EPTGolden Sun: The Lost Age Mafia Djinn Edition - Page 203
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On May 25 2014 23:51 Xatalos wrote: I can say for 99.99% certainty that the "control" thing isn't related to recruiting new players for a faction. Since I know for a fact that it's a "temporary" effect - you can be controlled, you can be uncontrolled, etc. Explain | ||
|
Erandorr
2283 Posts
On May 25 2014 23:04 kushm4sta wrote: DO U PEOPLE NOT GET IT LOL. SCUM ARE SCUMHUNTING. i think this is hilarious | ||
|
Erandorr
2283 Posts
##Vote: austinmcc | ||
|
Erandorr
2283 Posts
If that was true it would be actually funny to keep him alive so the scum factions have to deal with it. If he was speaking the truth they have a higher priority to kill him than we do. I think? | ||
|
OnceKing
United States939 Posts
sorry i haven't been around, last two days have been pretty hectic for me other people who have dropped off the face of the earth: tambo, valenius, thrawn off the top of my head i mean yeah tambo and valenius have posted recently but that doesn't change the fact that they're still just trying to just get by now uncertain on ritoky. the defense "feels" genuine but i can't really put my finger on why; looking at his big post it's pretty much just commentary and i don't really agree with his reads lmao. i dislike the defense of yell0w and hapa's standpoint makes sense to me. if you've got an actual strong scumread there's no purpose to go with rng over a read. so after today's lynch, ok with lynching: - tambo - valenius - thrawn - yell0w | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On May 25 2014 15:32 kushm4sta wrote: Not defend your stupid face.austin if you were red in this scenario, what would you do? On May 25 2014 17:10 Blazinghand wrote: HF, so that everyone, including the Good Sir of Blazing, understands, did you get a GUILTY result or a thing that says THIS BRO MAFIA or even a RED check. Color kinda important to me here, but I don't think you got a color back?holyflare claimed a guilty result on austinmcc On May 25 2014 18:03 geript wrote: Austin... Why didn't you recruit me? You make me so sad. I had a townread on you to. Fucking ABBA. I hope I get recruited. I really want to be 3P at some point. see below On May 25 2014 19:47 Xatalos wrote: austinmcc: There are some things that I'd like to know before I decide if I want to lynch you or not. 1) You were in Koshi's faction? 2) Did you "recruit" anyone yet? 3) What does "recruiting" actually do? Does the target become non-town? 4) What's the specific flavor on "recruiting" someone? Is it something like "being controlled by a Djinn"? 5) If so, I have reason to believe that this state of being controlled is temporary. That's why I have difficulty believing that it works like you said. If you make your target share your QT and stuff, won't he just reveal everything if he goes back to normal? 6) Do you have KP? 7) If so, who did you shoot last night? (1) Already answered, no. (2) Yes. (3) Depends. (4) My flavor says nothing about control. (5) Not temporary, except I guess death. (6) In a way (7) In a way (Also, my recruiting CANNOT be temporary, because recruited dudes get QT access. I can't give someone QT access, then have them disappear and go tell everyone who's there) On May 25 2014 23:39 kitaman27 wrote: I make my fake claims fun or ... less recruiter-y. Also, whether it makes sense or not, it's here. If nothing else, it would APPEAR that there are other roles that mention control or recruiting or SOMETHING, so you KNOW that non-standard mechanics exist.If I had to guess, austin is just fake claiming recruiter to make us paranoid about any obvious townies. He was caught and had nothing to lose. A recruiter mechanic doesn't make sense in this setup. Suppose his faction recruits a member from a mafia faction. Then they would have the complete scum list for that team. Think of how fast the game would fall apart that way. It doesn't work. Couple other posts coming to clear up some stuff and look at my voters | ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
