EPTyou can select whatever you want and then a trigger cuts it back to 12. this is delayed like giving a unit a move order. so it can be cheated if your fast enough or cause confusion as unit selection changes post selection.
[A] Starcraft 2 Brood War - Page 176
| Forum Index > SC2 Maps & Custom Games |
|
MavercK
Australia2181 Posts
you can select whatever you want and then a trigger cuts it back to 12. this is delayed like giving a unit a move order. so it can be cheated if your fast enough or cause confusion as unit selection changes post selection. | ||
|
MattyClutch
United States711 Posts
On August 12 2011 04:35 xarthaz wrote: Brood War with HD mod is the best imo. But its fun to see sc2bw with its perks too Linky? Or is it just easily found in custom games? | ||
|
eviltomahawk
United States11135 Posts
On September 08 2011 23:56 Ribbon wrote: It is possible to play SC2 with BW mechanics? I feel like that'd be interesting, to see if that added to the game like people often say it would. A lot of SC2 mechanics would be much harder to use with BW restrictions. Warpgates simply do not work without MBS. Having the 12 unit selection limit and BW-style larva morph would make larva management with Queens quite different, though it wouldn't be too impactful. Terrans will have an easier time scanning since scans are bound to the Orbital Command instead of the separate Comsat, so that frees up a few control groups. It would be really hard for Zerg players to deal with the 12 unit selection limit, especially if they rely on mass Zerglings, which suck compared to their BW counterparts. I also imagine that it would be hard to manage multiple Spine and Spore Crawlers without MBS. | ||
|
Asturia
Romania1 Post
Just a little dissapointed that it didn't worked like in BW - max units in SC2 is 200, not 400 (or maybe 600  as it used to be. (Remembering the days when I used to teleport a pack tanks in siege mode already) Yeah, those were the days! | ||
|
firehand101
Australia3152 Posts
| ||
|
blooblooblahblah
Australia4163 Posts
On September 10 2011 04:01 MattyClutch wrote: Linky? Or is it just easily found in custom games? it's not a custom game | ||
|
EternalSC
Sweden313 Posts
| ||
|
highsis
259 Posts
| ||
|
MattyClutch
United States711 Posts
Thats what I thought at first, but my weak Googlefu turned up nothing so I thought it was a new custom game. So it is neither and just that buggy higher res SC2 thing? Sad times  | ||
|
CosmosXAM
United States121 Posts
| ||
|
TedJustice
Canada1324 Posts
On September 09 2011 17:59 MavercK wrote: the problem is limiting the amount of selected units is handicapped by battle.net latency. because battle.net is awful. you can select whatever you want and then a trigger cuts it back to 12. this is delayed like giving a unit a move order. so it can be cheated if your fast enough or cause confusion as unit selection changes post selection. What if you used some kind of validator that made nothing work until that trigger has run? Like editing the move command and stuff like that. It would be a messy fix, but it would make it so that lag is lag and you can't issue commands when it lags, rather than being able to cheat when it lags. | ||
|
MavercK
Australia2181 Posts
On September 11 2011 04:23 TedJustice wrote: What if you used some kind of validator that made nothing work until that trigger has run? Like editing the move command and stuff like that. It would be a messy fix, but it would make it so that lag is lag and you can't issue commands when it lags, rather than being able to cheat when it lags. that would interfere heavily with someones play. theres a unit test map included in the maps if you download them from sc2mapster. you will have to setup the mods and stuff yourself to use this test map however. | ||
|
Flix
Belgium114 Posts
On August 19 2010 02:03 Pika Chu wrote: Wasting your time, just play BW if you don't like SC2. Are you serious? why would you post this? go away... it's a commendable project and will surely be a lot fun, loser.... | ||
|
KaluGOSU
United States171 Posts
let's get some TvZ action | ||
|
delHospital
Poland261 Posts
On September 12 2011 04:05 Flix wrote: Are you serious? why would you post this? go away... it's a commendable project and will surely be a lot fun, loser.... LOL, it was posted over a year ago in repsonse to OP's question whether he should proceed with the idea of making sc2bw or abandon it. | ||
|
Flossy
United States870 Posts
| ||
|
Phyrigian
New Zealand1332 Posts
| ||
|
coolcor
520 Posts
On August 25 2011 03:51 d_so wrote: This thread is about to get a lot more interesting.. Thread isn't interesting yet | ||
|
MavercK
Australia2181 Posts
 | ||
|
Phyrigian
New Zealand1332 Posts
| ||
| ||
