• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 03:44
CEST 09:44
KST 16:44
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202533RSL Season 1 - Final Week8[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16
Community News
BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams3Weekly Cups (July 14-20): Final Check-up0Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed19Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission re-extension4
StarCraft 2
General
Power Rank - Esports World Cup 2025 RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Esports World Cup 2025 - Final Player Roster Why doesnt SC2 scene costream tournaments
Tourneys
Esports World Cup 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 483 Kill Bot Wars Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BSL Team Wars - Bonyth, Dewalt, Hawk & Sziky teams ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL
Tourneys
[CSLPRO] It's CSLAN Season! - Last Chance [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok) Path of Exile CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The Games Industry And ATVI Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
[\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Socialism Anyone?
GreenHorizons
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 567 users

[A] Starbow - Page 17

Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games
Post a Reply
Prev 1 15 16 17 18 19 537 Next
nucLeaRTV
Profile Joined May 2011
Romania822 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-22 17:24:52
June 22 2012 17:21 GMT
#321
Workers are not freaking zerglings or marines or dragoons stalkers. They're workers, they're supposed to be equal. What you said is that they need more HP so they guaranteed win a 1v1 fight against other workers (I see no biased decision there, mr. Terran), but why shouldn't they die as fast as the other workers to infantry units?
"Having your own haters means you are famous"
MNdakota
Profile Joined March 2012
United States512 Posts
June 22 2012 17:25 GMT
#322
On June 23 2012 02:21 nucLeaRTV wrote:
Workers are not freaking zerglings or marines or dragoons stalkers. They're workers, they're supposed to be equal. What you said is that they need more HP so they guaranteed win a 1v1 fight against other workers (I see no biased decision there, mr. Terran), but why shouldn't they die as fast as the other workers to infantry units?


It's funny because I MAIN ZERG.

It was an example...
You may have a fresh start any moment you choose, for this thing we call "failure" is not the falling down, but the staying down.
nucLeaRTV
Profile Joined May 2011
Romania822 Posts
June 22 2012 17:32 GMT
#323
It doesn't matter, the point stands. At least you stopped arguing and realized it's the correct way.
"Having your own haters means you are famous"
MNdakota
Profile Joined March 2012
United States512 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-22 17:52:19
June 22 2012 17:40 GMT
#324
On June 23 2012 02:32 nucLeaRTV wrote:
It doesn't matter, the point stands. At least you stopped arguing and realized it's the correct way.


Ok then... you can think that.

EDIT:
They're workers, they're supposed to be equal.


I didn't hear Blizzard say they had to be the same... LOL!
You may have a fresh start any moment you choose, for this thing we call "failure" is not the falling down, but the staying down.
Syphon8
Profile Joined July 2010
Canada298 Posts
June 22 2012 18:24 GMT
#325
On June 23 2012 02:21 nucLeaRTV wrote:
Workers are not freaking zerglings or marines or dragoons stalkers. They're workers, they're supposed to be equal. What you said is that they need more HP so they guaranteed win a 1v1 fight against other workers (I see no biased decision there, mr. Terran), but why shouldn't they die as fast as the other workers to infantry units?


Because units should have alternative roles that excellent players can take advantage of through control. Workers in BW had very different stats.
',:/
MNdakota
Profile Joined March 2012
United States512 Posts
June 22 2012 18:26 GMT
#326
On June 23 2012 03:24 Syphon8 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 23 2012 02:21 nucLeaRTV wrote:
Workers are not freaking zerglings or marines or dragoons stalkers. They're workers, they're supposed to be equal. What you said is that they need more HP so they guaranteed win a 1v1 fight against other workers (I see no biased decision there, mr. Terran), but why shouldn't they die as fast as the other workers to infantry units?


Because units should have alternative roles that excellent players can take advantage of through control. Workers in BW had very different stats.


Yeah I have no idea where he is getting these ideas from...
You may have a fresh start any moment you choose, for this thing we call "failure" is not the falling down, but the staying down.
Kabel
Profile Joined September 2009
Sweden1746 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-22 18:53:20
June 22 2012 18:41 GMT
#327
FRB and the "BW-model" has been uploaded for some days now.

The problem with FRB:

Each base requires 24+3 workers to be fully saturated. There is no reason to have more than 4 bases anyway because 4x27 workers are half your supply.

The income in the start is really slow, meaning that its a very long early game with a slow income acceleration. (Since each worker generates so little income per minute)




The problem with the "BW-model":

Players get extremely rich once they grab the third base. Each base generates to much money. (Even though the amount is still lower than an SC2 base, its still to much.) Unspendable amounts if you reach 4 or 5 bases.





