• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 15:00
CEST 21:00
KST 04:00
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy7uThermal's 2v2 Tour: $15,000 Main Event14Serral wins EWC 202549Tournament Spotlight: FEL Cracow 202510Power Rank - Esports World Cup 202580
Community News
Weekly Cups (Aug 4-10): MaxPax wins a triple6SC2's Safe House 2 - October 18 & 195Weekly Cups (Jul 28-Aug 3): herO doubles up6LiuLi Cup - August 2025 Tournaments5[BSL 2025] H2 - Team Wars, Weeklies & SB Ladder10
StarCraft 2
General
RSL Revival patreon money discussion thread Team Liquid Map Contest #21 - Presented by Monster Energy #1: Maru - Greatest Players of All Time Rogue Talks: "Koreans could dominate again" Weekly Cups (Aug 4-10): MaxPax wins a triple
Tourneys
RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series Enki Epic Series #5 - TaeJa vs Classic (SC Evo) Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament SEL Masters #5 - Korea vs Russia (SC Evo) ByuN vs TaeJa Bo7 SC Evo Showmatch
Strategy
Custom Maps
External Content
Mutation # 486 Watch the Skies Mutation # 485 Death from Below Mutation # 484 Magnetic Pull Mutation #239 Bad Weather
Brood War
General
New season has just come in ladder StarCraft player reflex TE scores BW General Discussion BSL Polish World Championship 2025 20-21 September BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/
Tourneys
KCM 2025 Season 3 [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Small VOD Thread 2.0 [ASL20] Online Qualifiers Day 2
Strategy
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Fighting Spirit mining rates [G] Mineral Boosting Muta micro map competition
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Total Annihilation Server - TAForever Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason [MMORPG] Tree of Savior (Successor of Ragnarok)
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine The Games Industry And ATVI Russo-Ukrainian War Thread The year 2050
Fan Clubs
INnoVation Fan Club SKT1 Classic Fan Club!
Media & Entertainment
[Manga] One Piece Anime Discussion Thread [\m/] Heavy Metal Thread Movie Discussion! Korean Music Discussion
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Gtx660 graphics card replacement Installation of Windows 10 suck at "just a moment" Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
TeamLiquid Team Shirt On Sale The Automated Ban List
Blogs
The Biochemical Cost of Gami…
TrAiDoS
[Girl blog} My fema…
artosisisthebest
Sharpening the Filtration…
frozenclaw
ASL S20 English Commentary…
namkraft
from making sc maps to makin…
Husyelt
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 1159 users

Student Mafia IV (New/Newish Players Welcome) - Page 44

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 42 43 44 45 46 111 Next
batsnacks
Profile Blog Joined April 2014
United States4466 Posts
November 27 2014 22:52 GMT
#861
On November 28 2014 07:49 sicklucker wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 28 2014 07:47 batsnacks wrote:
On November 28 2014 07:41 sicklucker wrote:
I was also saying hypothetically If both bats and dandred are scum they would have to kill one of the guys pushing them hard. Wifmo my ass its the only play. Because you cant lose bats because then dandred would be voted out.

Alot of people agreed with me that a bats damdred scum team makes sense. If they didnt them I sapose im wrong here


So you think me and damdred are mafia. You think damdred's plan as mafia is to draw attention to the both of us by defending me. And you think our plan is to kill the people who are pushing us, because that somehow makes us less suspicious?

That's actually what you think???


I never said I believe this. I just feel it makes sense to lynch you. and if you show up mafia then dandred. If you show up town we have a confirmed basically in my mind


YES YOU DID. By believing me and damdred are mafia, that IS what you are saying you believe because that's what happened.
sicklucker
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Canada16987 Posts
November 27 2014 22:53 GMT
#862
Well for starters damdred is being over defensive here. I understand bats not wanting to get lynched. We have one guy talking about IF WE LYNCH then MAYBE WE LYNCH and damdred is all over it. I would hope a town damdred here would just help find scum.
Damdred
Profile Joined July 2014
15669 Posts
November 27 2014 22:54 GMT
#863
On November 28 2014 07:50 Breshke wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 28 2014 07:49 Damdred wrote:
On November 28 2014 07:46 Breshke wrote:
On November 28 2014 07:42 Damdred wrote:
Half maybe I need to dive him properly.

