• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 01:48
CEST 07:48
KST 14:48
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic3Code S RO8 Preview: Rogue, GuMiho, Solar, Maru3BGE Stara Zagora 2025: Info & Preview27Code S RO12 Preview: GuMiho, Bunny, SHIN, ByuN3The Memories We Share - Facing the Final(?) GSL47
Community News
BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack2Weekly Cups (June 2-8): herO doubles down1[BSL20] ProLeague: Bracket Stage & Dates9GSL Ro4 and Finals moved to Sunday June 15th13Weekly Cups (May 27-June 1): ByuN goes back-to-back0
StarCraft 2
General
Jim claims he and Firefly were involved in match-fixing Code S RO8 Preview: herO, Zoun, Bunny, Classic The SCII GOAT: A statistical Evaluation DreamHack Dallas 2025 - Official Replay Pack BGE Stara Zagora 2025 - Replay Pack
Tourneys
[GSL 2025] Code S:Season 2 - RO8 - Group A RSL: Revival, a new crowdfunded tournament series SOOPer7s Showmatches 2025 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament Sea Duckling Open (Global, Bronze-Diamond)
Strategy
[G] Darkgrid Layout Simple Questions Simple Answers [G] PvT Cheese: 13 Gate Proxy Robo
Custom Maps
[UMS] Zillion Zerglings
External Content
Mutation # 477 Slow and Steady Mutation # 476 Charnel House Mutation # 475 Hard Target Mutation # 474 Futile Resistance
Brood War
General
BW General Discussion BGH auto balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ FlaSh Witnesses SCV Pull Off the Impossible vs Shu StarCraft & BroodWar Campaign Speedrun Quest Will foreigners ever be able to challenge Koreans?
Tourneys
[ASL19] Grand Finals NA Team League 6/8/2025 [BSL20] GosuLeague RO16 - Tue & Wed 20:00+CET [Megathread] Daily Proleagues
Strategy
I am doing this better than progamers do. [G] How to get started on ladder as a new Z player
Other Games
General Games
Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread Beyond All Reason Path of Exile What do you want from future RTS games?
Dota 2
Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
Heroes of the Storm
Simple Questions, Simple Answers Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Heroes of StarCraft mini-set
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread Vanilla Mini Mafia
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine UK Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Vape Nation Thread
Fan Clubs
Maru Fan Club Serral Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Korean Music Discussion [Manga] One Piece
Sports
2024 - 2025 Football Thread Formula 1 Discussion NHL Playoffs 2024
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
The Automated Ban List
Blogs
A Better Routine For Progame…
TrAiDoS
StarCraft improvement
iopq
Heero Yuy & the Tax…
KrillinFromwales
I was completely wrong ab…
jameswatts
Need Your Help/Advice
Glider
Trip to the Zoo
micronesia
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 29280 users

Newbie Mini Mafia XXIX - Page 6

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 17 Next All
Djodref
Profile Joined September 2012
France3332 Posts
October 26 2012 07:37 GMT
#473
@Inig

Thanks for your post. I have to look more into it but I need to tell you that what I call town credit, you understand it as town status. So I was accusing you at wanting to gain town status.

WIFOM is a shorcut to say that you are speculating too much on what a mafia player would do or not. Mafia players love to produce fake arguments using WIFOM
Djodref
Profile Joined September 2012
France3332 Posts
October 26 2012 08:03 GMT
#476
@Ini

Could you tell me who you would like to lynch if you were unable to lynch any of the lurkers ?
Djodref
Profile Joined September 2012
France3332 Posts
October 26 2012 11:34 GMT
#485
On October 26 2012 19:36 Alsn wrote:
Just woke up and read through the thread.

First impressions are that Djodref seemed way more defensive than he needed to be towards my accusation. It was merely meant as a prod(which he probably realized) yet he felt the need to resort to insulting me as a way to discredit my points. If nothing else, it has sparked a ton of discussion, so I'm happy about that. To clarify, Djod does still feel slightly scummy to me, yet I'm still not convinced about him being town or scum as his actions can definitely be explained from both perspectives if one tries to. His main redeeming action to me is his willingness to stick to his guns and pressure Inig even though he was under pressure himself. I see that as a more townie move than a scum move, yet with all the other things brought up against him I don't feel that it's enough to clear his name.

That being said, my reads so far amount to mostly very slight reads in one way or the other. I think my strongest reads so far are Rad/debears who are looking both pretty towny, simply due to how willing they are to put themselves out there. If nothing else they have given us a lot of things to put into context once people start to flip, which is very good for town.

Right now I'd be in favour of lynching a lurker, simply due to the fact that I don't consider Djodref to be a strong enough of a read to me at this point. To sum up, I feel the benefits of getting rid of a non-contributor such as Roco currently outweighs the chance of Djodref flipping scum. Although Roco if you are still following the thread and haven't given up, posting your own feelings about the topics in the thread so far would go a long way towards eliminating suspicion against you.

I'll take a look at Inig's points regarding Dandel, but unless I missed something extremely incriminating when I read through it the first time I'd still be in favour of lynching a lurker.


@Alsn

As I've said, I was expecting better reasons from you to cast a FoS on someone, given your meta. Moreover, you kept saying things like "it could be scum, it could be town". Hence the half-assed comment.
I didn't realize that you were busy nowadays and I was very wary of your low post counts. Thus I've been provoking you on purpose to see what kind of reaction you would have. I can say that you kept your cool and I appreciate it.
I'm sorry if you felt insulted but I was attacking your "case", not your person.
Djodref
Profile Joined September 2012
France3332 Posts
October 26 2012 11:53 GMT
#486
On October 26 2012 14:34 Rad wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 26 2012 14:21 Djodref wrote:
@Rad

So your main concern about me was I said that I wouldn't change my mind ?
Do you have other concerns ?

