• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:01
CEST 07:01
KST 14:01
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall10HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0TL Team Map Contest #5: Presented by Monster Energy6
Community News
Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation5$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced4Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles5[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China9Flash Announces Hiatus From ASL66
StarCraft 2
General
The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation The GOAT ranking of GOAT rankings Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation Weekly Cups (June 30 - July 6): Classic Doubles Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing
Tourneys
$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series WardiTV Mondays
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response Simple Questions Simple Answers
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome Mutation # 478 Instant Karma
Brood War
General
i aint gon lie to u bruh... ASL20 Preliminary Maps BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall SC uni coach streams logging into betting site
Tourneys
[BSL20] Non-Korean Championship 4x BSL + 4x China [BSL20] Grand Finals - Sunday 20:00 CET CSL Xiamen International Invitational The Casual Games of the Week Thread
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Nintendo Switch Thread Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games? Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Summer Games Done Quick 2025! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NBA General Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
Culture Clash in Video Games…
TrAiDoS
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 601 users

[SC2B] Under the Microscope - Page 4

Forum Index > News
265 CommentsPost a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 12 13 14 Next All
ExO_
Profile Blog Joined September 2009
United States2316 Posts
July 11 2010 05:56 GMT
#61
On July 11 2010 14:51 Chairman Ray wrote:
Great read. I completely agree that all the exciting action has been depleted. In addition, I think it's boring to watch as well. After watching scbw for 3+ years, I'm still watching it. After a few games of sc2, I just can't get through the first 5 mins of the most exciting matches.


If you're only watching the first 5 minutes, isn't it possible you are missing the parts that made the game exciting in the first place?
Ideas
Profile Blog Joined April 2008
United States8088 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-11 06:02:55
July 11 2010 06:02 GMT
#62
On July 11 2010 14:50 cHaNg-sTa wrote:
Show nested quote +
On July 11 2010 11:59 ApacheChief wrote:
I don't think this is true at all.

StarCraft 2 probably has MORE interactions between the races, with early game spells like forcefield, EMP and fungal growth.

I don't understand...


Have you played/watched BW a decent amount? I'm guessing you haven't.

Spells were a lot more devastating in BW. They were ESSENTIAL to some tactics. Getting storm out for the mass hydra bust, getting dark swarm to save yourself from the M&M/tank push, getting irradiate out to stop the powerful muta sniping, getting spider mines to deal with the mass speedlots, and many more. These were all absolutely critical and powerful to stopping the opponent's powerful push/strategy. But the beauty about it is that even though it's a great and powerful spell to repel the opponent's strategy, the opponent can still make use of his units with superior micro. Storm dodging, moving all units out of dark swarm quickly, scourging science vessels (which even the Terran can counter with even better micro), zealot bombing, etc.

SC2 introduces too many elements that weaken the effect of these awesome spells because of how easy smart casting is. This is an extremely poor decision in terms of game dynamics because now everyone can storm with similar efficiency. On the other hand, a greater player in BW can make less templars AND storm far more effectively and faster than a player who is slower and not as micro-prepped. This is key, a BW player with a couple of templars against zerg is scary. But it's not scary at all in SC2 until they have a ton of templars. You EARN your "terrible terrible damage" in BW, the game doesn't just give it to you.

Things in SC2 like FF, fungal growth, marauders' concussive shells, etc, don't allow the opponent to overcome these "counters" with greater micro. It's just not possible. If I get FF'd, the only thing I can do is just.. let my trapped units attack. There's really nothing else you can do. Fungal growth? Well, you're just trapped until it wears off. And I'm sure everyone has experienced trying to run away from marauders with the trailing units have zero hope of living. They don't give the option of "hey, great micro can get me out of this pinch!" And that's what makes BW the great spectator sport it is today.

I think SC2 is fun to watch, but just for how long? Who knows. I still get goosebumps watching BW games. I hope SC2 can still do the same, but that might be asking for too much.


