• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 22:02
CEST 04:02
KST 11:02
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
RSL Season 1 - Final Week6[ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall15HomeStory Cup 27 - Info & Preview18Classic wins Code S Season 2 (2025)16Code S RO4 & Finals Preview: herO, Rogue, Classic, GuMiho0
Community News
Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed18Weekly Cups (July 7-13): Classic continues to roll8Team TLMC #5 - Submission extension3Firefly given lifetime ban by ESIC following match-fixing investigation17$25,000 Streamerzone StarCraft Pro Series announced7
StarCraft 2
General
Heaven's Balance Suggestions (roast me) Who will win EWC 2025? Esports World Cup 2025 - Brackets Revealed The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread
Tourneys
Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond) FEL Cracov 2025 (July 27) - $8000 live event Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series $5,100+ SEL Season 2 Championship (SC: Evo)
Strategy
How did i lose this ZvP, whats the proper response
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 482 Wheel of Misfortune Mutation # 481 Fear and Lava Mutation # 480 Moths to the Flame Mutation # 479 Worn Out Welcome
Brood War
General
BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ Flash Announces (and Retracts) Hiatus From ASL Soulkey Muta Micro Map? BW General Discussion [ASL19] Finals Recap: Standing Tall
Tourneys
2025 ACS Season 2 Qualifier [BSL 2v2] ProLeague Season 3 - Friday 21:00 CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues CSL Xiamen International Invitational
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers I am doing this better than progamers do.
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Path of Exile Nintendo Switch Thread CCLP - Command & Conquer League Project The PlayStation 5
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
The Games Industry And ATVI Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Stop Killing Games - European Citizens Initiative
Fan Clubs
SKT1 Classic Fan Club! Maru Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread [Manga] One Piece Korean Music Discussion Movie Discussion! [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 NBA General Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
Ping To Win? Pings And Their…
TrAiDoS
momentary artworks from des…
tankgirl
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 689 users

[M][T] Secret Hitler, Act I, Take II - Page 47

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 45 46 47 48 49 59 Next
kitaman27 *
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States9245 Posts
November 09 2018 17:09 GMT
#921
On November 01 2018 06:59 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
5. Rels - Nein!


On November 03 2018 07:03 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
5. Rels - Nein!


On November 06 2018 10:32 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
5. Rels - has been warned for not voting


On November 09 2018 08:15 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
5. Rels - Nein!


People really need to pay more attention to this.

The single most important part of this game in regards to ones alignment is voting record and election actions.

RELS HAS NOT CONTRIBUTED TO A SINGLE LIBERAL POLICY BEING PASSED.

He failed the rayn/krogan vote.
He failed the grack/prpl vote.
He didn't vote for conversion and rayn.
He failed the kita/grack vote.

You know what his first YES vote is going to be?

WHEN HE'S PRESIDENT.

He's suddenly "motivated" to play the game. You know why? Because he finally has an opportunity to send a facist policy through. How convenient.

Can we please just pass this over to rayn? Someone explain to me why rayn as president and krogran/grack as chancellor doesn't make more sense? Those guys have proven they can send liberal policies through. Rels has done absolutely nothing but smear my name to suit his purposes.
I'm better than dirt. Well, most kinds of dirt. I mean not that fancy store bought dirt. That stuffs loaded with nutrients. I... I can't compete with that stuff.
Rels
Profile Joined August 2008
France13467 Posts
November 09 2018 17:22 GMT
#922
On November 10 2018 02:09 kitaman27 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 01 2018 06:59 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
5. Rels - Nein!


Show nested quote +
On November 03 2018 07:03 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
5. Rels - Nein!


Show nested quote +
On November 06 2018 10:32 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
5. Rels - has been warned for not voting


Show nested quote +
On November 09 2018 08:15 [UoN]Sentinel wrote:
5. Rels - Nein!


People really need to pay more attention to this.

The single most important part of this game in regards to ones alignment is voting record and election actions.

RELS HAS NOT CONTRIBUTED TO A SINGLE LIBERAL POLICY BEING PASSED.

He failed the rayn/krogan vote.
He failed the grack/prpl vote.
He didn't vote for conversion and rayn.
He failed the kita/grack vote.