Sl is acting really strange with all this nonsensical math stuff.

Oats is weird but I wouldn't lynch today


I have the same feelings about Half

Im fairly sure SL is town, dont look at his weird math stuff. Last game the way rayn and then because of him kind of myself townread SL is that you need to look at the fact that he truly believes what he is saying is right and what he is saying is helping town. Never seen him mafia so could be wrong obviously.

Why is oats weird?


Just isn't playing how I've generally seen him, he came into the game much more aggro than usual he generally isn't as nitpicky.


Do you think nitpicky helps kill scum, or do you think it is something scum does to make themselves look like they are helping town.


That's a hard question, it could catch scum and scum could use it to discredit and look like they are helping town. Its more null but I don't usually see oats do it if at all
Half the Sky
Profile Joined May 2014
Germany9029 Posts
November 27 2014 22:55 GMT
#864
On November 28 2014 02:50 batsnacks wrote:
I think Trfel is pretty scummy actually.


On November 28 2014 02:56 batsnacks wrote:
Trfel writes these huge posts and I never finish reading them feeling like I've gained anything. I read his entire filter and the only thing I've taken away from it is that I'm mafia because meta, even though we've never played together, and damdred is my scum mate even though that makes zero sense.


On November 28 2014 03:15 batsnacks wrote:
I really don't think I've been scummy enough to warrant being the focus of every single one of Trfel's long winded posts.


On November 28 2014 03:17 batsnacks wrote:
Even his first post was about about me. He's gone into this game with the mindset of: Focus on bat, nothing more, nothing less, nothing else.


He has provided evidence on others but Bats and Damdred have both given him the most amount of material to work with. Sticking on point (for now) with Bats:

On November 28 2014 03:21 batsnacks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 28 2014 03:16 rsoultin wrote:
Mmmmm...that could just be cause he's new, the big posts.

Picking you to look into and build a case against isn't completely out to lunch with your insta-vote, though you removed it when kush decided to participate, didn't you? Damdred seems more scummy to me than you do at the moment. Not really reading Trfel as scum just because he built a case on you though.

Trfel said he agreed with the kush pressure.

Show nested quote +
On November 25 2014 12:46 Trfel wrote:
On November 25 2014 12:40 Oatsmaster wrote:
Man, what is this.

Whos scum Trefel?

If I had to take a guess right now, I would guess sicklucker and Half the Sky. But I feel like it's far too early for me to confidently make reads. As the vote gets closer, I will consider more strongly who to vote for. Until then, a no lynch or a policy lynch on an inactive (kushm4sta?) seems better than trying to take a guess if it still seems unclear.

Show nested quote +
On November 25 2014 14:59 Trfel wrote:
To be fair, kushm4sta, I would like some more from you. Batsnacks wants you to participate in the thread and share your thoughts, and that seems like a fair request. You obviously read batsnacks as scum. Any reasons we haven't mentioned yet? What about the rest of the people here?

Then he said I was scummy for it:

Show nested quote +
On November 26 2014 12:25 Trfel wrote:
To reiterate:
On November 25 2014 10:27 batsnacks wrote:
I think you should all start voting kush since that's the most logical vote right now.

That's the problem post with the kushm4sta policy lynch for me. Yes, I'm glad that he forced kusmh4sta to the thread. However, we don't need to focus only on one afk player to bring them back into the game. We can still investigate the people here while pressuring kushm4sta to play, we don't need to sidetrack our discussions for a policy lynch.


Make sure you compare bolded words.


My interpretation of the above is that you are using the policy lynch discussion to distract from the real problem. That is a valid point. That is a scum behaviour.

More unsupported attacks:

On November 28 2014 04:54 batsnacks wrote:
You know it's a problem when I don't feel like reading your posts because I already know everything I'm going to read will be useless and wrong and I won't remember any of it anyway.


On November 28 2014 05:09 batsnacks wrote:
A claim that's wrong is weak no matter how much "evidence" or "reasoning" you give.


