And it can't have been you, or was it?
Personality Mafia 2 - Page 17
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Vivax
21767 Posts
And it can't have been you, or was it? | ||
Vivax
21767 Posts
On March 15 2013 10:28 prplhz wrote: because then sloosh would be scum too or plexa wouldn't know about the nukes before dawn. You were sure he had to submit his action before dawn though. It would mean: You and SlOosh are scum yes. If plexa wouldn't know about nukes before dawn (which is a fair assumption) then why do you argue that he had to know it before for his role to be used? | ||
Vivax
21767 Posts
Corazon won't flip red stop this bs and lynch prplhz. | ||
Vivax
21767 Posts
On March 15 2013 10:43 supersoft wrote: You scumslipped so badly with that post, you even sold foolish with that post. and because you know foolishness role. please.... could be, doesn't really matter. Crossfire could very well be just a victim of the two of them. Same applys for vivax. I actually think if Sloosh is scum, crossfire should be town. Well he seems sure that Foolish role works like Foolish says but so do I cause I think the dude's town. | ||
Vivax
21767 Posts
On March 15 2013 11:02 DarthPunk wrote: Yeah I actually have to agree with VIVAX on it being doubtful that corazon would try and kill himself as scum day 2. Not only is that against every instinct you have as scum. which is generally SURVIVE! SURVIVE! But I am sure his scummer friends would have something to say about him being suicidal. The timing to say this is pretty scummy given you've almost not been pushing anything this day. The timing to say this is scummy if Cora flips town, that is. | ||
Vivax
21767 Posts
Just like yamato replacing marv in Normal Mini | ||
Vivax
21767 Posts
| ||
Vivax
21767 Posts
(Funny enough the first two guys I wanted to lynch were scum)/Swag | ||
Vivax
21767 Posts
I have been pretty much fooled by Cora at the point where I said "1.His latest posts look townie as fuck" and didn't really consider him cause I was dead set on marv being scum. However a little pride I can preserve in this since the first impression was actually right ![]() He kinda looks to me like noob scum, says things that look acceptable without showing real interest behind what he's saying. He doesn't pursue his own case while saying S & B's is very good but doesn't push for an Oats lynch either. Foolish? Wrong on Cora, so I guess he scum and yamato town? I would like to know why marv let go of prplhz after he said that stuff about Plexa though, he seemed interested into that but was satisfied with the answer: "I read it somewhere" | ||
Vivax
21767 Posts
| ||
Vivax
21767 Posts
| ||
Vivax
21767 Posts
Thanks! Anyway, risk cause he has never been brought up by Cora and has been soft-defended by Foolish, also doesn't (try to) contribute much. Foolish cause he was wrong with his reads and that seems to be a scumtell. SlOosh - well, he's guilty of what I am when it comes to reads, but I actually believed what I say as shown by my stubbornness. Also cause I think he's likely scum with prplhz for his slip. I just don't understand why he claimed the nukes were faked from a mafia perspective. Could have kept the origin secret. Meh. But he is associated with prplhz's slip. Prplhz cause of the slip and cause that should do. Also never brought up by Cora as possible scum or anything along that. | ||
Vivax
21767 Posts
On March 15 2013 13:07 Mocsta wrote: I am also going to guess that the magic marker invention lets the creator (sl0osh) draw up anything he wants and give them to ppl i doubt he can draw "real" things, cos they would be OP ===== & dont forget about Vivax and the magic mushroom This is all WIFOM, but consdiering Kurumi was scared of chagning alignment; I wonder if the magic mushroom forces him to change alignment? Anything you can shed a light on with this Vivax? Magic mushrooms was a jokey way to claim I got a nuke (and not let people know I had a dayshot immediately. Didn't know I wasn't the only one getting it) Nuke explosion=Mushroom and a magic marker had been invented. Anyway I doubt we have a vigi based on what we saw last night so yeah, see you next cycle. | ||
Vivax
21767 Posts
| ||
Vivax
21767 Posts
My whole personality as town is basically anti-sheep except for rare occasions (I like the prospect of being right when everyone else was wrong lol) So I think you mentioning me not getting influenced by supersoft isn't a good reason to claim I'm scum. As for my reads, I am too afraid as scum to end up on the wrong wagon/side usually. They were wrong mostly cause I started from the scum yamato town Foolish premise (I still can't believe yamato could be town tbh) and then made connections from that point on. However don't let me stop you rallying people for my lynch. | ||
Vivax
21767 Posts
When Chezinu shot Milkman I basically went sheep mode with town cause I knew BH had gotten back some sort of check. | ||
Vivax
21767 Posts
| ||
Vivax
21767 Posts
... ... ... Problem? Is now every guy scum who agrees with someone on some points but doesn't follow him in his reads? | ||
Vivax
21767 Posts
I also don't try consciously to change my meta every game (although many aspects change apparently cause people keep saying they never know if I'm scum or town), so far I never had a lurky town meta, but I had a lurky scum meta, that's a consequence of motivation to play the game. | ||
Vivax
21767 Posts
On March 15 2013 22:44 marvellosity wrote: Nope, that's not what I said. What I said was a complete refusal to engage at all. I don't mind you disagreeing with his reads. I don't mind you being wrong, Vivax. I expect you to be eternally wrong. What I do mind is you not trying, even one little bit, to understand where supersoft was coming from. Still doesn't make me scum. Every other post not spent figuring out where supersoft came from was a post trying to figure out things on my own. This is an awful reason to argue I'm scum. In fact it still doesn't make me trust you. I fried Corazon early over a mistake, which I wouldn't do as scum, before yamato wreaked havoc over the thread (I still think he should be lynched), how about looking for falsification and not confirmation? | ||
| ||