• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 05:38
CEST 11:38
KST 18:38
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall9HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles0[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China5Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL63Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?13FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event22
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Program: SC2 / XSplit / OBS Scene Switcher The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation Statistics for vetoed/disliked maps Weekly Cups (June 23-29): Reynor in world title form?
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament WardiTV Mondays Korean Starcraft League Week 77
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
SC uni coach streams logging into betting site Player “Jedi” cheat on CSL Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL BW General Discussion Practice Partners (Official)
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative Summer Games Done Quick 2024! Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
Formula 1 Discussion 2024 - 2025 Football Thread NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Blogs
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Blog #2
tankgirl
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 644 users

[A] Starbow - Page 516

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 514 515 516 517 518 537 Next
cacho56
Profile Joined January 2013
8 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-22 14:27:14
January 22 2014 14:09 GMT
#10301
On January 21 2014 23:37 AnteZ wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
Hello guys I am back :-)

I have spend yesterday evening and this morning reimplementing the modified movement in the data editor.
I can tell you already that I am quite fond of how well it works.
I have made one change that is key: Instead of giving the blockers (I called them followers before) a higher push priority, I gave them the push priority of the marines. This means that the blockers can be pushed aside like normal units but they still spread out the unit formation.
I initially assumed that bigger units also have higher push priority but it turns out all units I have checked have the same priority so this works for all units equally.
Because of this, microing units works much better, there was almost no blocking in my tests. I have also had no trouble chasing and killing a marauder with a zergling. Surrounds work also, as do melee vs melee engagements. However, there is a problem with stutter stepping marines. The chasing zerglings are blocked off almost completely and can not attack. This will need some ideas.
I have made another demonstration video. Enjoy.
ome more implementation details:
My changes consist of a new behaviour, associated effects and the blocker unit. The only thing that needs to be done to apply the new movement is to add the behaviour to it. For now I am just using a trigger that adds the behaviour to every unit entering the map (unless it is a blocker unit).

As for the problem of raising depots and planting buildings: It is possible to deactivate collisions with structures (think forcefields).

Since we generate the blockers periodically, problems with bunkers, dropships, etc. should not arise.

Also the blockers have a timed live, so every issue that remains should go away after 3 seconds :-)


Hey there! I'm not a starbow player, but I regularly check the threads in teamliquid related to sc2 mods to get some sort of feedback and ideas for the mod of my team because we usually have similar problems... And I thought... why don't I give something as an exchange?

@AnteZ:

I've seen your video, and I love how it works! You've had a really creative idea!

I know about a workaround that might solve your problem, I've sort of used it for our nydus canal ability.

You can configure the "blockers" to only block ally units. How to? There's a "collision" flag under the unit tab. If two units have the same collision flag, they can't occupy the same space. Your blocker must have "ground" and "forcefield", then it can't be in the same place that a forcefield or a ground unit occupies.

There are 6 unused ground collision flags. If you make 6 different blockers and each one with one of those 6 flags (and all the other flags unchecked), the spread trigger can work just as you want to with up to 6 different teams (maybe someone familiarized with galaxy script -or just data- can help you to add more collision flags, or you can use another flag that you don't use in the mod).

Every time that a ground unit is created, you have to check to which team it belongs, and assign to it a collision flag that will only have its team ground units (via behaviors or upgrades), and then create periodically for it the "blocker" just as you were doing it, but with the same flag of the team.

I see in it another problem with your trigger, but it's not a big deal: There are some units, like the Ultralisk, or the Thor, that can't be pushed away. Then, this system won't work for them.
Arston
Profile Joined April 2012
Russian Federation13 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-22 14:15:18
January 22 2014 14:14 GMT
#10302
Hi, guys. I should say I like your mod a lot. It is really great way to bring wave of fresh interesting features in slowly dying SCII ^__^
Not sure if there will be new major updates since the creator is going to make his bow but here there is a couple of suggestions. Maybe you’ll be fond of them, maybe not)

About cut units:
It is a pity that new swarm host has been removed. Don’t get me wrong - I believe it to be unit with cool concept (ground carrier ftw) and graphics… just a horrible design(
I assume that free locusts would be problem no matter how high (or low) their dps is… So maybe they should deal no damage at all? But increases damage dealt to unit attacked by them by other zergs (kinda like devourer acid spores). This way locusts can serve as army support, cannon fodder, encourage focus fire and micro, but be nowhere nearly as spendable and annoying.

