EPTAnd well, of course it's a proof. It's a proof that describes the notion that whoever wins the super ace wins the series.
Wow. How long did it take you to figure that out?
Do you like the new Super-Ace PL Format? - Page 6
| Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
|
Dagobert
Netherlands1858 Posts
And well, of course it's a proof. It's a proof that describes the notion that whoever wins the super ace wins the series. Wow. How long did it take you to figure that out? | ||
|
Gustav_Wind
United States646 Posts
On August 04 2009 09:39 Dagobert wrote: Since day1 and day2 are not identical, your formula is quite wrong. And well, of course it's a proof. It's a proof that describes the notion that whoever wins the super ace wins the series. Wow. How long did it take you to figure that out? The fact that the percentages for day 1 and 2 are different is a nitpick really. Replace the p variable with p1 and p2 and nothing really changes. the result is the same. On a more theoretical level, using one percentage for both days is correct if you think about it from the point of view of before the lineups for the two have been decided. You can still assign a theoretical single winning percentage by accounting for all possible combinations of lineups and the probabilities of each occurring. Also, the proof describes that Super Ace favors teams with better aces more than the single Bo7 format. That's a non-trivial result.I thought the result was obvious as well, but if you go back and read StarBrift's post you will see that not everyone agrees. I'm not posting a proof for no reason here. | ||
|
Avidkeystamper
United States8556 Posts
Honestly, they should get rid of ace matches. Just play the Bo7 all over again if it's 3-3 Gustav's right, but bear in mind that the difference will still be very small for a team like Oz vs CJ or SKT due to the fact that their probability to win a Bo7 is very small and the chance of JD winning an ace match isn't guaranteed. | ||
|
Malongo
Chile3472 Posts
| ||
IntoTheWow
is awesome32278 Posts
Bring back Winners League format. Sniping, map decisions, who to send first. Way more cool! | ||
|
Exteray
United States1094 Posts
On August 03 2009 01:30 tirentu wrote: Yes. Why? JAEDONG. QFT | ||
|
Avidkeystamper
United States8556 Posts
On August 04 2009 13:45 IntoTheWow wrote: I like the excitement it creates, but i don't think it's fair or that it represent the team league idea. Bring back Winners League format. Sniping, map decisions, who to send first. Way more cool! Starcraft's main foundation is 1v1. A true team league is impossible given the current progame teams and will actually distort the relative strengths of each team for it to happen. | ||
|
Sinedd
Poland7052 Posts
like one game decide the whole series ? ... if this was like bo3 it would be good , but bo1 ? ... suckz big time | ||
|
arew
Lithuania1861 Posts
| ||
|
Avidkeystamper
United States8556 Posts
| ||
|
Presony-Boy
Israel812 Posts
| ||
|
4Servy
Netherlands1542 Posts
| ||
|
FaCE_1
Canada6184 Posts
bo3 > Super Ace | ||
|
3 Lions
United States3705 Posts
On August 05 2009 03:17 Presony-Boy wrote: they should make the super ace a 4v4 game. On fastest space | ||
|
TheFoReveRwaR
United States10657 Posts
| ||
|
writer22816
United States5775 Posts
On August 04 2009 11:48 Malongo wrote: Just force a random Ace from the players that actually played in each team. That forces less "one mans" teams and no Ace sniping. lol | ||
|
Alsar
United States130 Posts
I don't see how Winner's League is any different than this format for putting emphasis on star players rather than team depth. You had jaedong all-killing everyone in WL also, so it's not much different. Not saying WL wasn't really fun and exciting, but I just don't get why some people are trying to say that it put more emphasis on team depth. | ||
|
ggnet)mOnion
United States72 Posts
| ||
|
Dknight
United States5224 Posts
| ||
|
Clasic
Bosnia-Herzegovina1437 Posts
On August 03 2009 02:52 Nylan wrote: Full of lamesauce. Bo3 Bo7 plz kthx Yeah, this is all i want lol | ||
| ||