LOL. Since you believe at least one elected people is scum, one of these votes must be pretty good then

On November 10 2018 02:09 kitaman27 wrote:
He's suddenly "motivated" to play the game. You know why? Because he finally has an opportunity to send a facist policy through. How convenient.

Anyone that has played with me these last year knows I get more motivated the more the game advances. So you're lying and you know you're lying. It's also easily checkable so it's a pretty bad lie.
Rels
Profile Joined August 2008
France13467 Posts
November 09 2018 17:26 GMT
#923
On November 10 2018 02:04 kitaman27 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 10 2018 01:08 Rels wrote:
Here, he's saying that a reason to scumread Grack is that he wants to elect two people that are scummy to "pass the blame". But this doesn't shouldn't make sense because in his point of view, Grack, Conversion and I are the 3 bottom people of his list. He tries to justify it with the last sentence, but that doesn't solve the chicken and egg problem; Grack is scummy because he wants to elect scummier people with him; but he's probably not scum with a dude he wants to elect; so he shoudln't have been that low on the list in the first place.


I was suspicious of Grack because I didn't like his nomination choices. When he chose not to elect you or conversion I decided to vote for him through (I was the tiebreaker). As for the Conversion is Hitler thing, I would be pretty surprised if Hitler hadn't figured out who his buddies are by now. If I can figure out that you're mafia, it should be pretty obvious to Conversion too considering how much you've propped him up all game and you've never supported a liberal agenda.

You were suspicious of Grack because you didn't like his nomination choices. But you also thought his nomination choices were scum. But you also thought scum wouldn't elect scum with them. So your reason to scumread Grack shouldn't make Grack scum.
When Grack finally chose another dude that you were less suspicous about, that should have made your Grack / Conversion or Rels MORE likely to be true, not less.
Rels
Profile Joined August 2008
France13467 Posts
November 09 2018 17:30 GMT
#924
and that doesn't answer the fact that you should these were 2 dudes from your middle tier list. You should have pushed for 2 NO votes and the accepted team being you president / one of your top tier
prplhz
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Denmark8045 Posts
November 09 2018 17:31 GMT
#925
What is checkable? Why is it good to downvote a government that passes a liberal policy? If we had all done like you, where would we have been, policy-wise? Are you proud that, by your own metric, at least one in four of your votes was good?

I sort of get how you don't play early game, I think you always do something like that, but painting yourself a hero because you do that makes no sense. And right now your cases seem to be just wild flailing, I don't really understand any of it.
http://i.imgur.com/M7t7egx.png
Rels
Profile Joined August 2008
France13467 Posts
November 09 2018 17:36 GMT
#926
On November 10 2018 02:31 prplhz wrote:
What is checkable? Why is it good to downvote a government that passes a liberal policy? If we had all done like you, where would we have been, policy-wise? Are you proud that, by your own metric, at least one in four of your votes was good?

I sort of get how you don't play early game, I think you always do something like that, but painting yourself a hero because you do that makes no sense. And right now your cases seem to be just wild flailing, I don't really understand any of it.

I don't paint myself as a hero, wtf are you talking about ? kita is claiming my sudden motivation is due to my will to attack him and become president, when there is an occam razor's explanation.

Your last sentence prove what is checkable.

It's not "good" to downvote a government that passes a liberal policy, try a little bit to understand the context. Kita is pushing the idea that:
"Rels has downvoted every government that has passed a liberal policy!"
But he's also pushing the idea that:
"One of the elected people is scum!"
Do you get now what it is ridiculous about it ?
byj
Profile Joined November 2015
494 Posts
November 09 2018 17:38 GMT
#927
On November 10 2018 02:31 prplhz wrote:
Why is it good to downvote a government that passes a liberal policy?

What would you have done if he had just voted yes to all and one had passed a fascist policy instead?
Rels
Profile Joined August 2008
France13467 Posts
November 09 2018 17:39 GMT
#928
I have no idea why rayn didn't want Grack / Conversion D2. Conversion can be president even if he was chancellor D2.
Rels
Profile Joined August 2008
France13467 Posts
November 09 2018 17:40 GMT
#929
kinda unrelated to what's happening right now but I just had that thought p:
happykrogan
Profile Joined March 2017
Germany408 Posts
November 09 2018 17:41 GMT
#930
On November 10 2018 02:31 prplhz wrote:
What is checkable? Why is it good to downvote a government that passes a liberal policy? If we had all done like you, where would we have been, policy-wise? Are you proud that, by your own metric, at least one in four of your votes was good?