On July 11 2010 14:53 sluggaslamoo wrote:
Yeah likewise, SC2 has had 7 years of design time plus 12 years of BW evolution, to create a game that should be 100x better than BW from the get-go.

SC2 should have taken what was so captivating in BW and made it even better. IMO SC2 just seems to be riding on the success of BW, and hoping that any change will still lead to a good game.



I like both these posts :D. exactly right guys
Free Palestine
EmeraldSparks
Profile Blog Joined January 2008
United States1451 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-11 06:06:20
July 11 2010 06:04 GMT
#63
I agree, there's a fundamental design change between the "everything is broken" school of design of SC1 and "everything is balanced" school of design in SC2.

In SC1 150 minerals in vultures have the potential to kill eight dragoons or twenty hydras (ggaemo style), 400 combined resources in templar or reavers can kill dozens and dozens hydralisks and floods of of zerglings besides, and a relatively small investment in mutalisks, lurkers, or defilers have the potential to dish out dozens of times their cost in damage.

All of these also have the potential to fail spectacularly and do nothing at all. It's not like that in SC2.
But why?
QibingZero
Profile Blog Joined June 2007
2611 Posts
July 11 2010 06:11 GMT
#64
The years we've spent since SC was released were not just spent learning how to play that game - they were largely spent learning how to play RTS games. The best WC2 players on Kali, the best SC players at launch... players at that skill level would have trouble holding D on iccup today. The first day a player like Idra or Nony touched SC2, they were better at it than anyone was at SC for years. This is how far the RTS world has come since.

What I'm getting at is that all of these 'give it time' posts are ridiculous. Do you really think the top players aren't trying out every possible way to win? With players being picked up by eSports teams before the game is even released, you'd better believe they're trying every little trick they can to get the advantage over others. Despite everything though, they can't make infestors as game-changing as defilers were. They can't make skirmishes come as interesting as marine vs lurker or goons vs early terran pressure. There are limitations in place that simply cannot be overcome by 'figuring more stuff out'.

By the way, there's a terrible misconception going on here. It didn't take 10+ years for Starcraft to be an amazing and dynamic game to play and watch. In fact, we've enjoyed it for that long.
Oh, my eSports
moon`
Profile Blog Joined July 2009
United States372 Posts
July 11 2010 06:16 GMT
#65
I like the points you make. Yes, SC2 spells are still pretty sweet but it seems rather dumbed down and does lessen the dynamics of each unit.
Empty your mind, be formless. Shapeless, like pandabearguy.
pred470r
Profile Blog Joined April 2010
Bulgaria3265 Posts
July 11 2010 06:29 GMT
#66
sad but true, great article anyway
LlamaNamedOsama
Profile Blog Joined July 2010
United States1900 Posts
July 11 2010 06:29 GMT
#67
"If I get FF'd, the only thing I can do is just.. let my trapped units attack. "

But why are the units trapped in the first place? There was crucial positioning involved. Also, I want to mention the addition of large units being able to break through forcefields. This isn't me saying "obviously it's now equal to brood war" amazingness - I'm just adding a new window of support for the already stated fact that Brood War has had 12 years of development. People are simply sanctifying and worshiping Brood War without giving SC2 a chance - these are NOT unchangeable issues - spell effects, cast speed, etc. are all changeable and rather simple changes in terms of object data. Spells can have game-changing effects: TLO's round in I believe the quarterfinals of the HDH proves this when fungal spores were used to great effect. Does it still have constraints on micro like the inability to move? Sure. But that doesn't mean there aren't ways to change that or move beyond that.

People are also making claims like "it just isn't as interesting." To me that seems incredibly odd to make such an absolute claim over a hugely subjective statement.

SC2 should have taken what was so captivating in BW and made it even better. IMO SC2 just seems to be riding on the success of BW, and hoping that any change will still lead to a good game.


