United Kingdom30774 Posts
+ Show Spoiler +On September 07 2013 17:22 heavenz wrote:Okay, firstly, Blurry, I am sorry I thought you were not town. You are a swiss man by the book. I wish someone had responded to me on the agression I put on Blurry before the night. I feel like I understand nothing now. Things to consider: Holyf. case on Ray, Infi's case, Voting behavior, There is one thing I didn't realize in the situation: Show nested quote + In fact ray should be another one on this list even but I'll post that a bit later, these are the candidates I'd rather focus on for now.
Holyf.'s endnote in the post where he makes a case vs infi and me. Show nested quote + As for my pressure on infii and heavenz I think they have cleaned up their acts reasonably well and so my only other candidate that would be viable is ray. However, I am more than comfortable lynching lurkers over him.
In another post. Obviously Holyf. had Ray on his suspicious list for a long time. But he didn't not make a post against him or pressure him until the very end of day1. This his Holyf. case against Ray + Show Spoiler + + Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler +
+ Show Spoiler +
These 3 posts are all talking about no-lynching. This is fair enough seeing as the topic at the time was that, however, the third post was after the whole conversation had ended and infii had posted this post: + Show Spoiler + Notice how of all the information infii was pointing out chairman ray had only mentioned the stuff about him, nothing of noteworthy. He didn't even contribute to anything that anybody had said, he just rehashed the dead conversation. While, yes, his posts had a flavour of townsmanship at first, this defensive nature and the contentless posting made me suspicious of him.
To insinuate further confusion he posted this: + Show Spoiler +
What better way to confuse townies than put them against each other? Stating that one of them is mafia and one of them is town is planting the seed for later when people get confused and re-read these things. Not to mention his 'scum' reads that come later are just as lackluster (will post that bit further down). The conversation had already stopped between me and umasi and then it was brought up again with possibilities. He states that a mafia strategy can be to divert attention to their argument and stifle the town but that whoever gets killed or lynched will reveal the alignment of the other. That is not true either, nothing can be sought at from those posts as they were merely a heated discussion about policies etc.
This is where it gets the most scum like. READ THIS ABOVE ALL ELSE. Who was his previous post about? Me and Umasi. Who did he say not to lynch day 1 because it would be a mistake? Me and Umasi.
Who is his scum read on?
+ Show Spoiler +
Me and Umasi. lol? It isn't even a scum read or anything it just states the same thing as his last post. That we could be both town both mafia or one of each, that's just nothing of value.
Not to mention the rest of his posts.
+ Show Spoiler +
He jumps right on top of velocity and hasn't unvoted him since. With no new information at all.
That is why instead of voting out the lurker who may just be total crap to begin with I think this is a bigger scum tell for me so;
##Unvote ##Vote: Chairman Ray
Summary in my words. Holyf. points out the discrepantcy in Ray words, where first he stats the opinion that lynching on day1 can be a mistake three times, and then states in a complex "what if" his thoughts about umasi and holyf. His (Ray) post about Umasi and Holyf discussion Show nested quote + I will give my first set of reads. When HolyFlare said that he was withholding his reads, he dug himself an obligation. By the end of this day, he must make a play justifying that he withheld his reads with good reason, or else he's mafia. If we see his posts and decide that there's no reason why he didn't give his reads in the first place, I think he's a good mafia candidate. When you started attacking HolyFlare and threw in a vote, I don't think at that point there was any good indication that HolyFlare is mafia. I think that either both of you are mafia, in which case the discourse was counterproductive for town because you misled everyone, or you are town, in which case you were both pressuring HolyFlare and seeing who would ride the lynch train. This gives me a reason to ease up on the possibility that you are mafia and HolyFlare is town. So what we see this post from Ray, Holyf. says that this is nothing of value. Ray attacks Holyf. with his words/english (I am not native, I wouldn't say things in such a complicated way). Holyf. notes it but doesn't amplify on it until the very end. He might have truthfully thought that Ray was scum, even more so than he thought about infi's and me (and only sidenoted him as scum, while we got the cases), and that's why he didn't make a case against him earlier but in last second to set him under way higher pressure. ---- I must admit that in the last time before the vote I didn't see things like that. Mostly with the death of Blurry I realize how easy it is to make a wrong judgement, and stand there like a stupid lol. I suspected too many players and trusted no one, but the chances that someone is town are still higher than beeing mafia, we are more after all. Holyf. made a case against someone and made it went with it balls deep, that this person slipped town almost makes him more town to me that if it had been scum. His reasoning wasn't just a short burst and