|
Another amazing vote (slave) count:
SagaZ (0): istandwithmitt playerboy345 (1): istandwithmitt istandwithmitt (2): GGTeMpLaR, OdinOfPergo
Not voting (10): playerboy345, Balla24, Vonthin, Seuss, SagaZ, onlywonderboy, July617, nyxnyxnyx, E00e, Bereft
Currently, istandwithmitt is set to be lynched. to deadline. Remember, voting is mandatory!
If there are errors, please let us know.
On October 15 2013 04:35 istandwithmitt wrote: ##vote: playerboy345
Note that you're supposed to ##unvote first if you want to change your vote (you can do it in the same post). I accepted your vote change but please try to remember to do it in the future, thanks.
|
On October 15 2013 04:47 istandwithmitt wrote:Show nested quote +On October 15 2013 04:44 GGTeMpLaR wrote:On October 15 2013 04:42 istandwithmitt wrote:On October 15 2013 04:39 GGTeMpLaR wrote: You get pinged throughout the day as having only made one early aggression post. People want your thoughts and for you to respond to concerns.
What do you do?
You do the same exact thing on another person. Unless you give something to me to convince me otherwise or someone else fucks up even more (which I think you've raised the bar pretty hard here so that will be difficult), I'm not changing my vote at this point. Yeah sorry for posting about who I think is scum. That's not the issue. The issue is your reasons are lackluster and you've only made two posts in this entire thread. Early on people have pinged you as suspicious and why they think that and you didn't respond to any of them. I encourage you, nay I challenge you to actually put some thought into this game and convince me you're town, or at the very least that someone else is a better lynch at this point. I just posted who I think is scum. I'm not going to try & convince people I'm town (hint: it's because it's impossible). If you think I'm scum, you should have a reason for it & not "LOL wtf." Hope this helps!
I and many others have given reasons for being suspicious of you.
If you're town this game, you're just not trying.
|
Like, you didn't even give a reason why you switched your vote off of SagaZ. Is he not suspicious anymore to you or are you just more convinced of playerboy345?
I'm sorry if my vote post on you was disrespectful I just thought it came from nowhere. I expected the next post you would make would address at least one of the people who pinged you as suspicious.
|
##vote: istandwithmitt
I'm not going to argue with you. Either you shape up and post in a style that doesn't invite us to get into long, time-consuming, and pointless arguments, or we're lynching you on principle.
On October 15 2013 04:33 onlywonderboy wrote: It's not that safe of a bet. He could just as easily be a scum who started being active early to avoid suspicion. I'm not claiming Odin is scum, but your logic is far from infallible. I'd rather rally around the guy making the most sense, not the guy making some sense first. Im most interested in Susses' reads since we know he's not scum.
You guys know for a fact that I'm not scum, but I'd like to remind you that I'm the only person in the game with zero people I can 100% trust. The fact that you know I'm genuine helps, but it doesn't make my reads correct.
That said, here's how I see things right now.
Completely Worthless, Lynch Plz: istandwithmitt
Probable Townie: E00e, nyxnyxnyx, OdinOfPergo, GGTeMpLaR Uncertain: Bereft, onlywonderboy, SagaZ, Vonthin Probable Mafia: July617, playerboy345
AFK: Balla24
These are just my initial impressions. I'm uncertain about a few people because we really haven't seen enough of them to truly judge. In any case, these are not conclusions but working hypotheses. I'll change them at the drop of a hat if I find reasons to change my opinion.
|
On October 15 2013 04:50 GGTeMpLaR wrote: Like, you didn't even give a reason why you switched your vote off of SagaZ. Is he not suspicious anymore to you or are you just more convinced of playerboy345?
I'm sorry if my vote post on you was disrespectful I just thought it came from nowhere. I expected the next post you would make would address at least one of the people who pinged you as suspicious.
I addressed why I think he is scum in the post where I voted for him. I do think he is scummier than SagaZ. My vote's going to be on whoever I think is scummiest all game & I think everyone else should do the same so I don't know why you would be surprised by me being willing to change especially after reading so many posts.
If you want me to respond to something, you're welcome to pose it to me. I saw people posting suspicions on me or whatever but nothing seemed worthwhile to address.
