
Basterd Mini Mafia - Page 118
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Lazermonkey
Sweden2176 Posts
![]() | ||
iGrok
United States5142 Posts
| ||
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
I guess I'll also leave the WoS thing alone for the same reason. I've said all I can about it. So I'm gonna dig and search for other suspects and see what I come up with. If I can't convince people to move their vote elsewhere then fine. But I'm still gonna do what I can to find scum. | ||
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
This is actually a towncase but since stutters seems to be on peoples suspicious list I think it's important. On July 02 2013 05:29 mkfuba07 wrote: 1) Explained this already. Your explanation is either mistaken (which is weird, because you accepted this reasoning during Roulette) or a misrepresentation. "Vayne from Roulette" for me is "lots of scum potential, but all things I've seen townies do". 2) No, many of those show my perspective on what happened. It was summary + analysis, which only seems reasonable since I was playing almost a day behind everyone else. 3) K. 4) Not scummy. 5) Already explained. And I haven't been here to take a stance except for the one that I did. Why interpreting what I've said differently this game compared to last game? 6) What does this even mean? If I had something significantly bad to say about him I'd say slight scum, not town at all. And I actually did say something bad about him in the paragraph before. It was weird that he pointed out marv being mia when marv said he was going to be missing shortly before that. Just wasn't bad enough to invalidate the good points. 7) True. Sorry for being eager to play with a friend again -_- 8) So the reasoning should be invalidated because rayn didn't scumslip in every one of his posts? I found him scummy for one post in roulette. How is this different? 9) First point, not true. Second, you quoted it. This seems like a legit argument between them to me. Fuba didn't have any votes on him @ the time and it would have been pretty unneeded attention. This looks pretty good for stutters IMO. | ||
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On July 02 2013 05:52 mkfuba07 wrote: More along the same lines. I just don't see this as a scum on scum play.rofl, it's because I think stutters is scum. My problem with the lynch is that I want to lynch rayn, which apparently isn't going to happen today, or stutters, who I'm surprised so many people have a town read on. It's not a "stupid fucking argument". Of course, if you didn't play in Roulette then you might not understand what I'm talking about, but there are contradictions between how he played then and how he's playing now that point towards him being scum. Unfortunately, as those contradictions center around his responses to me, others apparently don't find that compelling. | ||
s0Lstice
United States1832 Posts
As before I've been doing my best to keep track on my phone, but things won't quiet down for me completely until tomorrow. Several comments have been made about a few of my actions this game, so I'd like to talk about those. Defending vayne on day 1 came from that weird analysis post that he made. This is the one I mean: On June 30 2013 12:22 VayneAuthority wrote: Something rubs me the wrong way about lazermonkeys posting Starts off the thread not even wanting to scum hunt. Throws down a troll vote early, see jaybrundage in roulette for how something innocent just pads your filter with bs. Eager to jump on the stutters be before he has even defended himself His 6th post is just insanely scummy read it and tell me otherwise Rest of his filter is useless speculation He gets my vote until I can talk with him more and get a better read Can't vote right now as its much too precise to bold shit on an iPad but will contribute more when I'm home tomorrow night Having just played with scum Vayne, I don't remember him posting anything like this. There is actual D1 analysis here, and like I said, I was inclined to give him townie points for it. It not a concrete thing by any means, but it was enough to make me not want to lynch him day 1. My defense of him was a combination of this notion, plus being a little upset that we seemed to be as a town heading for a Marv sheep on a target I didn't really love despite him being absent for most of day 1. The whole thing put a bad taste in my mouth about the lynch. In that time leading up to lynch, I was