And so many also have exclaimed that SC2 should have tried to be more revolutionary.
Dario Wünsch: I guess...Creator...met his maker *sunglasses*
Saracen
Profile Blog Joined December 2007
United States5139 Posts
July 11 2010 06:34 GMT
#68
On July 11 2010 14:03 N(o)sarcasm wrote:
I'd have to agree that the attentiveness required to be comparatively decent to the next fellow in Brood War was a lot larger than in the current beta phase of Starcraft 2. However, as has been mentioned, ranted, raved, and beaten to death is the small, minute, minuscule thing that is the following.

--- Starcraft and its predecessor are 12 years old.
--- Starcraft 2 and its three expansions are 0 days old. It is still in its beta phase.

To expect a legacy like Starcraft to be followed without flaw or fault is simply being naive. Starcraft took years to captivate the lives of millions upon millions of players and viewers. Starcraft 2 seems to have to do this before it ever hits the shelf. I understand the sentiments of needing to macro a marine around to make the most of its usage on the field. The desire to dodge that lurker shot, split the armies to avoid the mass tank damage that could potentially end the game if you so much as a half a second off. Give the baby of this Legacy time to grow into what we all hope it will be. To expect a child to have the same aspects as its parent before its even been given time to grow is, I'll use the word selfish. People are being selfish with the seemingly unwavering desire for starcraft 2 to simply be a polished up starcraft 1 in every aspect, good or bad. It seems that perhaps while what made starcraft one great, also poses a sense of.. arrogance to the newer generation of children that haven't had more than a decade to perfect what seems to easy when we watch. Let Starcraft 2 have a chance to apply that 'awe' factor that the original had. I'm sure there will always be "I wish this was like that" moments in games, but to isolate those who want to take part in the creation of a game that is, in my opinion, a legacy by which most rts compare themselves to, seems very selfish.

In closing, I understand most, if not all of what I am typing has probably been posted or said a hundred million times over on various threads, forums, and conversations with friends. Though I would hope that some will gain a little insight if I have covered something that hasn't been said before.

I will reply to this post because you put a lot of effort into it. It's very well thought-out and structured (and respectful, lol), and it seems to sum up pretty much all the complaints pretty well, barring nextstep's comment about rather watching pros, Lord_of_Chaos's comment about maps affecting micro, and Hautamaki's comment about old school micro, which are all very good points points (as well as the point that there are two more expansions coming).

I originally wrote this article a while back, around when phase one was ending. SC2 is extremely fun to play. In fact, now that Beta is back up again, I don't play SC1 anymore. It's all SC2. I'll be honest: I like having drones that don't bug out, and that mine in a straight line, and stalkers that fire reliably. I like how silky smooth everything feels. I like the competing on the ladder, or messing around with friends. SC2 is a great game. And I'm not ashamed to say that I play it over SC1.

But the thing is, there just feels like there's something missing. SC2 is more about positional attacks and SC1 is more about unit micro. You can't deny this fact. In the past 5 months, SC2 has developed more than SC1 has over 5 years. We've come a long, LONG way since the Beta first started. Our play has been refined over and over again. Just how much more that's going to continue, I cannot say. But I'll say this: the entire point of this article is to pinpoint the thing that seems missing in SC2. And that's interactivity. It's something that either exists or it doesn't. We're not going to suddenly "discover" how to be interactive with units and spells in 5 years, or when Korean pros move over. It's more of a tool that Blizzard can give us to work with. And in this case, they didn't (to an extent). I'm not blaming Blizzard for this. I just wanted to make this issue known.
oxxo
Profile Joined February 2010
988 Posts
July 11 2010 06:49 GMT
#69
More nostalgia.

We've already seen how the metagame as evolved from 1-base all-ins to something more resembling current BW.

SC2 is an amazing game.

BW is and was an amazing game, but get over it. Stop bashing SC2 based purely on nostalgia.
PhilipJWitow
Profile Joined July 2010
29 Posts
July 11 2010 07:03 GMT
#70
I don't get it. You guys seem to just not like change and seem to be complaining a lot.

