EPTDo you plan on trying BW:Remastered when it comes out?
| Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
|
mishimaBeef
Canada2259 Posts
| ||
|
Strider!!
United States12 Posts
| ||
|
Mahanaim
Korea (South)1002 Posts
| ||
|
ninazerg
United States7291 Posts
Glad it's generating excitement, but it's just really Blizzard going, "Oh, this game is still really popular in Korea? I bet we can make some good money if we get Jaedong, Flash, Bisu, and Stork to play this." If you think I'm just being cynical, I think the stream-watching numbers are telling: thousands of concurrent viewers for StarCraft: Brood War. Sometimes they just watch progamers eating noodles. That huge rebirth of mass viewership is the reason Afreeca was able to host professional-level StarLeagues. And all of this was BEFORE Blizzard decided to make a move. I would expect less than one million buys in North America. Europe will probably be a bigger market. Pls no hate Edit: I'm not telling anyone not to buy it or enjoy it. Before you... you people... say I'm saying that. | ||
|
PinoKotsBeer
Netherlands1385 Posts
| ||
|
esReveR
United States567 Posts
On April 28 2017 16:41 PinoKotsBeer wrote: Just for the campaign, not multiplayer. My thoughts exactly. I've been wanting to run through the old missions for a long time, but the current broodwar doesn't work properly on my machine. Though the old WGTour, ICCUP, etc days were fun... I don't have the desire to relearn the game to the extent required to be competitive in multiplayer again. | ||
conTAgi0n
United States335 Posts
On April 28 2017 16:25 ninazerg wrote: Nope. Glad it's generating excitement, but it's just really Blizzard going, "Oh, this game is still really popular in Korea? I bet we can make some good money if we get Jaedong, Flash, Bisu, and Stork to play this." If you think I'm just being cynical, I think the stream-watching numbers are telling: thousands of concurrent viewers for StarCraft: Brood War. Sometimes they just watch progamers eating noodles. That huge rebirth of mass viewership is the reason Afreeca was able to host professional-level StarLeagues. And all of this was BEFORE Blizzard decided to make a move. I would expect less than one million buys in North America. Europe will probably be a bigger market. Pls no hate Edit: I'm not telling anyone not to buy it or enjoy it. Before you... you people... say I'm saying that. I'm also not saying that you should feel differently or that you should change your mind... but I don't understand what Blizzard being motivated by profit has to do with whether you want to try SC:R or not. Of course Blizzard is just doing it for the money; why else would a corporation do anything? They were in it for the money when they made the original SC too, but we still play that. It would more make sense to me if you said that you weren't interested because you don't like some design decision, or that the HD graphics don't appeal to you, or that you thought there was some more malicious motive associated with their decision. But I'm not sure what a company being motivated by profit has to do with wanting to try their product. Again, I'm not trying to challenge you on this or anything, I am just struggling to understand where you are coming from. | ||
|
highsis
259 Posts
If they had implemented 1. hotkey changes 2. unit groups upto 200 units (you can make only 11 air units 'stack'. easy solution to prevent 50 muta micro) 3. multiple building group selection Only then I would have been interested. | ||
|
NET
United States703 Posts
Edit: So excited I misspelled "I'm." Also would be cool to see all of the old school personalities come back to the game that made them who they are. Lets get that passion flowing. | ||
|
ninazerg
United States7291 Posts
On April 29 2017 06:08 conTAgi0n wrote: I'm also not saying that you should feel differently or that you should change your mind... but I don't understand what Blizzard being motivated by profit has to do with whether you want to try SC:R or not. Of course Blizzard is just doing it for the money; why else would a corporation do anything? They were in it for the money when they made the original SC too, but we still play that. It would more make sense to me if you said that you weren't interested because you don't like some design decision, or that the HD graphics don't appeal to you, or that you thought there was some more malicious motive associated with their decision. But I'm not sure what a company being motivated by profit has to do with wanting to try their product. Again, I'm not trying to challenge you on this or anything, I am just struggling to understand where you are coming from. Couple of things: First, StarCraft is already playable, so why would I play money to play a game that I can already play? Sure, the graphics are re-done, but it's the same game overall. I've always liked the StarCraft: Brood War graphics, so while I'm not against updating the graphics, I'd be fine without that. Second, Blizzard, as of late, has had a track record of releasing incomplete or buggy products. Or D3. Just for the 1.18 patch, they had a myriad of problems in the test realm, and that version was patched several times and the thing still needs fixing. I would be hesitant to purchase a product from a company that has a reputation for doing shoddy work. | ||
|
TelecoM
United States10664 Posts