trying to stay checked in despite other forces calling me away from the game. I did what I could do to push my favored lynch (stutters). I asked Marv to flick through his filter, and advocated for a switch to him as it seemed there was enough time/people in thread. When it wasn't going anywhere, I took a quick glance on the competing wagons, and liked Fuba's the most. I explained my reasoning later (it's in my filter addressed to Marv), but not at the time of the vote because again...divided attention. I don't really get why me being the 5th vote on Fuba on day 2 matters. I was in thread discussing it when there were no votes practically, went away and quite a bit of discussion happened, and then I voted when I was back in thread after reading all the new stuff and after having thought about it while I was away. I asked a few questions here and there to solidify things, and we made the right lynch. The case I wrote on JJD didn't hold because it was based on his tunneling scum meta. I wrote it, posted it, and then something like 10 minutes later, he posted his case on gumshoe. It was clear to me he had been writing it while I was writing mine, so it not as if he was reacting to it after I posted it. The timing was pretty funny, and it broke the meta case instantaneously. If he's not tunneling, then he's not tunneling. I retracted it because it was the right thing to do. I think a lot of the reasons people find me scummy can be attributed to my inactivity. Lots of shit happens in between the times I can be in thread, to the point that I have to break everything down and rebuild every read. I can't say I blame you guys. I think it's clear another break from TL is in order until I can get some solid freetime, as right now it can't be helped. I'm still reading, but I'm here if I've forgotten something I need to respond to. | ||
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On Day 1 Soltice voted fuba. @ first this looks good for him, But I'm gonna disagree and here's why: Originally Lazer was in the lead and we weren't sure about the deadline. He claimed cop w/ what we thought was 4 minutes remaining in the day. rayne, Lazer and Vivax switch to fuba and we thought the day ended. Here's where the votes were @ that time: + Show Spoiler + (Someone feel free to doublecheck these because if I'm wrong I don't want it to look like I'm deliberately misleading) Stutters (1): solstice, WaveofShadow (1): JarJarDinks, raynpelikoneet (2): Oatsmaster, WaveofShadow, Lazermonkey (2): VayneAuthority, Stutters, Vayne (2): marvellosity, mkfuba, mkfuba (3): raynpelikoneet, Lazermonkey, Vivax, Not Voting (1): gumshoe, First person to mention the extended deadline: On July 02 2013 06:03 s0Lstice wrote: 48/24 Time cycle, deadline 18:00 EDT (-04:00) I thought we have an hour? Marv you'd be the last person I'd sheep right now. OK, that might not be that big a deal. He could have just been aware of the deadline, thats fine. But notice the last line about sheeping marv. That was in response to Marv telling solstice to sheep his fuba vote. So what does S0lstice do 2 minutes later? He sheeps Marv O_o!!!! On July 02 2013 06:05 s0Lstice wrote: Notice that fuba already had a majority when Solstice voted. Also note that 2 townies and vivax who is practically comfirmed town were the only people voting him @ the time. Scum is not gonna want nobody on the wagon after a red flip. His vote was a pile-on that wasn't gonna make a difference @ the time.I could do fuba though if its not stutters, that's not a bad lynch. ##vote mkfuba And lastly, check out S0lsices filter and see if you can figure out what he thought of Fuba @ that point. I'll give you a hint, the post I just quoted is the only mention of him up untill that point. He literally had given no reason to vote Fuba and he specifically told marv he wasn't gonna sheep him. | ||
s0Lstice
United States1832 Posts
I feel pretty darn good about Marv being town. Vivax and gumshoe look really town too. The only way Vivax is scum is if the missing NK was intentional, and I think that's horribly unlikely. Gumshoe did all the heavy lifting in the WoS vs. fuba lynch. If either of them are scum, then gg you earned the win. This leaves Stutters, JJD, and WoS. This is where I'm looking. | ||
s0Lstice
United States1832 Posts
| ||
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On July 07 2013 13:23 s0Lstice wrote: seems wierd to exonerate gumshoe for his part in WoS vs Fuba and then still have WoS in your list.This leaves Stutters, JJD, and WoS. | ||
