• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 11:40
CEST 17:40
KST 00:40
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles2[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China8Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL65Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?14FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event22
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form? Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays Korean Starcraft League Week 77
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL SC uni coach streams logging into betting site BW General Discussion BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ ASL20 Preliminary Maps
Tourneys
[BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational [BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Russo-Ukrainian War Thread US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2024! Summer Games Done Quick 2025!
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 679 users

[A] Starbow - Page 514

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 512 513 514 515 516 537 Next
Xiphias
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Norway2223 Posts
January 19 2014 16:06 GMT
#10261
Scourge do overkill here as well, but not as "bad".
aka KanBan85. Working on Starbow.
AnteZ
Profile Joined September 2011
Germany29 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-19 19:22:04
January 19 2014 18:56 GMT
#10262
Hello,
thanks for this great mod. Your effort is very appreciated. I have taken another look at the problem of clumped movement and I have come up with a new approach (to my knowledge) to spread out units while moving.
The basic idea is to have every unit followed by a neutral unit.
The follower will take up space, and cause the other units in the clump to spread out.

I have hacked together a small demonstration. You can see the result here.
Or search for "spread spread out movement" in the eu custom games (not arcade). I should say that the follower should be made invisible in a serious implementation.


Its a very dirty hack. I made it in 15 minutes and I have close to no experience with the editor. Here is what I did:
I put some marines and neutral zerglings onto the map. Then I modified the zerglings to have a small little sphere as model. I set its push priority to 100 and its movement speed to 2.3.
After that, I created a trigger that orders each zergling to follow one marine upon startup.

As a result, the silky smooth movements of the sc2 engine are mostly preserved, while the clumping is avoided. Further more, the units formation is never the same, although in my tests a preference for an arrow shaped patterns has shone through (similar tobird formations).

Let me know what you think and if you would consider implementing something like this into starbow.
decemberscalm
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States1353 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-19 22:28:27
January 19 2014 22:27 GMT
#10263
On January 20 2014 03:56 AnteZ wrote:
Hello,
thanks for this great mod. Your effort is very appreciated. I have taken another look at the problem of clumped movement and I have come up with a new approach (to my knowledge) to spread out units while moving.
The basic idea is to have every unit followed by a neutral unit.
The follower will take up space, and cause the other units in the clump to spread out.

I have hacked together a small demonstration. You can see the result here.
Or search for "spread spread out movement" in the eu custom games (not arcade). I should say that the follower should be made invisible in a serious implementation.


Its a very dirty hack. I made it in 15 minutes and I have close to no experience with the editor. Here is what I did:
I put some marines and neutral zerglings onto the map. Then I modified the zerglings to have a small little sphere as model. I set its push priority to 100 and its movement speed to 2.3.
After that, I created a trigger that orders each zergling to follow one marine upon startup.

As a result, the silky smooth movements of the sc2 engine are mostly preserved, while the clumping is avoided. Further more, the units formation is never the same, although in my tests a preference for an arrow shaped patterns has shone through (similar tobird formations).

Let me know what you think and if you would consider implementing something like this into starbow.

And how exactly would you micro backwards?

Zerglings being randomly blocked by invisible followers?

Don't get me wrong, its an interesting idea and attempt at less clumpy movement, but it seems like it would have a TON of flaws. Players need to have reliable movement.
CutTheEnemy
Profile Joined November 2013
Canada373 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-20 00:01:38
January 20 2014 00:01 GMT
#10264
You could fix the scourge to get extra overkill by having it do damage over time for .5 seconds, something to delay the kill minutely basically. They're sky banes, watching tourneys I don't see any need to split them at all anymore.
Can we help spread the word and create pressure to get Rob Pardo to replace Browder as head of Sc2? Pardo led the team for broodwar, frozen throne, and wow/BC. We need to make this a thing before LotV development starts. Think about it.
NukeD
Profile Joined October 2010
Croatia1612 Posts
January 20 2014 01:22 GMT
#10265
On January 20 2014 07:27 decemberscalm wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 03:56 AnteZ wrote:
Hello,
thanks for this great mod. Your effort is very appreciated. I have taken another look at the problem of clumped movement and I have come up with a new approach (to my knowledge) to spread out units while moving.
The basic idea is to have every unit followed by a neutral unit.
The follower will take up space, and cause the other units in the clump to spread out.

