A plea for mapmakers - Page 3
| Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games |
|
Gfire
United States1699 Posts
| ||
|
JackReacher
United States197 Posts
On January 25 2013 20:00 [F_]aths wrote: Dawn of War never made it successfully into big esports. You cannot just copy something to make a different thing better. Bullshit. It did as much as any other pre-SC2 non-Blizzard RTS did. It was in WCG 2 years running, which back in the pre-esports days, was a BIG FUCKING DEAL for a non-Blizz title. DoW was a great game and had a lot of good players competing, most of whom were BW players. On January 27 2013 06:38 Gfire wrote: I think waygates would let you do something like bridges, or even way more. However, I think it wouldn't have the visual and pathing issues. It could be a bit hard to wrap your brain around, though, which for pro players I think is fine but it might be confusing for spectators. Would need testing. By waygates I mean a pair of gates on the map, where units sent to one gate would teleport to the other. I also want something that would give a passive advantage (like economy advantage,) to players who hold it but unlike a base can be passed back and forth instantly and it will always be beneficial to hold it even for the shortest amount of time. With the right placement and the proper number balance you could really encourage a lot more action. These two things I like but... I'm not sure if it doesn't feel enough like Starcraft anymore with them. For custom maps, though, worth a try. I would LOVE to see Xel'Naga watchtowers provide a slow but steady trickly of minerals or gas to whichever player controls the area. It would really promote getting small numbers of units out on the map early instead of just expanding or even double expanding off of zero units, and would give lots of small skirmishes between small numbers of units to watch in the early game that actually carried importance. C&C3 and DoW had similar things, and it was crucial to get your first few units out on the map and contest certain things to get a slight economic advantage, which made a slight difference down the road, and encouraged players to get units early even if going econ and skirmish/contest the areas, or at least not let the other player take them all and leverage a decent econ advantage. I'm not suggesting a hold-victory-points-for-money type system like Dawn of War, of course, but giving a small stream of minerals for holding something sort of like a watchtower (maybe the equivalent of 3 or so mining drones?) while it is held by a player, just to get players to not totally turtle up early. | ||
|
SiskosGoatee
Albania1482 Posts
On January 28 2013 03:15 The_Frozen_Inferno wrote: I tried that, the only thing is that I can't seem to place the unit I made and the icon also doesn't look normal but like a green zealot or something when I make the new unit, any suggestions? The rest seems to work.I don't have the beta client / editor, so I'm making a couple assumptions about what already exists in the HotS editor. I'm assuming that blinding cloud works like most other abilities like it. As usual, there is also more than one way to do it: The viper has an ability that creates a 'persistent effect' that will periodically 'search area' and 'apply behaviour' to all viable targets. These kinds of abilities usually last for like 0.5 a second but the periodic search is equal to that duration and would re-apply the behaviour as long as the unit is in the AoE. (that's why when you leave, the unit is instantly restored, since the applied behaviour wears off). A model actor is then probably connected to the persistent effect's creation/destruction to make it pretty. So, all you have to do is create a new behaviour: buff with infinite duration. Its periodic effect will be set to fire off blinding cloud's 'search area' effect. You just need to match the period stats with that of the original 'create persistent' effect. Stick this new behaviour on the unselectable unit you make by adding it to the 'Behavior: Behaviors - Behavior' field (the same field that the immortal's hardened shield is on, for reference). Then you need to fiddle with model actors to make sure everything looks pretty. The simplest way is to duplicate the blinding cloud model actor, and change its events to: Unit birth. cloud unit = create Unit death. cloud unit = destroy Actor creation = AnimPlay. (whatever asset name is normally played for blinding cloud) Actor creation = SetTintColor. (If you want to give it a visual indicator that it's a non-standard blinding cloud) -> Now that I think about it, you could also just change the Unit Model to the blinding cloud model. But that method has a few other disadvantages and is marginally more complex to set up. Though both methods should work. | ||
|
EatThePath
United States3943 Posts
On January 28 2013 07:12 SiskosGoatee wrote: I tried that, the only thing is that I can't seem to place the unit I made and the icon also doesn't look normal but like a green zealot or something when I make the new unit, any suggestions? The rest seems to work. Did you save, close, and reopen? Otherwise your units won't show up in the list. | ||
|
EatThePath
United States3943 Posts
On January 28 2013 05:21 Big J wrote: Elevators and doors that open/close periodically. Same for bridges that appear and disappear. Also moving platforms. Like imagine the metropolis islands floating in between the main bases. You build a Nydus, connect it with the island. Once it docks with the opponents main, all your army goes through the docking choke point ![]() I've tried to do that, but the tough part is making sure units behave correctly when they are at the edge of terrain, especially when it changes. Like a closing door, does it kill things? Or push them aside? I couldn't figure out how to make it work properly. But that was when I was a total editor noob, maybe I should try again. I had so many cool map ideas for it! [edit] oops I meant to edit not double post, sry =\ | ||
|
Qikz
United Kingdom12023 Posts
Is there a chance map makers can look into either better shaped or larger mains? Some maps are so damn small for factory units to either move around or get out of the base so oftentimes it's very easy to get things stuck. Running out of space for production is a problem for Terran in general, but due to the inability to put buildings close to each other mech has such a big problem. I hate Ohana for many reasons, and cloud kingdom, but both of them have the big issue of the main being horrible to try and build up properly. | ||