I mean one of your biggest complaints is that things are overpowered but you can overcome them by using either more overpowered things or simply micro. But now things are more balanced and there aren't things you have to overcome? It seems like such a bizarre argument. "Planes used to be SO much better because there was always that risk of dying. Now it's like it's stable and fun for most people, it's so lame."

I think this whole thing is more of a fact you've been playing Brood War for so long that you're not willing to accept a new mode of play. I mean if you've been playing the same game for a few years I can see why it's hard to change, but that's just the way works. It happens in sports too and you either have to get used to it or just quit, but stop whining!
ShadeR
Profile Blog Joined December 2009
Australia7535 Posts
July 11 2010 07:10 GMT
#71
SC2 is the succession of BW it's stupid to make the excuse that it needs 10+ years to develop when Bw has already laid the ground work.
firebound12
Profile Joined March 2010
Canada274 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-11 07:11:02
July 11 2010 07:10 GMT
#72
Everyone.

Give <3 to both SCBW and SC2.

Plexa
Profile Blog Joined October 2005
Aotearoa39261 Posts
July 11 2010 07:17 GMT
#73
On July 11 2010 16:03 PhilipJWitow wrote:
I don't get it. You guys seem to just not like change and seem to be complaining a lot.

I mean one of your biggest complaints is that things are overpowered but you can overcome them by using either more overpowered things or simply micro. But now things are more balanced and there aren't things you have to overcome? It seems like such a bizarre argument. "Planes used to be SO much better because there was always that risk of dying. Now it's like it's stable and fun for most people, it's so lame."

I think this whole thing is more of a fact you've been playing Brood War for so long that you're not willing to accept a new mode of play. I mean if you've been playing the same game for a few years I can see why it's hard to change, but that's just the way works. It happens in sports too and you either have to get used to it or just quit, but stop whining!

This is the type of argument I despite more than anything else on TL. The vast majority of people who played BW before SC2 are significantly better than those who did not. Furthermore, we understand the game better than the average gamer does and we know how things work. If this weren't true, we wouldn't be dominating so hard at the moment. This may sound stuck up and elitist but it's fact.

Saracen's article does compare BW to SC2 and in a valid way. The game breaking elements that were present in SC1 like reavers, mines, swarms etc are all missing in SC2. The dynamic relationships discussed in the article are lacking. These are also facts. We know that this is a new game, but these things enhance spectator value and create a more interesting game. We are willing to accept a new mode of play, but it is fairly clear that there is room for improvement. If sc2 is just about whomever creates the correct unit composition then it is going to be a very boring game in a few years time. The elements in BW made it so that creating the correct unit composition wasn't always going to be the winning element - you could do things like storm drops, utilise mines effectively, use tricks like hold lurkers and whatnot to regain lost ground. These things are just not possible in SC2 at the moment - and indeed the game would benefit from having some of these elements introduced.

A good example of the different is TLO's colossus drop build which is a complete gimmick in SC2 and isn't really going to be viable long term vs the Reaver drop build from the early days of SC/BW which was a perfectly legitimate opening - and still is today.

We all love SC2, and we want to it to be the best it can possibly be - that's why we write these articles. Not because we're lost in the past wishing the game was just SC1 again. We don't want SC1 one again - but we do want the elements which made SC1 amazing present in SC2 - that was Sc2 can live for another 10 years and still be an amazing game like SC1. The points Saracen raises are things I hope the devs take to heart in the upcoming expansions (since nothing is going to change before retail i dont think) and we get to see some amazing units come into play .
Administrator~ Spirit will set you free ~
NotJack
Profile Joined December 2009
United States737 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-11 07:21:32
July 11 2010 07:18 GMT
#74
As nostalgic as the article is, I don't see the point in stating things everyone who loves BW knows and then using it to say "the excitement is gone".

The overly-simple persuasive structure of the whole piece makes it seem like the author is trying to convince newcomers to TL that SC2 is nothing compared to BW.