The optimal would be:


A faster income acceleration at the start. More money in the beginning = more options.
Each fully saturated base generates less income compared to a SC2 base,
Each base requires "fewer" workers, meaning that players are able to expand more. (And have supply for workers)

I think games which involves many bases on both sides tends to be funniest to both play and watch. Thats why I try to implement aspects of area control. It shall be a risk to take an expansion, but you will have acess to the right tools so you can defend it properly. Something I feel SC2 lacks and BW has plenty of.

I ain´t satisfied with either of the two models. But with some tweaking I think we will hit jackpot ^^

Creator of Starbow
MNdakota
Profile Joined March 2012
United States512 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-22 19:38:56
June 22 2012 18:56 GMT
#328
On June 23 2012 03:41 Kabel wrote:
FRB and the "BW-model" has been uploaded for some days now.

The problem with FRB:

Each base requires 24+3 workers to be fully saturated. There is no reason to have more than 4 bases anyway because 4x27 workers are half your supply.

The income in the start is really slow, meaning that its a very long early game with a slow income acceleration. (Since each worker generates so little income per minute)


Remember that you do not have to have 27 workers at a base. 16 workers will do you the job. And besides, no one is going to have fully saturated bases up to four.

The income in the start of the game is not slow at all. Do people not know how to make workers constantly?

In fact, the reason why it's more fun with the lower income is because you don't get the "deathball" as quickly and fights happen in between. Not only that but expanding becomes more important and you want "expanding to be easier" which is already. I don't see the problem currently.

Since you have such little income at the start of the game. Micro becomes much more important and not only that but static defense is more powerful.

Currently, I think the way the mod is going with the resources is dumb and I don't think it should be that way. At least, keep FRB variants on the NA server.

With what we have now, you have too many options to do anything. You gain army too quickly and that makes the game stupid and it's getting null. I can support like three barracks with not even 12 workers on one base and still manage to not skip making SCVs, marines and supply depots.

Please, I guarantee you that you'll have a better experience with FRB and a long with many others that are following the mod.

On June 23 2012 03:41 Kabel wrote:
A faster income acceleration at the start. More money in the beginning = more options.
Each fully saturated base generates less income compared to a SC2 base,
Each base requires "fewer" workers, meaning that players are able to expand more. (And have supply for workers)

I think games which involves many bases on both sides tends to be funniest to both play and watch. Thats why I try to implement aspects of area control. It shall be a risk to take an expansion, but you will have acess to the right tools so you can defend it properly. Something I feel SC2 lacks and BW has plenty of.

I ain´t satisfied with either of the two models. But with some tweaking I think we will hit jackpot ^^



The income with FRB is motherfucking perfect! In fact, you get the same amount of income in Brood War but since workers mine faster in StarCraft 2, it adds up to being the same in Brood War but people don't realize it because workers actually mine faster in StarCraft 2.

[image loading]

You don't gain income too fast, or too slow. It's in the right place!

Less income = expansions are more important, therefore logically. Someone is going to take more bases. Then since they're less units on the field. Area control units become much more effective a long with static defense.

No one in FRB is ever going to go above 40 workers. It just really never happened. Unless of course, both players are turtling and being boring overall to watch.

Then of course, you're going to have more expansions because the income is less. Expanding becomes much more natural and obvious to new players.

FRB is exactly what you're looking for but you have no idea at the moment. I still don't know why you can't see it but this is it. I am serious, I want this mod to succeed because it is FUN. Now with FRB, it is even more fun. Micro is actually viable. To do.

If you remember in Brood War. Rarely did either player get to 200/200 supply. Not only did it take forever with the income rate, but it was god awfully hard to control and execute perfectly.

Disclaimer: Those who read this have to understand that this is my opinion and I am very open minded when it comes to these kinds of things so don't get insulted. I am not afraid to give my dead honest opinion. Instead, read it and understand it and take it for granted.

TL;DR: FRB was way better for Starbow.
You may have a fresh start any moment you choose, for this thing we call "failure" is not the falling down, but the staying down.
Deleted User 97295
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
1137 Posts
June 22 2012 20:38 GMT
#329
--- Nuked ---
Kabel
Profile Joined September 2009
Sweden1746 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-22 20:52:17
June 22 2012 20:45 GMT
#330
To expand is a risk. You invest money to start a process. The process is a burden the first 100 seconds of its existence. Its an egg you need to protect. Once the expansion is finished, its still helpless and useless. You must invest even more money to send workers there.