sudden idea like I thought at first. What makes me curious however that he seems to list those players the highest on suspicion who suspect / doubt him, namly Ray, Infis, Me. Please answere me on this Holyf. Infi In general if he would post three times more I would straight up say town, I am d'accore with his reasoning. Here's his last post regarding the Ray case Show nested quote +The case brought up by holyflare against ray was pretty weak. But somehow people still swallowed that pill. I will not have enough time to fully analyze what went on, but here is my gut feeling: Holy tried to save myrzeth by leading town on another weak target. Of course we will find all of scum between the people that voted for ray because the vote was so close. Eventually all of scum hopped on to ray to secure a miss-lynch. I have come to a somewhat different conclusion, I ask you please give your thoughts about it too. Show nested quote +I have the overall feeling that we are town led by scum because of the chaotic back and forth of discussions, random accusations and fake aggressiveness. Everyone needs to focus on the facts at hand and not let himself be guided by lurish arguments Alright, please don't be afk then and show us the "facts at hand". I have no existent scum list at the moment, and my judgment will on infis will wait for: Show nested quote + Same here, except this is my last chance to post before night ends so I'm forced to do this now. But I will iterate on it more when day comes. (if I survive the night)
Well voting behavior is kinda core :D But it's a big topic, so I will delay this for now Further things I plan to write on in the future: Umasi (omg, what a topic...) and Blurry's death. I think today is the time for working to togehter and getting clues and not the time for suspicious.
Like I said before, I targeted the people who were looking the scummiest so far. You and infii at that time had only posted summaries, at least ray had made some accusations. When you and infii had posted more analysis that vindicated you to me and so I had to pick another scummy target. Who else than the guy who tunneled on the 2 outspoken people (who even said himself we shouldn't lynch). He dug his own grave with his repsonses though, his only defence was velocity's QT in caps. I was tempted to move back to myRZeth at the last second, however, ray called him town and then with 2 or 3 minutes to go put a vote on myRZeth instead of velocity. This looked scummy as fuck - if he was town, why would he vote another town to save himself, it didn't make sense.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Before I get into this whole lurker bull shit with myrz again here's a summary of why I think we should be voting one of the people who weren't on the chairman ray wagon. Entertaining the idea that blurry was town was a stretch to say the least, however, what made him the target for the nk? Realistically, any case made to do with it is pure speculation, yet, I think there are several justifiable ones. Everyone knows that blurry was against lord velocity right, but so was bereft, in terms of voting.
Facing these reasons it must mean that either:
a) blurry looked more townlike to someone than bereft (or bereft is scum) and blurry/bereft weren't on the wagons and so they had to pick one. b) blurry said something that made him look like a better target, most probably at night c) lord velocity is mafia and they wanted pressure off of him
This made me suspicious. Instinctively, I was thinking that it is a bit of a, b and c. So, that being said it was time to filter dive. Throughout blurry's filter he was pretty tunnely on lord velocity. Obviously, there is some disagreement at the start between me and him:
+ Show Spoiler +On September 04 2013 08:04 Blurry wrote:Show nested quote +On September 04 2013 07:53 Holyflare wrote:On September 04 2013 07:51 Umasi wrote:On September 04 2013 07:36 Chairman Ray wrote: Regardless of the math, a day 1 lynch as the norm gets people talking. No lynch = no incentive to give up information. Unless everyone is super cooperative and gives great information, we lynch. anything else to add about anything? Holyflare: no lynching is 'occasionally alright'. I'll grant you that. But no lynching D1 is not good. the problem is you could be 'lynching a potential townsman' but the entire reason you are lynching that person is because they are more than likely a potential scummer! voting to no lynch because the target could be town is like not using your doctor save because your target could be scum and there'd be a vig shot on him. Like, is that sensible? not really. I'm gonna go to class, I'll be back later tonight. /afk that's dumb reasoning, a lynch day 1 is 75% likely to hit a townsperson compared to the 25% for scum. Especially considering within that 75% is likely to be 1 or 2 blue roles that would have to reveal and then subsequently be lost at night if they were the target to be lynched You get a lot more out of lynching than just the player dead, you also get loads of information on everybody and is one of the best ways to have the scum reveal themselves. Bandwagoning, Fence Sitting, Caving under pressure are some of the best ways to spot the scum and these are revealed when you lynch a player day 1. Since its plurality vote anyway, I'm going to be lynching somebody no matter what day 1, so now that the decision to lynch is taken out of your hands you better come up with some scum reads to not waste this day and reduce the chances of a mislynch.
