The Game [N] - Page 120
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Wade Fell
United States501 Posts
| ||
Coagulation
United States9633 Posts
| ||
Wade Fell
United States501 Posts
look at him and tell me he's not scum | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
On March 22 2013 05:31 Wade Fell wrote: I might be scum but if I am scum I am bussing VE who is also scum look at him and tell me he's not scum WADE FELL CLAIMS SCUM LMFAO WHAT IS THIS SHIT?! | ||
Wade Fell
United States501 Posts
| ||
Wade Fell
United States501 Posts
On March 22 2013 05:33 VisceraEyes wrote: WADE FELL CLAIMS SCUM LMFAO WHAT IS THIS SHIT?! nice misrepresentation. I'm saying my arguments stand on their merits, you are scum WHETHER OR NOT I am scum so we lynch you | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
Wade Fell
United States501 Posts
WHERE IS IT? You said he was irrefutably scum. THEN YOU'RE LIKE HEY WIGGS LETS BE BUDDIES | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
Wade Fell
United States501 Posts
On March 22 2013 05:38 VisceraEyes wrote: I saw a good case in the Wiggles case. I agreed with the Wiggles case. There's nothing more to say on the matter. IT doesn't matter if he's my top scumread because he posted a case I agreed with on someone else I was suspicious of - much in the way that you agreed with my suspicions on Ryu. But you know, failed to post said "super BH case filled with links and shit"? Remember that BH? You're using this as the crux of your argument against me and you did THE EXACT SAME THING ON N1. Yeah i didn't post a huge case because you SHAT ON ME by outing me in the thread and I specifically note that Ryu is not my top scumread at the end of the night. I still post cases, because I'm afraid hey maybe I'll die. But you haven't posted at ALL about wiggles. Do you think he is scum? Yes or no answer pls | ||
Wade Fell
United States501 Posts
On March 22 2013 05:40 VisceraEyes wrote: Which by the way Wade, how's that suspicion of Ryu coming? You keep grasping at things that might possibly make me scum, when you keep NOT providing any supporting reasoning for anyone else you're suspicious of. You're overly aggressive with both myself AND TestSubject AND Peashooter, when you provide virtually NO REASONING for being suspicious. I've provided tons of reasoning for all my reads, and I do NOT think TPS is scum any more and I have stated so clearly in the thread. Testsubject is literally trying to lurk his way to victory (which, btw, is WHAT HE DOES when he's not town) and you STILL have no clear explanation for what you were thinking during D2 | ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
Wade Fell
United States501 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
VisceraEyes
United States21170 Posts
| ||
Wade Fell
United States501 Posts
| ||
Wade Fell
United States501 Posts
| ||
cosmicomics
81 Posts
On March 21 2013 12:37 goodkarma wrote: There's like honestly no reason... What you just posted makes sense to me. The "not useful" meta argument I had doesn't seem to hold water, as I believe this is a solid case. While your day one was very scummy, as was some of your wishy-washy reads from today, I feel your case deserves consideration. Unfortunately, time is short. I'm going to change my vote while I look further into this.: ##Unvote ##Vote: Ace goodkarma acknowledges that Mr. Wiggles is very scummy, but "feels" like his case is still worth consideration. He then puts his vote on Ace while acknowledging the lack of time. Let me repeat that. He acknowledges that his super scummy read Mr. Wiggles made a case, that the case "feels" ok even though he didn't have time to read it, an proceeds to side with his super scum read Mr. Wiggles. He moves his vote before he looks further into this. And he doesn't look into it at all! This means that goodkarma, without properly reading his scum read Mr. Wiggles' case decided it was better to err on his side and vote Ace. Before reading. How does he respond to Ace's flip? On March 22 2013 02:02 goodkarma wrote: Would it be possible for us to, like maybe, consolidate on the top two candidates like ~halfway through the day cycle so that, like maybe, we can have a more decisive vote result that can actually be analyzed? It turned into a 3-way split result... Like how in the fuck did you expect things would end well? But goodkarma, you switched too... There were like 4+ people who couldn't be bothered to consolidate on the top two candidates of the day (VE/Mr. Wiggles), and I thought fuck it (I know, not great reasoning... feel free to hammer me but tbh exactly my thought process). What I saw in Mr. Wiggle's most recent case was what I perceived to be a blatant scumslip. We're talking about the legendary ace. Wanting to hunt who he thought to be 3P and not scum. It just didn't make sense from a town perspective, so even if he wasn't in the game that long I opted to lynch him. But if you want a TL;DR for what to take from the ace mislynch: We need to consolidate on two candidates, and anyone who can't be bothered to and/or brings up new candidates late in the cycle should be looked at with extra suspicion. Maybe some people here didn't know better before, but you do now. So no more excuses. He blames town for not voting in a way where he can analyze the vote results. Where does he get off doing this? Even when he talks about the Ace mislynch, notice where the blame lies. He blames Ace for not playing the way he should have. He doesn't admit any fault of his own, he doesn't give an explanation why did a hard hard 180 on someone he called super scummy, and he doesn't even bother trying to draw conclusions about Mr. Wiggles' alignment! He is overly concerned with how he himself is perceived rather than showing any indication of trying to figure out the game. He blames everyone else but makes sure to explain why he deserves none of the blame. He lectures town on how they should behave rather than providing any meaningful contribution / insights, even into the person who swayed him to lynch Ace. Who flipped town. goodkarma is scum | ||
| ||