| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 13 2013 03:26 marvellosity wrote: no, I don't have an explanation for it, except that the above is proof that it is amusing | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36161 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22417 Posts
Just saying, see you tomorrow :p | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On March 13 2013 03:15 austinmcc wrote: Was away for a moment, noticed slOosh talk. I checked Personality 1 because I thought there'd been a role that had to tunnel someone and only post on them. Didn't find it, but maybe skipped over. Is there anyone known for just fighting with MZ every game they're in? I agree with slOosh being a futureproblem, but his activity being ONLY to tunnel made me think that perhaps it's a personality limitation, despite most personalities in this game not coming with the same extreme limitations that they came with in 1. Couldn't find a particular role, but if there's a player known for fighting with MZ, or a player known just for tunneling, it's a possible explanation (that doesn't say anything about his alignment  )there was a role in pers one who only shouted scum at those who accused him perhaps sloosh is confused herein and thinks MZ at him bit his thumb. On March 13 2013 00:45 marvellosity wrote: did anyone have any thoughts about this? his lamp is dimming like a skull he is grinning we all have these troubles I hate to burst his bubble but this game we won't be winning little Imp was a macho he has fallen in stock though he did not vote GreY slit his throat Imp's IC status is no mo' I have two hours to spare So to scum say I: beware I'll be in the thread Viv, Cora, Fool need be dead perhaps I shall clear a pair | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
that super's so bad he says my posts are unreadable but I am unbeatable all of my rhyming is rad I say to the ones shoveling shit my contributions the best, you tits I wonder if scum are attacking role players so they don't have to fight logic-sayers well, go on, think on it. | ||
|
Vivax
22417 Posts
On March 12 2013 11:26 marvellosity wrote: Anyway, I am compelled to do this during the day. I was gonna make it super-awesome but I cba. I'm blates a cop and I want to investigate Foolish and Ver n stuff. There we go. Move along, nothing to see here. On March 12 2013 11:44 marvellosity wrote: Apparently I have to say that I'm a parity cop with the aforementioned targets. Sadly this leaves me no wiggle room and is REALLY FUCKING DULL. YES I AM TALKING TO YOU. Marv can you expand on this stuff to cast away some doubts I have before fucking off. Are you a parity cop that has to announce itself and you checked Ver and Foolish or what? I don't understand what's going on here. | ||
|
prplhz
Denmark8045 Posts
| ||
|
Corazon
United States3230 Posts
Anyone trying to make it look like I'm contradicting myself from duel mafia when it comes to meta reads should also know that I followed Acro's meta read on Hapa in Duel Mafia. Also you should also realize that Yamato's meta is not my whole case. If you're saying this you really have not read my filter at all. Lastly, Yamato are you going to make better defenses then "I'm town so your argument is stupid"? | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
Ver should be considered town Imo. Whatever that's worth. | ||
|
Vivax
22417 Posts
| ||
yamato77
11589 Posts
| ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18464 Posts
On March 13 2013 03:20 marvellosity wrote: Does anyone else find it weird he talks about himself in 3rd person here? I know people do so occasionally but I've never seen slOosh do it I don't think. Do you think it was ghost written in the scum QT? Other than that I don't see why writing about yourself in the 3rd party is indicative of alignment at all. He could be roleplaying someone who writes about himself in the 3rd person? Ace does it a lot (but sloosh looks nothing like Ace in anything else). | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On March 13 2013 04:12 Vivax wrote: Look at what marv said, he seems to have been forced by the hosts to say that he's a parity cop and not just a cop so apparently he initially lied about his role O_o it pains me to see you like this I still may be the only one who thinks you no bish and yet you say things to bad I must call you a cad you are smart enough to know what this is You are the only smurf hunter better than me You can people's true identities so look at ole marv what a swatch he does carve wearing that claiming face of VE's | ||
|
Vivax
22417 Posts