I have hacked together a small demonstration. You can see the result here.
Or search for "spread spread out movement" in the eu custom games (not arcade). I should say that the follower should be made invisible in a serious implementation.


Its a very dirty hack. I made it in 15 minutes and I have close to no experience with the editor. Here is what I did:
I put some marines and neutral zerglings onto the map. Then I modified the zerglings to have a small little sphere as model. I set its push priority to 100 and its movement speed to 2.3.
After that, I created a trigger that orders each zergling to follow one marine upon startup.

As a result, the silky smooth movements of the sc2 engine are mostly preserved, while the clumping is avoided. Further more, the units formation is never the same, although in my tests a preference for an arrow shaped patterns has shone through (similar tobird formations).

Let me know what you think and if you would consider implementing something like this into starbow.

And how exactly would you micro backwards?

Zerglings being randomly blocked by invisible followers?

Don't get me wrong, its an interesting idea and attempt at less clumpy movement, but it seems like it would have a TON of flaws. Players need to have reliable movement.

Are you not even going to try it? The way the units move in that video is perfect. Please just try it :/
sorry for dem one liners
SolidSMD
Profile Joined April 2011
Belgium408 Posts
January 20 2014 02:03 GMT
#10266
On January 20 2014 10:22 NukeD wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 07:27 decemberscalm wrote:
On January 20 2014 03:56 AnteZ wrote:
Hello,
thanks for this great mod. Your effort is very appreciated. I have taken another look at the problem of clumped movement and I have come up with a new approach (to my knowledge) to spread out units while moving.
The basic idea is to have every unit followed by a neutral unit.
The follower will take up space, and cause the other units in the clump to spread out.

I have hacked together a small demonstration. You can see the result here.
Or search for "spread spread out movement" in the eu custom games (not arcade). I should say that the follower should be made invisible in a serious implementation.


Its a very dirty hack. I made it in 15 minutes and I have close to no experience with the editor. Here is what I did:
I put some marines and neutral zerglings onto the map. Then I modified the zerglings to have a small little sphere as model. I set its push priority to 100 and its movement speed to 2.3.
After that, I created a trigger that orders each zergling to follow one marine upon startup.

As a result, the silky smooth movements of the sc2 engine are mostly preserved, while the clumping is avoided. Further more, the units formation is never the same, although in my tests a preference for an arrow shaped patterns has shone through (similar tobird formations).

Let me know what you think and if you would consider implementing something like this into starbow.

And how exactly would you micro backwards?

Zerglings being randomly blocked by invisible followers?

Don't get me wrong, its an interesting idea and attempt at less clumpy movement, but it seems like it would have a TON of flaws. Players need to have reliable movement.

Are you not even going to try it? The way the units move in that video is perfect. Please just try it :/


The way they move without interacting with enemy units you mean, invisible units will lead to a lot of problems.
Working on Starbow!
Beef Noodles
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States937 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-20 04:08:40
January 20 2014 04:07 GMT
#10267
I don't know how collision detection works in the editor, but...

Could you give every ground unit a check for if it collides with another unit? If it collides, give it like a 50% chance to take a step in a random direction before continuing on the path on which it is ordered to move? That way, you get predictable movement once units are spaced far enough apart?

I could see it also giving clumped units a "scooby doo" like effect (where they don't really start moving where you want them to at first), because when they are very clumped and they get the command to move, it might start a crazy chain reaction of collisions. If that's the case, maybe try a 20-30% chance to step in a random direction?