and here:
+ Show Spoiler +On September 04 2013 08:13 Blurry wrote:Show nested quote +On September 04 2013 08:07 Holyflare wrote:On September 04 2013 08:04 Blurry wrote:On September 04 2013 07:53 Holyflare wrote:On September 04 2013 07:51 Umasi wrote:On September 04 2013 07:36 Chairman Ray wrote: Regardless of the math, a day 1 lynch as the norm gets people talking. No lynch = no incentive to give up information. Unless everyone is super cooperative and gives great information, we lynch. anything else to add about anything? Holyflare: no lynching is 'occasionally alright'. I'll grant you that. But no lynching D1 is not good. the problem is you could be 'lynching a potential townsman' but the entire reason you are lynching that person is because they are more than likely a potential scummer! voting to no lynch because the target could be town is like not using your doctor save because your target could be scum and there'd be a vig shot on him. Like, is that sensible? not really. I'm gonna go to class, I'll be back later tonight. /afk that's dumb reasoning, a lynch day 1 is 75% likely to hit a townsperson compared to the 25% for scum. Especially considering within that 75% is likely to be 1 or 2 blue roles that would have to reveal and then subsequently be lost at night if they were the target to be lynched You get a lot more out of lynching than just the player dead, you also get loads of information on everybody and is one of the best ways to have the scum reveal themselves. Bandwagoning, Fence Sitting, Caving under pressure are some of the best ways to spot the scum and these are revealed when you lynch a player day 1. Since its plurality vote anyway, I'm going to be lynching somebody no matter what day 1, so now that the decision to lynch is taken out of your hands you better come up with some scum reads to not waste this day and reduce the chances of a mislynch. You can still vote no-lynch in a plurality, besides, I have only been suggesting the no-lynch if nothing comes to obvious light. The fact that you people are so eager to let us lose a day of mislynching is funny though because I don't think any of your arguments make sense. If our strongest weapon is our connection theories and our votes, THEN WHY IS IT NOT BETTER TO GET 1 MORE DAY OF THESE THINGS?????? Wagons can happen every fucking day on every lynch. Why are you all so eager to kill off potential townspeople?? A couple more things, please don't use loaded questions. I don't want to kill townspeople, but I also think that the risk of doing so is necessary to inspire discussion. Why does it have to be obvious that someone is scum? We should go off our best hunch rather than waste time. for example.
While these things don't make a towny, it made him appear townlike to some people. Namely:
umasi: + Show Spoiler +On September 04 2013 12:20 Umasi wrote:I am around to talk to, class finished and I'm at my computer. Show nested quote +I'm not telling you my scum reads or especially my town reads at this moment in time. Why not? Show nested quote +missed this somehow earlier -- was posting from my phone. ray what do you mean by "everyone"? thought only mafia and masons get this privilege...... he was like 'oh hoh hoh this is a clever way to catch scum' or he's a troll. or he's legitimately confused by how this game is played. Show nested quote +On September 04 2013 11:09 Blurry wrote: This discussion is pretty slow so how about this. Everyone answer the following questions.
Who is your strongest town read? Who is your strongest scum read?
This will let us see where peoples allegiances lie. Also, give reasons for your choices.
Strongest town read: Holyflare, active, trying to provide analysis Strongest scum read: Lord Velocity, hes just following along with Umasi's ideas, not really providing any of his own stuff. strongest town read:You for asking this question and trying to talk about something productive. strongest scum read: vel, for calling me out as town and ignoring the other parts of my reads post, it feels like he thought I was a threat to be appeased. I also am leery of heavenz for ignoring the discussion.