I sort of get how you don't play early game, I think you always do something like that, but painting yourself a hero because you do that makes no sense. And right now your cases seem to be just wild flailing, I don't really understand any of it.

The fact that you finally come out to say somthing meaningful after a long time of nonrelevant posts and it is to defend a guy which it is likely you are in a team with doesn't look good.
prplhz
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Denmark8045 Posts
November 09 2018 17:58 GMT
#931
On November 10 2018 02:38 byj wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 10 2018 02:31 prplhz wrote:
Why is it good to downvote a government that passes a liberal policy?

What would you have done if he had just voted yes to all and one had passed a fascist policy instead?

I don't get this hypothetical, who would have passed a fascist policy and why? I don't get this at all.
http://i.imgur.com/M7t7egx.png
prplhz
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Denmark8045 Posts
November 09 2018 17:59 GMT
#932
On November 10 2018 02:41 happykrogan wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 10 2018 02:31 prplhz wrote:
What is checkable? Why is it good to downvote a government that passes a liberal policy? If we had all done like you, where would we have been, policy-wise? Are you proud that, by your own metric, at least one in four of your votes was good?

I sort of get how you don't play early game, I think you always do something like that, but painting yourself a hero because you do that makes no sense. And right now your cases seem to be just wild flailing, I don't really understand any of it.

The fact that you finally come out to say somthing meaningful after a long time of nonrelevant posts and it is to defend a guy which it is likely you are in a team with doesn't look good.

Hmm, that does look kind of suspicious.
http://i.imgur.com/M7t7egx.png
kitaman27 *
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States9245 Posts
November 09 2018 18:09 GMT
#933
rayn, why did you sit around and do nothing all day if you wanted me to get elected?

Conversion and Krogan would have very easily switched their vote if you told them to, yet you didn't.
I'm better than dirt. Well, most kinds of dirt. I mean not that fancy store bought dirt. That stuffs loaded with nutrients. I... I can't compete with that stuff.
prplhz
Profile Blog Joined November 2010
Denmark8045 Posts
November 09 2018 18:13 GMT
#934
On November 10 2018 02:36 Rels wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 10 2018 02:31 prplhz wrote:
What is checkable? Why is it good to downvote a government that passes a liberal policy? If we had all done like you, where would we have been, policy-wise? Are you proud that, by your own metric, at least one in four of your votes was good?

I sort of get how you don't play early game, I think you always do something like that, but painting yourself a hero because you do that makes no sense. And right now your cases seem to be just wild flailing, I don't really understand any of it.

I don't paint myself as a hero, wtf are you talking about ? kita is claiming my sudden motivation is due to my will to attack him and become president, when there is an occam razor's explanation.

Your last sentence prove what is checkable.

It's not "good" to downvote a government that passes a liberal policy, try a little bit to understand the context. Kita is pushing the idea that:
"Rels has downvoted every government that has passed a liberal policy!"
But he's also pushing the idea that:
"One of the elected people is scum!"
Do you get now what it is ridiculous about it ?

No. What is wrong with winning a game through scum passing 6 liberal policies in an effort to look good to town? And why is it better to vote no to three governments without scum that passes liberal policies than it is to vote yes to a government with scum that passes a liberal policy? I'm having a very hard time understanding this particular thing.

Why is it better to downvote a scum government that passes liberal than to upvote three town governments that passes liberal?

Anyway, scum will always want to pass some liberal policies in the beginning for town cred, so let them.
http://i.imgur.com/M7t7egx.png
Rels
Profile Joined August 2008
France13467 Posts
November 09 2018 18:16 GMT
#935
On November 10 2018 03:13 prplhz wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 10 2018 02:36 Rels wrote:
On November 10 2018 02:31 prplhz wrote:
What is checkable? Why is it good to downvote a government that passes a liberal policy? If we had all done like you, where would we have been, policy-wise? Are you proud that, by your own metric, at least one in four of your votes was good?

