[M] Lost Yield

On August 31 2010 05:28 Whiplash wrote:
It looks pretty nice, it needs more detail though but I'm sure you know that.

Black Line = Line of Sight Blocker

On August 31 2010 10:59 BoomStevo wrote:

I don't see any black lines. Are there LoS blockers I am not seeing?

Otherwise, I have no real complaints about the layout...

P.S. With all those gold rocks down below, I expected more gold expansions.

On August 31 2010 10:49 Antares777 wrote:
I like the positions of the mains, nats, and expansions. I have no criticism for any terrain imbalances or suggestions. All you need to do is add the textures and doodads. :D

On August 31 2010 16:09 vica wrote:
I would like to see it a bit bigger to see if you could fit a fifth expansion. Or the fourth. I dislike the idea of being forced to take the gold as a fourth, or fifth. I like the entire design however.

On August 31 2010 14:45 Umbra wrote:
My only concern with this map is for a fast expanding Zerg. The position of the main is a far distance from the main ramp and natural expo, so a zerg may have trouble spreading creep down to the natural fast enough to deal with early harass, especially from Terran. It could take 3 or 4 tumors to extend the creep down to the expansion fast enough which would make it hard to position spine crawlers and move queens between bases without getting sniped. Other than this potential zerg imbalance, the map looks pretty good

On September 01 2010 02:27 FlaShFTW wrote:
awww... i was hoping for a map with just high yield expansions... =( but i really like the map! however, its kinda like a 2 player lost temple, considering you have a high ground where tanks or reapers can abuse... so i kinda dont like that =( otherwise, great!

On September 01 2010 03:58 McCheese wrote:
But nonono, that will be unpathable. The only things that can go up there will be like flying things. No cliff walking or jumping or dropping on that cliff. =] Hopefully that makes it even better. =D

On September 01 2010 06:43 CharlieMurphy wrote:
with all those mineral units, the map would surely lag wouldn't it?

On September 01 2010 06:39 dimfish wrote:


I know you said you're really in the major terrain layout phase, but maybe some doodads would help people see visually that the nat cliff is unpathable. Or you could post map analyzer pics! *wink*

hope that helps. =D Its only 2 tumors to get down the ramp. Ofcourse the first you have to wait for it to reach to pretty much the end, but it can be difficult I guess...

Thanks for the feedback! Its much appreciated. =]

On September 01 2010 14:27 ohN wrote:
I kinda hate the mineral background but other than that, great map.
Could use 1 more expansion for each player though or at least 1 contested one.

On September 01 2010 14:17 Thoreezhea wrote:
the outer edges look retardedd, full of minerals and shit... ugh.

On September 01 2010 12:46 Umbra wrote:


Thanks for the pic. And yea it might just be a problem for a zerg who opts for tumors over the first few larva spits to extend the creep more rapidly. If you didnt wait for creep to expand, it may take one extra tumor. Great map overall, hope I get to play it on the Aus server

On September 12 2010 07:13 Antares777 wrote:
Put DRs at the high yield expansions or Zerg may fast expand there a lot imo. I've seen it happen a countless number of times on Kulas Ravine, and I think DRs would be greatly needed.