On March 13 2013 04:13 yamato77 wrote: No one who is thinking thinks I'm mafia any more. I'm done doing things for the sake if defending myself. From here on out my focus is getting the scum lynched. Meanwhile not mentioning a single scum he wants lynched. | ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 13 2013 04:11 VisceraEyes wrote: I agree with this conclusion, but came at it from another angle. I know gaming "balance" isn't the best, but Foolishness as scum makes Ver as town more likely imo.I think Ver is lying about not reading his role. That is an active decision to play against your win con, and Ver doesn't strike me as that sort of player from my limited experience with him. He also doesn't strike me as the type of scum player who would draw attention to himself by lying in such a manner. Conversely, Ver strikes me as EXACTLY the kind of town player who would lie about reading his Role PM. Ver should be considered town Imo. Whatever that's worth. BC just got mentioned again as well, and I don't like how most of what he did D1 was just comment on Foolishness/Ver/slOosh being absent, then see himself out. His filter is larger than I remembered, but says as much or less than I remember. I'll follow up more on this later, but Foolishness as scum + BC looking scummy have me townie on Ver for the time being. 1-2 mafia in that group 2-3 mafia in the people that have been around longer than me but aren't super-vets (AND HALF OF WHOM ARE NEAR INVISIBLE THIS GAME) 0-2 mafia in newer folks | ||
|
Promethelax
Canada7089 Posts
On March 13 2013 02:58 yamato77 wrote: Let's lynch Vivax tomorrow because all he's doing is spamming the goddamn thread while town figures out the game. Also, everyone ignore him. On March 13 2013 03:09 yamato77 wrote: Scum Foolish/Vivax team getting lazy resorting to their same old tricks. On March 13 2013 00:42 yamato77 wrote: I want to argue with you on Cora a moment because I disagree with how you characterize the early parts of his post. His early posting is roleplaying, and it feels stiff to me. There is something markedly different about his attack on me this game and his attack on me night zero of Duel that makes me uneasy. I suggest you read the early part of his filter this game and that game and come away with a better understanding of him. Also, it makes the fact that he is unwilling to go away from me even more concerning. In duel, he was much more active with other reads while maintaining his read on me than he is here. I have him leaning scum in my books, because of this meta distinction. here are three targets painted bright red so tell me does Yam not want Viv/Fool/Cor dead? You are attacking a strawman you can do better, you can! for now you need to be shot in the head | ||
|
Vivax
22417 Posts
justice is approaching marv beware And you Promethelax Your trusted circle sucks Join me in my pressure and we'll find the red treasure | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18464 Posts
On March 13 2013 02:51 marvellosity wrote: I'm pretty wary of this argument. Just because it makes no sense, it doesn't mean that it's in fact not the case ;p there's enough other reasons to make a read of the situation one way or another without worrying whether a role makes sense for a particular alignment. Fine. I see no reason why scum would use an anonymous dayvig shot to take out Kurumi, when they could use it on any one of the high profile targets. I definitely see no reason why scum would CLAIM their anonymous dayvig shot after using it, especially if the only way it gets outed is if it is first confirmed to hit a townie. Even if you think the "balance" reason is not valid, the way it was used is completely stupid for scum. Scum doesn't shoot scumspect townies who are martyring themselves and shitting up the thread. They definitely don't announce that they are doing that: they know that player is a townie. | ||
|
Acrofales
Spain18464 Posts
| ||
|
austinmcc
United States6737 Posts
On March 13 2013 04:20 Acrofales wrote: Unless you've seen yamato's PM, you don't know if it's anonymous. Fine. I see no reason why scum would use an anonymous dayvig shot to take out Kurumi, when they could use it on any one of the high profile targets. I definitely see no reason why scum would CLAIM their anonymous dayvig shot after using it, especially if the only way it gets outed is if it is first confirmed to hit a townie. Even if you think the "balance" reason is not valid, the way it was used is completely stupid for scum. Scum doesn't shoot scumspect townies who are martyring themselves and shitting up the thread. They definitely don't announce that they are doing that: they know that player is a townie. There was no ##Shoot: Kurumi, but the "pro GF snipe" was a pretty clear reference to MZ's shot. It wasn't like we were confused as to who had shot once it happened. | ||
| ||
|
|
OSC
WardiTV Weekly
PiGosaur Cup
Kung Fu Cup
The PondCast
Online Event
Korean StarCraft League
Afreeca Starleague
Rush vs Soulkey
CranKy Ducklings
BSL Open Qualifier
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