s0Lstice
United States1832 Posts
like..what are you doing? | ||
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On July 07 2013 13:32 s0Lstice wrote: Yeah I don't know what I was thinking w/ the sheep thing. I even posted the vote count myself. But the rest still stands. You voted Fuba w/o even mentioning him once up until that point. And you did it @ a time when it wasn't gonna make a difference.in fact Marv didn't vote for fuba at all on day 1... like..what are you doing? | ||
s0Lstice
United States1832 Posts
On July 07 2013 13:29 JarJarDrinks wrote: seems wierd to exonerate gumshoe for his part in WoS vs Fuba and then still have WoS in your list. It's not weird. gumshoe's efforts on day 2 show nearly unmistakable desire to solve the game and further discussion. I'm not ruling out the possibility of WoS being scum and therefore gumshoe being wong (sort of?). But you don't need the wrong or the right portion to see the townie intentions in gumshoe's d2 posting. | ||
s0Lstice
United States1832 Posts
Things look dire for you right now and your efforts to slough the attention on to me are full of misrepresentation. It looks malicious to be quite frank. | ||
JarJarDrinks
United States1302 Posts
On July 07 2013 13:40 s0Lstice wrote: I don't really have any expectation that I'm gonna be able to save myself. I'll be happy if I do, but I'm just trying to give my opinions. Things look dire for you right now and your efforts to slough the attention on to me are full of misrepresentation. It looks malicious to be quite frank. And I think you don't expect that I'll be able to save myself either. Which is why you need 3 suspects because you're gonna still need 2 goats once I flip. | ||
s0Lstice
United States1832 Posts
There's a few things about JJD that make me nervous about this lynch. First, day 1 there is a Rayn lynch wagon. A JJD wagon forms counter to it, and here is what JJD says: On July 01 2013 11:02 JarJarDrinks wrote: OK. Rayne's kinda convinced me that he's town over the last few pages. I think he's legit pissed @ oats. I'd prefer not lynching rayn (though if I have to vote him to save myself I obviously will). I laid out my case against Solstice already. He'd be my preferred lynch today. Vivax and Oats are calling for Rayn's head, and at this point there is a possibility that Rayn is lynched. I think it would be odd for JJ to not go in here. More, he called Rayn scum earlier, so the groundwork was already laid for him to get on the Rayn wagon. Instead, he recognizes some pretty townie posting by Rayn, and backs off, despite it possibly meaning his own head. There have been flashes of real clairvoyant and solid analysis like this: On July 02 2013 03:06 JarJarDrinks wrote: OK so here he's trying to sow seeds of doubt in the mass roleclaim plan even though it's been pretty much agreed on that it's an incredibly powerfull play. Like why mention those things and then vote yes? So then why vote yes? Vayne voted against it for this same reason. The only reason to vote yes is because he's scared to post anything that would apear to be anti-town. He's knows the mass roleclaim is detrimental to scum. He'd trying to use 2 seperate excuses as to why we shouldn't do it and hoping that one of em sticks. The problem is those excuses directly clash with each other. Either it's a huge boon to scum or it's broken and cheap. How can it be both? The scummiest looking thing about him imo is his actions around the day 1 lynch, and it's so on the nose scummy looking that I'm left getting townie vibes off it, as weird as that sounds. What kind of scum drops an explanationless (and I mean totally explanationless) vote on a counter wagon to a now confirmed scum? It's so suicidally stupid and careless; I think it's unlikely that a scum JJ does this. Also he is currently not playing to his scum meta. You can refer back to that case I wrote on him, the games are in there. I wouldn't call him tunnely this game. What do you guys think of this stuff? I propose we lynch Stutters today. I want to return to this chain of posts: On July 01 2013 02:46 Stutters695 wrote: This is why I thought he was town. The miller stuff is eh (a lot more damming now with Vivax's post however). Like it isn't an unreasonable assumption and his reaction to my "scummiest post in the thread" was almost exactly how I'd react. I'd expect scum to be much more concerned with justifying their stance immediately rather than just