|
11589 Posts
On January 24 2013 04:50 Vivax wrote: Why did you take all this time just to dodge my questions and call me an idiot though?
You could post counter-examples. I really just don't give a shit about your opinion.
You're not going to get me lynched anyway so what's the point?
|
11589 Posts
What do you think you're accomplishing right now, Vivax?
Are you going to get me lynched? No.
Are you trying to associate me with FT? That's fine, I don't care, he's town, I'm town, and we're fucking happy about it.
Are you trying to associate me with Gonzaw like you did with Toad? Really productive there.
|
11589 Posts
On January 24 2013 05:04 Vivax wrote: Why are you saying that FT is town but gonzaw isn't Because I haven't had the time to filter Gonzaw yet.
Seriously, just leave this alone. If by some fucking miracle you are town you need to realize you're pursuing an unproductive line of thought in believing that Ft/Toad/Yamato/Gonzaw is the four-man scum team you're looking for.
Right now I'm far more inclined to think you're just mafia shitting up the thread and causing confusion. I would kill you except for FT's read on you.
|
11589 Posts
On January 20 2013 19:39 Oatsmaster wrote: Ok, so my plan for voting for the mayor is to vote for a mayor, 1) I think that is town 2) I think that is able to smack down(figure out) the scum. So basically, standerd stuff.
So far, Gonzaw has a lot of activity but ima wait and see if its town motivated or scum motivated. I dont like Vivax entrance and subsequent disappearance but I mean its a null tell. He has got to know he would be called out like that.
Axle, Please try to make your posts coherent to the people here, if we dont understand you, you will get ignored/lynched/vigged/unlikely nk
This post of Oats, along with other things like his willingness to give out reads, his overall activity level, and his fairly unnecessary (if mafia) case on Gonzaw, makes me believe that he is town.
The fact that he's continued to pursue his read on Gonzaw today is quite telling to me. When he posted the case at night, I believed he would have done so with the idea that it was cheap town cred to do something like this at night when there was no lynch on the line. However, today I see that he's fairly invested in the idea that Gonzaw is mafia, something that I feel a lot of people are at the moment.
Basically, if you think Gonzaw is mafia, Oats is far likelier to be town.
Plus, I agree with WBG's logic regarding the BGs, and not lynching them at the moment. Unless you are absolutely certain Oats is mafia, I do not feel like it is worth it to lynch him today. That's my thought on that situation. I think he might be town, and I'm not sold on lynching him yet even if others believe otherwise because he, if town, is valuable protection for our elected roles.
On to my updated mafia reads:
If I take seriously the idea that Oats is town, I have to consider the possibility that Debears is not. Debears' only contribution is a case on Oats, which is quite weak. Mafia debears would want Oats lynched, because that would mean that mafia gets to shoot into both Toad and FT tonight, or at any point in the future. While this would instantly out his as confirmed mafia, I'm not sure how confident I am with the idea that mafia wouldn't trade one of their own for our two elected roles, especially the mayor. Plus, people would be content to sit on the idea of town debears until the mayor/sheriff gets shot, which is quite useful. It's basically lynch immunity.
On January 22 2013 02:58 debears wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 02:54 JieXian wrote:On January 22 2013 02:47 debears wrote:+ Show Spoiler +On January 22 2013 02:37 JieXian wrote:Show nested quote +On January 22 2013 02:05 austinmcc wrote: Okay, I'm done with this nonsense. The #1 trend I see in Stutters town play is that he won't vote and he'll get modkilled. He's an inactive player and yet you want to lynch him for inactivity? What? Show nested quote +On January 21 2013 15:35 debears wrote:On January 21 2013 15:32 mkfuba07 wrote:On January 21 2013 15:26 debears wrote:On January 21 2013 13:38 Toadesstern wrote:On January 21 2013 13:21 yamato77 wrote:On January 21 2013 09:14 yamato77 wrote:On January 21 2013 09:03 Vivax wrote: ## Vote Sandroba
If he's town, he won't be killed and be of great use.
If he's scum, he won't be able to hide it for long in that position.