Just throwing ideas out
Gene(S)is
Profile Joined May 2010
Sweden419 Posts
January 20 2014 04:39 GMT
#10268
I have hacked together a small demonstration. You can see the result here.
Or search for "spread spread out movement" in the eu custom games (not arcade). I should say that the follower should be made invisible in a serious implementation.


That way of moving reminds me much more of BW then what we have today, it would also be less frustruating when dealing with say storms and baneling mines.

How are the sound effects in Starbow, do they use the old BW tracks?
For the swarm
Qwyn
Profile Blog Joined December 2010
United States2779 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-20 04:52:31
January 20 2014 04:51 GMT
#10269
On January 20 2014 13:39 Gene(S)is wrote:
Show nested quote +
I have hacked together a small demonstration. You can see the result here.
Or search for "spread spread out movement" in the eu custom games (not arcade). I should say that the follower should be made invisible in a serious implementation.


That way of moving reminds me much more of BW then what we have today, it would also be less frustruating when dealing with say storms and baneling mines.

How are the sound effects in Starbow, do they use the old BW tracks?


Nope, but when Patch 2.1 comes out you will be able to listen to BW soundtracks .

Some units do - depends on if they have an SC2 representation or not. For instance, scourge use BW sounds because they have no sound files in SC2. Lurkers use the sounds they had in SC2 before they were scrapped.
"Think of the hysteria following the realization that they consciously consume babies and raise the dead people from their graves" - N0
Budmind
Profile Joined January 2014
Germany2 Posts
January 20 2014 12:50 GMT
#10270
Just throwing in a question: Is the movementspeed on medics going to be nerfed slightlity? As it is of now theyre the same speed as nonstimmed rines, thus can be held a A-Move meleeblocking circle( try zerg flanking on that) or is it as intended?
AnteZ
Profile Joined September 2011
Germany29 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-20 13:09:42
January 20 2014 12:56 GMT
#10271
On January 20 2014 07:27 decemberscalm wrote:
And how exactly would you micro backwards?

Zerglings being randomly blocked by invisible followers?

Don't get me wrong, its an interesting idea and attempt at less clumpy movement, but it seems like it would have a TON of flaws. Players need to have reliable movement.

I don't have all the answers yet, I just wanted to get some feedback as soon as possible. I agree that reliability is of the highest importance - the player must feel in control at any moment.
I also agree that having invisible blocking units on the map is asking for a lot of problems. But it will still be a finite amount of problems so maybe it is worth the trouble.

I am going to fiddle around a little more when I am back from work in a few hours. I wonder if it would feel too strange if we only activate the followers a few seconds after the move command has been issued. This way the very intense in-battle micro should remain largely the same, while the clumping that usually occurs on longer distances (I guess - i havent actually investigated this) should be mitigated.

As for the zergling case: I am not sure what the best way of handling this is. I am thinking of adding some sort of small range aura for every melee unit that deactivates enemy followers in some way.



On January 20 2014 13:07 Beef Noodles wrote:
I don't know how collision detection works in the editor, but...

Could you give every ground unit a check for if it collides with another unit? If it collides, give it like a 50% chance to take a step in a random direction before continuing on the path on which it is ordered to move? That way, you get predictable movement once units are spaced far enough apart?

I could see it also giving clumped units a "scooby doo" like effect (where they don't really start moving where you want them to at first), because when they are very clumped and they get the command to move, it might start a crazy chain reaction of collisions. If that's the case, maybe try a 20-30% chance to step in a random direction?

Just throwing ideas out


I have though of that actually before the idea with the invisible units. But I imagine that it would result in a lot more jerky motions. Think about it: every gap in the unit clump will quickly be filled again and we have to keep making gap by moving a unit in a random direction (jerky and out of the players control). With the followers the gaps are persistent and the units move around them smoothly. Jerkyness might occur when splitting up a clump but not once the units are spread out.
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7031 Posts
January 20 2014 13:03 GMT
#10272
On January 20 2014 21:56 AnteZ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 07:27 decemberscalm wrote:
And how exactly would you micro backwards?