I sort of get how you don't play early game, I think you always do something like that, but painting yourself a hero because you do that makes no sense. And right now your cases seem to be just wild flailing, I don't really understand any of it.

I don't paint myself as a hero, wtf are you talking about ? kita is claiming my sudden motivation is due to my will to attack him and become president, when there is an occam razor's explanation.

Your last sentence prove what is checkable.

It's not "good" to downvote a government that passes a liberal policy, try a little bit to understand the context. Kita is pushing the idea that:
"Rels has downvoted every government that has passed a liberal policy!"
But he's also pushing the idea that:
"One of the elected people is scum!"
Do you get now what it is ridiculous about it ?

No. What is wrong with winning a game through scum passing 6 liberal policies in an effort to look good to town? And why is it better to vote no to three governments without scum that passes liberal policies than it is to vote yes to a government with scum that passes a liberal policy? I'm having a very hard time understanding this particular thing.

Why is it better to downvote a scum government that passes liberal than to upvote three town governments that passes liberal?

Anyway, scum will always want to pass some liberal policies in the beginning for town cred, so let them.

I don't understand what you're saying. I'm not claiming I'm town due to my voting pattern, I'm defending against kita's accusation that my votes make me scum.
kitaman27 *
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States9245 Posts
November 09 2018 18:32 GMT
#936
On November 10 2018 03:16 Rels wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 10 2018 03:13 prplhz wrote:
On November 10 2018 02:36 Rels wrote:
On November 10 2018 02:31 prplhz wrote:
What is checkable? Why is it good to downvote a government that passes a liberal policy? If we had all done like you, where would we have been, policy-wise? Are you proud that, by your own metric, at least one in four of your votes was good?

I sort of get how you don't play early game, I think you always do something like that, but painting yourself a hero because you do that makes no sense. And right now your cases seem to be just wild flailing, I don't really understand any of it.

I don't paint myself as a hero, wtf are you talking about ? kita is claiming my sudden motivation is due to my will to attack him and become president, when there is an occam razor's explanation.

Your last sentence prove what is checkable.

It's not "good" to downvote a government that passes a liberal policy, try a little bit to understand the context. Kita is pushing the idea that:
"Rels has downvoted every government that has passed a liberal policy!"
But he's also pushing the idea that:
"One of the elected people is scum!"
Do you get now what it is ridiculous about it ?

No. What is wrong with winning a game through scum passing 6 liberal policies in an effort to look good to town? And why is it better to vote no to three governments without scum that passes liberal policies than it is to vote yes to a government with scum that passes a liberal policy? I'm having a very hard time understanding this particular thing.

Why is it better to downvote a scum government that passes liberal than to upvote three town governments that passes liberal?

Anyway, scum will always want to pass some liberal policies in the beginning for town cred, so let them.

I don't understand what you're saying. I'm not claiming I'm town due to my voting pattern, I'm defending against kita's accusation that my votes make me scum.


You're not defending it adequately though. Voting no to all four pairings and justifying it by saying one of those 6 players was mafia, doesn't make it okay.
I'm better than dirt. Well, most kinds of dirt. I mean not that fancy store bought dirt. That stuffs loaded with nutrients. I... I can't compete with that stuff.
Rels
Profile Joined August 2008
France13467 Posts
November 09 2018 18:37 GMT
#937
On November 10 2018 03:32 kitaman27 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 10 2018 03:16 Rels wrote:
On November 10 2018 03:13 prplhz wrote:
On November 10 2018 02:36 Rels wrote:
On November 10 2018 02:31 prplhz wrote:
What is checkable? Why is it good to downvote a government that passes a liberal policy? If we had all done like you, where would we have been, policy-wise? Are you proud that, by your own metric, at least one in four of your votes was good?

I sort of get how you don't play early game, I think you always do something like that, but painting yourself a hero because you do that makes no sense. And right now your cases seem to be just wild flailing, I don't really understand any of it.

I don't paint myself as a hero, wtf are you talking about ? kita is claiming my sudden motivation is due to my will to attack him and become president, when there is an occam razor's explanation.