Don't choose based on some mood. Even if sandro doesn't want it, a good town should want him in that position.
I don't like austin, I don't like gonzaw. Clarity didn't post his reads and he's usually not the guy who wants to take the lead. Voting Chezinu, are you fucking kidding me?Oatsmaster? Nah. Vivax wtf kind of post is this? Vote for a guy who doesn't want to be mayor, with really shitty "if he's scum" logic. There's never a good reason to give a free lynch to a player you don't have a really good town read on. You're proposing to trade the office of mayor, with the protection and the powerful synergy with mason roles, for a read on a single player that can easily be ascertained otherwise. Why do you seem to care so little for who becomes mayor if it isn't you? You "don't like" Austin or gonzaw, but you don't say why. You seem ready to discredit Chezinu on a moment's notice, when I see him as a valid candidate. This is not constructive town posting, Vivax. You've done very little but worry about your own image so far this game and it's worrisome to me that you're reacting so negatively to people not wanting to elect you. Yes, Toad, this is totally me just saying Vivax doesn't think like me and is there for scum, you got me. I think I did a pretty good job equating what he's doing with this post to scum motives in posts in my filter, and you brushing it off as him not agreeing with me is retarded and a malicious misrepresentation. You're just trying to make me look bad and get me angry at the same time. Do you honestly think Vivax would be send out by his (supposedly) mafia team for a candacy as mayor? Do you honestly think Vivax would be so carefree as mafia to candidate for mayor and not post for the next *idk* bunch of hours? Don't you think Vivax would have been way to scared to candidate for mayor as mafia? Especially given his recent game as mafia that he, against all odds still won due to massive town modkills. Do you honestly think Vivax would be dropping a vote like that if he has multiple people in irc / QT / whatever to ask on who to vote? With that "reasoning" he provided? Sure it's bullshit, it's one of the most retarded posts I've seen in this game so far but do you really think he'd do that as mafia? Mafias think about what they're posting and while it might happen that they slip it is an incredibly far fetched assumption to believe team mafia would send out someone like vivax, who is a very new player, who isn't particularry known for being good as mafia + Show Spoiler [anecdote] +remember YANMN? He was busted on d2 or something like that and got 2 more spare days because we had debears claiming SK in the thread and modkills that made people think it's better to no-lynch once to get one more cycle in case Vivax SOMEHOW ended up flipping town to stay in the open, getting heat from everyone and do all that on purpose? You've got to be kidding me if you think those are mafiatreats. This is wrong. So wrong. Vivax had an extensive mayoral post written up before the game, as shown by how quickly he posted it after daypost. His mayoral election run is a null tell But the fact that he posted it so quickly after the game started is, to some people, indicative of his towniness. I agree with them. A scum player would likely wait to post, until after he's discussed it in the QT. I don't think it's 100%, but it has me leaning town for him, and nothing has particularly tipped him back to scum yet. Scum has nothing to risk from him running and everything to gain. He looks like he cares about town with it. Everyone will disregard him because he doesn't have good reads as town. As town, he cares about town. He wants to become mayor despite his reads Show nested quote +On January 21 2013 15:43 debears wrote: Gonzaw
Do you honestly believe a town vivax would see himself good enough to be a good mayor?
Hell I purposely didn't post a mayoral election because I decided it wouldn't be beneficial for town when there are vets who are much better than me So is running for mayor as a townie who knows he's bad actually a townie sign or not? You can't seem to make up your mind >_> I can't decide between gonzaw and Fivetouch as mayor for now. It's a null sign normally. But the fact that Vivax keeps pushing his candidacy is troubling to me right now, especially when he's pushing himself over Gonzaw AND Austin. I would doubt both Gonzaw and Austin are scum I don't get this. Why? ___ I like the case on pprlprlprlz and I'm voting 5touch because of that. Unless the mafia sub in for both bodyguards, the sheriff and mayor cannot be nked until the bodyguards are taken down. That means that we should place good town players who are likely to get nked in the mayor and sheriff spots. Vivax is not by any means a player at threat of being nked as town. He doesn't have good reads. Austin and Gonzaw are two players that are nk targets as town and have good reads from what I have heard. I'd say either of them is a good choice for sheriff, with Gonzaw preferred
This post, and many like it, show that debears is fairly preoccupied with the idea of Bodyguards and their potential protection powers. When I was mafia, and I was attempting to bluesnipe, one of the quickest tells you can pick up on is who seems preoccupied with blues in general, or a specific role such as doctor. Debears may have already has the idea in his head on Day 1 to make this sort of play as mafia, to sub himself in as a BG and use this "unlynchable" status to his advantage.
