Student Mafia IV (New/Newish Players Welcome) - Page 52

On November 29 2014 02:38 rsoultin wrote:
Come to think of it...

@Bats, I'm not seeing your top three scum for lynch. Did I miss that or are you just not playing ball?

On November 29 2014 02:03 rsoultin wrote:
##vote meatpudding

Just get this feeling if we vote bats, he's going to flip town.

Okay, lightning. I'll buy it, because legitimately I was specifically asking you the questions about why you didn't want to lynch Day 1 because it did seem fishy to me. It was part of my first post on the thread, asking people why that made any sense, before I remembered who'd even said it. You may very well have felt pressured to when I started questioning you about it and making the case for lynching day 1 as a policy.

That said...why? I'd outright said I got your explanation. Were you worried I'd start calling you scum if you didn't? Why would that worry you? You don't have a role if you're town. The players in the thread aren't following me (I originally was on slam, and only later switched to dicks). Half the people hear think I'm scummy or at the very least a jerk. Not a pied piper of awesome to mention a name and boom that person is lynched, lol. So what about what I said forced you to change your vote?

On November 29 2014 02:55 kushm4sta wrote:
bats help me figure out which of these sneaky tryhard sonnabitches are scum...
is it htf or something?

On November 29 2014 03:05 Half the Sky wrote:


I think you have. Meat isn't a policy lynch yet. I am saying scum based on what he posted before he disappeared. Meat is not a policy, Alakaslam is, and I think might be edging closer to a modkill.

What I am questioning is Kush's justification for calling DSMI a policy lynch when he'd posted more recently (to Kush's voting him) and a scum lynch. He used "doubles" as the explanation. Am I making sense now?

On November 29 2014 03:10 Half the Sky wrote:
EBWOP - Rewording my last sentence for clarity.

Rsoultin, what I am questioning is Kush's justification for calling DSMI a policy lynch AND a scum lynch, when DSMI had posted more recently (to Kush's voting him). He used "doubles" as the explanation. Am I making sense now?

On November 29 2014 04:34 rsoultin wrote:
Lightning, man...that just sounds weak. If you weren't convinced and didn't want to, you simply shouldn't have. I wasn't after you with barrels loaded and even if I was...-shrugs- Nothing stopping you from telling me to go screw myself lol. Unless your issue is you think I "pressured" you to do it to get the vote on dicks.

You could have as easily voted for bats and made it a race. There was a case out against him and he had several votes. Never told you who to vote for. xP So I guess I'm just not following you.

On November 26 2014 08:02 Trfel wrote:
I'm becoming highly suspicious of batsnacks.

Looking at batsnacks' posts this game, it does seem like he hasn't contributed many reads or constructive comments at all. He has pressure voted kushm4sta, and tried to convince other people to vote for kushm4sta, as shown:



Then Oatsmaster starts hinting that he might be mafia, and he responds as follows:


He just starts attacking Oatsmaster, without actually providing any argument against the accsusations.

It's been nearly 24 hours and I cannot find any critical thinking or logical reads from batsnacks. He has been only minimally probing for information, as well.

Now, examining batsnacks' mafia history, it seems to show similar, non-accusatory play as mafia, but an ability to logically provide arguments against people as town.

In Fantasy Football Mafia Mini 2, his most recent mafia game, batsnacks was a mafia vanilla. His posts generally seem to lack content, for example this:

batsnacks did give some analysis in saying that robik seemed to be town in that game, which ended up being correct. But he failed to provide specifics or any real evidence of this:


He also defends Liam from an accusation. Up to now, the only two real things he's said are claiming these two people to be town. At this point he is accused of being mafia, and this is his defense:

He continues to not provide any true defense or explanation for his actions, and ends up being lynched on the first day.

In his mafia game before that, Fantasy Football (FFL) Mini, batsnacks is a town vanilla.


batsnacks accuses Oatsmaster of being mafia in this game (which ends up being incorrect). But when he defends someone as being town, he provides some support for this claim, and also shares his views a bit.


Here's a critical analysis of a post in that game. It doesn't result in anything, but this post has more logic and scum-searching than his play to this point in the current game, as well as his play in the first game I mentioned, where he was mafia.


Then he claims Hopeless1der to be mafia, which ends up being correct. I don't see any reasoning listed, though. This post also came after the first 24 hours of the game, unlike all of the other posts quoted here.

I did notice this inconsistency between his post in this game:

and this:


Why the change? Probably just a change in his playstyle, but another explanation is that he is searching for mafia in that game, and has less incentive to do so in this game.

Looking at batsnacks' play in the game preceding the above game, 2p2 Vanilla Werewolf 13er, batsnacks immediately comes up with a comprehensive look at GlowingBear:


He's clearly thinking and investigating the posts, and trying to find the scum. Then he starts thinking that SkyDragon is scum:



He continues to press on GlowingBear and SkyDragon. Both end up being town, but batsnacks is showing that he is capable and willing to attempt to find scum and provide logical accusations that other players are scum.

In conclusion, batsnacks seems very suspcious because he has not yet provided any real content, particularly at least one accusation of someone being mafia with an argument behind it. This resembles his play in his last game, where he was mafia, and contrasts with his play in previous games where he was town. What do you guys think?

On November 27 2014 07:31 Breshke wrote:


Landslide you say? Okay if dicksmash wasnt totally uninterested in winning this game he would probably be voting for bats HIS SCUMREAD. so that leaves the votes at 4 to 6. That means it only takes one person to change their mines for it to be 5-5 with the vote being pushed over by afk slam. I'm really starting to not care what you think sick lucker i voted where i thought I should

On November 27 2014 07:31 Breshke wrote:


Landslide you say? Okay if dicksmash wasnt totally uninterested in winning this game he would probably be voting for bats HIS SCUMREAD. so that leaves the votes at 4 to 6. That means it only takes one person to change their mines for it to be 5-5 with the vote being pushed over by afk slam. I'm really starting to not care what you think sick lucker i voted where i thought I should

On November 28 2014 22:36 LightningStrike wrote:
I just woke up after going to bed after my last post and I asked who my top 3 scum are and here is mine that are here
meatpudding
kushm4sta
Alakaslam
@rsoultin The only wagon at the time was Dicksmash McIroncock and other cases that wasn't well put out and few people who I felt was townie voted for Dicksmash McIroncock so sorry if I put it all on you but it was mainly your push to get me to vote kind of forced my hand :|

On November 27 2014 07:09 Blazinghand wrote:
Final Vote Count

batsnacks (2): Oatsmaster, Trfel, Breshke
Dicksmash Mcironcock (6): kushm4sta, Damdred, Half the Sky, LightningStrike, SickLucker, rsoultin, Alakaslam
sicklucker (1): meatpudding
Trfel (1): batsnacks


Not Voting (1): Dicksmash McIroncock


Currently, Dicksmash Mcironcock is set to be lynched.