Yet Batsmacks is NOT saying WHY Trfel is wrong.

On November 28 2014 07:26 batsnacks wrote:
Everything SL is saying is so wrong. "More than 1/4 chance I'm mafia" where do you get this stuff?


He's not refuting with support/evidence anyone (Trfel, SL, myself, whoever) who is pushing him. Again if you must, filter Batsmacks and read pages 4-6. On page 5, you will see the same type of unsubstantiated post again and again. Not much better on page 6.

Finally, the anti-tunnel argument is getting old. We're aware there are three scum in the game. It is just that at present, you are providing most of the material to be working with. If you are innocent, then you need to start poking holes in any of the arguments presented, which you have failed to do so far.

The phoenix must burn to emerge. - Janet Fitch
Damdred
Profile Joined July 2014
15669 Posts
November 27 2014 22:58 GMT
#865
On November 28 2014 07:53 sicklucker wrote:
Well for starters damdred is being over defensive here. I understand bats not wanting to get lynched. We have one guy talking about IF WE LYNCH then MAYBE WE LYNCH and damdred is all over it. I would hope a town damdred here would just help find scum.


Because its HORRIBLE practice and not protown at all! We don't lynch someone based on wifom night kills its horrible and bad and you are still talking u associated flips
sicklucker
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Canada16987 Posts
November 27 2014 22:58 GMT
#866
See this is the thing about my town play people dont understand and often misread me. I like to theorize about possible situations as one bit of evidence to a conclusion. But when I post these theory's people go .OMG HES CRAZY HE BELIEVES WHAT HES WRITING. No im just throwing out ideas for discussion to help us solve the big picture. I dont expect people to blindly follow my logic but I do think I have good points.
batsnacks
Profile Blog Joined April 2014
United States4466 Posts
November 27 2014 22:58 GMT
#867
So what exactly are you trying to say HTS?
batsnacks
Profile Blog Joined April 2014
United States4466 Posts
November 27 2014 22:59 GMT
#868
On November 28 2014 07:58 sicklucker wrote:
See this is the thing about my town play people dont understand and often misread me. I like to theorize about possible situations as one bit of evidence to a conclusion. But when I post these theory's people go .OMG HES CRAZY HE BELIEVES WHAT HES WRITING. No im just throwing out ideas for discussion to help us solve the big picture. I dont expect people to blindly follow my logic but I do think I have good points.


I explained to you why you don't have good points. You should get new ones.
batsnacks
Profile Blog Joined April 2014
United States4466 Posts
November 27 2014 23:01 GMT
#869
ebwop also you've been saying me and damdred are mafia team for a while now so no that's not just a spur of the moment theory you just now cooked up.
sicklucker
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Canada16987 Posts
November 27 2014 23:03 GMT
#870
On November 28 2014 07:59 batsnacks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 28 2014 07:58 sicklucker wrote:
See this is the thing about my town play people dont understand and often misread me. I like to theorize about possible situations as one bit of evidence to a conclusion. But when I post these theory's people go .OMG HES CRAZY HE BELIEVES WHAT HES WRITING. No im just throwing out ideas for discussion to help us solve the big picture. I dont expect people to blindly follow my logic but I do think I have good points.


I explained to you why you don't have good points. You should get new ones.


You just pretty much confirmed his case against you with this post...
meatpudding
Profile Joined March 2011
Australia520 Posts
November 27 2014 23:03 GMT
#871
Hey guys, I'm in the middle of this http://www.abc.net.au/news/2014-11-28/brisbane-storms-68000-residents-still-without-power/5924112. I don't have power at home but hopefully can catch up a little bit.
Be excellent to each other.
sicklucker
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Canada16987 Posts
November 27 2014 23:04 GMT
#872
On November 28 2014 08:01 batsnacks wrote:
ebwop also you've been saying me and damdred are mafia team for a while now so no that's not just a spur of the moment theory you just now cooked up.