heavenz: + Show Spoiler +On September 04 2013 15:26 heavenz wrote:Umasi, is very aggressive, which is a townlike nature, but beeing aggressive on the first day with everyone just getting into isn't a big feat, so that reduces my town read of him at the moment, at least he called me out for my opening post, which was indeed worthless, and thought to be just a bit of a discussion starter before I went to bed (I didn't think the game would actually start yesterday). However Pharcyd3 also jumped on me with 1 post, 1 line, calling me out and then leaving the thread. At least equally scummy to my opening post, even more so that he just followed Umasi. There need to come more indeed. Lord Velocity, I don't have to quote here much as every post says: he doesn't like to get attention and tries to behave neutral / hide Holyflare is just doing his thing, posting much, but the content is mostly contentless. As he said himself, he is holding back his informations. Blurry good townread opening posts, focussing on the discussion. Chairman Ray, suspicious, or just weird? What is this about... Killerdog, started out with a strong town post, but then just keept summing Umasi's and Holyf.'s conversation up. I want to have more than you just repeating and summing up the last 5 posts. most Scum: Lord Velocity, Pharcyd3, Chairman Ray, Holyflare (until he stops holding back, which I assume will be on day 1, then we'll see.) most Town: Blurry, Killerdog, Umasi and here + Show Spoiler +On September 04 2013 21:31 heavenz wrote: He's active, his opinions are townlike, he studied Lord Velocity who behaved a little suspicious. He started a discussion to bring everyone to speak and voice their opinions.
That's more town than the most right now. Yes it could be fake, but in my book his action are town. he then put some more analysis in and said that bereft and blurry were more townlike, so I'm alright taking him off this part of the list for now + Show Spoiler +On September 06 2013 06:28 heavenz wrote: I am still thinking that myrezth is a good target for a 1st day lynch. He is most of all a safe bet. Yes he might be town, but he's a counterproductive town, it's like with an employe, yes it's one employe more, but it's the one who's distracting the others from their work. Most of all he shows no willingness to learn.
Ofcourse I would rather vote mafia on day1 but unless I have some sort of understanding a better bet, I go with myrezth.
LV is a curious case, he loves umasi / holyf. and ignores everything what everyone else says and just tries to impress them. Chairman I kinda like your work or idea you had, and I am can't agree at the moment with holyf.'s case on you. Bereft and Blurry are both equally neutral, Blurry even acknowledged his neutrality, but tried to satisfy me by agree with me. No bro.
I have not come to a conclusion yet, damn my mind.
killerdog: + Show Spoiler +On September 05 2013 03:48 killerdog wrote:ok here are my current reads/opinions on people. umasi -He was one of my original town reads, and hasn't been afraid of the limelight/stepping on peoples toes. I really liked his first post in that he pointed out that making "i am new" posts just serves to give people more ammunition to throw suspicion on random people, and potentially saved us from being in a situation where 4-5 people read really scummy just off their first post, which could have derailed town a lot and let mafia with decent first posts hide easily.) He was vocal about wanting to move on from the lynch/nolynch debate (which seems fair) and he put the original pressure on velocity. But then decided to pounce on holyflare. Whether that was a good decision or not I don't know but he comitted to it pretty hard, other then one post at velocity, he's focussed 100% on holyflare from that point on. He also poked chairman ray for a bit of information earlier on. I still think he's town, but given how willing he was to pressure that hard against holyflare, I would be hesitant to centre any kind of town circle around him. I would much rather have someone more passive/gentle like blurry helping guide the discussion because if we just pressure every mistake too hard, people will get intimidated and afraid of posting, and we risk tunell visioning away from more subtle scummy behaviour. Also worth noting that he and holyflare have played before, where (as far as i can tell) Umasi was scum and Holyflare played a good town town. I don't know if the events of that game have had any effect on the decisions either Umasi or Holyflare have made this game, since they brought it up in their first posts, it might as well be mentioned. infii -Didn't say much of anything yesterday, but thats understandable because timezones. He made a post today basically calling out the people who haven't been posting much, other then that he's one of the first people (other then velocity) to suggest Umasi isn't playing pro town. The only read i've been able to infer (other then the inactives) is that he's a bit suspicious of Umasi/maybe looking to disntance himself from umasi. First he voices a disagreement with Umasi's policy of keeping a vote on his suspect, the says Show nested quote +On September 05 2013 00:54 infii wrote: Still too early for conclusions. The only thing I find noteworthy until now is Umasi's kinda-agressiveness and twisting words in others mouths, seems a bit scummy. He hasn't really contributed anything other then that, and it sticks out a bit that pretty much the only thing he's done is knock on other people for not doing enough. on the whole a pretty neutral read so far. heavenz -First post wasn't really anything, I believe he was saying hi before going to