Love u Nina 😏 Remastered is HYPE BOYS (and girls) EDIT: I think this has more to do with the fact Blizzard knows BW ESports will be bigger than sc2 again, and they are trying to give it a push in the right direction, remastered should only be seen as a positive from any BW players point of view. I'm also hoping this spawns a new / old generation of foreign BW esports, maybe we will see BW return to big foreign events, that's the dream. | ||
|
BlueStar
Bulgaria1162 Posts
- will play it tho ! | ||
|
Shield
Bulgaria4824 Posts
On April 30 2017 16:19 BlueStar wrote: won't give money for buggy shit to blizzard - will play it tho ! So you're planning to download it illegally? :D | ||
|
RobinJohnsson
Sweden110 Posts
| ||
|
fabiano
Brazil4644 Posts
On April 30 2017 21:04 Shield wrote: Yeah, I intend to play SC: Remastered. It'll be even better for me if they have a ladder mod with auto-mining and smart macro (multiple selection of buildings only), but I know BW elitists are people who still live in the 90's and will hate that. That said, I played BW before sc2. :D So you're planning to download it illegally? :D About the bolded part: watch what Day9 has to say on this subject. Hope that will make you understand why people defend to keep the game as it is. | ||
|
ViZe
United States1513 Posts
they shouldn't change the control scheme or anything like that. i can get behind hotkey rebinding and a few minor things, but no mbs and 12 unit control groups is fundamental to how the game is played. that would not be broodwar. that would be sc2 with broodwar units | ||
|
Cricketer12
United States13966 Posts
On April 29 2017 06:53 highsis wrote: Nope, don't see much difference from BW. I've already finished a nostalgia run of BW campaigns using SC2 mass recall.. If they had implemented 1. hotkey changes 2. unit groups upto 200 units (you can make only 11 air units 'stack'. easy solution to prevent 50 muta micro) 3. multiple building group selection Only then I would have been interested. Soooo you want sc2? | ||
|
Glioburd
France1911 Posts
 . | ||
|
Creager
Germany1889 Posts
| ||
|
Hannibaal
41 Posts
| ||
|
Jealous
10107 Posts
| ||
|
DeadByDawn
United Kingdom476 Posts
Planning to play WC3 instead, in the hope of WC4. | ||
|
JungleTerrain
Chile799 Posts
| ||
|
figq
12519 Posts
| ||
|
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
| ||
|
CrymeaTerran
149 Posts
| ||
|
Bijan
United States286 Posts
On April 29 2017 07:35 ninazerg wrote: Couple of things: First, StarCraft is already playable, so why would I play money to play a game that I can already play? Sure, the graphics are re-done, but it's the same game overall. I've always liked the StarCraft: Brood War graphics, so while I'm not against updating the graphics, I'd be fine without that. Second, Blizzard, as of late, has had a track record of releasing incomplete or buggy products. Or D3. Just for the 1.18 patch, they had a myriad of problems in the test realm, and that version was patched several times and the thing still needs fixing. I would be hesitant to purchase a product from a company that has a reputation for doing shoddy work. OK, fair enough I guess, but that has nothing to do with your original post. It's like the first post was you being bitter about Blizzard and your second post was a legitimate rationalization of why someone might not want to buy SC:R. | ||
|
ShuriKn
Canada20 Posts
| ||
|
c0sm0naut
United States1229 Posts
| ||
|
c0sm0naut
United States1229 Posts
On May 15 2017 02:02 JungleTerrain wrote: You guys realize that every game ever released has had the end goal of producing profit right? Every decision made by a corporation is to eventually make a profit, have you guys not encountered the spirit of capitalism in any of your studies? Don't blame blizzard for that. I can see why people might be upset with the shoddy patch, but they are treating the remastered as the real release here and everything about 1.18 seems to be a test run. yeah but there is a huge difference in shit like this being done, when blizzard offered virtually no suport to bw last few years, suddenly oh hey guys we are supporting bw again. patch comes out, tournaments announced, reborn announced. honestly just feels contrived, which is exactly how sc2 felt after seeing these monkies try to replicate their accidental success with its predecessor and fail miserably with all the imba shit @ launch. it was like it was only being played by console gamers or something in tests, lol. there was absolutely no stress testing done of the product before launch, it was completely rushed and total garbage (2010) | ||
HaN-
France1919 Posts
| ||
|
CecilSunkure
United States2829 Posts
| ||
|
aFF]ZuluNAtion[
Poland173 Posts
| ||
|
Sok
Denmark13 Posts
| ||
|
Bub
United States3518 Posts
| ||
|
paxconsciente
Belgium91 Posts
bw is a great game, i love it, but it's only truly balanced at the highest level and is simply too difficult to play to have fun currently for most players, I played about 500 games as a competent RTS player and haven't found the "perfect" game yet, they've always either been me stomping over some shitter or getting my ass kicked even while watching tutorial vids and doing deliberate practice. | ||
|
sM.Zik
Canada2543 Posts
| ||
|
Edpayasugo
United Kingdom2210 Posts
| ||
|
Jandos
Czech Republic928 Posts
| ||
|
ProMeTheus112
France2027 Posts