About terrans:
What do you think of diamondback (campaign unit)? Could it fit Starbow – with proper stats nerf of course? Imho it might make mech even more fun, supporting vultures hit-and-run tactics and being sort of alternative to tank 

About abduct:
Maybe it should neither insta-kill unit (assuming zerg has decent army) nor make it invulnerable after grabbing in a weird way but simply reduces dealt both by it and to it after grabbing?

P.S. Is toss going to get some army addition? I have seen discussion of floating probe-like unit recently in this topic...

Thank you for your time!
ZeeMan
Profile Joined August 2010
Australia66 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-22 14:48:07
January 22 2014 14:34 GMT
#10303
Psy has some games up on his channel:
http://www.youtube.com/user/PsyStarcraft/videos

edit: they're not very close or good
AnteZ
Profile Joined September 2011
Germany29 Posts
January 22 2014 14:50 GMT
#10304
On January 22 2014 23:09 cacho56 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 21 2014 23:37 AnteZ wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
Hello guys I am back :-)

I have spend yesterday evening and this morning reimplementing the modified movement in the data editor.
I can tell you already that I am quite fond of how well it works.
I have made one change that is key: Instead of giving the blockers (I called them followers before) a higher push priority, I gave them the push priority of the marines. This means that the blockers can be pushed aside like normal units but they still spread out the unit formation.
I initially assumed that bigger units also have higher push priority but it turns out all units I have checked have the same priority so this works for all units equally.
Because of this, microing units works much better, there was almost no blocking in my tests. I have also had no trouble chasing and killing a marauder with a zergling. Surrounds work also, as do melee vs melee engagements. However, there is a problem with stutter stepping marines. The chasing zerglings are blocked off almost completely and can not attack. This will need some ideas.
I have made another demonstration video. Enjoy.
ome more implementation details:
My changes consist of a new behaviour, associated effects and the blocker unit. The only thing that needs to be done to apply the new movement is to add the behaviour to it. For now I am just using a trigger that adds the behaviour to every unit entering the map (unless it is a blocker unit).

As for the problem of raising depots and planting buildings: It is possible to deactivate collisions with structures (think forcefields).

Since we generate the blockers periodically, problems with bunkers, dropships, etc. should not arise.

Also the blockers have a timed live, so every issue that remains should go away after 3 seconds :-)


Hey there! I'm not a starbow player, but I regularly check the threads in teamliquid related to sc2 mods to get some sort of feedback and ideas for the mod of my team because we usually have similar problems... And I thought... why don't I give something as an exchange?

@AnteZ:

I've seen your video, and I love how it works! You've had a really creative idea!

I know about a workaround that might solve your problem, I've sort of used it for our nydus canal ability.

You can configure the "blockers" to only block ally units. How to? There's a "collision" flag under the unit tab. If two units have the same collision flag, they can't occupy the same space. Your blocker must have "ground" and "forcefield", then it can't be in the same place that a forcefield or a ground unit occupies.

There are 6 unused ground collision flags. If you make 6 different blockers and each one with one of those 6 flags (and all the other flags unchecked), the spread trigger can work just as you want to with up to 6 different teams (maybe someone familiarized with galaxy script -or just data- can help you to add more collision flags, or you can use another flag that you don't use in the mod).

Every time that a ground unit is created, you have to check to which team it belongs, and assign to it a collision flag that will only have its team ground units (via behaviors or upgrades), and then create periodically for it the "blocker" just as you were doing it, but with the same flag of the team.

I see in it another problem with your trigger, but it's not a big deal: There are some units, like the Ultralisk, or the Thor, that can't be pushed away. Then, this system won't work for them.