|
On October 15 2013 04:51 Seuss wrote:##vote: istandwithmittI'm not going to argue with you. Either you shape up and post in a style that doesn't invite us to get into long, time-consuming, and pointless arguments, or we're lynching you on principle. Show nested quote +On October 15 2013 04:33 onlywonderboy wrote: It's not that safe of a bet. He could just as easily be a scum who started being active early to avoid suspicion. I'm not claiming Odin is scum, but your logic is far from infallible. I'd rather rally around the guy making the most sense, not the guy making some sense first. Im most interested in Susses' reads since we know he's not scum. You guys know for a fact that I'm not scum, but I'd like to remind you that I'm the only person in the game with zero people I can 100% trust. The fact that you know I'm genuine helps, but it doesn't make my reads correct. That said, here's how I see things right now. Completely Worthless, Lynch Plz: istandwithmitt Probable Townie: E00e, nyxnyxnyx, OdinOfPergo, GGTeMpLaR Uncertain: Bereft, onlywonderboy, SagaZ, Vonthin Probable Mafia: July617, playerboy345 AFK: Balla24 These are just my initial impressions. I'm uncertain about a few people because we really haven't seen enough of them to truly judge. In any case, these are not conclusions but working hypotheses. I'll change them at the drop of a hat if I find reasons to change my opinion.
How am I "worthless" when you evidently have one of the same scumreads as me?
|
Istand, even to this point, if anyone goes through your filter, you haven't posted anything useful to support yourself.
@Suess,
I'm curious on why you think Nyx is town though. His 5? post consist of nothing but pretty much the same statement. I'm less than sold on the idea.
|
First impressions: going into this I was feeling most uncomfortable with nyxnyxnyx, blindly following some1 sounds like a pretty bad idea for a town, and especially stating it in the thread sounds more to me like he was trying to get onto OdinOfPergo's good side. And the I read istandwithmitt's post and I'm like wtf. He voted for me at the beginning and I thought it was alright, aggressive play-style pointing fingers early to get some heat and get the discussion going, but then instead of making use of it he just go silent. And now this switcharoo vote with no explanation and abrasive behavior?
|
On October 15 2013 05:01 OdinOfPergo wrote: Istand, even to this point, if anyone goes through your filter, you haven't posted anything useful to support yourself.
@Suess,
I'm curious on why you think Nyx is town though. His 5? post consist of nothing but pretty much the same statement. I'm less than sold on the idea.
posting about who you think is scum == useful
a million words where you don't talk about who you think is scum =/= useful
|
How about instead of posting about how I'm unpleasant or whatever the argument is right now, people tell me what they think of playerboy especially wrt what I posted about him.
Well, see ya
|
On October 15 2013 05:01 OdinOfPergo wrote: Istand, even to this point, if anyone goes through your filter, you haven't posted anything useful to support yourself.
@Suess,
I'm curious on why you think Nyx is town though. His 5? post consist of nothing but pretty much the same statement. I'm less than sold on the idea.
At the time nyxnyxnyx wanted to blindly follow you the discussion that was going on was chaotic, without purpose, and generally a mass of confusion and bad assumptions on all sides. Killing the conversation so that we could move on to actually hunting scum needed to happen.
It is slightly suspect. It's possible both you and he are actually mafia, and he's just chiming in to increase confidence in your authenticity. However, so long as I think you're a townie and contributing positively to the game, nyxnyxnyx is also likely a townie because as a mafia he wouldn't gain anything by killing a disruptive conversation or following the lead of a proactive townie.
|
It looks like most things about my post were cleared up thanks to Seuss. Id just like to emphasize that at no point I said I wanted the cop to come out, I wanted the cop to know when to come out. As I have learned now the general consensus is that they should only do it when they are about to be lynched. I did not know that when making my post and it is really not a trivial answer. I am currently liking (-> thinking they are town) Odin and GGTemplar because they explain their posts and intentions. Seuss would also be in that category but he is already confirmed town. I have a hard timing finding Mafia with evidence to back it up. Playerboy has a lot of funny posts that dont really help, but this is not too bad imo. Istandwithmitt does not seem to try to create a good discussion atmosphere but again that is not too bad.
|
I'd like to hear what playerboy345 has to say to Istandwithmitt's accusations; just complete the weird triangle between them 2 and E00e.
|
Teenage mutant ninja vote (slave) count:
SagaZ (0): istandwithmitt playerboy345 (1): istandwithmitt istandwithmitt (3): GGTeMpLaR, OdinOfPergo, Seuss
Not voting (9): playerboy345, Balla24, Vonthin, SagaZ, onlywonderboy, July617, nyxnyxnyx, E00e, Bereft
Currently, istandwithmitt is set to be lynched. to deadline. Remember, voting is mandatory!
If there are errors, please let us know.
|
Well here I am again, sorry I had a long sleep today, Odin I think your reads are good reads are strong, I can see why you pegged me as possible scum, I was just trying to talk and move things along but with that said yeah I should of added more onto my post's and contributed/clarified/spoke-up with ideas of my own.
My own personal reads ?