Zerglings being randomly blocked by invisible followers?

Don't get me wrong, its an interesting idea and attempt at less clumpy movement, but it seems like it would have a TON of flaws. Players need to have reliable movement.

I don't have all the answers yet, I just wanted to get some feedback as soon as possible. I agree that reliability is of the highest importance - the player must feel in control at any moment.
I also agree that having invisible blocking units on the map is asking for a lot of problems. But it will still be a finite amount of problems so maybe it is worth the trouble.

I am going to fiddle around a little more when I am back from work in a few hours. I wonder if it would feel too strange if we only activate the followers a few seconds after the move command has been issued. This way the very intense in-battle micro should remain largely the same, while the clumping that usually occurs on longer distances (I guess - i havent actually investigated this) should be mitigated.

As for the zergling case: I am not sure what the best way of handling this is. I am thinking of adding some sort of small range aura for every melee unit that deactivates enemy followers in some way.

For the video, I didn't understand the moment where the marine was blocked in by the zergling. Don't units move out of the way automatically unless on hold position? Or is that only for friendly units? Or not for units that are on a move/follow command?
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
AnteZ
Profile Joined September 2011
Germany29 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-20 14:32:39
January 20 2014 14:32 GMT
#10273

For the video, I didn't understand the moment where the marine was blocked in by the zergling. Don't units move out of the way automatically unless on hold position? Or is that only for friendly units? Or not for units that are on a move/follow command?


Not neccessarily. There is a variable called push priority that controls it. My guess is that you can only push units with lower or equal push priority. I have set the push priority of the followers to a very high value so they do not budge.
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7031 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-20 14:54:02
January 20 2014 14:52 GMT
#10274
On January 20 2014 23:32 AnteZ wrote:
Show nested quote +

For the video, I didn't understand the moment where the marine was blocked in by the zergling. Don't units move out of the way automatically unless on hold position? Or is that only for friendly units? Or not for units that are on a move/follow command?


Not neccessarily. There is a variable called push priority that controls it. My guess is that you can only push units with lower or equal push priority. I have set the push priority of the followers to a very high value so they do not budge.

I don't think it's a good solution though, although to its credit in some scenarios it performs admirably.

For instance, what if you're trying to raise a supply depot, but you can't because there is an invisible follower? What if you're trying to plant a building? What if a group of units are going into a dead-end path and there is a clump of invisible followers in the way of one of the units, like an invisible wall separating it from its companions, won't that feel weird and inconsistent?

And there are a number of complicated implementation issues, I would say. Dropships would require the destruction and creation of a new follower for every pick-up. As would vikings for every landing. After the phoenix' graviton beam you'd have to send a new move command. Every unit needs a separate follower too, causing immense overhead during the design process, because every time you change one value on one unit you need to change it on the follower as well.
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
AnteZ
Profile Joined September 2011
Germany29 Posts
January 20 2014 16:02 GMT
#10275
Good points so far. I am making a list of issues and try to think of a way of doing things without requiring too many special cases. Though I am not too worried about problems with dropships, raising depot and such. Yes they require special treatment but I think they are not unsolvable - if tedious.
I am far more worried about units interacting with eachother like SolidSMD mentioned. That will need testing.

By the way: anybody know how the templar is implemented? It has this blueish thingy that follows it. Perhaps there is a way of making it solid and act as a follower. That would be much cleaner.

Any suggestions are very welcome.
Beef Noodles
Profile Blog Joined March 2010
United States937 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-20 18:50:49
January 20 2014 18:50 GMT
#10276
On January 20 2014 21:56 AnteZ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 20 2014 13:07 Beef Noodles wrote:
I don't know how collision detection works in the editor, but...