Hi. Yes i am actually using the unused ground collision groups so the blockers only interact with units, not structures or similar ( so you can raise depot and plant down buildings). Do you know of a way to assign these collision groups in a game? I have checked but the only thing i have found is a trigger to deactivate collision altogether. Do you know if there is a difference between using unused ground vs unused air? because only having 6 groups makes 4v4 impossible.
StarscreamG1
Profile Joined February 2011
Portugal1653 Posts
January 22 2014 15:43 GMT
#10305
Keep the game as it is, don't kill it with crazy units or ideas please This is a game made of small victories, keep it that way.
cacho56
Profile Joined January 2013
8 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-22 18:17:14
January 22 2014 15:45 GMT
#10306
On January 22 2014 23:50 AnteZ wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 22 2014 23:09 cacho56 wrote:
On January 21 2014 23:37 AnteZ wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +
Hello guys I am back :-)

I have spend yesterday evening and this morning reimplementing the modified movement in the data editor.
I can tell you already that I am quite fond of how well it works.
I have made one change that is key: Instead of giving the blockers (I called them followers before) a higher push priority, I gave them the push priority of the marines. This means that the blockers can be pushed aside like normal units but they still spread out the unit formation.
I initially assumed that bigger units also have higher push priority but it turns out all units I have checked have the same priority so this works for all units equally.
Because of this, microing units works much better, there was almost no blocking in my tests. I have also had no trouble chasing and killing a marauder with a zergling. Surrounds work also, as do melee vs melee engagements. However, there is a problem with stutter stepping marines. The chasing zerglings are blocked off almost completely and can not attack. This will need some ideas.
I have made another demonstration video. Enjoy.
ome more implementation details:
My changes consist of a new behaviour, associated effects and the blocker unit. The only thing that needs to be done to apply the new movement is to add the behaviour to it. For now I am just using a trigger that adds the behaviour to every unit entering the map (unless it is a blocker unit).

As for the problem of raising depots and planting buildings: It is possible to deactivate collisions with structures (think forcefields).

Since we generate the blockers periodically, problems with bunkers, dropships, etc. should not arise.

Also the blockers have a timed live, so every issue that remains should go away after 3 seconds :-)


Hey there! I'm not a starbow player, but I regularly check the threads in teamliquid related to sc2 mods to get some sort of feedback and ideas for the mod of my team because we usually have similar problems... And I thought... why don't I give something as an exchange?

@AnteZ:

I've seen your video, and I love how it works! You've had a really creative idea!

I know about a workaround that might solve your problem, I've sort of used it for our nydus canal ability.

You can configure the "blockers" to only block ally units. How to? There's a "collision" flag under the unit tab. If two units have the same collision flag, they can't occupy the same space. Your blocker must have "ground" and "forcefield", then it can't be in the same place that a forcefield or a ground unit occupies.

There are 6 unused ground collision flags. If you make 6 different blockers and each one with one of those 6 flags (and all the other flags unchecked), the spread trigger can work just as you want to with up to 6 different teams (maybe someone familiarized with galaxy script -or just data- can help you to add more collision flags, or you can use another flag that you don't use in the mod).

Every time that a ground unit is created, you have to check to which team it belongs, and assign to it a collision flag that will only have its team ground units (via behaviors or upgrades), and then create periodically for it the "blocker" just as you were doing it, but with the same flag of the team.

I see in it another problem with your trigger, but it's not a big deal: There are some units, like the Ultralisk, or the Thor, that can't be pushed away. Then, this system won't work for them.


Hi. Yes i am actually using the unused ground collision groups so the blockers only interact with units, not structures or similar ( so you can raise depot and plant down buildings). Do you know of a way to assign these collision groups in a game? I have checked but the only thing i have found is a trigger to deactivate collision altogether. Do you know if there is a difference between using unused ground vs unused air? because only having 6 groups makes 4v4 impossible.


1st Question: You can achieve that by creating a upgrade:

1) F7 (Data module) -> + -> Game data -> Upgrades -> Add upgrade (with the chosen name)

2) Under the "effects" tab, add a modification for each ground unit like in the image.

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


3) Copy the effect as many times as flags you have and edit the copies via xml changing the number of the flag. Click after finishing the green XML icon at the top bar.

+ Show Spoiler +
[image loading]


4) Make a trigger in the initialization, and give one of those upgrades to each team.

(You can edit each unit upgrade via xml too to make it faster... just copy/paste the text between "<EffectArray" and "/>", change the unit ID next to "reference=" and increase the number next to "value=")

I thought that it could be done with a behavior too, but I can't see the option...

2nd Question: The air collision flags don't work like the ground ones. With them, two units can be in the same spot, but will slowly push each other.