bed. His post with his reads is pretty intereseting, and i agree with most of them. I'm interested by the fact he has holyflare on his scum list (although i agree that holy has been being a bit uncooperative) as most people other then umasi seem to have read him as town so far. I've written this before holy's section, so we'll see if i change my mind on holyflare after going through holyflares filter again. Don't have much of a read on him, but he's contributed and seems much townier then some of the people so far. myRzeth -Still hasn't postsed, apparently he's in germany so I would expect him to post, at the latest, this evening. Otherwise he'll need to have a good excuse. Bereft -Not got much on him, he was supportive of blurry's move to just out reads to get things going, and he was also disagreeing with Holyflare when it came to Holyflares decision to withhold his reads. However while Umasi took this as a queue to pounce on holyflare, Bereft seemed pacified by holyflare posting this: Show nested quote +On September 04 2013 13:24 Holyflare wrote:On September 04 2013 13:23 Umasi wrote:
do we just sit here and twiddle thumbs? Fwiw, I totally fucked up day one last game. And I'm not prideful enough to call myself not awful, but purposefully not talking about something because you have information to hide is just stupid. I've never said not to talk I just said don't call people scum or announce them as 'reads', do what you just did and it's all good by me. and backed off hard, called for people who haven't psoted yet to post and dissapear. Don't have much of a read on him either way either. Pharcyd3 -By far the most suspicious person so far in my opinion. To reiterate what I said, his one post is just attacking heavenz for his first post, irony of that aside, doing that and then dissapearing is really scummy in my opinion. The reason I'm so suspicious of him is I'm having a hard time visualising a situation where he's town and acts like this. If he's in a hurry and didn't have time to read the thread then randomly throwing accusations at someone without having read the thread yet is either really bad town, or plain scum. If we assume that he wasn't just randomly throwing accusations around without reading the thread fully. If he had time to read the thread, why didn't he have the extra minute or two it would have taken to address any of the topics being discussed, I don't see a townie thinking it's ok to throw suspicions on someone, ignoring the current conversation, then disappear. I also found it interesting that so many people picked up on velocity's post, but so few noticed pharcyd3's. For the record here are the people who posted after pharcyd3's post but didn't mention it until I fingered him in my first post. HolyFlare, Blurry (references velocity), Bereft (references velocity), Umasi (references velocity) Note bereft did say just before i posted Show nested quote +On September 04 2013 13:26 Bereft wrote:
also infii, killerdog, myrzeth, pharcyd3, where you guys at? so he might have just missed it. HolyFlare -Holyflare seems to be involved in everything, early on he was very much in control of the flow of debate, bringing up sleeping n1, then not being afraid of disagreeing with people. However once Blurry suggested sharing reads he pretty defensive/confrontational. Regardless of his orientation, to me he feels like a rather charismatic player who doesn't want to just scrape by being passive and answering questions, but rather wants to be one fo the people in the driving seat, and that might be why he reacted to blurry taking the initiative like he did. There were three people who stood out to me as pressuring him on his refusal to share reads. -Bereft, who seemed to be satisfied by holyflares response, -Blurry, most of blurry's posts seem to be things holyflare disagreed with, or vice versa -Umasi, who ended up going hard on holyflare. To be honest I'm having a hard time getting any kind of read off of him. He's stated that his style is "asking off the cuff questions about posts" to catch people off guard. Something he's been consistent in doing. He also didn't seem to change his posting style, or go super defensive when umasi voted for him. He's talking alot (most posts of anyone i think) and doing a good job asking questions but the way he reacted to being asked for reads was a bit dereailing and very uncooperative. He hasn't really given any evidence to prove himself town so far. He's talking a ton about the over all "metagame" of mafia, and a lot about mafia tactics in general but basically nothing relevant to this game itself. It takes more then asking other people questions to prove yourself a townie, and refusing to give any analysis on the other players at all, while still expecting people to answer all your questions is asking for a lot. Still very much on the fence about him and I'm starting to regret interrupting Usami when i did. Lord Velocity -Originally I felt people were sort of ganging up on velocity without any real case. He made a first post which didn't say much other then give a "gut feeling" and, true, he was asked for reads by umasi and didn't answer the question before leaving the thread for a while, but considering that pharcyd3 made an at least equally suspicious post 12 minutes later, and that got totally ignored, the number of people putting velocity on their lists seemed a bit high. However after reading his defensive posts, I'm a lot more suspicious of him now. He called scum on Umasi based on Show nested quote +On September 04 2013 13:24 Lord Velocity wrote:
Strongest Scum read: Umasi due to his fast vote on Holyflare and his super aggressive early play.