Your last sentence prove what is checkable.

It's not "good" to downvote a government that passes a liberal policy, try a little bit to understand the context. Kita is pushing the idea that:
"Rels has downvoted every government that has passed a liberal policy!"
But he's also pushing the idea that:
"One of the elected people is scum!"
Do you get now what it is ridiculous about it ?

No. What is wrong with winning a game through scum passing 6 liberal policies in an effort to look good to town? And why is it better to vote no to three governments without scum that passes liberal policies than it is to vote yes to a government with scum that passes a liberal policy? I'm having a very hard time understanding this particular thing.

Why is it better to downvote a scum government that passes liberal than to upvote three town governments that passes liberal?

Anyway, scum will always want to pass some liberal policies in the beginning for town cred, so let them.

I don't understand what you're saying. I'm not claiming I'm town due to my voting pattern, I'm defending against kita's accusation that my votes make me scum.


You're not defending it adequately though. Voting no to all four pairings and justifying it by saying one of those 6 players was mafia, doesn't make it okay.

I'm attacking your reasonning. You think at least one dude elected is scum, yet you're attacking me saying "he voted NO to all the teams, therefore he's scum!" Well according to you, I voted NO to at least one scum, so your reasonning doesn't make sense.
kitaman27 *
Profile Blog Joined April 2009
United States9245 Posts
November 09 2018 18:40 GMT
#938
On November 10 2018 03:37 Rels wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 10 2018 03:32 kitaman27 wrote:
On November 10 2018 03:16 Rels wrote:
On November 10 2018 03:13 prplhz wrote:
On November 10 2018 02:36 Rels wrote:
On November 10 2018 02:31 prplhz wrote:
What is checkable? Why is it good to downvote a government that passes a liberal policy? If we had all done like you, where would we have been, policy-wise? Are you proud that, by your own metric, at least one in four of your votes was good?

I sort of get how you don't play early game, I think you always do something like that, but painting yourself a hero because you do that makes no sense. And right now your cases seem to be just wild flailing, I don't really understand any of it.

I don't paint myself as a hero, wtf are you talking about ? kita is claiming my sudden motivation is due to my will to attack him and become president, when there is an occam razor's explanation.

Your last sentence prove what is checkable.

It's not "good" to downvote a government that passes a liberal policy, try a little bit to understand the context. Kita is pushing the idea that:
"Rels has downvoted every government that has passed a liberal policy!"
But he's also pushing the idea that:
"One of the elected people is scum!"
Do you get now what it is ridiculous about it ?

No. What is wrong with winning a game through scum passing 6 liberal policies in an effort to look good to town? And why is it better to vote no to three governments without scum that passes liberal policies than it is to vote yes to a government with scum that passes a liberal policy? I'm having a very hard time understanding this particular thing.

Why is it better to downvote a scum government that passes liberal than to upvote three town governments that passes liberal?

Anyway, scum will always want to pass some liberal policies in the beginning for town cred, so let them.

I don't understand what you're saying. I'm not claiming I'm town due to my voting pattern, I'm defending against kita's accusation that my votes make me scum.


You're not defending it adequately though. Voting no to all four pairings and justifying it by saying one of those 6 players was mafia, doesn't make it okay.

I'm attacking your reasonning. You think at least one dude elected is scum, yet you're attacking me saying "he voted NO to all the teams, therefore he's scum!" Well according to you, I voted NO to at least one scum, so your reasonning doesn't make sense.


My argument is that you haven't contributed to a single liberal policy being passed based on your voting record. There isn't any way to depute that, regardless of how you want to frame it.
I'm better than dirt. Well, most kinds of dirt. I mean not that fancy store bought dirt. That stuffs loaded with nutrients. I... I can't compete with that stuff.
Rels
Profile Joined August 2008
France13467 Posts
November 09 2018 18:47 GMT
#939
On November 10 2018 03:40 kitaman27 wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 10 2018 03:37 Rels wrote:
On November 10 2018 03:32 kitaman27 wrote:
On November 10 2018 03:16 Rels wrote:
On November 10 2018 03:13 prplhz wrote:
On November 10 2018 02:36 Rels wrote:
On November 10 2018 02:31 prplhz wrote:
What is checkable? Why is it good to downvote a government that passes a liberal policy? If we had all done like you, where would we have been, policy-wise? Are you proud that, by your own metric, at least one in four of your votes was good?