I know its adding to the evidence. Damdred should probably bus you now ;p
batsnacks
Profile Blog Joined April 2014
United States4466 Posts
November 27 2014 23:04 GMT
#873
On November 28 2014 08:03 sicklucker wrote:
Show nested quote +
On November 28 2014 07:59 batsnacks wrote:
On November 28 2014 07:58 sicklucker wrote:
See this is the thing about my town play people dont understand and often misread me. I like to theorize about possible situations as one bit of evidence to a conclusion. But when I post these theory's people go .OMG HES CRAZY HE BELIEVES WHAT HES WRITING. No im just throwing out ideas for discussion to help us solve the big picture. I dont expect people to blindly follow my logic but I do think I have good points.


I explained to you why you don't have good points. You should get new ones.


You just pretty much confirmed his case against you with this post...


Tell me what you're still stuck on and I'll unstuck you.
Damdred
Profile Joined July 2014
15669 Posts
November 27 2014 23:05 GMT
#874
Bats actually had decent responses to tr before his death happened. And he's right about not being tunneled that's how town loses games.

Thirdly Scumsnacks and damred (teehee) wouldn't put themselves at the forefront of discussion damdred wouldn't lead the lynch and take out the #1 pressure on him that's idiotic I can fight pressure and discredit them. Total wifom but its not what I would do
Damdred
Profile Joined July 2014
15669 Posts
November 27 2014 23:06 GMT
#875
I'm not voting bats because I can remember what he posts....your points are bad
Breshke
Profile Joined July 2014
Australia3749 Posts
November 27 2014 23:07 GMT
#876
Bats can you please clarify why you have said multiple times you and damdred could not be scum together.
Damdred
Profile Joined July 2014
15669 Posts
November 27 2014 23:07 GMT
#877
See you say you want town to win SL but you are dragging the thread through shit just to pit out crazy wrong theories currently and want people to scum hunt but keep throwing stuff at me and bats
Breshke
Profile Joined July 2014
Australia3749 Posts
November 27 2014 23:09 GMT
#878
Also Damdred could you explain your read on Bats a bit more if you can.

Also bats can you do the same for Damdred.
Half the Sky
Profile Joined May 2014
Germany9029 Posts
November 27 2014 23:10 GMT
#879
On November 28 2014 07:58 batsnacks wrote:
So what exactly are you trying to say HTS?


Arguments that you are scum or at least exhibiting scum-like behaviour. But I have one last post since you had brought it up yourself (operative part in bold) -

On November 28 2014 02:56 batsnacks wrote:
Trfel writes these huge posts and I never finish reading them feeling like I've gained anything. I read his entire filter and the only thing I've taken away from it is that I'm mafia because meta, even though we've never played together, and damdred is my scum mate even though that makes zero sense.


If we ignore the word "meta", the point still stands. He used a valid behaviour comparison from other games.

(If you want, filter Trfel, go to page 1, about mid-way down

On November 26 2014 08:02 Trfel wrote:
Now, examining batsnacks' mafia history, it seems to show similar, non-accusatory play as mafia, but an ability to logically provide arguments against people as town.

In Fantasy Football Mafia Mini 2, his most recent mafia game, batsnacks was a mafia vanilla. His posts generally seem to lack content, for example this:
Show nested quote +
On October 23 2014 16:57 batsnacks wrote:
On October 23 2014 16:50 Alakaslam wrote:
On October 23 2014 14:24 Alakaslam wrote:


Fite me

You know it is time

Exact same amount of letter swapping sson


I only had to swap 2 letters, the A and the I. You have to swap 3, the N, O, and W. Plus you have an extra letter that doesn't even belong there.

Looks like I'm right about you. You're clearly reaching here.

batsnacks did give some analysis in saying that robik seemed to be town in that game, which ended up being correct. But he failed to provide specifics or any real evidence of this:

Show nested quote +
On October 24 2014 06:50 batsnacks wrote:
I think robik looks pretty solid. I like how he's posting; he's focused, not all caps, consolidated, no personal dramas, that stuff is what reminds me of hard to get along with robik. @DrParnassus what about robik this game seem hard to cooperate with? Could you quote an example? You did say -everything about the way he's playing- reminds you of that.