Which feels a lot like just counter accusations rather then a justified read, just stating what happened rather then saying why you thought the actions were scummy isn't very watertight. This Show nested quote +On September 04 2013 23:02 Lord Velocity wrote: I think I shoulndn't be lynched and we should hear from more people about reads on everybody before we misslynch and end up having no reads. school, so I might post from there. Bye/brb Also felt like a bit of an overreaction given the amount of pressure he was under at the time. He might just be a townie who wasn't expecting pressure and overreacted though. Not sure on him, but he's on the scummier end of the spectrum out the the players who have posted more then a paragraph or two. Hopefully he will start volunteering some information himself without any more pressure. Chairman Ray -Hasn't been very active yet, This one post is a huge elephant in the room when it comes to him Show nested quote +On September 04 2013 07:53 Chairman Ray wrote: Has everyone got their QT yet? You should have received one by now. The way he phrased it makes it seem unlikely that he's mafia slipping up. As someone else said, he might have been trying to trip up a mafia, or just screwing around, but I would very much like him to go on record saying why he posted this just so it's dealt with and doesn't cause misunderstandings later. Other then that he hasn't said much other encouraging threatening to lynch people which seems logical enough. Not enough content for a read though, hope he posts more tonight. LoneMeow -Hasn't said much content wise, although i do agree with his statement that Umasi/Holyflare argument seems a bit town v town. He seems to have popped in at a time when the thread was relatively inactive, and posed questions to a few people. He hasn't pointed out much which hasn't already been said though. Blurry -As i mentioned in an earlier post, Blurry was disagreeing with holyflare on several points over several different posts. Infact his first 5 posts are all either voicing a differing opinion to holyf, or straight up quoting him and disagreeing. He then brought up the topic of just sharing reads to promote discussion, which holyf refused to do (which then set umasi off.) I don't know if this is one of them trying to distance themselves from the other, or one getting some kind of read off of the other, (or indeed just a side effect of them being two of the more active players during that time period) but as it's pretty much all Blurry has done I feel it's relevant. He's also spared two posts to help explain a few things to velocity, from those two i would say he seems to think velocity is just town who overreacted to a bit of pressure, regardless of why he did it though, I think explaining why he was under suspicion is a pro town move, as mafia would probably want to let him just talk himself into a lynch rather then try and help him. I also liked how he helped move the discussion along on day 1 by calling for reads. One of the townier players imo. and here + Show Spoiler +On September 06 2013 00:30 killerdog wrote:Show nested quote +On September 05 2013 14:38 Umasi wrote:
Killerdog, I'm having trouble understanding what exactly you think, because you give a lot of summations of peoples posts, and your thoughts (which is good!) but you don't actually draw conclusions from it all. Instead of going X did A and Y did B which had a scummy result, be like 'this is why he is scummy/not scummy'. I can't tell what you're actually trying to communicate in your post =/
I thought I sort of did that in the long post I made while ago, but it might have been a bit hard to find because the post got a bit bloated :p I'll just put players in an abridged list of reads, in vague town to mafia order Town- Killerdog: (fuck yeah) Umasi: + Show Spoiler +Currently town read, hasn't been as much as some people, but the the posts he did make all seemed to serve a purpose, and I feel like he's been consistent in calling out behaviour he disagrees with. Also amde a few good town guiding posts. As the game progresses I'd hope for a little more reads/pressure coming from him, but he's definitely not what I'd call n1 lynch potential at all. Blurry: + Show Spoiler +I got a very town read off blurry, for reasons I said last post. However he's provided no content (other then a "good post tomorrow" promise) in the last 36 or so hours. I'm keeping him high on my town list under the assumption that he's going to make a really good town post in the next few hours, if he doesn't post, or just parrots some other opinions then he's going quite far down the list very quickly. Don't feel like he'd be a good n1 lynch just because I'm loath to abandon someone who read so town at start, but if he doesn't have a reason for vanishing or if he posts nothing of value before the voting deadline I'll reassess. Holyflare: + Show Spoiler +Holyflare's been very very active, even if a lot of the posts have been a bit fulffy with regards to relevant content. I felt like he spent most of day 1 arguing about how "mafia should be played" rather then actually playing it, which can read as scum given how he didn't want any associations thrown on him, but he god into three arguments really quickly with blurry, bereft and Umasi and didn't back down from any of them (to the point where Umasi voted him.) I feel that's a point in his favour as town, because it would take a very brave mafia to be willing to thrust himself into the limelight that quickly. He's also made two decent posts since the, one calling out heavenz and infii for their relative lack of content. While ragging on people who haven't been very productive is by no means enough to put you as a pure town read, I liked his posts, and unless he suddenly locks up would like to keep him around.