Could you give every ground unit a check for if it collides with another unit? If it collides, give it like a 50% chance to take a step in a random direction before continuing on the path on which it is ordered to move? That way, you get predictable movement once units are spaced far enough apart?

I could see it also giving clumped units a "scooby doo" like effect (where they don't really start moving where you want them to at first), because when they are very clumped and they get the command to move, it might start a crazy chain reaction of collisions. If that's the case, maybe try a 20-30% chance to step in a random direction?

Just throwing ideas out


I have though of that actually before the idea with the invisible units. But I imagine that it would result in a lot more jerky motions. Think about it: every gap in the unit clump will quickly be filled again and we have to keep making gap by moving a unit in a random direction (jerky and out of the players control). With the followers the gaps are persistent and the units move around them smoothly. Jerkyness might occur when splitting up a clump but not once the units are spread out.

Good point, but didn't units move "jerky" in brood war? I remember my lings would sometimes jump backwards before getting into a kongo line and going to the destination.

It might be interesting to check for collision, and give a 50% chance to take a step in 1 of 5 directions (as opposed to a random direction). The five directions being forward, left, right, forward right (diagonal), forward left (diagonal). All directions being relative to the unit's orientation.

Again I don't use the editor, so I don't know how feasible this would be, so feel free to ignore me.
iHirO
Profile Blog Joined January 2011
United Kingdom1381 Posts
January 20 2014 22:25 GMT
#10277
Starbow testing:

I had a play about with the Starbow Tester, here's some things I noticed.

Possible Balance Issues:
  • Ghost's Shock ability is stackable meaning that its possible to immbolise units in an area with multiple shots.
  • Hallucinated observers/science vessels/overseers retain their detection ability.
  • Defilers can consume free units (e.g. changelings) to restore mana. In a maxed army situation you could have unlimited overseers providing free energy.
  • Hallucinated Arbiters retain their cloaking field, which could be imbalanced.
  • Science Vessel's Emp drains all energy and shields, is this spell too strong?

Bugs:
  • Error messages displayed on screen when attempting to Overcharge non production buildings (e.g. supply depots, tech labs, reactors, CCs etc).
  • Reavers continue to lock on to target even when no scarabs are available.
  • Reavers do no damage if friendly units are targeted to be attacked.
  • Overlord/Dropship/Warp Prism doesn't show their carrying capacity bar.
  • Overcharge can be continuously dropped on a building, should it be prevented or is it correct behaviour?
  • Hallucinated changelings glitch when attempting to transform (minor issue).
  • Hallucinated units don't show a timer.
  • Non Protoss hallucinations show normal death animations instead of fading away (minor issue).
  • “Not Enough Energy” message displayed when attempting to chrono boost a geyser.
  • Unable to hallucinate burrowed units, is this by design?

Questions:
  • Why are Lurkers the only zerg unit to have a separate unburrow hotkey?
  • Why can the Medic cast Matrix on mechanical units instead of just biological units? Is this to encourage Bio Mech builds?
GraphicsThis is for all you new people: I only have one rule. Everyone fights. No one quits. You don't do your job, I'll shoot you myself. You get me?
NapkinBox
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
United States314 Posts
January 21 2014 03:52 GMT
#10278
Hahah, you mentioning Hallucinated Arbiters reminded me of when White_ra (I think) massed Hal. Arbiters to recall into enemy base.

Matrix on mech units for those turnaround moments I guess; saving a siege tank and so forth. You can Matrix on Vessels right? Would make saving Vessels from Scourges alot easier.
"Who has the best durability feat in all of comic book superheroes?" "Aquaman surviving pop culture."
[SC]Django
Profile Joined September 2013
Poland44 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-21 10:44:39
January 21 2014 10:26 GMT
#10279
Please visual & graphics changes to :

Vulture "Ion Thrusters" upgrade icon change:
[image loading]

Siege tank "Siege Mode" upgrade icon change:
[image loading]

Maybe Change model from dropship for this "Hercules dropship"
http://starcraft.wikia.com/wiki/Hercules_dropship
Of course change size...