Edit: Reading recent posts I see that this was made a long time ago when the change was still leaving some players unstirred; it makes a lot of sense now that it's in context.
knyttym
Profile Blog Joined December 2006
United States5797 Posts
July 11 2010 07:25 GMT
#75
I have been thinking about small scale micro battles recently and it seems to come down to two mechanics. Unlimited unit selection and smart casting.

The potency of storms and mutalisk harass need to be limited with the incorporation of these mechanics. Just imagine 25 stacked mutalisk harass or a dozen brood war strength storms going off at once. Transitions are hugely limited because of the need to weaken these spells.

The specific situation I was looking at was midgame protoss versus terran where P is rushing storm. The upgrade basically has no immediate affect on the marauder balls because 1 or 2 storms are too weak and the marauders are too efficient at dodging with unlimited select. Later storm becomes impossible to dodge because you can constantly blanket his army with smart casting. Blizzards answer to this was simply add in a counter unit, the ghost. Now it comes down to as you said unit compositions rather then army control.

I really don't see why taking these two mechanics out will ruin the game but I highly doubt blizzard will do so. Zealots in the midgame will be more effective since 20 marauders won't be able to kite all together. Forcefield won't need a nerf since casting 10 to walloff will be a difficult micro moment. Storm can be buffed so transition will be safer and you cannot infinite storm easily.
sluggaslamoo
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
Australia4494 Posts
July 11 2010 07:31 GMT
#76
On July 11 2010 16:03 PhilipJWitow wrote:
I don't get it. You guys seem to just not like change and seem to be complaining a lot.


Yeah if its change that makes the game worse, then of course we don't like it.
Come play Android Netrunner - http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=409008
Endymion
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United States3701 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-11 07:54:21
July 11 2010 07:33 GMT
#77
It's sad because in the BW scene no one ever played a "perfect game," no matter how extraordinarily skilled each and every contender was. I fear that because SC2 is so much easier to control, that mistakes for these players will completely become a thing of the past. Bisu will never miss a force field, nor will he never be able to cover an entire screen with storms in under a second. The potential for these "perfect games" could lead to a true competitive strategy game where build orders mean the difference between a win or a loss, which will become very boring to watch and to play after a while. BW was a lot like playing sc2 and counterstrike together, and with the lack of the counterstrike aspect apm requirements will be lowered, and perfect BOs will be found even faster (from what I see anyways).

EDIT: sorry, restated a lot of Plexa's arguement, but it's all true..
Have you considered the MMO-Champion forum? You are just as irrational and delusional with the right portion of nostalgic populism. By the way: The old Brood War was absolutely unplayable
HaruHaru
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United States988 Posts
July 11 2010 07:53 GMT
#78
I teared up as I read this :'( Nothing can ever replace BroodWar in terms of gameplay. It really is a clusterfuck of seemingly imbalanced ideas that meshed together to form the most balanced RTS ever. You players who have never been into the BW scene don't understand just how much SC2 is lacking compared to BW... Threads like these make me sad. I want to tell myself that SC2 is a newer and better game thats just as good as BW, but the more i play and the more I watch VODS and streams i realize it will never be as intense as watching savior's last sunken colony die just as consume is done researching :/ I feel like a part of me is dieing with SC2 being released :'(

the single player should be nice though
Long live BroodWar!
Beyonder
Profile Blog Joined September 2002
Netherlands15103 Posts
Last Edited: 2010-07-11 08:11:58
July 11 2010 08:06 GMT
#79
Though I agree with what the article says, you might end up being semi-surprised if you watch SC2 in 6 months. An illustrative example is PvT, with Dalailamer vs. White-ra (see replay thread) being a good example. Protosses are playing zeal/temps vs terran quite often. Terrans can do wonders with hellions here, which are microable vs. storms!