On June 10 2017 12:01 paxconsciente wrote: yes untill wc3 HD comes out and people can start playing proper team and custom games again bw is a great game, i love it, but it's only truly balanced at the highest level and is simply too difficult to play to have fun currently for most players, I played about 500 games as a competent RTS player and haven't found the "perfect" game yet, they've always either been me stomping over some shitter or getting my ass kicked even while watching tutorial vids and doing deliberate practice. this could be adressed by a good ladder system (no-nonsense, ELO-like system? no need season reset?) and a healthy population even just playing games 1v1 stating your overall level you get good games pretty often I think but tbh for the team games, good games happen quite often in 3vs3 in BW, best I've seen across games I have played | ||
|
niteReloaded
Croatia5281 Posts
In my world, it's a must buy. Without MM, I'd maybe pass, but MM will actually take the frustration out of BW, that feeling of getting stomped for a while, until you can get an occasional win. | ||
|
Nyarly
France1030 Posts
Do you plan on trying BW:Remastered when it comes out? : Yes (4142) 63% No (1217) 19% Maybe (1190) 18% I don't know, can you repeat the question? | ||
|
SinO[Ob]
France897 Posts
| ||
|
lastride
2390 Posts
| ||
|
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
| ||
|
Ancestral
United States3230 Posts
| ||
|
Corvuuss
Austria354 Posts
On June 28 2017 19:21 Ancestral wrote: Would have hoped to have seen Linux support, but since I think their target market is SK, that's too much to ask. More and more big titles coming out for Linux but Blizzard nowhere to be seen. As blizzard is a company my reason for this would be: Too much work for not enough return | ||
|
Clbull
United Kingdom1439 Posts
| ||
|
Popparockz
United States40 Posts
On May 06 2017 18:45 Creager wrote: I'm down, but if they somehow decide to charge more than 20 bucks for this I'm not gonna buy it (ok, who am I kidding, I probably still would at some point, but not without swaying fists accompanied by lots of hate). It is 15 dollars. | ||
|
ShuriKn
Canada20 Posts
On June 28 2017 12:03 TT1 wrote: ill play it w/ the old graphics xD do you dislike the new graphics or prefer the classic one? | ||
|
TT1
Canada9990 Posts
On July 02 2017 12:46 ShuriKn wrote: it's about time! do you dislike the new graphics or prefer the classic one? prefer the classic one, ill try the new graphics out of curiosity but i'd rather play on 4:3 anyways. better minimap positioning and mouse movement (even tho i know widescreen has more map vision). | ||
|
KungKras
Sweden484 Posts
| ||
|
pzea469
United States1520 Posts
There is nothing about this that aims to attract new players. Same limited mechanics from BW that will scare away any new kid who gives it a try. Like many, I used to think those limitations were what made the game what it was, but I now believe it is really just holding it back. | ||
|
Fatam
1986 Posts
On June 21 2017 06:59 niteReloaded wrote: Matchmaking will be the deciding factor for me. In my world, it's a must buy. Without MM, I'd maybe pass, but MM will actually take the frustration out of BW, that feeling of getting stomped for a while, until you can get an occasional win. Yeah that is 100% the only reason I will buy as well. | ||
|
iopq
United States877 Posts
| ||
|
Yiome
China1687 Posts
Would probably pick it up later (on a sale maybe) for the campaign | ||
|
KameZerg
Sweden1757 Posts
On April 29 2017 07:35 ninazerg wrote: Couple of things: First, StarCraft is already playable, so why would I play money to play a game that I can already play? Sure, the graphics are re-done, but it's the same game overall. I've always liked the StarCraft: Brood War graphics, so while I'm not against updating the graphics, I'd be fine without that. Second, Blizzard, as of late, has had a track record of releasing incomplete or buggy products. Or D3. Just for the 1.18 patch, they had a myriad of problems in the test realm, and that version was patched several times and the thing still needs fixing. I would be hesitant to purchase a product from a company that has a reputation for doing shoddy work. I agree, SC:R is literally worse than 1.16 | ||
|
QueenOfLegion
Malaysia15 Posts
| ||
|
WeddingEpisode
United States356 Posts
| ||
|
pebble444
Italy2495 Posts
| ||
|
summerloud
Austria1201 Posts
On April 28 2017 19:04 esReveR wrote: My thoughts exactly. I've been wanting to run through the old missions for a long time, but the current broodwar doesn't work properly on my machine. Though the old WGTour, ICCUP, etc days were fun... I don't have the desire to relearn the game to the extent required to be competitive in multiplayer again. there is an excellent conversion of the old campaigns into sc2 youknow, its called mass recall | ||
|
KungKras
Sweden484 Posts
... but there is no poll :/ | ||
|
MarlieChurphy
United States2063 Posts
| ||
BigFan
TLADT24920 Posts
On August 11 2017 05:42 KungKras wrote: Has anyone else noticed that OP talks about a poll. ... but there is no poll :/ Poll is on the front page of TL ^^ | ||
|
ninazerg
United States7291 Posts
On April 29 2017 20:44 GGzerG wrote: Hell yea I'm hype as hell for remastered, don't listen to Nina either because when it is released, I'll bet 100$ Nina will be playing remastered within a few weeks of it being released. Give me my 100 dollars. | ||
|
Xeln4g4
Italy1208 Posts
| ||
|
niteReloaded
Croatia5281 Posts
Oh, snap. it's been months already. No ideas for new polls? | ||
|
BeaSteR
Sweden328 Posts
| ||
|
Nikon
Bulgaria5710 Posts
| ||
|
the_last_terran1
48 Posts
| ||
|
xRS_JuNiOr
3 Posts
| ||
| ||