I sort of get how you don't play early game, I think you always do something like that, but painting yourself a hero because you do that makes no sense. And right now your cases seem to be just wild flailing, I don't really understand any of it.

I don't paint myself as a hero, wtf are you talking about ? kita is claiming my sudden motivation is due to my will to attack him and become president, when there is an occam razor's explanation.

Your last sentence prove what is checkable.

It's not "good" to downvote a government that passes a liberal policy, try a little bit to understand the context. Kita is pushing the idea that:
"Rels has downvoted every government that has passed a liberal policy!"
But he's also pushing the idea that:
"One of the elected people is scum!"
Do you get now what it is ridiculous about it ?

No. What is wrong with winning a game through scum passing 6 liberal policies in an effort to look good to town? And why is it better to vote no to three governments without scum that passes liberal policies than it is to vote yes to a government with scum that passes a liberal policy? I'm having a very hard time understanding this particular thing.

Why is it better to downvote a scum government that passes liberal than to upvote three town governments that passes liberal?

Anyway, scum will always want to pass some liberal policies in the beginning for town cred, so let them.

I don't understand what you're saying. I'm not claiming I'm town due to my voting pattern, I'm defending against kita's accusation that my votes make me scum.


You're not defending it adequately though. Voting no to all four pairings and justifying it by saying one of those 6 players was mafia, doesn't make it okay.

I'm attacking your reasonning. You think at least one dude elected is scum, yet you're attacking me saying "he voted NO to all the teams, therefore he's scum!" Well according to you, I voted NO to at least one scum, so your reasonning doesn't make sense.


My argument is that you haven't contributed to a single liberal policy being passed based on your voting record. There isn't any way to depute that, regardless of how you want to frame it.

and that doesn't make anyone scum. Especially since I voted against at least one scum in your view of the game.
[UoN]Sentinel
Profile Blog Joined November 2009
United States11320 Posts
Last Edited: 2018-11-09 22:34:39
November 09 2018 22:34 GMT
#940
The proposed government is: President Rels and Chancellor Grackaroni. You have to send Mocsta and me your votes.
Нас зовет дух отцов, память старых бойцов, дух Москвы и твердыня Полтавы
Prev 1 45 46 47 48 49 59 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 7h 59m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 242
RuFF_SC2 166
Livibee 122
ProTech70
Ketroc 40
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 17233
Icarus 11
Dota 2
monkeys_forever1095
NeuroSwarm141
Super Smash Bros
AZ_Axe167
Other Games
tarik_tv20623
summit1g15694
JimRising 397
WinterStarcraft268
ViBE221
Trikslyr94
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick1882
BasetradeTV32
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 13 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta49
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Azhi_Dahaki9
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Rush927
Upcoming Events
Sparkling Tuna Cup
7h 59m
Online Event
13h 59m
BSL 2v2 ProLeague S3
15h 59m
Esports World Cup
2 days
ByuN vs Astrea
Lambo vs HeRoMaRinE
Clem vs TBD
Solar vs Zoun
SHIN vs Reynor
Maru vs TriGGeR
herO vs Lancer
Cure vs ShoWTimE
Esports World Cup
3 days
Esports World Cup
4 days
Esports World Cup
5 days
CranKy Ducklings
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
BSL20 Non-Korean Champi…
6 days
Bonyth vs Sziky
Dewalt vs Hawk
Hawk vs QiaoGege
Sziky vs Dewalt
Mihu vs Bonyth
Zhanhun vs QiaoGege
QiaoGege vs Fengzi
Liquipedia Results

Completed

2025 ACS Season 2
RSL Revival: Season 1
Murky Cup #2

Ongoing

BSL 2v2 Season 3
Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL20 Non-Korean Championship
CSL Xiamen Invitational
Championship of Russia 2025
Underdog Cup #2
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25

Upcoming

CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
BSL Season 21
RSL Revival: Season 2
SEL Season 2 Championship
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
FEL Cracov 2025
Esports World Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.