EPTThis Town Ain't Big Enough Mafia - Page 3
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
| ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
On February 28 2013 00:59 Acrofales wrote: He has stated, in no uncertain terms, that he KNOWS it was horribly anti-town. Why would a townie EVER say that? I can't find that statement anywhere... I found a statement where he suggests people will give him a hard time post-game. | ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
On February 28 2013 01:07 Alderan wrote: I will vote for whoever my vote would kill. On the one hand if we kill Adam we set a precedent that early out of line duels make you appear more scummy and thus people won't want to do them. But then on the other hand Adam's reads have been better than Keirathi's imo. Again, number one goal is that they both don't die. If your priority is to make sure someone dies and there's not a double-lynch, then you MUST switch your vote (especially considering that the evidence you listed in this quote does more to suggest an Adam town than it does a Keirathi town). Kill Keirathi. Your vote remaining on Adam does less to kill Adam than moving it onto Keirathi does to kill Keirathi. | ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
| ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
On February 28 2013 01:19 Acrofales wrote: Which means he knows he did something wrong, doesn't it? Now what did he do wrong? Well, that's in the post he quotes (quoted by me, and I quoted it from CT): This means he knows it was wrong. AKA anti-town. And yet, he is unrepentant and warns that he will do it again. That quote doesn't actually fully apply to this game. He didn't lynch Keirathi; he put Keirathi UP for lynch. Keirathi still has plenty of time to defend himself. A far scummier response would have been just what I posted. A townie who realizes he may have made a bad decision, thanks to everyone yelling at him that he made a bad decision, would read your quote and be like "Yeah, that looks kind of bad. Crap." | ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
Double-lynching when one of the people dueled the other of his own volition is idiotic in this game. Anyone who is either not voting or is voting specifically for a double-lynch need to realize that they are relying completely on mafia being utterly retarded and not playing to their win condition in any way. | ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
| ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
| ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
| ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
Do you know what's even more idiotic? Complaining about how awful Adam's early duel was, how much info/work it lost for town, etc., and then declaring a policy duel against anybody who asks you for your reads. That makes you just as anti-town as Adam if you were to fulfill that -- that would be two days in a row that town is robbed of deciding, together, who needs to be up for lynch. You think town can survive that? That's a HORRIBLE policy, and it's honestly just as bad as your horrible double-lynch. | ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
Instead we have an incredibly easy double-lynch about to occur that mafia must be super happy about, because they're not helping us to consolidate on anyone specific at all. That suggests that a double-lynch could EASILY be a double mislynch, exactly what scum want. | ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
On February 28 2013 01:51 Acrofales wrote: His playstyle makes no sense as either alignment. People don't play with labels on their heads reading "SCUM" or "TOWN," and they do not always play optimally or ideally, especially in weird formats like this one. I don't think you can declare someone 3P just because they don't play exactly according to your definition of what an ideal town or scum would do. | ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
On February 28 2013 01:55 Acrofales wrote: I had said about 5 times that I thought Adam was 3P, yet you didn't read it. Are you sure you're town? I didn't seriously think that you were willing to lynch based on that possibility. And if I don't seem super town to you, perhaps I'm a 4P... | ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
Thrawn, you've called Keirathi scummy, Adam scummy, and suddenly you agree with this 3P theory that you haven't commented at all on previously, just conveniently in time to prevent a Keirathi single lynch and in time to clinch a double-lynch. This looks really bad for you, and I cannot see the town motivation for double lynching on a day when town didn't even get to pick who went up for lynch and there is virtually no possibility that they are both scum. | ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
On February 28 2013 02:02 thrawn2112 wrote: if we kill adam too, nobody will dare to shoot early from now on Policy is a horrible reason to potentially mislynch twice on Day 1 | ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
On February 28 2013 02:02 thrawn2112 wrote: his desire to duel seems to have some sort of win-con type motivation. Sorry to clutter the thread, but I keep finding things like this. EVERY action from ANY player has some sort of win-con type motivation -- everyone is trying to win. | ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
| ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
On February 28 2013 02:14 iamperfection wrote: Kier is like confirmed scum he doesn't care about town. Anyone fearing a double town lynch is simply wrong If you are so sure about Kier then vote for him. Doing anything else is a lack of conviction | ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
On February 28 2013 03:04 thrawn2112 wrote: i wanna know what keir and adam think about a double lynch I'm sure they'll be all for it. -_- | ||
|
zarepath
United States1626 Posts
| ||
| ||
