not him. Not a Protoss. Not THAT Protoss. MC says, "Hi Greg, long time no see." You back slowly out of the booth. But you can't. It's already forcefielded.
JaspluR
Profile Joined April 2010
Australia174 Posts
August 02 2010 13:03 GMT
#12
great thread, also listed the weakenesses
i find cloak banshee rushes still hard to deal with (after phase 1 everyone had stopped doing this) - phase 1 where we were forced robo (zerg was mass roach and terran was cloak banshee rush/marauder)
Catch]22
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
Sweden2683 Posts
August 02 2010 14:19 GMT
#13
Another thought: Why not consider using Warp Prisms as your "spotting" unit, cant be too shabby to be able to warp in reinforcements aswell by picking up an early warpgate upgrade.
JrK
Profile Joined June 2010
United States283 Posts
August 02 2010 14:26 GMT
#14
Very cool! Thank you for sharing!
JrKjrKJrk
prochobo
Profile Joined May 2010
United States232 Posts
August 02 2010 16:02 GMT
#15
Sweet strat. I'm a mid Diamond and I tried this a few times this morning with great results. I like the fact that Terran's response to double stalker is more marauders and tanks, which get creamed by void rays.

And man, vikings fall fast to charged void rays. I thought your void ray was dead in the 2nd replay right after the viking popped, but it only got 1 shot off.
Ndugu
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
United States1078 Posts
August 02 2010 16:38 GMT
#16
I've actually been using a build a lot like this to great success.

I've been trying to transition to carriers/blink stalkers and its been going surprisingly well. I only use the carriers over high-ground or out of range where they're very hard to hit. They go vikings, and I cream the vikings with my blink stalkers. Don't engage their ground army with my stalkers if I can help it.

So far, I don't have any replays where either myself or my opponent didn't massively screw up and kinda make it a wash where any build coulda won, though .
MadMike
Profile Joined July 2010
United States7 Posts
August 02 2010 17:35 GMT
#17
I can't wait to try this later tonight! Haven't had a chance to check the replaces yet.

You mentioned that this build turns into more of a contain when Terran places a bunker at the ramp instead of a wall. I was wondering if you've played against a fast expo terran who goes heavy marines into ghost and/or thor while using one or two bunkers to defend his early expo and what success (or failure you've had). I have a feeling that without zealots this may allow for the fast expo. Or am I totally off base in that the bunker + expo can't get up before your stalkers arrive?
kcdc
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
United States2311 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-08-02 19:41:35
August 02 2010 19:40 GMT
#18
I've used stalker-void ray openings a lot against T, and I completely agree with most everything he's said. Getting early blink does make the game more fun, but your army will feel quite small with all of the infrastructure expenses.

As for the build's weaknesses, I'll agree that banshees can be a problem. Another good way for T to beat this build is marine-ghost. If T can emp your sentries to get down the choke, his combat shield/stimmed marines will pose big problems for you. The other thing that would be tough to deal with is a marine-tank opening. An early push before siege research could overwhelm your mobility-based composition, and later, sieged tanks will outrange the forcefield cast meaning T can take back his ramp and push or expand.

It's a good, fleshed out strategy tho, and a lot of T's don't yet know how to properly deal with it.
Eben
Profile Blog Joined September 2008
United States769 Posts
August 02 2010 19:48 GMT
#19
I just got demolished by this build going for a standard 1-1-1.

Seems like a really fun build though! Will try it next time I play protoss
DaBears57
Profile Joined December 2009
United States300 Posts
August 02 2010 19:58 GMT
#20
Sounds great, I will definitely try out this build later.
1 2 3 4 5 10 11 12 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 6h 15m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 257
NeuroSwarm 185
StarCraft: Brood War
Sea 2938
ToSsGirL 61
Movie 18
Bale 18
Terrorterran 11
Dota 2
monkeys_forever648
League of Legends
JimRising 918
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King117
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor119
Other Games
summit1g8554
shahzam1867
WinterStarcraft465
ViBE225
RuFF_SC278
Models1
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream2362
Other Games
gamesdonequick647
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 16 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• practicex 52
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• RayReign 27
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift5893
• Lourlo1407
• Stunt143
Counter-Strike
• Shiphtur1747
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
6h 15m
Replay Cast
19h 15m
Replay Cast
1d 5h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 6h
WardiTV Invitational
1d 6h
GSL Code S
2 days
Rogue vs GuMiho
Maru vs Solar
Online Event
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
GSL Code S
3 days
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Bunny
The PondCast
3 days
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
WardiTV Invitational
4 days
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
5 days
WardiTV Invitational
5 days
Cheesadelphia
5 days
GSL Code S
6 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
ECL Season 49: Europe
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.