|
Message Blazinghand if you request a ban please ^_^
Also when the game you're sitting out is over! |
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
On September 05 2015 07:12 Onegu wrote:
1 game ban for beneather for not posting at all and being replaced
Nothing for VA as personal reasons came up needing him to be replaced
Approved. Note that Beneather was already on the ban list at the time your game started. Please make sure to check the ban list against your signups list!
On September 07 2015 05:04 Onegu wrote:
Sicklucker sat out my game also
Thanks
|
Doesn´t that technically mean that Onegu wasn´t using the ban list for his game, and shouldn't be able to ban people based on it? We had that discussion a couple of ban list threads ago. Where Doc Helvetica wanted to ban people after explicitly stating he wasn´t using the ban list. Or something.
|
On September 10 2015 09:21 Acrofales wrote:
Doesn´t that technically mean that Onegu wasn´t using the ban list for his game, and shouldn't be able to ban people based on it? We had that discussion a couple of ban list threads ago. Where Doc Helvetica wanted to ban people after explicitly stating he wasn´t using the ban list. Or something.
Hunh? I don't see how Onegu's game ignored the ban list. Essplain?
|
On September 10 2015 09:54 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On September 10 2015 09:21 Acrofales wrote:
Doesn´t that technically mean that Onegu wasn´t using the ban list for his game, and shouldn't be able to ban people based on it? We had that discussion a couple of ban list threads ago. Where Doc Helvetica wanted to ban people after explicitly stating he wasn´t using the ban list. Or something. Hunh? I don't see how Onegu's game ignored the ban list. Essplain?
Beneather was on the ban list (meaning: not allowed to play in games that follow the ban list). Yet he played in Onegu´s game. Thus Onegu was ignoring the ban list, intentionally or not.
|
you dont have to respect the ban list anyway its up to the host . so whatever
|
"Hosts can choose to follow the Ban List or not at their own discretion. If they are following the Ban List, then players who are listed as banned will not be allowed to sign up for that game."
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
Ah, fair point. By definition Onegu's game didn't follow the banlist. Beneather remains at his one-game ban. sicklucker's /sitout still counts though, he sat out the game so his ban is removed.
|
|
|
Ok as long as he is still on the banlist I am fine.
|
Blazinghand
United States25560 Posts
On September 11 2015 07:09 Koshi wrote:
I sat out Gaiden.
Thanks for the heads-up! I noticed adjusted banlist already.
|
On September 10 2015 10:28 Wile E. Coyote wrote:
you dont have to respect the ban list anyway its up to the host . so whatever
Hey, what the hell?!?
Who are you and how
Dude wait did you ask?
If I can't log in...
You better hope you didn't change the password and had told me who you were and whatnot
I am lax with my smurf but he's still mine sson
|
On September 22 2015 15:27 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On September 10 2015 10:28 Wile E. Coyote wrote:
you dont have to respect the ban list anyway its up to the host . so whatever Hey, what the hell?!? Who are you and how Dude wait did you ask? If I can't log in... You better hope you didn't change the password and had told me who you were and whatnot I am lax with my smurf but he's still mine sson
I am alakaslam, don't worry password is unchanged, carry on. Please ask next time, and I will change the password once I confirm no games are in progress...
|
Newbie Student Mafia XIV has ended.
I have a couple issues under review. Will update later if necessary.
Carry on, banlist vultures ^^
|
On September 22 2015 23:56 rsoultin wrote:
Newbie Student Mafia XIV has ended.
I have a couple issues under review. Will update later if necessary.
Carry on, banlist vultures ^^
^ BlazingHand I caused all the troubles again.  I feel like we'll get to know each other a lot during my stay on TL Mafia.
|
Battle of the Drams is on track to begin tomorrow. If you have sitouts pending, you have until tomorrow to get them in!
|
Season of the witch mafia is over.
Requesting a 3 game ban for Bill Murray for outing game-breaking information intentionally after his death:
On September 24 2015 03:39 Bill Murray wrote:
wow im lynched
1) you all didnt deadline vote
2) you all didnt fucking let me speak
3) you all put 5 votes on me for no fucking reason
I was the Judge. I was town. Good fucking game. I'm never playing on this website again.
The bolded is the important part. That piece of information led directly to town instantly losing the game. This is basically the same thing as a dead mafia outing his team.
I'm requesting 3 game, but semi-permanent might actually be the correct call here. It's intentionally ruining a game because you're unhappy about being lynched. I'll leave that decision to the almighty blazinghand.
|
Just going to weigh in, for what it's worth.
I'd have to agree with Palmar, though town had its faults prior to the day 3 lynch (i.e. we were quite disorganised), I really took great care in not outing my role or even softing it and how the mafia managed to nail both Tictock and my own roles was beyond me, I looked through the mafia qt and you re-read messages 550-560 between Rels and Fidei and sure enough, Bill Murray's claim directly led to the soup as Rels was debating claiming the same role that BM had claimed and they still had a backup plan after that.
I am admittedly somewhat biased as I issued a ban not too long ago for something similar in Himalayas, but I feel especially as Palmar was more explicit on this, I don't know why Bill Murray had done this.
Only thing is severity...when I looked up the ban for GB, he had no precedent and even with a 1 game ban, people contested what I put out. If there is precedent for him doing this, then I see where 3 to semi-perm comes in. With intention (I know GB was raging too but this was more blatant than what happened in Himalayas), I'd say more than 1 for sure, but beyond that I can't really say.
Irrespective, I trust Palmar/BH's judgement on this. The ban is more than warranted.
|
Canada11355 Posts
Isn't BM on that pic of TL mafia banlist hell? The one where it goes through the layers like outing mafia team/breadcrumbing role pm/posting after death/Bill Murray/inactivity
I fucking found it through TL's search engine you people better bow down
![[image loading]](http://imgur.com/FzFHe.png)
|
@HTS BM has already been removed off the semi-perm list once... maybe even twice.
He's like the most banned guy on TL mafia, and yes he has flipped out and ruined games in rage before.
The problem is, I actually like BM, he's a pretty nice guy for the most part, he just has these fits of anger that cause him to do really stupid stuff that affects everyone. I just can't think of any alternative solution to the banlist to deal with it, unless we do something like just not banning him at all and accept that once a year he'll break a game in rage.
I don't really care one way or the other. The thing about BM is that he's not a compulsive asshole in between his rage bursts, so 90% of his games he's just fine.
|
Repeat offender? My mistake I wasn't aware there.
In that case, I'd be asking for 3 to semi-perm then. Not arguing against you at all Palmar, not in the least, more ignorance from my end. 
And FF, wow, who in the hell made that graphic, that is pretty interesting lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