|
The_Frozen_Inferno
Canada98 Posts
I haven't figured out how to fix that once I break it. Saving and restarting doesn't always fix it either. Or maybe it does now. I'm not sure. Usually I always end up duplicating an existing unit + actor (not messing with their ID - only editor names) and go from there. That's usually a safe way to do it. Can you spawn the unit manually in the tester? Open the chat window in the test document and enter 'createunit ________' where ___ is the name of your unit. If it doesn't spawn there or turns into the white orb model, it's likely broken. **** Can you really make moving terrain in the editor? I thought at most you could make dynamic water effects, which are purely aesthetics. | ||
|
crbox
Canada1180 Posts
It would however force, as you wrote above, more positional play. I'd like to see some maps where there are different mechanics for high ground to low ground attacks/spells | ||
|
Gfire
United States1699 Posts
But the easiest way to make new units is with the duplicate feature (not copy+paste,) so you can duplicate the actors as well without any problems. I think duplicating force field and then changing the actor model and behaviors would probably be the easiest way to make neutral spells. As far as moving terrain goes... You can't make moving cliffs, but there might be a way to dynamically change which area is pathable, and use units for the platform underneath, and also move the units standing on it along as well... But it could get pretty complicated. | ||
|
SiskosGoatee
Albania1482 Posts
![]() It works by the way. I am working on a map now with ridiculously short rush distance, the catch is that the key choke on the natural as well as some other parts of it have blinding clouds. | ||
|
Fatam
1986 Posts
On January 28 2013 08:41 SiskosGoatee wrote: + Show Spoiler + ![]() It works by the way. I am working on a map now with ridiculously short rush distance, the catch is that the key choke on the natural as well as some other parts of it have blinding clouds. hmm really short rush distance + no disadvantage to melee? wouldn't that make early ling aggression OP? Or am I missing something. | ||
|
SiskosGoatee
Albania1482 Posts
On January 28 2013 08:53 Fatam wrote: Something has to balance out the fact that Zerg is at a pretty big disadvantage at this very chocked map with a short rush distance?hmm really short rush distance + no disadvantage to melee? wouldn't that make early ling aggression OP? Or am I missing something. It's also this very desired Zerg themed map that people like to see, infested space platform specifically. | ||
|
JOJOsc2news
3000 Posts
On January 28 2013 08:41 SiskosGoatee wrote: ![]() It works by the way. I am working on a map now with ridiculously short rush distance, the catch is that the key choke on the natural as well as some other parts of it have blinding clouds. That's pretty cool. I have been following this thread ever since my reply because it was in my Subscribed Threads. It's great to see that this has actually worked out. I'm looking forward to the map. I guess zealot aggression would be quite good on it. | ||
|
SiskosGoatee
Albania1482 Posts
On January 28 2013 09:07 JOJOsc2news wrote: Yeah, well, it's also pretty darn choked so I hoped to balance the chokes out with the clouds.That's pretty cool. I have been following this thread ever since my reply because it was in my Subscribed Threads. It's great to see that this has actually worked out. I'm looking forward to the map. I guess zealot aggression would be quite good on it. ![]() It's another 2-in-1 map. It's cross only, one of the spawns has a very short rush distance. I'm also thinking about adding neutral creep at some points maybe for balance reasons? | ||
|
JOJOsc2news
3000 Posts
On January 28 2013 09:17 SiskosGoatee wrote: Yeah, well, it's also pretty darn choked so I hoped to balance the chokes out with the clouds. ![]() It's another 2-in-1 map. It's cross only, one of the spawns has a very short rush distance. I'm also thinking about adding neutral creep at some points maybe for balance reasons? Oh cool a picture! As for the creep... I am really not a fan of neutral creep but since this is a Zerg themed map it would make sense (especially with the blinding clouds around etc.) Where would you put it? Edit: spoilered picture | ||
|
Gfire
United States1699 Posts
Reminds me a bit of crossfire. I'm not sure about the double entrance nat, though... it seems like the blinding cloud isn't very effective since the other entrance is so much more appealing already. | ||
|
SiskosGoatee
Albania1482 Posts
| ||
|
JOJOsc2news
3000 Posts
On January 28 2013 09:26 Gfire wrote: I don't think creep is necessary... The map's already too big and complicated. But the use of the blinding cloud and the different spawn points is nice and interesting. Reminds me a bit of crossfire. I'm not sure about the double entrance nat, though... it seems like the blinding cloud isn't very effective since the other entrance is so much more appealing already. Thought so too. Having no way on ground into someones base/natural without passing a blinding cloud right in front of it on the other hand is quite tricky too. | ||
|
Gfire
United States1699 Posts
After thinking about it for a minute I don't have such a problem with the use of the blinding cloud on that entrance to the nat... It seems okay to me. Maybe the other ramp is too wide, though? Not really on-topic though. | ||
|
SiskosGoatee
Albania1482 Posts
On January 28 2013 09:26 Gfire wrote: Every map I make rips of crossfire to some degree honestly. Making a balanced version of Crossfire is sort of an obsession for me. Spefically to encorporate 'that part' of crossfire.I don't think creep is necessary... The map's already too big and complicated. But the use of the blinding cloud and the different spawn points is nice and interesting. Reminds me a bit of crossfire. I'm not sure about the double entrance nat, though... it seems like the blinding cloud isn't very effective since the other entrance is so much more appealing already. I concur, that's why I did this:![]() You basically have two defence points a bit further apart, the rocks also now mean you probably want to break them down shortly after taking that fourth. | ||
| ||

![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/tHJvXinl.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/lZqgdtgl.jpg)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/EMd9Wb7l.jpg)