Aside from this, debears has been fairly inactive, and hasn't pursued his scum reads very strongly. He posted a case on Gonzaw (that had him as slight scum, rofl), and then backed off of it later. He has a "case" on Oats, but he earlier posted this:
On January 23 2013 10:42 debears wrote: Btw, I say we take the focus of oats and me for today. I'll get nked tomorrow. If Oats is town he will too.
##vote annul ##vote double lynch
So we know he doesn't want to lynch Oats. Who does he want to lynch? Annul. Why?
On January 23 2013 12:00 debears wrote: Annul, reads plz. If you aren't going to defend yourself, give reads and reasoning and help us obi-wan. That's plenty enough contribution
On January 24 2013 01:37 debears wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2013 01:32 austinmcc wrote:On January 24 2013 01:20 AxleGreaser wrote:On January 24 2013 01:04 austinmcc wrote:Disclaimer, this is cobbled together over like 2 hours, so it's a bit disjointed and may not read well. On January 23 2013 10:52 AxleGreaser wrote:
##vote: Double Lynch Which means for those that claim dont read the OP that we Lynch two tomorrow. D3 Why are you voting for a double lynch? IIRC correctly i was already voting for it so that I was not just piling on the annul so real fast wagon... A while later I said something specific about the annul wagon The double Lynch seemed self evident. I pointed out when it would happen which is the following day. I had considered at some stage if delaying it one day might better as the reads get better out there However consecutive double Lynches D3 andD4 looked fairly reasonable and it easier to slow down by going D3 D5, if you find you need the time than to speed up. It just looked right? You pointed out the speed of the annul wagon and that you were uncomfortable with it. But I couldn't find your actual thoughts on doubly lynching anywhere earlier on in your filter. You asked about it in relation to the mayor's votes, but I didn't see particularly thoughts on whether we should/shouldn't double lynch. I'm less concerned with when it would occur if we voted for it, which anyone can find, and more concerned with WHY people voted for it. Do you think a double lynch is ALWAYS good for town? Why so? If not, why is it good for THIS town in this situation? It's stuff like that. Austin, we have lurkers in clarity, BK, and fuba. We have a scummy annul. We have a scummy Gonzaw We had questionable nks. What reason isn't there for double lynch? 1) We have to find a way to rid of these damn lurkers 2) I am 95% sure 5touch is town. Toad is looking town to me at this point also (his alignment will be figured out anyways eventually). Use them while we got them. 3) I will very very likely die tonight. I want to help what little I can before then
On January 24 2013 15:31 debears wrote: I am not comfortable with lynching Gonzaw currently over annul and BKE
Upon closer inspection of his town games listed, and a couple of his scum games, I found that his posting style of convincing someone of their scumminess is a trait of his town games.
I only looked a little in the scum ones and I didn't see it
I didn't see anything in terms of him defending himself against a scumread's accusations in either
That would leave me wanting to lynch Gonzaw based on 1) His running for mayor (scum having to have someone run) 2) Him trying to convince 5touch to lynch oats over prplhz
I'm still waiting on an answer over whether the mayor/sheriff can be killed in the same night as a bodyguard.
If so, then I agree with not lynching Oats. If the mayor/sheriff can't be killed on the same night, we should take that into consideration of lynching oats
He gives zero reason. He just calls him "scummy". I don't like this sort of thing at all. The speed at which he voted for annul also to me indicates that this is a mafia vote, because he did it early in the day and with zero prior mention of annul. These four posts are the only ones he even mentions annul in at all, and they've all been in day 2. Very weird to me.