Worth noting is that I think having at this stage in the game, I voting off a vocal player who might be a bit scummy is a worse play then voting off someone who has contributed nothing. We really don't want to punish contributing, and potentially end up on day 3 or 4 with a few players who have yet to commit to anything, and have all the people we've pushed hard (and have lots of post to reference and analyse) be dead. it gets a bit fuzzier here Lord Velocity: + Show Spoiler +It feels a bit like he wears his heart on his sleeve, he goes super from a little pressure, then with a little reassurance goes super starts posting normally, then goes super defensive/apologetic from some more pressure, then a little reassurance and he's back to posting normally, even being willing to knock other people for being suspicious of him because he feels he's been cleared. I don't think a mafia would be this confident in towns opinion of him, and would be a little more wary given how many times he's been under heavy suspicion. I also like that he's actively posting and engaging in discussion. Again, I really don't see him as a n1 lynch candidate right now, just because he's active, unafraid despite already having been under the gun twice, and as I said in holyflares area. Even if someone is reading a bit scummy, as long as they're active and contributing I'd rather lynch someone who's being super non-committal on the first day or 2. I get that that some people might disagree with that statement but if they do then I'd ask that we have that discussion day 2 rather then now, as we have only got 9 hours left to decide on a lynch, and I'd rather leave "meta policy" discussions or whatever until we've decided on a lynch for tonight. Bereft: + Show Spoiler +Honestly have no idea what to do with him right now, he argued with holyflare early on, then made a post about another game being funny and vanished. It feels like he didn't re-read the thread closely enough on returning or something, but he was making some accusations/quoting things out of context which didn't really make sense at the time he got back. He's not been afraid to give opinions on multiple people though, and I wouldn't mind keeping him around as long as he posts more/says more. If he keeps vanishing then coming back and quoting things out of context he's gonna go down the list pretty fast. Lonemeow: + Show Spoiler +Have trouble getting a read right now, doesn't have very many posts, but he's asking questions when he see's things which don't make sense to him and is giving his opinion on things. While he's part of the trio of inii/heavenz/lonemeow who I feel have been a little sparse with regards to putting their foot down, and would like to see a bit more pressure applied towards him, I feel out of those three he's been asking questions indiscriminatingly which puts him above the other two for now.. Heavenz: + Show Spoiler +Same boat as lonemeow right now, he moans about inactives but has a grand total of 6 posts, only two of which contained actual analysis. While his longest post isn't poorly written and contains some decent insight, but is a bit sparse with actual reads (only clear read is him saying velocity is town), 2 or 3 good points isn't really much to your name after almost 48 hours of play. Personally I don't think he's a good n1 lynch, because he's shown the potential for decent analytical posts, and is willing to throw suspicion on people, however if he doesn't start posting more regurarly and being a bit clearer with what he thinks things actually mean then he's not going any higher on my list. Infii: + Show Spoiler +Hasn't posted much at all, he promised a big post today, and based on that he'll either go up in the list or stay here, I'll probably make my decision on whether he feels like a valid day 1 lynch or not based off that. Chairman ray: + Show Spoiler +Said he was working on his scum reads but hasn't mentioned *anyone* except holyflare and umasi, where are you reads? Also jumped really hard on Lord Velocity, I know I did too but I've explained my reasoning, and I'm curious what Ray's is. Hasn't really done anything except say things about holyflare and umasi, who aren't really relevant (imo) with regards to the day1 lynch, and has shown no signs of changing, He's probably the non afk player I would be most willing to lynch at this point. Pharcyd3: + Show Spoiler +afk-ed, probably gonna get mod killed myrzeth: + Show Spoiler +claims he's been active but hasn't posted shit. That means he's read all our posts saying he needs to come out and hasn't done anything. This isn't a game where everyone does their own thing in a corner, it's a game where town has to work together, not sure if he's really bad town, creative mafia, or trolling but he's my current #1 lynch
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Blurry also said that he was putting the pressure on LV on the backburner: On September 06 2013 13:27 Blurry wrote: I'm putting lynchign LV on the backburner for now as I think we'll be better off lynching someone that voted for Chairman as we're guaranteed that one of them is scum pretty much.