This can work in 4v4, the problems are the FFA with more than 6 teams. The allied units can push each other, only the enemies can't. Each team (not each player) must have the same collision. Anyway, you can use other flags like D-8 Charge, small critter, swarm, larva... I think that those won't affect that much the gameplay.
StarscreamG1
Profile Joined February 2011
Portugal1653 Posts
January 22 2014 16:32 GMT
#10307
Why on Earth a Scout requires a FBeacon? :\
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7031 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-22 18:42:05
January 22 2014 18:38 GMT
#10308
http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/1vuoxx/starbow_needs_programmers_and_web_designers/

What is the idea behind creating an external Starbow client? I guess the issue is matchmaking and creating a ladder, but couldn't that be serviced with merely a website?

(the website already exists, by the way: http://www.starbow.com/ )
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
Xiphias
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Norway2223 Posts
January 22 2014 19:16 GMT
#10309
On January 23 2014 03:38 Grumbels wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/1vuoxx/starbow_needs_programmers_and_web_designers/

What is the idea behind creating an external Starbow client? I guess the issue is matchmaking and creating a ladder, but couldn't that be serviced with merely a website?

(the website already exists, by the way: http://www.starbow.com/ )


well I think some feel that it is easier to just have a small program with an all-in-one features rather than having to work around in a web-site. I might be wrong though.
aka KanBan85. Working on Starbow.
Grumbels
Profile Blog Joined May 2009
Netherlands7031 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-22 19:23:10
January 22 2014 19:22 GMT
#10310
On January 23 2014 04:16 Xiphias wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2014 03:38 Grumbels wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/1vuoxx/starbow_needs_programmers_and_web_designers/

What is the idea behind creating an external Starbow client? I guess the issue is matchmaking and creating a ladder, but couldn't that be serviced with merely a website?

(the website already exists, by the way: http://www.starbow.com/ )


well I think some feel that it is easier to just have a small program with an all-in-one features rather than having to work around in a web-site. I might be wrong though.

But you'd need a website for purposes of distributing the program anyway. I suppose you're thinking of a launcher, the way that iccup worked? I don't think you can mimic all the functionality of the iccup launcher for sc2 anyway though.

(I personally don't mind a program btw)
Well, now I tell you, I never seen good come o' goodness yet. Him as strikes first is my fancy; dead men don't bite; them's my views--amen, so be it.
[SC]Django
Profile Joined September 2013
Poland44 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-22 20:11:49
January 22 2014 20:09 GMT
#10311
Johny Zerg says: Currently the models and icons are not a priority, but in the future, may be implemented.

How much time does the addition of these 2 icons ?

Vulture "Ion Thrusters" upgrade icon change:
[image loading]

Siege tank "Siege Mode" upgrade icon change:
[image loading]

This icon is really cool than those which are have in StarBow.
Ej_
Profile Blog Joined January 2013
47656 Posts
Last Edited: 2014-01-22 20:55:08
January 22 2014 20:23 GMT
#10312
with little experience in sc2 or bw (mostly dicking around with friends), i played my first starbow game. and i won.

my opponent went 2base carriers vs zerg. he also had 26 apm
i have to say it was pretty fun though. i like the need to inject much more often.
"Technically the dictionary has zero authority on the meaning or words" - Rodya
Xiphias
Profile Blog Joined May 2010
Norway2223 Posts
January 22 2014 20:59 GMT
#10313
On January 23 2014 04:22 Grumbels wrote:
Show nested quote +
On January 23 2014 04:16 Xiphias wrote:
On January 23 2014 03:38 Grumbels wrote:
http://www.reddit.com/r/starcraft/comments/1vuoxx/starbow_needs_programmers_and_web_designers/

What is the idea behind creating an external Starbow client? I guess the issue is matchmaking and creating a ladder, but couldn't that be serviced with merely a website?

(the website already exists, by the way: http://www.starbow.com/ )


well I think some feel that it is easier to just have a small program with an all-in-one features rather than having to work around in a web-site. I might be wrong though.

But you'd need a website for purposes of distributing the program anyway. I suppose you're thinking of a launcher, the way that iccup worked? I don't think you can mimic all the functionality of the iccup launcher for sc2 anyway though.

