EPT/in
Noir Mini Mafia: Chapter 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
/in | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
| ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
##vote ObiWanShinobi | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
The type of rando matters. Cryptographically random randolynches are 100% certified legit. I propose we institute this method as an official standard for random lynch in Liquidian law. | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
Your rando lynch is not demonstrably cryptographically random and hence I reject it in favour of the cryptographically random one proposed by Blazinghand. | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
You're saying you get a free pass because no one lynches you?? | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
On July 16 2014 17:07 Blazinghand wrote: I... what? is there actually a person who doesn't know about doge? ok, i'll play along. in plain speech: i'm being sarcastic in the quoted post. It's doge meme. I don't think robik's defense i actually reasonable, i'm making fun of it. I was referring to robiks post as not making any point. Not yours, I get what you mean.  | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
BH RNGs robik to lynch, obi and me vote him to see what happens. robik becomes defensive and shouts that this is a bullshit lynch, it would be the first time he got mislynched (or lynched), and insults the people who voted him. BH thinks robik is really scum after those responses, which sounds like a scum getting randomly caught and raging. The implication being that a real town, secure in his innocence, wouldn't need to defend himself emotionally against what is essentially a nonsense lynch. Whereas a scum instinctively will protect himself strongly as scum are not expendable compared to town. I agree with that line of reasoning, but I want to confirm, BH, is that what you think too? Do you have anything else to add? | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
| ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
On July 17 2014 04:37 Snickers wrote: Yea it's time for you guys to stop voting robik. Atleast two players have proven they are bad. Sebastian brought up percentages. The percentage of newbie games first lynch mafia is a lot lower than ring. Anyway gobble is scum, so obvious. Explain? Or should I respond with "Anyway snickers is scum, so obvious"? Because your accusation is worse than BH's RNG. | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
On July 17 2014 13:45 Snickers wrote: If you read closely, I was not even talking about that post. And it is time for me to come clean. Off of the top off my head, I said gg was obv scum to get discussion going. The reason I said him was because I find it most likely for scum to be the third one to jump on. Also I think his reasoning was weak. As for obis unvote, his reasoning was also weak. Now these were mainly to get conversation going so I do not really care if my recalling of details is accurate. And if Robik wants to read me mafia this game like last game I did something similar, well I would not have such a great case on kush without them .That is just weak. First your third one on the bandwagon theory is just wifom. Even if it were commonly accepted that those who jump in the middle were more scummy would scum not then game that? And as far as I can tell there is no evidence to suggest the alignment of players on a bandwagon based on time of jump and nor have you advanced your own theory. Second you dismiss me and obi's arguments as weak but did not even bother to explain. It seems to me your arguments are the weakest of all. And your defence that you were trying to get conversation going? There was already conversation going and your baseless accusations do not help. You look like someone who is trying to say something without saying anything. ##unvote ##vote snickers | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
On July 17 2014 14:22 kushm4sta wrote: not feeling good about this snickers lynch actually. ##unvote ##vote bh Ok but why BH? | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
The impression he had on me was of a scum raging because got caught randomly not of his fault. But it's just an impression and now I feel worse about snicker and his non arguments. | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
| ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
On July 17 2014 16:46 MysteryMeat1 wrote: So its time to start participatin as im done with three straight days of 10 hour days! Just from a quick read through, I really don't like obi, i read through his filter and felt that he didn't really contribute anything. The post where he goes how is your defense working, seemed really really whiny that your defense was working. I don't see obi and Robik being on the same team. If one was to flip green i would probably kill the other one. Your reads are confusing, so let me try to rephrase: 1) obi is scum because he did not contribute. 2) obi's 'how is robik's defense working' post seems like a scum expressing disappointment at the fact that robik got off the noose. 3) obi is on a different team to robik So doesn't that by logic mean robik is town? Or do you think that if obi flipped town despite your suspicions, then robik would be scum - but why? Why would obi being town make robik scum when you haven't stated what makes robik guilty? If your answer is that obi and robik are really at odds with each other and are unlikely to be on the same team, then that's not really an argument for obi-town implying robik-scum. Town doesn't know who else is town and it's very common to find 2 townies being mortal enemies. So the enemy of a townie isn't necessarily scum. | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
Second I do think MM1 is shady due to his weird post on robik and obi. I would lynch him if he gets more votes and time runs short otherwise its snicks for me. | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
On July 18 2014 05:27 MysteryMeat1 wrote: ##Vote:Obiwanshinobi forgot to bold it. I would like to add, i don't think Blazinghand as cop would claim in this situation. The reason being is that if there is a roleblocker/saver on the town side, or a roleblocker on the mafia side, he basically never gets a check. This whole entire game. Mafia can literally keep him alive until roleblocker gets lynched and then they kill BH in the night and he doesn't get any useful information. And why would you assume mafia has roleblock? I doubt town escort would roleblock the fakeclaim because countering and lynching would be better. This is random mafia, unless...you are scum and slipped? | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
Only one of them can be blue, and the other is VT or mafia. I doubt a VT fake counterclaiming because that just doesn't make sense. BH fakeclaiming blue as VT would be counterproductive, because a blue counterclaim would ensure a townie gets lynched, not a good idea. It's not certain that if BH is blue, that he actually is cop. He may be a non-cop blue pretending to be a cop to throw mafia off. That way, because he is the real blue, he's safe, but mafia are misled as to what town can do. Case 1: BH is blue, robik mafia Why would robik counterclaim as mafia? If he was mafia, and he got BH lynched and BH turned blue, then he's next. At the end of day 2 it would be 5-1 which is very town favoured. So I don't think that's likely. Case 2: BH is mafia, robik blue We can assume that BH was genuinely concerned that he would get lynched. So if he was mafia, either he gets lynched if he says nothing, or by fakeclaiming at least he has a chance of getting town to mislynch the actual blue. This might be the case, in which case we lynch BH. Case 3: BH is VT, robik blue It's not very possible to tell Case 2 from Case 3. I don't think BH would do something as dumb as VT fakeclaim blue, confusing town more than it confuses mafia. I think this isn't likely. So I think we lynch BH, as he's not likely to be blue or VT, and more likely a desperate mafia. ##unvote ##vote Blazinghand | ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
| ||
|
gobbledydook
Australia2593 Posts
On July 18 2014 15:17 Snickers wrote: Vote:Blazing Hand One down One to go. This game too ez. Here comes my night bullet. fix your ##vote syntax  | ||
| ||