In FRB a worker generates ca 30-38 minerals per minute. In BW, each worker generated ca 55-60 minerals per minute. This means that just sending a few workers to mine on a new expansion has a (decent) effect on your economy. An expansion would simply start paying of more quicker.

To expand in FRB is a really long and expensive process. Its true that it has to be done. But the amount of time it takes before the expansion starts to pay of is very long and very costly, due to the slow income by each worker.

Expanding requires that you spend a large percentage of your total economy in doing it. (If you go from 1 base to 2 bases.) Since players have so limited income with 1 base, there aint that much money over for teching or building army. Just building base defence to protect the expansion.

The three pillars of the game: Spend money on army, spend money on technology, spend economy on more economy. You can´t maximize all three at the same time. But you shall always be able to spend atleast some money on each of them. Right now, spending money on more money is expensive. That limits your other options. That limits your offensive capability.

From the games we played on EU atleast, players seemed to stay very defensive. Each player has so few units in the first 8 minutes of the game. Why risk loosing them when they are so expensive to replace?

After players expanded, they started investing in technology and army. Mutalisks came into play like 13-14 minutes into the game. And to observe such a game felt very lame. Imagine if this ever gets casted in a hobby tournament, I fear that the entertainment value will be low. : /


With this being said, I think the games generally were very entertaining 16 minutes and later. When players got more bases, expanded everywhere etc. Maybe you had other experiences on the NA server with the games people played there.

I think the FRB has potential, but it needs to be tweaked in some way. Some suggestions:

The build time of a base is reduced from 100 seconds to.. lets say 80.

The build time of workers are decreased from 17 to 15.

Or that each base only has 6 mineral patches and each worker harvests 5 minerals. This would make each worker slightly more efficent. And each base requires less workers. And it still keeps the income per base lower compared to SC2.



If people here have any ideas, please share them




On June 23 2012 05:38 Laertes wrote:
Okay, so I am going to put FRB on every Starbow map, cause I think dakota has a point, let's just try it to see how it goes on NA, I'm still undecided, but I'd like to integrate the FRB system into the mod.



I thought you had both uploaded on NA? One named Starbow and one named Starbow FRB? If not, feel free to do it

Creator of Starbow
MNdakota
Profile Joined March 2012
United States512 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-22 21:04:25
June 22 2012 21:01 GMT
#331
The thing is, players can play different styles. I for one, am more of an aggressive player. I like to attack. I am confident in my micro that I could kill things. It is a war game for a reason. I can still produce an army on the side of making workers at the same time.

Of course taking an expansion is going to be a risk. Someone who realizes that and takes advantage of killing you is strategy. They are being rewarded for being a smarter player than the other.

Some players may want to play more defensive which is fine. It's just a different play style and how people enjoy the game.

I am assuming that people play much differently on the EU side of things because everything you're saying isn't a problem on the NA side.

It isn't very expensive and hard to expand in FRB in the first place. All you do is stop making units for about 10 seconds and then put down the base and defend it. Unless of course, you're being more offensive and keeping him from expanding while expanding yourself. It's strategy.

It's a development process when setting up a new base. Either you can make bases last a little bit longer by putting more minerals on the nodes themselves (which is an easy fix by the way).

Because I don't feel like the problem is FRB right now. I feel like it's the players fault for not having a strong economy. They just don't know how to play? (LOL!) They're obviously having a hard timing making workers for some reason.

Just don't queue up more than two workers and you can do so much more. It's just the basics of macro mechanics. I for one, enjoy watching the FRB style and a long with playing it.

As for now, FRB is where it's at and I'm going to continue playing it because I enjoy it.

You can obviously have a different version of EU while us NA people can play on FRB.
You may have a fresh start any moment you choose, for this thing we call "failure" is not the falling down, but the staying down.
Deleted User 97295
Profile Blog Joined August 2010
1137 Posts
June 22 2012 21:09 GMT
#332
--- Nuked ---
MNdakota
Profile Joined March 2012
United States512 Posts
June 22 2012 21:11 GMT
#333
On June 23 2012 06:09 Laertes wrote:
Alright, so I have an interesting idea. Here is what I did dakota; I gave Daybreak, Ohana, and Taldarim FRB. I left Devolution and Kaerpasir alone. We are going to make 20 something odd rotational vods, record Ohana, then, Tald, then Kaer, then Devo, then Daybreak. We see how FRB plays out with all of them with FRB, and how it plays out on bw mock, then we analyze where each system falters, and make our OWN system, so as to accomodate starbow in and of itself.


