|
186 average for me. That's after 20 tests. I used to play CS at a high level (Top32 cpl 2003 I think?) and I remember I was pretty slow for a good fps player D: A buddy of mine used to be in the 150 range average.
As far as latency and lag it definitely makes a difference in micro, but not even close to the amount of difference it can make in an fps. IMO the easiest way to illustrate the difference in sc2 is how fast your 2nd worker gets out. If you start your worker just before you send your scv's to the patches there is generally a tiny delay before you can start your second worker when playing online. If you start up a custom game right now so you have 0 latency, that delay is gone.
Edit: My best was 164 :D
|
|
|
Lol I'm so slow... ~240
Maybe it's cuz I just woke up and I'm hella sore from working out!!! =(
|
Very disconcerting that mine is like an average of 250+. No wonder I feel like I can't react the same while playing tennis anymore. Going to have to practice this.
|
On July 03 2010 06:34 ImperialFenix wrote: Very disconcerting that mine is like an average of 250+. No wonder I feel like I can't react the same while playing tennis anymore. Going to have to practice this.
Don't feel too badly; I'm averaging around 230-250 as well >.<.
Sub 200 is pretty impressive.
|
Damn.... I was not paying attention whatsoever for a second or so and somehow managed to get 2ms reaction time xD Most definitely dumb luck haha but I was surprised when I saw that, and now that I think about it, I should have taken a screenshot 
I average around 190, with my best around 170. I dunno, but I feel like I don't actually react that fast in game, maybe it's because of the pretty graphics of sc2, or maybe because this test lets you just focus on one thing.
|
167 average here, but I don't think it really has any connotations on how good you are at SC2 (Obviously, else I might be something other than terrible)
|
Did it about 10 times. My best average was 220. I am sure the type of mouse you are using has a big effect as well. I have tested the time it took for my mice to send a signal or something on another website and my razer diamondback was significantly faster than my mx518, which I use now.
Also, after doing it 10 times I now see a green box floating around.
|
i just did this after a few beers, got like 270 :p
|
210 average with my MX518, 158 average with my salmosa.. what?
|
I had almost no latency during the beta phase while playing on the US servers. I imagine I connect to somewhere on the East Coast of US, to which I have sub 25ms ping. If you double this for sending+return, you only get 50ms, which doesn't affect any micro or unit control at all and barely feels like a delay at all.
With a good fiber-optic connection and playing on the local servers, most of you wouldn't be able to tell the difference between playing on bnet and LAN.
However I did play some games on the euro servers and it was significantly worse. You could really feel the latency in contrast with the US servers. I imagine it was ~200ms which is approximately the reaction time of a person. So yes, when playing on foreign servers, you will have a delay of ~reaction time and you will feel it, but honestly it's not THAT bad, and is still perfectly playable.
|
i tried so hard, and got so far, in the end it didn't even matterrrrrr (220, lol...i also played in cal-i for a few seasons btw lmfao)
just imagien how it was back then on USWEST playing BGH you could actually feel your workers lagging ! let's be happy we're done with that
|
it didnt matter where i looked! i still got 180-210 on all my tries ^_^ maybe my reflexes aren't working :p
|
|
|
215 average
185 with mountain dew lols
I agree this doesn't translate to playing well since my macro is horrible tbh
im 27 too so some hope for us old guys (i smoke weed too)
|
|
|
219 best, 290 average.. whatever
|
48th. your score sign up or log in 0 seconds ago 25clicks avg 257.3
|
On July 03 2010 17:04 CharlieMurphy wrote: 48th. your score sign up or log in 0 seconds ago 25clicks avg 257.3
I didn't feel like signin up... but I think I was 48th too! XD
|
150 but I used to play an extensive amount of fps
|
|
|
|
|
|