He also defends Liam from an accusation. Up to now, the only two real things he's said are claiming these two people to be town. At this point he is accused of being mafia, and this is his defense:
Show nested quote +
On October 24 2014 21:41 batsnacks wrote:
I think I'm not a good lynch right now. For obvious reasons.

He continues to not provide any true defense or explanation for his actions, and ends up being lynched on the first day.

In his mafia game before that, Fantasy Football (FFL) Mini, batsnacks is a town vanilla.

Show nested quote +
On October 06 2014 23:34 batsnacks wrote:
On October 06 2014 23:28 Oatsmaster wrote:
On October 06 2014 23:26 batsnacks wrote:
Oats if you are in fact "contributing" shouldn't you be thanking me? I did enable these "contributions" of yours. I feel like you're annoyed with me for allowing you to contribute.

Or are you annoyed with being in the spotlight this early?

You dont get to claim credit for something that happened accidentally.

What are your reads, mainly holyflare and me?


I agreed with HF a lot last game and he was town. I'm agreeing with him this game already so, tentatively town.

I'm voting you because I think you're scummy.

Also lol at "accidentally"

You claimed on accident now?

batsnacks accuses Oatsmaster of being mafia in this game (which ends up being incorrect). But when he defends someone as being town, he provides some support for this claim, and also shares his views a bit.

Show nested quote +
On October 07 2014 08:07 batsnacks wrote:
Wait a minute, something isn't right. I quoted all of the following from the same post.

On October 07 2014 02:35 Blazinghand wrote:
...there's roughly speaking 13 players, right? If 3 are scum, then that gives us a solid 22% chance of lynching scum purely based on RNG.


No townie in this game knows the ratio of town to mafia, so it is correct here that BH gives us an example ratio of 10/3 or 22% as an example.

But then later in that post he says this:

On October 07 2014 02:35 Blazinghand wrote:
...the fact of the matter is, I'm offering a straight-up 22% chance to lynch someone.


BH how do you KNOW there are exactly 3 mafia? I bolded fact because that's a serious word to throw around when you're supposedly working with estimates.

Here's a critical analysis of a post in that game. It doesn't result in anything, but this post has more logic and scum-searching than his play to this point in the current game, as well as his play in the first game I mentioned, where he was mafia.

Show nested quote +
On October 08 2014 02:24 batsnacks wrote:
On October 08 2014 02:22 Hopeless1der wrote:
You had one job batsnacks.
+ Show Spoiler +
and then HF gave you another one.


Does it make you nervous that I've already figured out you're mafia?

Then he claims Hopeless1der to be mafia, which ends up being correct. I don't see any reasoning listed, though. This post also came after the first 24 hours of the game, unlike all of the other posts quoted here.

I did notice this inconsistency between his post in this game:
Show nested quote +
On November 25 2014 10:58 batsnacks wrote:There is no such thing as scum slips, so no, dude didn't scum slip.

and this:

Show nested quote +
On October 07 2014 08:29 batsnacks wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:19 Grackaroni wrote:
You're implying that at the start of the post BH was careful not to slip that he had knowledge of the setup. (by pointing out that the number of scum is unknown) and then *slipped* that he was 100% sure there were 3 mafia within like 10 seconds of typing which is really unrealistic.

What I see is BH working off the assumption that random lynch provides at least 22% chance of hitting mafia compared to day 1 analysis which varies (and BH thinks is worse for catching mafia)


I think it's feasible that he slipped.

besides

The TL mafia database disagrees that random lynch is better. So by random lynching we 1) have worse odds of lynching mafia and 2) players who agree with the random lynch have zero accountability for their votes.

Why the change? Probably just a change in his playstyle, but another explanation is that he is searching for mafia in that game, and has less incentive to do so in this game.

Looking at batsnacks' play in the game preceding the above game, 2p2 Vanilla Werewolf 13er, batsnacks immediately comes up with a comprehensive look at GlowingBear:

Show nested quote +
On September 26 2014 08:14 batsnacks wrote:
I'm not completely caught up yet but I still think GB is mafiawolf.

