EPTHero Mini Mafia - Page 2
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
Tunkeg, tell us what's so scummy about the two players pls. Boson, can you give us another useful post?Just like that yo. | ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
Be nice and question him thoroughly, too, I'll go make a sammich. | ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
I've switched my vote to Tunkeg. Thanks to WBG for the meta analysis, the other reasons are pretty obvious. With this I'll have some time to think a little more about jay. What got me was his initial sheeping behavior regarding 1. thrawn and 2. me (after VE wrote the case). That combined with his very defensive activity as opposed to the scumhunting one. Anyway, I might post something more detailed later. I'd also like to lynch grush early, possibly not today. I can't stand having him in lategame. While this might look like a policy, I lost the previous game by lynching another guy instead of him, simply cause the other guy was more readable. You'll always find a little suspicious something in readable players, and grush isn't readable. | ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
So basically, the case on him seems to be built on "the change of tone in his post". That post with changed tone dabears mentioned was written one day after the last ones, so it's likely that he's writing like that cause he's not heated up like the day before. That day, he finished into an OMGUS fight with dabears, where they basically both vote for each other cause they argue about having to vote for the people you lean scum on. And this is where the matter stinks. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewmessage.php?topic_id=384953¤tpage=9#171 This is dabeers post about Adam. OH SHIT HE'S SUSPICIOUS CAUSE HE'S NOT VOTING FOR THRAWN. Look at the post, look at the voting thread, look at the reactions. Adam voted before debears upon being accused by him of not voting thrawn, meanwhile, dabears accused Adam of something he himself did. Only clarity so far has expressed criticism of this case against Adam, now I will, too. 1.The case is shit 2.The case is shit 3.The case is shit Being this a shit case accepted by many people, I think there's scum trying to sheep in it. | ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
On December 10 2012 12:27 jaybrundage wrote: I swear to god if thrawn doesnt explain him self. Hes the most anti town player i have seen in a while. Frustrating really. I am only hesitant to vote him because i dont like early bandwagons in general. It hurts the conversation and shit to read if we all are voting the same person. Regardless of how unlogical his claims maybe (for town). Thrawn can you please drop your sharade and just attempt to explain your reasoning. Or as i said before your gonna get lynched It's also the post that gets jaybrundage so many votes. If you look at the timing of this post, jaybrundage tries hard to contribute here. But he doesn't want to vote cause he'd be looking like he's bandwagoning (THRAWN had 3 votes on him at the time of this post). He probably also saw that two people were arguing over not-happened votes during questionings, so he also tried hard to justify himself for not voting thrawn. This post in general looks so constructed that it hurts. Seriously, I'd even vote for jay before Tunkeg. What do you think? | ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
Adam got accused by dabears of not voting the guy he was questioning. Meanwhile, dabears didn't vote Adam while accusing him of this, thus making himself guilty of the same "mistake". Adam notices it, and 1. votes for him since it's what he wanted 2. Says it's suspicious that dabears himself didn't vote for Adam. | ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
On December 11 2012 22:06 Bluelightz wrote: Is voting necessary when one has suspicions on someone? No. It's up to them when they vote. By saying that you're actually defending Adam against dabears first accusations. Dunno if you even realize that. | ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
And I don't care if Adam is voting for me as long as I believe him to be town. What kind of bad question is that. Why are you thinking from a scum point of view? On December 11 2012 22:10 Bluelightz wrote: I'm defending dabears first accusation. On December 10 2012 11:43 debears wrote: @Djo The person that I don't like so far is adam. I would arguably say he has been just as, if not more, aggressive with you on thrawn. Yet, he hasn't voted him. He implied heavily that thrawn was scum, yet doesn't think he's scummy when asked directly. Furthermore, he keeps hard questioning thrawn on a response that thrawn basically said he wouldn't say (even though it seems to me that he was joking) even though he said he doesn't think thrawn is scum. His reaction is feeling very forced The first bolded part is what dabears himself does. The second is word twisting of Adam saying: "If I wanted to call you scummy I would have" into "I don't think he's scummy." And I don't see any scum motivation in hard questioning thrawn. He acted not according to his meta, and that's what made Adam so suspicious of him. How is that scummy??? Go read, Bluelightz mate. I hope you saw the part where Debears said Adam is suspicious for not voting now. | ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
| ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
Marv, why do you have a townread on jay? | ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
That's cause I didn't read the thread properly and thus made shit accusations. I thought you'd be a little more up to date. Or are you just publicly trying to find reasons to drop your vote from me? | ||
|
Vivax
22080 Posts
| ||
| ||