A lot of this will change (or feel camouflaged?) when new maps arrive, and it isn't just one battle that decides. Bigger maps will help a ton

edit: though I really hope that we see more of this in the expansion, as Plexa points out.
Moderator
lagesaurus
Profile Joined April 2009
Sweden2 Posts
July 11 2010 08:08 GMT
#80
Agreed. What more can I say. I also like Plexa's post:

On July 11 2010 16:17 Plexa wrote:

This is the type of argument I despite more than anything else on TL. The vast majority of people who played BW before SC2 are significantly better than those who did not. Furthermore, we understand the game better than the average gamer does and we know how things work. If this weren't true, we wouldn't be dominating so hard at the moment. This may sound stuck up and elitist but it's fact.

Saracen's article does compare BW to SC2 and in a valid way. The game breaking elements that were present in SC1 like reavers, mines, swarms etc are all missing in SC2. The dynamic relationships discussed in the article are lacking. These are also facts. We know that this is a new game, but these things enhance spectator value and create a more interesting game. We are willing to accept a new mode of play, but it is fairly clear that there is room for improvement. If sc2 is just about whomever creates the correct unit composition then it is going to be a very boring game in a few years time. The elements in BW made it so that creating the correct unit composition wasn't always going to be the winning element - you could do things like storm drops, utilise mines effectively, use tricks like hold lurkers and whatnot to regain lost ground. These things are just not possible in SC2 at the moment - and indeed the game would benefit from having some of these elements introduced.

A good example of the different is TLO's colossus drop build which is a complete gimmick in SC2 and isn't really going to be viable long term vs the Reaver drop build from the early days of SC/BW which was a perfectly legitimate opening - and still is today.

We all love SC2, and we want to it to be the best it can possibly be - that's why we write these articles. Not because we're lost in the past wishing the game was just SC1 again. We don't want SC1 one again - but we do want the elements which made SC1 amazing present in SC2 - that was Sc2 can live for another 10 years and still be an amazing game like SC1. The points Saracen raises are things I hope the devs take to heart in the upcoming expansions (since nothing is going to change before retail i dont think) and we get to see some amazing units come into play .


This is so true. We do not want a unit-composition game.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 12 13 14 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 5h
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
WinterStarcraft489
Nina 223
StarCraft: Brood War
Leta 244
PianO 60
Noble 15
Icarus 12
Dota 2
monkeys_forever668
League of Legends
JimRising 750
Super Smash Bros
hungrybox490
Other Games
summit1g6643
shahzam898
ViBE228
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick44682
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 17 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• Berry_CruncH308
• practicex 146
• Hupsaiya 65
• Kozan
• Migwel
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• sooper7s
• intothetv
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• Diggity6
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush804
• masondota2503
• Stunt268
Upcoming Events
The PondCast
5h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
11h
WardiTV European League
11h
Jumy vs NightPhoenix
Percival vs Nicoract
ArT vs HiGhDrA
MaxPax vs Harstem
Scarlett vs Shameless
SKillous vs uThermal
Replay Cast
19h
RSL Revival
1d 5h
ByuN vs SHIN
Clem vs Reynor
OSC
1d 8h
Replay Cast
1d 19h
RSL Revival
2 days
Classic vs Cure
FEL
2 days
OSC
2 days
[ Show More ]
RSL Revival
3 days
FEL
3 days
FEL
3 days
CSO Cup
3 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
3 days
Bonyth vs QiaoGege
Dewalt vs Fengzi
Hawk vs Zhanhun
Sziky vs Mihu
Mihu vs QiaoGege
Zhanhun vs Sziky
Fengzi vs Hawk
Sparkling Tuna Cup
4 days
RSL Revival
4 days
FEL
4 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
4 days
Bonyth vs Dewalt
QiaoGege vs Dewalt
Hawk vs Bonyth
Sziky vs Fengzi
Mihu vs Zhanhun
QiaoGege vs Zhanhun
Fengzi vs Mihu
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-07-07
HSC XXVII
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
Acropolis #3
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025

Upcoming

2025 ACS Season 2: Qualifier
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSL Xiamen Invitational
2025 ACS Season 2
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
SEL Season 2 Championship
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
Underdog Cup #2
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.