On September 25 2014 11:02 GlowingBear wrote:
I think Storr is mafia because of this:

This post stinks:

On September 25 2014 09:20 StorrZerg wrote:
(1) i'd lynch fecal for the donkey entrance to the game.

the overly troll attitude fecal has with the caps locks, and insta vote on holy is really throwing off scum vibes. Deff would lynch.


On September 25 2014 08:34 Fecalfeast wrote:
The fact that nobody was using the voting thread made me think they were joke votes. That's why I didn't use the thread anyway.

Lol I actually like your case holyflare


"yeah right"

Also i don't like the GB entrance to the game

On September 25 2014 08:41 GlowingBear wrote:
Oh THANK GOD I'm town again! I hate rolling scum.

Ok, Haru, tell me what you think of holyflower by now


(2)unless im missing a game he just played, last game he was scum. seems odd to lead with a lie.


(1) very has reason to call someone definetely scum. I did that no geript last game. There is nothing alignment indicative in fecal's entrance and that makes storr look bad.

(2) storr was scum with me and I clearly stated on the qt that I wanted to be town. I was mafia for 3 games and I wish I was town on this, which I am. I never lied.

The way he is disliking entrances looks like he is trying to pretend to be an aggressive town.

Also, he gives Haru free town pass for his entrance and also obiwan. None has alignment indicative posts.

On September 25 2014 10:11 StorrZerg wrote:
obi probably town too.


I'm on a phone and I'm too lazy to search for the town pass on Haru now.

storr is my strongest scum read the moment


Here's his case on storr. He says storr is pretending to be aggressive town by disliking entrances. That is a weird thing to say. How can GB tell the difference between someone who is pretending to be aggressive town and someone who actually is aggressive town based on so few posts? Imo he can't and is just making stuff up.

He also scum reads storr for saying someone is "definitely" mafia and says he said the exact same thing as scum last game. Well, look at this:

On September 25 2014 11:32 GlowingBear wrote:
Naaaah. I'm positive storr is scum.
##Vote: Storr


He did it again this game.

I also think this post is scummy:

On September 25 2014 13:09 GlowingBear wrote:
On September 25 2014 12:51 Hopeless1der wrote:
On September 25 2014 12:42 GlowingBear wrote:
On September 25 2014 12:28 Hopeless1der wrote:
On September 25 2014 12:22 GlowingBear wrote:
On September 25 2014 12:19 Hopeless1der wrote:
not much time tonight, but right now severely dislike glowingbear. Very shallow reads imo. HF's case wasnt terrible, it was misplaced. If haru couldnt prove he was actually sad about rolling blue I'd be voting for him right now. Since the case has obviously failed, why would HF stay with it? Thats ridiculous.

Then there's his scumlist...what the hell is that about. players have literally not even posted yet, but GB has solved the game? I dont buy that in the slightest.

I'll probably be gone until this time tomorrow but should be generally more active when I'm around during my evenings. (Just started a new job, dont want to play at work)


Because that's his scum read and if the case didn't go through he should be asking more questions to Haru to get more information?

Lol...

HF's case on Haru was literally based on one post that was demonstrably false using out-of-thread but public information. Again, why try to stick with such a case? Refusing to "overlook" (which is a strange way to phrase it btw) his case would be way more suspicious than dropping it like he already has. The fact that this seems suspicious to you makes YOU look suspicious to me.


Because it's easy, as scum, to pick on a tiny problem to bus a partner then drop the read.

That is so incredibly shallow. Unless I have found surefire scum tomorrow, I'm voting you just based off this interaction.

btw, fecalfeast is behaving pretty similar to last game imo. No reason to hate on him just yet. Palmar seems to have gotten upset that no one uses the voting thread to follow his policy and has taken up a silent protest. Sky is new to TL but not to mafia. I'd like to hear his (her?) thoughts on why d1 claimers usually got lynched on SK.
I'm gone for now, see you all later.