I don't really have confidence in anyone as of yet, I mean I know a good chunk of us are town but none of the post's here give much info (Besides mitt and playerboy going at each other . which is weird ) like i said again in a previous post we should be talking more but like E00e said we'll have a hard time finding mafia without actual evidence to back it up . So i've really got nothing so far. I'm just trying to read everyone safely and calmly.
|
ok i'm back.
reading thru the thread, i'd like to caution people against jumping on the mitt vote. i think what we need to decide on is whether we want to (a) vote a useless townie who might be scum or (b) vote an active townie who we have a strong scum read on.
the reason why i'd caution town to vote mitt is because before the game even started, i was doing some joke votes and istandwithmitt goes:
On October 10 2013 14:55 istandwithmitt wrote: Did this start? ##vote balla24 he's voting himself you wyould not do this as town if we had gotten our pm's at this point, i would have thought this was some miserable scum play. but role pm's hadn't even been sent out at that point! so in conclusion, just keep in mind his in-game posting seems much in line with his pre-game posting.
i think worst case if by the end of d1 we don't see a strong scum case against anyone in particular, mitt is an easy candidate. however given that we have another 24 hours at this point, let's not get pigeon-holed on mitt as there may be stronger candidates out there. i for one would perhaps put Vonthin and GGTemplar in that list, depending on what kind of posts they make in the next 24 hours. not necessarily saying i think they're scum at the moment, but i would like to hear more from them.
the reason i'm singling these 2 out atm is because GGTemplar randomly hones into a pretty mild exchange between Sagaz and mitt and starts postulating about in what scenarios Sagaz is mafia or mitt is mafia, but them both being mafia are mutually exclusive. this seems like either an attempt to appear helpful while not being helpful at all, or a misguided attempt to be helpful, as their exchange seemed pretty minor / un-noteworthy and he's not providing any real analysis but more like game theory.
as for Vonthin, all he does is jump upon the RNG proposal with a massive amount of risk aversion. in this kind of situation, i'm inclined to find mafia to be more risk averse than a townie. as mafia, you'd like to avoid being in the hot seat at any cost possible, whereas as town, my general feeling is that i'm less afraid of being scrutinized because i have nothing to hide. Vonthin also seems to completely miss the fact that Odin isn't actually proposing an RNG, but implicitly proposing RNG as a means to an end -- as a tool to force people to do their best to wriggle out of the hot seat.
|
also lawl, adding July to that list, just read his post above. July, please give us some reads within the next 12 hours -- that should be enough time for you to "safely and calmly" get your reads together.
|
|
Back to the vote (slave) count:
SagaZ (0): istandwithmitt playerboy345 (1): istandwithmitt istandwithmitt (4): GGTeMpLaR, OdinOfPergo, Seuss, nyxnyxnyx
Not voting (8): playerboy345, Balla24, Vonthin, SagaZ, onlywonderboy, July617, E00e, Bereft
Currently, istandwithmitt is set to be lynched. to deadline. Remember, voting is mandatory!
If there are errors, please let us know.
|
On October 15 2013 11:29 Bereft wrote: also lawl, adding July to that list, just read his post above. July, please give us some reads within the next 12 hours -- that should be enough time for you to "safely and calmly" get your reads together.
We don't actually need every last poster giving a full list of reads. In fact, it's a fairly decent way for mafia members to look productive without actually contributing anything useful.
The thread is also drawing very quiet, which is good news for the mafia, so I'm going to incite some discussion.
At this point I believe istandwithmitt is just an absolutely terrible player/communicator. He's confrontational, dogmatic, egotistical, and generally a pain in the butt, but he's drawn way, way more negative attention to himself than makes sense for mafia. Bereft is right that we should be focusing on finding other targets right now.
To that end, I believe the two most likely mafia players are SagaZ and July617. I'll present each case in turn.
+ Show Spoiler [SagaZ] +While he was the first player to post following the start of the game, he's been a sparse participant since. His first post immediately drew suspicion for a number of reasons. 1. Despite its word count it's actually very light on content. 2. The actual suggestions contained within are highly questionable. Observe: On October 14 2013 11:26 SagaZ wrote: As a disclaimer early, I think we should all agree on something. We are all newbies here, so if you fuck up or say something dumb, don't play the "oh sorry, I am new I didn't know". [/color]
[color=green]Seuss is our confirmed town, we should try to organize around him. For a day 1 lynch, I think lynching some1 innactive is the best way to go.[/color] Having innactive players around just give mafia the opportunity to sit back and do nothing while town runs around screaming at each other. So give information about yourself if you can, so that others will be able to read you easy.