In that last post he also says he'd be willing to lynch BKE, but he's never mentioned him before either, and indeed doesn't even bother to provide a reason. So what about prphlz? He supported that lynch day 1, right?
On January 22 2013 00:22 debears wrote: 5touch I agree with a prplhz lynch.
He hasn't scumhunted. He has dedicated himself to defending himself with previous games and making no contributions to the town
That's his only mention about his own read on prplhz. All of this I believe is indicative of a blendy mafia mindset, something I find pervasive throughout his filter. Not many of his reads seem original to him at all. His low activity suggests not wanting to be in the spotlight. I don't believe he's actively playing the game in a way I think town debears would, because town debears is characteristically more convinced of his own reads, a la Hero Mini where he was hyper aggressive day 1 in pursuing his target.
Now, for the same reason WBG gave for not lynching Oats, I don't think we should lynch Debears either. But if I had to pick a mafia out of the two BG's, I would actually pick debears. Oats is greener to me.
So, who else do I think is mafia, and which of them do I want to lynch today?
Vivax could still be mafia. While a lot of the vets have previously had him as town, even they are less certain of this idea than they were before. However, if he is mafia I don't think he's going to get any better and we will have more information to lynch him with at a later date. Unless he continues to be completely anti-town for the rest of today, I don't think he's a particularly good lynch, and I don't think many other people do either.
Annul might be mafia, as he's played similar to Vivax today, but I actually feel less confident about lynching him because of how easy it is for everyone to call him town. There's literally been zero resistance to lynching him today aside from other people giving out their own mafia reads and trying to get them lynched. I don't think a single person has called him even somewhat town, though I may be wrong because I've only skimmed the last ten pages. I don't like lynching him today.
Gonzaw is an interesting idea.
On January 21 2013 13:51 gonzaw wrote: Yamato, the chances of Vivax being scum are kind of low I think. He's had a LOT of posts, even more than when he was town in games like Can't Believe and the like. Also seems too confident to be scum. At worst let him be for a few days, if he's scum he'll surely "break" and go lurking or something.
Don't really know what to think of debears/grush; they are not making much sense and are kind of "trolling" with their votes and some of their reads, but that's too null to blindly lynch on D1.
He has a few of these types of posts in his filter, where he softdefends a player (often Vivax actually) and generally gives weak reads. I don't feel like he's taken many strong stances with his reads this game. Even his opposition of the prplhz lynch was fairly weak.
On January 21 2013 05:53 gonzaw wrote: Well...it seems i have the habit of posting here when nobody else is around to respond back (or post about other things) so I like quadriple post lol
.....maybe I'm doing that intentionally as scum! :O :O >_>
Also, he has a few of these posts in his filter, where he seems particularly preoccupied with his own image, and how town perceives the things he's doing. As I just finished typing in my analysis of another mafia player in NMM XXXIII. preoccupation with town's perception is a mafia tell, as they are more likely to care about how they are perceived than town.
On January 21 2013 06:00 gonzaw wrote:It's hard to "consolidate posts". People make it seem like it's so easy. When I play the game I don't "think consolidately". I find a bunch of stuff and have a bunch of thoughts, which can't really be "consolidated" into a nice single perfect post. I'm going to my aunts house in like 1 hour anyway so I'll let you guys breathe for a moment 
He even goes so far as to defend his spammy nature, something that I, as town, feel completely unmotivated to justify. While this is indicative of how I feel on the matter, that I just post what I think at the time I think it, I do not feel the need to justify this mindset. However, Gonzaw obviously does, which again leads me to believe that he is concerned with his image. This idea is also reinforced with the concept that running for mayor and being active on D1 are two easy ways to get people to have cheap town reads on you.