So, why was he killed? There can only be one possible reason. His 'towny' like nature to Umasi, heavenz and killerdog, combined with this post: On September 06 2013 07:23 Blurry wrote: I think its clear that at least one of the people voting, and probably 2 or 3, for chairman ray are Scum.
I think going into the next day all of our attention should be on these people. Its so unlikely that a Mafia would avoid jumping on this bandwagon especially when the vote count was so close.
I think we all need to share our reads on Umasi, Holyflare, Lonemeow, Killerdog, and myrzeth and then look into lynching one of these people tomorrow.
Once night comes to an end I'll give my ideas.
Therefore, some, if not all of the scum, are in fact ON the bandwagon. This means that; LoneMeow, myRZeth, Umasi, killerdog should be our preferred targets for the lynch today (I know I said people off it but this makes the most sense).
In this list I'm also going to add Lord Velocity, the reason being that he has put blurry and bereft together throught the entire game, he has made them look like buddy's and then when the scum killed off blurry velocity has even harder pushed the idea that bereft is scum. This makes him look incredibly scummy to me.
Examples are: + Show Spoiler +On September 05 2013 09:47 Lord Velocity wrote: Umasi to me is more on the town side of things and Holy in the middle. Bereft on the more scummy parts of things with Blurry neutral.I haven't heard much else from them since so I think it's safe to think about lynching either Myrz, or Pharcyd, because I don't know how the mod killing thing REALLY works. But yea unless they respond I'm pretty sure they're safe lynches. + Show Spoiler +On September 05 2013 13:55 Lord Velocity wrote: One more thing, I'm sorry if this is quite contradicting to the "Deflect suspicion" thing but I've noticed that Bereft has backed up Blurry with utter confidence and Vice Versa. Now I will go to bed, See you all in the morning + Show Spoiler +On September 05 2013 22:56 Lord Velocity wrote: Okay so I have to rush this a littlebit? I have to go to school and won'tbe here for the end of the night. So I would like to say that my read on Umasi I think was posted, but if not it's the same to Killers a little, they both provided major information leading us in the right direction on others, Holy still stands neutral as I said, I'm a little sketchy onBlurry andBereft because they come in, disregard everything said, and focus on everything that's happened like 5(or like 8) pages ago and don't bother trying to clear their names on some peoples list, as they have also got some sort of "Blurry said something, he's right." Or vice versa with bereft. But I won't be around to the end of the lynching phase so I'm sorry. I also do'nt think I'm a smart vote as I have 2 right now, so I think that might stay the same,but I will be voting for Bereft or Heavenz. Thank you, see you all later. + Show Spoiler +On September 05 2013 22:58 Lord Velocity wrote: ##Vote: Bereft Votes Bereft, kills blurry, shows he's been on bereft all game to avoid suspicion?
What compounds the LV suspicion is his post today
On September 07 2013 07:30 Lord Velocity wrote: So I am now certain Bereft isn't town because after I pressure him on his whole relations with Blurry, and why he agrees with his thoughts and does what he does basically, but then he says something about me already being suspicious of them being a duo, and tries to jump on me to get me eliminated and provides what he thinks are supporting facts on why I'm "mafia" But Blurry dies, which leads me to believe that either mafia killed him to frame Bereft in my eyes, or Bereft indeed got rid of Blurry so that no further suspicions would arise from the whole situation proposed by me earlier in night 1. Can I get some thoughts on the situation? Or just thoughts on why Blurry would die and who he was pointing at, or if you guys think he was just a kill, and nothing special.
(Sorry if it's a little WIFON"
He's speculating that people got rid of blurry to frame bereft, or to put more suspicion on bereft because of his argument. The only one to have these suspicions is LV himself, in fact that's all he's been talking about all game, so why not make a post that also defends himself in the process?
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Either way, I want people to do the following things;
1) Make reads/analysis/scum tells on the following : Umasi, killerdog, lonemeow, myRZeth and Lord Velocity. I'm specifically looking at Umasi and killerdog because of their associations with Blurry being "strong town reads" to themselves.
2) Come up with other theories, I don't mind, not saying this is the only one by any means.
3)DO SOMETHING.
|