TL Mafia 4

On February 21 2009 14:16 BloodyC0bbler wrote:


That is the worst reason for playing this i have ever heard ...

On February 26 2009 10:26 mikeymoo wrote:

Actually he's my friend irl, and we've probably been on our respective accounts at the other guy's house so it probably shows up in the IP check from a while back (we both moved, so we're in separate cities now).
And no, I probably would have set up an elaborate scheme to smurf my way in.

On February 28 2009 04:17 d_so wrote:
i hope i'm a TOWNIE

On March 01 2009 04:17 triflejack wrote:
Can we torture inertinept or threaten his family before he dies so we get the other mafia names? This straight-to-lynching thing seems inefficient to me

On March 01 2009 15:59 Caller wrote:
I've voting for Scaramanga now? ok.

On March 01 2009 14:03 Pyrrhuloxia wrote:
Here are more of my thoughts because I am apparenty being silent only posting 12 times a day.

We've already got inertinept and now I think triflejack is pretty suspicious. He's got 12 posts and is thus very likely a smurf (I dunno how to find the few posts outside of this thread)

Signing up:

"I shall play this game. Sign me please"

After accusations of smurfing occurs:

"I'm guessing these guys are smurfs. Damn them." (How could someone who at this point has about 2 posts and yet know what smurfing means and know who the missing regulars are not be a smurf?)

After PMs go out:

I got my role! MAFIA
(Who would want to create drama by jokingly calling themselves mafia other than mafia? Any non mafia would worry about sowing false fears about them and distracting the town. A mafia would probably be trying reverse psychology by appearing to appear secure in their innocence.)

Well after we started lynching inertinept and calling sanctuary on veterans he says:

"Since we have to lynch someone without justification anyway, let's just find a Bisu fanboy and kick them out"

Another joke post:

"Can we torture inertinept or threaten his family before he dies so we get the other mafia names? This straight-to-lynching thing seems inefficient to me"

Then he votes without supporting sanctuary:

"I vote inertinept"

LTT said: "I think he believes that the clue that caught him wasn't actually pointing to him, which is why he was upset."

Dunno why LTT would say this but if that's true, trifles are rather benign. Triflejack had nothing in his profile and no posts and thus if he was mafia all that could be used for clues for him is his name. Note that being a smurf doesn't make him more likely to be mafia, but this guy is pretty suspicious for reasons other than that. Also if anyone thinks I'm strangely silent I have more posts in this thread than this guy has in his entire TL career. Also if anyone was in the game where I was mafia you would remember that I was talkative as fuck when I was mafia, if I'm less talkative now it's because I have more friends and more of a life now (went to a concert tonight, got a party for Bisu vs Jaedong that I'm going to later, gotta drive my friend to an ice rink in a few hours).

On March 01 2009 14:41 Bockit wrote:


I can't think of a better situation to use sanctuary tbh.

We just established 8 confirmed townies at the cost of them losing their night protection. I can't imagine it would be hard for mafia to kill a few of them just by picking random people to kill at night. This way when our 8 confirmed townies are most vulnerable, they become invincible for a night and mafia don't know who they are and those random hits that would have hit them, are ignored.

All that aside, when is a more beneficial time to use sanctuary? It's not like mafia are going to suddenly target all our medics, or all our Private Eyes in 1 night. This means that any other time we choose to use sanctuary would be a stab in the dark.

What we have chosen is the most methodical choice.