My stance this early is easy: I will vote for people that post nothing worthy or nothing at all, unless some1 slips. I am also more likely to vote for people that say suspicious stuff and then say "sorry I didn't know I am new" SagaZ spends both the first and last paragraphs primarily rambling about how people shouldn't play the newbie card. If all he really wanted to do was encourage newbies to post, as he later claimed, he could easily have done so with a far more positive tone. He doesn't sound like he's encouraging newbies as much as discouraging them. While he does make two seemingly reasonable suggestions, they are obvious and ultimately counter-productive. As the sole confirmed townie in the game, my lifespan is likely to be short. Rallying around me exclusively would simply set the town up for trouble upon my inevitable death. Similarly, lynching players who'll simply be modkilled does nothing for the town either. So SagaZ' first post discouraged activity and made no useful suggestions. That's enough to arouse suspicion, but not to conclude he is mafia. That brings us to his second post: On October 14 2013 20:11 SagaZ wrote: Of course I meant lurker lynch, afkers will get modkilled after all. If one guy is not saying anything in the thread or very little, but still turn out to vote for people without giving reasoning... that would be very scum telling to me. I guess it is fairly obvious to everyone, but pointing it out will make them talk whether they want it or not, and that gives information. I took the opportunity of the first post to basically say "game started, don't hide behind your inexperience and post".
For town to win we need 2 thing: - Get everyone active - Organize around our confirmed towny Seuss
@nyxnyxnyx: Care to explain why you trust Odin? Him being so hyper posty makes me nervous but he actually present points for us to discuss on, which creates discussion and is therefore good for town. It is weird to me at least that you come in, decide to side with odin even thought we have a confirmed townie. In this post he claims he meant "lurker" when he said "inactive". However, in his first post he clearly stated that his potential vote targets included those who posted "nothing at all". SagaZ is backpedaling here, and making it seem reasonable by repeating the reasoning that undermined his previous position. He also very carefully drops his excuse for the weird newbie-discouraging rambling at the end of an unrelated paragraph, burying it. "Getting everyone active" is an important step for towns looking to win, but SagaZ doesn't actually have any suggestions on how to do that, and doesn't participate enough himself. He again says everyone should organize around me, also without suggesting how or acknowledging the obvious flaw in the strategy (e.g. I'm a dead man walking). Finally, he ends the post promoting discord. While nyxnyxnyx' decision to trust Odin could have used some additional vetting, at that point Odin was at the nexus of a fairly chaotic argument, and rallying behind his "let's randomly pick someone and put them in the hotseat to get information flowing" idea would have killed a lot of the useless chatter while promoting helpful discussion. Questioning nyxnyxnyx at this point only served to perpetuate the pointless debate, and promote distrust. SagaZ third post was entirely inconsequential, and above analysis. His fourth post at least pretended to have substance: On October 15 2013 05:02 SagaZ wrote: First impressions: going into this I was feeling most uncomfortable with nyxnyxnyx, blindly following some1 sounds like a pretty bad idea for a town, and especially stating it in the thread sounds more to me like he was trying to get onto OdinOfPergo's good side. And the I read istandwithmitt's post and I'm like wtf. He voted for me at the beginning and I thought it was alright, aggressive play-style pointing fingers early to get some heat and get the discussion going, but then instead of making use of it he just go silent. And now this switcharoo vote with no explanation and abrasive behavior?
There are a lot of words in this post, but it essentially says nothing. The entire latter half is a rehash of what everyone else had already said about istandwithmitt. The former half mostly repeats his previous misgivings about nyxnyxnyx' decision, adding an extra touch of distrust of both nyx and Odin. No progress towards anything happens over the course of these paragraphs. Finally, there's SagaZ latest post: On October 15 2013 05:20 SagaZ wrote: I'd like to hear what playerboy345 has to say to Istandwithmitt's accusations; just complete the weird triangle between them 2 and E00e. At this point debating with istandwithmitt was utterly pointless, whoever was doing it. I had said as much earlier. Promoting a useless discussion is never helpful to the town. It is for these reasons that I believe SagaZ has a very high probability of being mafia, and is worthy of a lynching.
+ Show Spoiler [July617] +July has posted 6 times since the game began (I'm excluding his edit explanation and apology), and he's made a solid point once. Look for yourself: http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=430766&user=July617The only useful contribution he's made was his response to Odin's confusing RNG plan. At the time Odin's confusing manner of communicating made it seem like the plan was to randomly select someone, lynch them, and call it a day. That ultimately wasn't what Odin was aiming for, but at the time it seemed that way and if July hadn't responded as he did someone else would have. Which brings us to his other 5 posts. They all say essentially the same thing, "I don't want to lynch anyone yet, let's wait and talk more." If everyone was jumping to conclusions in the first four hours istandwithmitt style that might have been fine, but with practically half our time spent he's still waiting for a sign from God (or is it the Godfather?). The only player who has contributed less is Balla24, who hasn't posted at all. Keeping his head this low, and trying to keep people deferring the lynching decision as long as possible, makes it a high probability that July617 is mafia.
Until such time as either or both of these individuals has a convincing defense established, it's my preference that we lynch one of them over istandwithmitt, much as it pains me.
|
|
|
|