While this is not a strong mafia tell, it is what I have managed to find in his filter after a short bit of diving. I am fairly confident in the possibility of him being mafia for these reasons, along with those that the rest of town has posted. I will resume my filter dive of him tomorrow, and either confirm my own bias or perhaps see something that might change my mind.
|
11589 Posts
EBWOP: Annul might be mafia... but I feel less confident about lynching him today because of how easy it is for everyone to call him mafia
not town, lol
|
11589 Posts
On January 24 2013 16:22 Toadesstern wrote: anyone doubting debears look at the timestamp of his vote on d1... I do not, at all, believe that a quick wagon on to an obviously strong town player excludes debears from the possible mafia candidates.
|
11589 Posts
Especially considering, yet again, that he shows zero reason for wanting FT to be mayor, and doesn't push for FT to be mayor at all aside from a single post in the thread.
Yeah, no. That's really weak. I'm not going to exclude debears just for potentially bussing his own teammate.
|
11589 Posts
On January 24 2013 16:28 Toadesstern wrote:Show nested quote +On January 24 2013 16:25 yamato77 wrote:On January 24 2013 16:22 Toadesstern wrote: anyone doubting debears look at the timestamp of his vote on d1... I do not, at all, believe that a quick wagon on to an obviously strong town player excludes debears from the possible mafia candidates. again, look at the timestamp. Debears was like the first guy to vote palmar. He was the third.
Dude, if that's your ONLY reason for thinking he's town it's fucking weak and you need to reassess.
|
11589 Posts
Look, with debears this game it's not WHAT he's doing, it's HOW he's doing it.
With zero justification, zero reasoning, and almost no real involvement.
|
11589 Posts
Well, anyway, those are my reads and you're free to disagree with them as you probably will.
I don't care. I have to get up in five hours and I have a 15 hour day to deal with. Bye.
|
11589 Posts
On January 24 2013 16:36 Toadesstern wrote: He's still one of the first voters you voted Palmar once he changed his lynch to Prplhz He's still a bodyguard while both Palmar and I are both still alive.
There's absolutely no reason to discuss debears right now. You're the one that defended him after I said in the post I didn't want to lynch him today.
Like I said, you're free to think what you will, but that's a weak reason to think someone is town.
|
11589 Posts
I may have been wrong about Oats. Looking at his play around Gonzaw, he's not very aggressive and he's defended himself a lot.
I need a look at his last town game. Be back later.
|
11589 Posts
Okay so I've compiled a list of posts from his town game that lead me to believe that he has incorporated parts of his town meta into this game, and one particular post that I feel would give me a strong tell that I find completely lacking.
On January 13 2013 09:05 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On January 13 2013 08:55 Mocsta wrote: All you have done is successfully derailed the thread convo, and made people uncomfortable to post. Others have agreed with me. I see no town motivation for your behaviour.
You have continued this behaviour, and when asked about it, you dodge the questions and instead ask irrelevant questions to the mods.
OOO I like this post. Explain how I have derailed thread convo. How have I dodged questions. Where are the irrelevent questions. TO EVERYONE: I see no town motivation for your behaviour.Notice how he doesnt say that my behaviour is scummy. Notice. Mocsta, do you want to lynch people for being bad or for being scum?
This post of his, and especially the part I bolded, is something he's done quite a lot this game, and it incorporates a couple of facets of his play that I find telling. First of all, he addresses his question, and indeed most of his posting in general, to the loudest/most influential thread presence, in this game that was Mocsta. In NMM, he spends a lot of time interacting with Micsta, just as he has done this game with Vivax early in the game, and FT in the latter half of D1. Perhaps this is just a general tendency of his play, but he has kept with the same sort of behavior there.
Secondly, the question itself is one he is oft to repeat. Oats has asked FT whether he believed Oats to be bad/scum on multiple occasions and in many different ways. Again, this is a small thing, but it is the little things that we lose when we play mafia versus when we play town, and Oats is consistent in this manner.