Each night I can attach a fire djinn to someone. That djinn burns away the role that the person has and adds a new one (I have a set number of djinn, in my head they're pokemon, and each has a certain ability. I give the person that djinn, their old role is gone, they now have the role of the attached djinn). If I target a townie, the townie is recruited and joins me. Their old role gone, new role in place. Not a control thing, and not temporary. If I target a scummer, I burn away any role they had, lose my pokemans, and DO NOT recruit. Yes, it would be way unbalanced if I could recruit mafia, change their wincon. However, fire is a bit unstable, and so IF I choose to add someone, I also burn a random person for 1 KP. So i HAVE KP, and I could pledge, for the most part, not to use it (i have to recruit more to have a shot at winning, but could hold off for a while or something), but I cannot target anyone in particular. Anyway, I can target a recruit, and if I use it the random KP hits, but I cannot target the KP. Anyway, it looks like all the kill is flavored. My shot hit the smurf last night. Some of my posts from earlier this cycle are smurf-guy-focused, I know that peruvian had a sandro read on it and whatnot, but I'm the one who killed it. Anyway, you should be able to see that I talk more about the smurf kill than the others, it was mine, but no, I'm not actually suspicious of other folks for that kill, the peruvian is suspicious for his own crap. | ||
|
Steveling
Greece10806 Posts
Read the bloody names that jumped first on the austin wagon. These guys are all 3p. Their priority is to eliminate other 3p. fucks sake | ||
|
Steveling
Greece10806 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
Also, as far as winning goes, I need the other faction dead. I need endgame. And I need to have 3-5 people recruited. Any less and our fire isn't strong enough. Any more and our fire is burning too hot. So I don't need to add people every night, but I gots to be allowed to get at least one more recruit in, then can go scumhunting with the recruit OR just scumhunt with text. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Valenius
United Kingdom1266 Posts
On May 26 2014 01:18 austinmcc wrote: Since trying to hide faction doesn't work, I'm mars. Fire. I THINK that all 4 factions are elemental djinn things, but don't know for sure. Mah nemesis IS another element. Each night I can attach a fire djinn to someone. That djinn burns away the role that the person has and adds a new one (I have a set number of djinn, in my head they're pokemon, and each has a certain ability. I give the person that djinn, their old role is gone, they now have the role of the attached djinn). If I target a townie, the townie is recruited and joins me. Their old role gone, new role in place. Not a control thing, and not temporary. If I target a scummer, I burn away any role they had, lose my pokemans, and DO NOT recruit. Yes, it would be way unbalanced if I could recruit mafia, change their wincon. However, fire is a bit unstable, and so IF I choose to add someone, I also burn a random person for 1 KP. So i HAVE KP, and I could pledge, for the most part, not to use it (i have to recruit more to have a shot at winning, but could hold off for a while or something), but I cannot target anyone in particular. Anyway, I can target a recruit, and if I use it the random KP hits, but I cannot target the KP. Anyway, it looks like all the kill is flavored. My shot hit the smurf last night. Some of my posts from earlier this cycle are smurf-guy-focused, I know that peruvian had a sandro read on it and whatnot, but I'm the one who killed it. Anyway, you should be able to see that I talk more about the smurf kill than the others, it was mine, but no, I'm not actually suspicious of other folks for that kill, the peruvian is suspicious for his own crap. Does it mention if the random 1kp fires if you fail to recruit a scum? | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On May 26 2014 01:22 marvellosity wrote: OF COURSE. YOU FIENDISH FIENDand you were really having a go at me for killing the smurf hydra? tut tut austin. On May 26 2014 01:24 Valenius wrote: Does it mention if the random 1kp fires if you fail to recruit a scum? If I USE a fire djinn, the KP happens. So as long as I send in a recruit action, there's a KP action. I'ts not an equal and opposite thing, but essentially, if I send a fire djinn to recruit someone, someone gets burnt. Also, fire bros are immune from that burning. Keeps me from getting LOL RNGed on N1 when I try to recruit. | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
|
Holyflare
United Kingdom30774 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
|
Xatalos
Finland9675 Posts
| ||
| ||