(I personally don't mind a program btw)


No, we cannot get all the functionality of iccup simply because of battle.net 2.0, but we will try and get as much as possible. A client seems to be the more elegant solution atm in spite of none of this being too elegant without blizzard...
aka KanBan85. Working on Starbow.
zeo
Profile Joined October 2009
Serbia6282 Posts
January 22 2014 22:53 GMT
#10314
Hey guys. Been hearing a lot about starbow recently and was wondering if the new patch that makes arcade free also makes starbow free to play. I kinda don't want to ever give Blizzard even the smallest amount of money ever again. I have WoL
"If only Kircheis were here" - Everyone
Sumadin
Profile Joined August 2011
Denmark588 Posts
January 22 2014 22:57 GMT
#10315
Everything is free. Just open the arcade and go play.

I don't know if there are any plans for an extension mod yet, but would be an option.
The basic key to beating a priest is playing a deck that is terrible.
zeo
Profile Joined October 2009
Serbia6282 Posts
January 22 2014 23:26 GMT
#10316
On January 23 2014 07:57 Sumadin wrote:
Everything is free. Just open the arcade and go play.

I don't know if there are any plans for an extension mod yet, but would be an option.

Thanks for the info, really hope the stand-alone mod gets put together.
"If only Kircheis were here" - Everyone
saddaromma
Profile Joined April 2013
1129 Posts
January 23 2014 06:42 GMT
#10317
Do you guys keep change log somewhere?
[SC]Django
Profile Joined September 2013
Poland44 Posts
January 23 2014 09:33 GMT
#10318
When StarBow add to extension mods ?
NapkinBox
Profile Blog Joined January 2012
United States314 Posts
January 23 2014 11:45 GMT
#10319
Is there anyway to make Abduct work like Firebat's Lasso in Dota? Instead of insta-pulling a unit, it just latches on to it and then you have to move the Vipers back to drag the attached unit.
"Who has the best durability feat in all of comic book superheroes?" "Aquaman surviving pop culture."
Sumadin
Profile Joined August 2011
Denmark588 Posts
January 23 2014 12:00 GMT
#10320
On January 23 2014 20:45 NapkinBox wrote:
Is there anyway to make Abduct work like Firebat's Lasso in Dota? Instead of insta-pulling a unit, it just latches on to it and then you have to move the Vipers back to drag the attached unit.


Wouldn't make much sense game-design vise. In a game like DOTA where Heroes play a crucial role, it makes sense that single-target disablers like abduct or lasso are weaker and slower. But in an RTS like SC2 there is barely any single unit it would be worth wasting so much APM disabling if it took so long, and this is even less the case in Starbow. Abduct in SC2 and Starbow is a killing move and nothing less would be worth it.
The basic key to beating a priest is playing a deck that is terrible.
Prev 1 514 515 516 517 518 537 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 1h 22m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Creator 13
StarCraft: Brood War
Hyuk 987
Soma 281
sSak 100
Sharp 72
sorry 46
Aegong 31
Mind 21
Pusan 21
zelot 21
yabsab 18
[ Show more ]
Free 16
IntoTheRainbow 6
Bale 6
ZerO 6
Stork 3
ivOry 2
Dota 2
XaKoH 523
XcaliburYe416
Counter-Strike
shoxiejesuss676
Super Smash Bros
Mew2King313
Other Games
ceh9761
Stewie2K674
Pyrionflax211
crisheroes189
SortOf134
rGuardiaN94
ZerO(Twitch)0
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick28450
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH368
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota2254
League of Legends
• HappyZerGling118
Upcoming Events
Wardi Open
1h 22m
Replay Cast
14h 22m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
1d
WardiTV European League
1d 6h
MaNa vs sebesdes
Mixu vs Fjant
ByuN vs HeRoMaRinE
ShoWTimE vs goblin
Gerald vs Babymarine
Krystianer vs YoungYakov
PiGosaur Monday
1d 14h
The PondCast
2 days
WardiTV European League
2 days
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
Replay Cast
2 days
RSL Revival
3 days
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
[ Show More ]
Replay Cast
3 days
RSL Revival
4 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
4 days
RSL Revival
5 days
FEL
5 days
FEL
5 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
RSL Revival
6 days
FEL
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

BSL Season 20
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.