On January 13 2013 20:49 Oatsmaster wrote: Ok posters with little to no content laguerta Trotske Acid~ glurio
Posters that seem to be trolling the shit out of the thread Bringniga
##Vote: bringaniga Its less than 12 hours to lynch and I know that you are active. Please contribute in a manner that will help town
Either we lynch them, or lynch an active player. Also, in case you guys didnt read the OP or dont know, its plurality lynch so the person with the most votes at the end of the day will get lynched. THEREFORE there is no need to consolidate to lynch. HOWEVER town should consolidate in order to prevent scum from being able to affect the final vote with a last minute vote switch
If I'm not wrong, Oats has made a carbon copy of this post this game, calling out inactive players. It also reveals a mindset he has that is reinforced with this:
On January 13 2013 00:52 Oatsmaster wrote: Mocsta stop being useless and repeating what other people have already said.
He is preoccupied, as town, with the "pro-town" concept of how people are or aren't playing, and gives his opinion. He has many of these sorts of posts and comments in his filter this game, which again is a small tell, but certainly indicative of the fact that he's playing to some degree with the same mindset he would if he was town. Is he a good enough mafia player to fake this? I have no reason to believe so, but it is possible.
On January 13 2013 08:58 Oatsmaster wrote:Mocsta, you are looking awfully scummy. In fact, im gonna vote you. After I show how you are scum Show nested quote +On January 12 2013 16:38 Mocsta wrote:
BUT.. you are almost sounding "paranoid" - I know this, because after my last game, many assumed I was "paranoid".
What is wrong with sounding paranoid? Do you instantly believe what the other person says? This is scummy because Town wants paranoid players to find scum and scum want believing players to manipulate. Show nested quote +On January 12 2013 16:41 Mocsta wrote:zarepath, thanks for the well thought out response. I actually replied to Sn0_Man before reading this.. if i did read this first, I could have saved myself a post.  On January 12 2013 14:51 zarepath wrote: I think you're right, Sno_Man, that it can be instawin if mafia can control the town environment. But instead of auto-suspecting anyone who is proactive, perhaps a better tack is to make sure we have a town environment that mafia cannot control.
Scum also want to buddy the most active town player in the thread so that they wont get pushed by him. Mocsta, how does this post add to the 'conversation' you keep talking about? Show nested quote +On January 13 2013 07:14 Mocsta wrote: Wow. Thats it over the night shift.
Oats u sound like sno_man.
perhaps the aggresion u 2 have shown is why there is a lack of discussion.
I think u should read what i posted to him.
My questions are ice breakers and i have not a genuine comment from to stimulate town conversation. In fact. You are deterring conversation.
@oatsmaster Why should i NOT treat is the outcome of your agressive posts [stopping fluid and positive town conversation] as scummy motivations Come on, show how me and sno-man are not stimulating conversation? Not being all friendly and nice isnt a scumtell you know. Like what is a genuine comment? Sounds like fluff you are throwing out there because you cant respond to my post. Show nested quote +On January 13 2013 07:23 Mocsta wrote: Trotske,
I agree his posts are ermm.. "diffferent?".. however, there are still to my knowledge 3 participants who have not contributed at all.
Acid, Shz, Glurio
@Trotske Since you are here, I may as well try to generate some meaningful discussion.
(1) Do you think it was reasonable to mention to Sn0_Man and Oatsmaster that their over-agressive/paranoid type early-game playstyle might actually be preventing people from talking (including the 3 I listed above)?
(2) Do you think that behaviour is a normal town approach to the game? Ok mentioning the lurkers which everyone can see... Looks involved but has no point in stimulating conversation. The first question he asked Trotske is hilarious. 'Do you think that my posts on them were scummy?' That is not a townie mindset. At all. Because town is more concerned about finding scum, than caring how they look to the other players. 2. Again, what is the point in asking this question? It looks good at first glance but this can be adequately be answered in great detail by both scum and town so what he is trying to get out of it? He is trying to see if people agree with the oats/sno lynch. Mocsta, either shape up or die. ##Vote: Mocsta
This case on Mocsta is quite interesting to me. He makes the same sort of case against Gonzaw, and while that case did not come until N1, it shows the same sort of mindset and play that Oats shows when town. He is overly focused on one person, and is generally only critical or slightly aware of the thread around him.
One criticism of Oats this game is that he's "too aggressive", something that I find to be something that characterizes his town game.