I still think FRB is more solid than something we could ever make. Which is why it was so successful even with vanilla StarCraft 2.
You may have a fresh start any moment you choose, for this thing we call "failure" is not the falling down, but the staying down.
Kabel
Profile Joined September 2009
Sweden1746 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-22 21:30:17
June 22 2012 21:29 GMT
#334
I can lift another hot topic to this thread. Some players on EU want the Stalker back.

The main reason is that the current Dragoon have been "stalkeraized." They are weaker, are fast, have blink and can be warped in. They are fat and clumpsy and try to fit in the role of a mobile harassing unit. The stalker themselves does that job perfectly.

The "real" dragoon is a powerhouse. A mean machine that takes shit from no one. Earlier in this mod dragoons have been much stronger, but due to the power of warp in and blink I have nerfed them.

The defenders of the Dragoon want it to remove blink, maybe make it able to not warp in, and make them stronger in all areas. Plus that it is such an iconic unit that looks really good. An old fan-favourite doing comeback in this game.. And the nice blue goo when it dies.. aaahhh..

Personally I think the Dragoon is right now caught between two roles. It needs to choose one of them. Plus that I can´t stand the look of the stalker. But I found this skin, which makes them feel more old-school protoss: http://www.sc2mapster.com/assets/dark-protoss/files/47-templar-stalker/

People has even suggested to let both units be in the game, but having completely different roles.

Let me hear your arguments and thoughts.
Creator of Starbow
Monochromatic
Profile Blog Joined March 2012
United States997 Posts
June 22 2012 21:35 GMT
#335
On June 23 2012 06:29 Kabel wrote:
I can lift another hot topic to this thread. Some players on EU want the Stalker back.

The main reason is that the current Dragoon have been "stalkeraized." They are weaker, are fast, have blink and can be warped in. They are fat and clumpsy and try to fit in the role of a mobile harassing unit. The stalker themselves does that job perfectly.

The "real" dragoon is a powerhouse. A mean machine that takes shit from no one. Earlier in this mod dragoons have been much stronger, but due to the power of warp in and blink I have nerfed them.

The defenders of the Dragoon want it to remove blink, maybe make it able to not warp in, and make them stronger in all areas. Plus that it is such an iconic unit that looks really good. An old fan-favourite doing comeback in this game.. And the nice blue goo when it dies.. aaahhh..

Personally I think the Dragoon is right now caught between two roles. It needs to choose one of them. Plus that I can´t stand the look of the stalker. But I found this skin, which makes them feel more old-school protoss: http://www.sc2mapster.com/assets/dark-protoss/files/47-templar-stalker/

People has even suggested to let both units be in the game, but having completely different roles.

Let me hear your arguments and thoughts.


Next players will want the wraith replaced with a banshee, no.

Dragoons are an iconic protoss unit, they do their job well. Protoss doesn't need to be able to harass with stalkers when they have such amazing units such as the reaver.

The Dragoon isn't caught between 2 roles, unless the stalker is the same thing. Both stalkers and dragoons can defend and attack. The Dragoon is just weaker.

Not having a super powerful gateway unit is good, it stops players from warping in things that are too powerful. This also encorages the Protoss to tech up for blink, so he can use his dragoons more effectivly.

It sounds to me like SC2 players complaining that the game isn't like SC2, it's more BW. And I'd say that more BW is better.
MC: "Guys I need your support! iam poor make me nerd baller" __________________________________________RIP Violet
MNdakota
Profile Joined March 2012
United States512 Posts
June 22 2012 21:39 GMT
#336
On June 23 2012 06:35 Monochromatic wrote:
Show nested quote +
On June 23 2012 06:29 Kabel wrote:
I can lift another hot topic to this thread. Some players on EU want the Stalker back.

The main reason is that the current Dragoon have been "stalkeraized." They are weaker, are fast, have blink and can be warped in. They are fat and clumpsy and try to fit in the role of a mobile harassing unit. The stalker themselves does that job perfectly.

The "real" dragoon is a powerhouse. A mean machine that takes shit from no one. Earlier in this mod dragoons have been much stronger, but due to the power of warp in and blink I have nerfed them.

The defenders of the Dragoon want it to remove blink, maybe make it able to not warp in, and make them stronger in all areas. Plus that it is such an iconic unit that looks really good. An old fan-favourite doing comeback in this game.. And the nice blue goo when it dies.. aaahhh..

