EPTOn April 26 2013 08:37 getmoript wrote:
@VE. What's your read on Giygas?
@VE. What's your read on Giygas?
Null. I can look into if you like.
TL Mafia LXI - Page 9
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Null. I can look into if you like. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 26 2013 08:42 Artanis[Xp] wrote: The only host-WIFOM I've used was regarding getmo being town. I haven't contributed much because I got replaced into a game and I've been too lazy to read up. As for the plan thing, all three previously named vets being town together AND keeping them alive triples the risk, therefore I found it unlikely that none of them are scum, thus it reduces the playerpool to look at significantly. You may be aware of the fact that I hate big games. This would be an easy way to reduce the amount of people to look at for the day. Also, I'd rather not have scumvets solve the game for me. They would solve it in a very unpleasant way. This explanation....buys you time. But I'd still like some conclusions. You said BC case was bad - does that make him scum? You said you want to lynch into vets, but give no indication which you want to lynch. You said "I've been too lazy to read up" but you're not too lazy to come in and limit the lynch without reading. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
To be honest though I have doubts - I went back and reread Surprisingly Normal Mini Mafia II to see what I could glean from his scum game and there are similarities...but I don't know if that's just how he posts or if he's intimidated by the size of the game or what. But that's all they are - doubts, not suspicions. The fact that you've misrepresented his play in the case doesn't help - he very clearly told me what he meant after I asked for clarification re: the tube post, and I have to assume he's telling me the truth. You insisting that he's lying or whatever does nothing to strengthen your case. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 26 2013 09:54 getmoript wrote: Town. I see no reason to question the roleblock/jail. If he was roleblocked by town, then odds are he was the second NK. If he was roleblocked by scum, then he's almost certainly town. Why? I don't understand this at all. He hasn't done anything at all - that's not reason enough for you to question the roleblock? And the fact that BC claimed RB? Those are both excellent reasons to question the roleblock. So why not question the roleblock? Why is he town OUTSIDE the claim of RB? You don't find it odd that he thought that inactivity was "especially damning" yet he ignored tube the whole game long? You don't find his fail-tunnel of me suspicious at all? Like, it looks to me like you only think he's town because you agree with him that I'm scum, which if that's the case then you're doing something wrong friend...because A) Palmar has given no good reason for thinking I'm scum and B) I'm town. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 26 2013 09:59 raynpelikoneet wrote: I'm pretty sure you are just a townie who is on the wrong track. I can understand your thought process quite well, but if you think Ace is now playing in a town mindset, that is not a reason why he would be mafia. It's kinda stupid to assume so. What if Ace was just uninvested on D1? You should probably look into people you think are scummy now, or throughout the game. Of course if you think Ace has done some stuff on D1 that really points to him being scum then ignore my words, but if that's the case, please point those actions out. WHY CAN YOU ASK THIS QUESTION OF OTHERS BUT NOT ASK THIS QUESTION ABOUT ME?!?!?!? WHAT IN THE HOLY FUCK ARE YOU DOING RAYN?! | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 26 2013 10:03 grush57 wrote: we must kill the palmar This is odd considering YOUR target of preference now has a case against him and someone pushing dat lynch. Why give up on YOUR read in favor of mine? Is there anything particularly strong in the case against Palmar? Anything particularly weak in the case against GiygaS? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
I haven't even DONE anything more than when you were arguing that I hadn't done shit rayn. Do you see how that statement infuriates me? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 26 2013 10:20 raynpelikoneet wrote: Well what do you think then BM calling Tube town for "wanting to get rid of inactives like Drazak" then? BM is ever a mystery to me. I'll have to look into his filter to answer this sufficiently. Being wrong doesn't mean that he's scum...and Palmar wasn't "wrong" about tube, he said "I find inactivity exceptionally scummy in this setup" and proceeded to ignore an inactive. That IS scummy. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 26 2013 10:30 VisceraEyes wrote: BM is ever a mystery to me. I'll have to look into his filter to answer this sufficiently. Being wrong doesn't mean that he's scum...and Palmar wasn't "wrong" about tube, he said "I find inactivity exceptionally scummy in this setup" and proceeded to ignore an inactive that ended up flipping scum. That IS scummy. Fixed. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 26 2013 10:34 raynpelikoneet wrote: I really hate this. But there are none on TL. I've checked. Wouldn't that make the bolded a scumslip then? :/ On April 26 2013 10:21 grush57 wrote: It was a batman joke, I think he is pretty scummy though. The giygas case kind of failed, however it had some points and I wish we could get some traction on his lynch he is so scummy! He also does the scum trait of constantly saying, I have to do something I'll answer later. In my case that is usually afk and let other scumplayers take over or wait for advice in the qt. Not to mention the fact of fake contributing. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
TOWN HAS GRUSH BEEN SCUM EVER? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
to start imo. I want to lynch Palmar, BC seems to be under a lot of suspicion and he just posted a case on Yamato and thinks Ace is 3rd. From there, just let us know who you'd like to lynch the most and why. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 26 2013 10:48 raynpelikoneet wrote: VE how often is: 1) Palmar wrong about you 2) you wrong about him 3) you attack each other when both town? Aren't these three questions asking the same thing? How can he be wrong about me if he's scum and vice versa? Anyway....this is so hard to answer because we've played a bunch of games together. However I can say with confidence that we're hardly ever wrong about each other when we're both town. We attack each other, but generally arrive at the right conclusion pretty quickly when we're both town. When we're opposing alignments, we're wrong more often but not much. Side effect of playing a lot of games with someone is being able to read them pretty well, and I've played a lot of games with Palmar (much to my chagrin early on in my career -.-) On the whole he's better at reading me when we're opposing alignments then I am at reading him. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 26 2013 11:03 Sharrant wrote: Phone posting and I hate it. I'm 2 pages from being caught up With the thread but I'm about to be on the subway. Can post in 2 hours. Palmar should not even be up for debate today. When I get home if anyone is still going after him I will fight you tooth and nail on this. Ve is not on the chopping block either. Talk to you guys soon. PREPARE YOUR BOWELS FOR IMMINENT RELEASE!!!! | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
On April 26 2013 11:45 Bill Murray wrote: im not sure tube is town 100% it was a specific question about him... i wouldnt EVER bring up tube... hes mainly null from me... havent seen much out of him HE'S FUCKING DEAD BILL. AND SCUM. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
I want to lynch Palmar still. Nothing has changed since I left except BM posting a lot and Palmar continuing to be awful. | ||
| ||