Sentinel: model, portait and sounds change to Oracle
[image loading]

and why arbiter doesn't have old remastered sounds ?



Please for this changes i I would be happy.
Hider
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Denmark9376 Posts
January 21 2014 13:01 GMT
#10280
On January 21 2014 07:25 iHirO wrote:
Starbow testing:

I had a play about with the Starbow Tester, here's some things I noticed.

Possible Balance Issues:
  • Ghost's Shock ability is stackable meaning that its possible to immbolise units in an area with multiple shots.
  • Hallucinated observers/science vessels/overseers retain their detection ability.
  • Defilers can consume free units (e.g. changelings) to restore mana. In a maxed army situation you could have unlimited overseers providing free energy.
  • Hallucinated Arbiters retain their cloaking field, which could be imbalanced.
  • Science Vessel's Emp drains all energy and shields, is this spell too strong?

Bugs:
  • Error messages displayed on screen when attempting to Overcharge non production buildings (e.g. supply depots, tech labs, reactors, CCs etc).
  • Reavers continue to lock on to target even when no scarabs are available.
  • Reavers do no damage if friendly units are targeted to be attacked.
  • Overlord/Dropship/Warp Prism doesn't show their carrying capacity bar.
  • Overcharge can be continuously dropped on a building, should it be prevented or is it correct behaviour?
  • Hallucinated changelings glitch when attempting to transform (minor issue).
  • Hallucinated units don't show a timer.
  • Non Protoss hallucinations show normal death animations instead of fading away (minor issue).
  • “Not Enough Energy” message displayed when attempting to chrono boost a geyser.
  • Unable to hallucinate burrowed units, is this by design?

Questions:
  • Why are Lurkers the only zerg unit to have a separate unburrow hotkey?
  • Why can the Medic cast Matrix on mechanical units instead of just biological units? Is this to encourage Bio Mech builds?


Great post. Thanks for finding these inconsistencies. We will look into it.
Prev 1 512 513 514 515 516 537 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 20m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
MaxPax 554
mouzHeroMarine 353
Hui .267
IndyStarCraft 197
Rex 134
RotterdaM 14
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 3568
Jaedong 2415
Flash 2349
EffOrt 902
Hyuk 661
Soulkey 426
ZerO 385
Snow 372
Stork 364
actioN 298
[ Show more ]
Soma 251
firebathero 221
GuemChi 185
Mind 136
sSak 71
TY 64
JulyZerg 60
Barracks 54
Sharp 47
PianO 44
hero 43
Yoon 41
Sea.KH 34
soO 26
JYJ24
sorry 23
HiyA 22
yabsab 21
Terrorterran 21
Aegong 20
Rock 19
GoRush 12
Shine 9
IntoTheRainbow 8
Dota 2
Gorgc5915
qojqva3136
League of Legends
singsing2373
Dendi1188
Counter-Strike
fl0m831
markeloff150
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King241
Other Games
hiko1675
B2W.Neo1263
Beastyqt857
Lowko325
crisheroes299
ArmadaUGS136
Liquid`VortiX135
KnowMe77
Trikslyr52
ZerO(Twitch)21
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick45939
StarCraft 2
WardiTV1174
CranKy Ducklings111
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Reevou 2
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Nemesis6669
• TFBlade637
Upcoming Events
RotterdaM Event
20m
Replay Cast
8h 20m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
18h 20m
WardiTV European League
1d
MaNa vs sebesdes
Mixu vs Fjant
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
ShoWTimE vs goblin
Gerald vs Babymarine
Krystianer vs YoungYakov
PiGosaur Monday
1d 8h
The PondCast
1d 18h
WardiTV European League
1d 20h
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
2 days
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
3 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
FEL
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
5 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
5 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 20
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.