Personally I think the Dragoon is right now caught between two roles. It needs to choose one of them. Plus that I can´t stand the look of the stalker. But I found this skin, which makes them feel more old-school protoss: http://www.sc2mapster.com/assets/dark-protoss/files/47-templar-stalker/

People has even suggested to let both units be in the game, but having completely different roles.

Let me hear your arguments and thoughts.


It sounds to me like SC2 players complaining that the game isn't like SC2, it's more BW. And I'd say that more BW is better.


It sounds like to me that players are complaining that they can't adapt to certain situations. Just because the Dragoon has a delay, doesn't mean it sucks. They should just learn how to use that effectively even though it has the attack delay. Same goes for wanting to switch from FRB.
You may have a fresh start any moment you choose, for this thing we call "failure" is not the falling down, but the staying down.
nucLeaRTV
Profile Joined May 2011
Romania822 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-22 22:18:41
June 22 2012 22:18 GMT
#337
Alright, I'll stop with any ideas from now on. Have fun improving the map!
"Having your own haters means you are famous"
TaShadan
Profile Joined February 2010
Germany1969 Posts
June 23 2012 08:15 GMT
#338
On June 23 2012 02:21 nucLeaRTV wrote:
Workers are not freaking zerglings or marines or dragoons stalkers. They're workers, they're supposed to be equal. What you said is that they need more HP so they guaranteed win a 1v1 fight against other workers (I see no biased decision there, mr. Terran), but why shouldn't they die as fast as the other workers to infantry units?


actually in bw they are not equal
scvs have more health and even the mining times of probes/scvs/drones are slightly different and probes can "shoot" through allied zealots so they have a small range while the other workers are melee
Total Annihilation Zero
TaShadan
Profile Joined February 2010
Germany1969 Posts
Last Edited: 2012-06-23 08:37:01
June 23 2012 08:28 GMT
#339
On June 23 2012 06:29 Kabel wrote:
I can lift another hot topic to this thread. Some players on EU want the Stalker back.

The main reason is that the current Dragoon have been "stalkeraized." They are weaker, are fast, have blink and can be warped in. They are fat and clumpsy and try to fit in the role of a mobile harassing unit. The stalker themselves does that job perfectly.

The "real" dragoon is a powerhouse. A mean machine that takes shit from no one. Earlier in this mod dragoons have been much stronger, but due to the power of warp in and blink I have nerfed them.

The defenders of the Dragoon want it to remove blink, maybe make it able to not warp in, and make them stronger in all areas. Plus that it is such an iconic unit that looks really good. An old fan-favourite doing comeback in this game.. And the nice blue goo when it dies.. aaahhh..

Personally I think the Dragoon is right now caught between two roles. It needs to choose one of them. Plus that I can´t stand the look of the stalker. But I found this skin, which makes them feel more old-school protoss: http://www.sc2mapster.com/assets/dark-protoss/files/47-templar-stalker/

People has even suggested to let both units be in the game, but having completely different roles.

Let me hear your arguments and thoughts.


i think you should get the real dragoon, although i like the aiur stalker skin, back without blink and warpin but more health and firepower and range upgrade

also in general i think you should reduce the dps of all units especially ranged ones by reducing the rate of fire
Total Annihilation Zero
Danko__
Profile Joined January 2012
Poland429 Posts
June 23 2012 12:09 GMT
#340
Well, i think we could upload some replays of games we played and analyze them.
Prev 1 15 16 17 18 19 537 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 2h 17m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ProTech78
StarCraft: Brood War
Nal_rA 4785
Hyuk 4080
Zeus 1366
ToSsGirL 252
Leta 95
Backho 81
Sacsri 55
ajuk12(nOOB) 23
NaDa 22
Britney 0
Dota 2
ODPixel230
XcaliburYe166
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K925
Other Games
summit1g6011
ceh9473
SortOf32
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1168
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH446
• Sammyuel 37
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• lizZardDota253
Upcoming Events
Esports World Cup
2h 17m
ByuN vs Zoun
SHIN vs TriGGeR
Cyan vs ShoWTimE
Rogue vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs Solar
Reynor vs Maru
herO vs Cure
Serral vs Classic
Esports World Cup
1d 2h
Esports World Cup
2 days
CranKy Ducklings
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Zhanhun
Dewalt vs Mihu
Hawk vs Sziky
Sziky vs QiaoGege
Mihu vs Hawk
Zhanhun vs Dewalt
Fengzi vs Bonyth
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
6 days
Online Event
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
CC Div. A S7
Underdog Cup #2
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
HCC Europe
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.