It can be shallow, but at least I'm the only one trying to get people talking. Nothing is in the way of updating my reads the more people starts to talk. If you lynch me, you'll be lynching a townie for stupid reasons and you'll soon lose the game as much as you lost our last one


The "at least" in that sentence is really scummy to me. It's a tone thing. It's like he's really saying "I'm mafia but at least I'm the only one trying to get people talking." It's also scummy how he says he's the -only- person getting people talking. GB made a case against HF earlier for dropping his case against HaruRH. I'm not a mind reader but I think HF made that case to get people talking. So GB is scum reading HF for trying to get people talking -- while saying he, GB, is the only contributor in the thread.

I also think this post is scummy:

On September 25 2014 10:18 GlowingBear wrote:
Ok

Glowningbear's first scum team guess: Haru, HF, Storr

Gonna have dinner and give reasons


GB is referring to himself in the third person here in order to distance himself from his reads that he doesn't actually believe in. How can he be confident he's caught the whole scum team and solved the game? Later when he's drunk he posts this:

On September 25 2014 17:48 GlowingBear wrote:
My dribk senses says JAT is possibly mafia


So now GB has found 4 mafia... HF is mafia for getting people talking with an early case, Haru is mafia for unflipped assosiations, storr is mafia because GB can tell somehow that storr is just pretending to be aggressive town, and JAT is mafia because ???


Speaking of reads, GB is frantic this game about "getting reads." He is addicted to reads and needs an intervention. He wants to convince us so badly that he is trying to get reads that he can not stop saying it:

On September 25 2014 08:46 GlowingBear wrote:
It won't help me getting reads if you use day1 just to charge your solar beam.


On September 25 2014 09:46 GlowingBear wrote:
Asking about holyflare's case to everyone is my way to get people talking and getting reads from them.


On September 25 2014 11:11 GlowingBear wrote:
Why I think Haru is scum:

He doesn't want to talk much, not letting me getting reads:


On September 25 2014 11:11 GlowingBear wrote:
Why not talking? He should be helping us with reads day1.


On September 25 2014 11:15 GlowingBear wrote:
I'm done with the reads. I'm going to get ready for a party.


On September 25 2014 11:28 GlowingBear wrote:
Because I want people talking about people so I can get reads.


On September 25 2014 13:09 GlowingBear wrote:
Nothing is in the way of updating my reads the more people starts to talk.


On September 26 2014 00:33 GlowingBear wrote:
Sorry, I'm guilty of getting people to talk to get my reads instead of immediately attacking both HF and hope.


On September 26 2014 00:33 GlowingBear wrote:
I think that is good to register and to get reads.


On September 26 2014 00:49 GlowingBear wrote:
Gut feelings VS actual reads. Actual reads won.


On September 26 2014 00:49 GlowingBear wrote:
It could be totally wrong but at least I would get people talking more so I can have more reads



He's clearly thinking and investigating the posts, and trying to find the scum. Then he starts thinking that SkyDragon is scum:

Show nested quote +
On September 26 2014 08:18 batsnacks wrote:
Also this post is really scummy:

On September 26 2014 01:07 SkyDragon wrote:
On September 25 2014 12:51 Hopeless1der wrote:Sky is new to TL but not to mafia. I'd like to hear his (her?) thoughts on why d1 claimers usually got lynched on SK.


"His" is correct. :p

d1 claimers got lynched depending on what they were saying.

- If they claimed to be Town with nothing to back it up, they were seen as suspicious and people would vote to lynch them if their play-style doesn't match.
- Throwing out names on the first day was seen as suspicious.
- Feigning ignorance of a particular role was suspicious unless he weren't very bright in the first place (As one guy did when he asked the Mod in the thread whether getting no pm means that you're a Villager - We straight away knew that he was trying it, lynched him and he turned out to be Mafia)
- Changing votes repeatedly was seen as suspicious.
- Normally active players who become quiet were seen as suspicious.

There's no one answer to fit all situations really. There were also power roles so someone may have been saying something considered "weird" because they were the Seer, Doctor, Vigi or some other good role (And the last thing you want to do is get them lynched). There would be some hesitation to vote to lynch anyone on Day 1 but sometimes something is said that just doesn't feel right to several people.


It's a long post filled with info that makes zero conclusions about anything. Perfect mafia post. If I'm not voting GB today I'm voting skydragon.