laugh it off and not elaborate until pressure is on them. I reacted almost identically to an accusation from vivax in roulette that I felt was ridiculous. In addition to that, he's one of the most active players. I can pull specifics if you want but that's the rundown. On July 01 2013 03:47 Stutters695 wrote: You're misunderstanding. I'm leaning scum on him now, that was explaining why I thought he was town when I woke up this morning and did a quick skim. Although I do think accepting a miller claim isn't unreasonable. It essentially is just having someone say "hey, don't check me because you'll waste your power (pre-parity announcement) and cause a mislynch." It doesn't in any way confirm Marv, but ensures he is judged on the basis of his actual play. That he's so sure Marv is town is worrisome but I can see where he is coming from to a certain extent. I also don't like how many people are slipping by saying absolutely nothing. Even if we lynch him we should hear his reads and force these hardcore lurkers to post something. On July 01 2013 03:50 Stutters695 wrote: I guess part of it is how easy this has been that's concerning me. Scum could be sitting idly by arguing between us but when everyone active is on Rayn we'll get nothing going forward, we should at least look into a couple other people. This waffle is larger than anything that Belgium has ever produced. A scum read on Rayn that appears to come largely from Vivax' analysis. Except, the case by Vivax dealt almost exclusively with the unreasonableness of Rayn's reaction to Marv's miller claim. He then goes on to support the reasonableness of Rayn's reaction (which obliterates the basis for his scum read) as well as express nervousness about how easy the pressure on Rayn has mounted. So we are left with....a scum read with ZERO basis. This looks extremely contrived. I have to be perfectly honest...Stutters entered my blind zone when his pursuit of fuba started because the effort looked genuine and was far and above what I would typically expect from him. I'm thinking that was a mistake. I shouldn't have let these posts go. With the benefit of a scum flip, Stutters exchanges with fuba take on a different light. It's easy to look engaged and confident when you KNOW you are attacking scum. Also, here's Stutter's day 2: On July 04 2013 01:55 Stutters695 wrote: Well I want to believe WoS because I still think Fuba is scum. I just don't understand fake claiming there. Why would scum be out to get him on d2 when all he has to do is talk his way out of a lynch today/defend fuba and mislynch into a n2 win by not blocking? What incentive does scum have to kill him here? On July 04 2013 02:01 Stutters695 wrote: I'm aware. I'm pretty damn confident in my scumread on Fuba. I guess 3p would explain his weird behavior, but he's been so fucking scummy. Usually I'd associate someone with 3p if they're more on the townish-null side. They both can't be scum because this would be the most retarded bus in the history of mafia. I want to believe WoS, but here's a reason why we shouldn't believe WoS. Fuba is totes the scum, but 3p I guess could explain it? This is the sum total of him 'figuring out' this situation. The thought process doesn't seem to equal the conclusion....maybe because he already knows the answer. I'm out of time for tonight. I have to drive home in the morning tomorrow, but I'll get back in time for the deadline (early as I can). When I come back I want to see thoughts on this. We need to get this lynch right. | ||
s0Lstice
United States1832 Posts
On July 07 2013 13:50 JarJarDrinks wrote: I don't really have any expectation that I'm gonna be able to save myself. I'll be happy if I do, but I'm just trying to give my opinions. And I think you don't expect that I'll be able to save myself either. Which is why you need 3 suspects because you're gonna still need 2 goats once I flip. Earlier comment from me aside, if you are town don't check out. I expect you to try until the end to show it. You already sound defeated here. | ||
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
And if you're having doubts about JJD, I assume that means you think WoS is also mafia? | ||
s0Lstice
United States1832 Posts
Wos seems most likely for scum 2, but I won't have time to look mote closely until tonight. I feel good about stutters. I'm gonna vote during this little break from driving as it looks like I forgot to last night | ||
WaveofShadow
Canada31494 Posts
![]() | ||
| ||