On January 13 2013 01:05 Oatsmaster wrote: Hey Mocsta, what was the point of your opening questions? Do you think you achieved your goal?
This, and the post I quoted earlier of him criticizing Mocsta, are two of his first few posts in the game. He continues that type of aggressive language throughout. Him being aggressive is not indicative of him being mafia, it is of him being town.
On January 13 2013 18:51 Oatsmaster wrote:How the fuck am I intimidating town from contributing? Please actually quote, it irritates me when you say I am wrong about you and you leave it at that. Thanks for not telling me how to change. Show nested quote + On January 13 2013 07:18 Mocsta wrote: @oatsmaster Why should i NOT treat is the outcome of your agressive posts [stopping fluid and positive town conversation] as scummy motivations
How does aggressive posts stop fluid and positive town conversation? What is your idea of a good town conversation Mocsta? Show nested quote + Why are you so against town collaborating together to prepare for the scum hunt?
I started the scumhunting? How does town collaborate when no one knows who else is town? If people dont want to post, then that is their problem. I shouldnt have to force people to post right? Show nested quote +On January 13 2013 18:00 OmniEulogy wrote: Hmm... Mocsta could you link the game Oats was scum. I just looked through three of his old games and he was town in all. It did bring to my attention the massive change in his play style though. Although it doesn't incriminate him, it sure as hell doesn't help what I'm thinking about him.
I was scum in this game http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=385389Show nested quote + The hypocrisy in what you've accused Mocsta of and what you have done so far is amazing.
Explain please
Elements in this post show how he handles suspicion placed on him with town. He obviously doesn't understand it, and indeed finds himself to be pro-town, something I find consistent with his defenses this game. While he may not be as arrogant because there are players better than him playing, he is certainly making an effort to play, in certain ways, similar to his town game.
Again, I reach the conclusion that I think Oats is town, and for it, I find Gonzaw more likely to be mafia. Let's lynch him instead.
|
11589 Posts
Lol, Vivax, how am I "setting myself up to bus" someone I conclude to be mafia in my post? How am I "setting up" for anything when my vote has been on him since?
Who else am I going to lynch after I make a post like that, as mafia?
Stop being dumb. Gonzaw has been my focus, and it's silly of you to read everything I'm doing from the strict mindset that I am mafia.
|
11589 Posts
I want to see what Gonzaw says about this.
|
11589 Posts
Vivax if you're town you're a moron for what you're doing with this red check.
But, no matter your alignment, town's best play is to lynch Gonzaw here, so let's see some votes.
|
11589 Posts
On January 25 2013 01:39 Vivax wrote: Austin, you're derp, I already wrote gonzaw used his powers. He's the guy who used the extra shot N1 and today he's been masoning.
Don't believe FT is town just cause of the D1 lynch. People elected him to kill prplhz, so that's what he would do, along with getting massive cred. How did you get a check of his role today from a night 1 check?
Holy shit you're lying.
|
11589 Posts
On January 25 2013 01:44 Toadesstern wrote: so justs to get this straight, he claimed DT and claimed to get back his alignment + roles, correct?
That should be easy enough to confirm, give me a sec. The fact is, he got back a check from N1 about something he's saying Gonzaw is doing D2. How the fuck does that work?
I think they're both mafia.
|
11589 Posts
On January 25 2013 01:47 Vivax wrote: I don't know if gonzaw was mason today or yesterday night, that's what I ended up believing.
I asked the host about that and a few bunch other things but he's been ignoring all my questions this game.
Given how scum is riding on that point it was rather yesterday night I guess. The way mason works this game is that you choose a person to mason with for a whole cycle, not day or night, but both. If he shot someone last night as you claim, he would have shown up as mafia jack vig, not mason. The mason would have had to begin today, and you wouldn't get that check back.
|
11589 Posts
As town we're all suspicious of you and this claim because you gave a combination of roles that was impossible for you to know.
Sadly you could still be town because he could have been mason day 1, and you're just being an idiot and assuming he shot N1.
|
|
|
|