He continues to press on GlowingBear and SkyDragon. Both end up being town, but batsnacks is showing that he is capable and willing to attempt to find scum and provide logical accusations that other players are scum.

In conclusion, batsnacks seems very suspcious because he has not yet provided any real content, particularly at least one accusation of someone being mafia with an argument behind it. This resembles his play in his last game, where he was mafia, and contrasts with his play in previous games where he was town. What do you guys think?


It's a pattern. Scum-like behaviour (I will avoid the "m" word) attached to the previous post I made. Posts that do not have evidence hard for anyone or refuting arguments made against you. It was indicative then, and it's showing again now.
The phoenix must burn to emerge. - Janet Fitch
sicklucker
Profile Blog Joined July 2011
Canada16987 Posts
November 27 2014 23:11 GMT
#880
On November 28 2014 08:07 Damdred wrote:
See you say you want town to win SL but you are dragging the thread through shit just to pit out crazy wrong theories currently and want people to scum hunt but keep throwing stuff at me and bats


Honestly No one would be talking about anything If I didnt start shit up... Im super driving this thread tonight like it or not
Prev 1 42 43 44 45 46 111 Next
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 5h 1m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
mouzHeroMarine 499
Hui .208
ProTech99
MindelVK 53
Nathanias 49
Codebar 48
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 26168
Larva 643
ggaemo 133
soO 33
yabsab 31
Sexy 28
Stormgate
UpATreeSC84
NightEnD57
Dota 2
qojqva4189
Dendi1397
420jenkins460
League of Legends
Reynor109
Counter-Strike
Foxcn1188
pashabiceps609
Stewie2K324
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu338
Other Games
fl0m1970
ceh9613
Beastyqt434
KnowMe289
ArmadaUGS189
ToD165
QueenE93
Sick38
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 23 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• davetesta29
• LUISG 10
• iHatsuTV 9
• Legendk 8
• OhrlRock 1
• Kozan
• sooper7s
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Migwel
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
StarCraft: Brood War
• 80smullet 13
• Pr0nogo 10
• HerbMon 9
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
• BSLYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV509
League of Legends
• Nemesis3616
Other Games
• imaqtpie1440
• Scarra291
• Shiphtur215
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
5h 1m
LiuLi Cup
16h 1m
Online Event
20h 1m
BSL Team Wars
1d
Team Hawk vs Team Sziky
Online Event
1d 16h
SC Evo League
1d 17h
Online Event
1d 18h
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
1d 20h
CSO Contender
1d 22h
[BSL 2025] Weekly
1d 23h
[ Show More ]
Sparkling Tuna Cup
2 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
2 days
SC Evo League
2 days
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
2 days
BSL Team Wars
3 days
Team Dewalt vs Team Bonyth
Afreeca Starleague
3 days
Sharp vs Ample
Larva vs Stork
Wardi Open
3 days
RotterdaM Event
3 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Afreeca Starleague
4 days
JyJ vs TY
Bisu vs Speed
WardiTV Summer Champion…
4 days
PiGosaur Monday
5 days
Afreeca Starleague
5 days
Mini vs TBD
Soma vs sSak
WardiTV Summer Champion…
5 days
Replay Cast
6 days
The PondCast
6 days
WardiTV Summer Champion…
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2025-08-13
FEL Cracow 2025
CC Div. A S7

Ongoing

Copa Latinoamericana 4
Jiahua Invitational
BSL 20 Team Wars
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 3
BSL 21 Qualifiers
WardiTV Summer 2025
uThermal 2v2 Main Event
HCC Europe
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025

Upcoming

CSL Season 18: Qualifier 1
ASL Season 20
CSLAN 3
CSL 2025 AUTUMN (S18)
LASL Season 20
BSL Season 21
BSL 21 Team A
RSL Revival: Season 2
Maestros of the Game
SEL Season 2 Championship
PGL Masters Bucharest 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters Fall
Thunderpick World Champ.
CS Asia Championships 2025
Roobet Cup 2025
ESL Pro League S22
StarSeries Fall 2025
FISSURE Playground #2
BLAST Open Fall 2025
BLAST Open Fall Qual
Esports World Cup 2025
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.