Did you understand I was only speaking about a particular point (agreeing that a strict lurker policy should be part of our strategy) ?


My original concerns came from the "confidence" ordeal from before. As I found with debears, that can turn out to be a huge ordeal and I'll address it again if I feel the need to.

My concerns about your unwillingness to change your stance on something regardless of the arguments provided are still there. To me, as I've stated, this feels like a scummy perspective. I can't see a good reason for a townie to not be open to changing their opinions on something based on further arguments. "No no no not going to budge on this!" feels scummy. "Let me hear your points, ok, I disagree and here's why" feels townie.

It was the way you handled the questions. It doesn't matter that it was about just a particular point, or even if that point mattered in the end, but that you were so specific about never changing your opinion on it regardless of the arguments provided. It didn't feel like a townie move, so I can only suspect scum, but furthermore, you've dodged my questions until now. Why? If you can so simply answer them now, why didn't you do it before? You clearly saw them, acknowledged them, but didn't answer them. Instead, you said you were done with me.

Going to have to look over all this in more depth tomorrow as I'm getting tired and need to wind down.


@Rad

I gave more thoughts about your post and I've decided that I should try to address your concern in a better way than my last attempt. I understand that I need to answer the 2 following questions, please correct me if I am wrong
1)Why I was not open to change my stance ?
2)Why I was dodging this question at first ?

1) I wasn't open to change my stance because I think that enforcing a strict lurker policy is a bad strategy for town. I was quite stubborn on this point because I have seem some games where people forgot to scumhunt because they were relying on the policy too much. Except for this point, I believe that I can be quite open minded. I would go as far as to reconsider my position on the policy, given the incredible amount of lurkers that we have in this game.

2)I've been dodging your questions because I didn't understand the nature of your concern. I thought you were asking me about this particular point which I thought I had already addressed. That's why I gave you the same answer again and again. But I understand now that you were more concerned about my general state of mind which would lead me to not discuss anything. I wanted to end this discussion with dandel about the policy because it didn't really matter for me to agree with him or not. For me, disagreeing on policy is natural. What really counts is the general consistency of a player and whether or not he gives good reasons when he changes his mind. I felt like we were done talking about this with dandel and I wanted to close the subject while giving my final stance about it. After all, this is only policy discussion, which should be less relevant than scumhunting discussion.
Djodref
Profile Joined September 2012
France3332 Posts
October 26 2012 12:02 GMT
#490
[/joke post]
Kush <3

Policy lynch Kush, anyone ?

Alsn, are you in ?

[/joke post]
Djodref
Profile Joined September 2012
France3332 Posts
October 26 2012 12:09 GMT
#491
@Inig

I'm keeping my vote on you to keep the pressure on you. I'm glad that it led you to post more. I'm less inclined to lynch you right now but I need more time and more discussion with you to decide what I should do.
You really need to clarify your stance on Cheese, I have no idea where you stand right now.
Djodref
Profile Joined September 2012
France3332 Posts
October 26 2012 12:17 GMT
#493
@Inig

I'm also very curious of the reason why you chose imcasey over Oat/kush. Could you please us tell why ?
Djodref
Profile Joined September 2012
France3332 Posts
October 26 2012 13:23 GMT
#501
@sylver

Could you please explain your reasons for me to be your backup vote ?
Djodref
Profile Joined September 2012
France3332 Posts
October 26 2012 13:56 GMT
#510
On October 26 2012 22:47 Dandel Ion wrote:
Man, I did get a bit emotional, I admit, but I really do consider him scummy. Not just because he accused me specifically.

I can see, however, that Ingi lynch will probably not go through today, since nobody wants to support it.

I'm keeping my vote on him for now (because, conversely, I don't find the Djo suspicions to be too compelling) and I still have hope that maybe some people will look at it the same way.


@Dandel

We have plurality lynch system, so we don't need to consolidate, and I have no idea how many people are actually going to vote today...
Could you tell us more about why you want to lynch Ini ?
Djodref
Profile Joined September 2012
France3332 Posts
October 26 2012 14:11 GMT
#516
On October 26 2012 23:05 sylverfyre wrote:
Early on, Djo, I felt a contradiction from you based on a combination of you criticizing the lurker policy + calling out a lurker. More recently, you've switched gears a lot and been unsatisfied in defenses mounted against your case.

Finally just now claiming "not needing to consolidate" is fishy to me too. If we don't consolidate, we're going to have someone get lynched with like 3 votes, reducing scum's need to assist in the lynchwagon as well as improving scum ability to make sure one of their own cannot be lynched - so we're less likely to find scum today, but equally importantly, we would have less information later in the game (and could cause town to go rabid on itself) We want to consolidate.

I dunno if mods have more replacements lined up, I sure hope so. Having 3 playerdrops happen on day 1 is really depressing to me.


Please tell me the points you think I have been addressing in an unsatisfactory way. Same for you, Cheese, by the way.
If you are town, I recommend you to give better explanations than this for possibly voting me because it is going to backfire on you.
What do you mean exactly by "switching gears a lot" ?
Djodref
Profile Joined September 2012
France3332 Posts
October 26 2012 14:14 GMT
#517
On October 26 2012 23:05 sylverfyre wrote:
Early on, Djo, I felt a contradiction from you based on a combination of you criticizing the lurker policy + calling out a lurker. More recently, you've switched gears a lot and been unsatisfied in defenses mounted against your case.

Finally just now claiming "not needing to consolidate" is fishy to me too. If we don't consolidate, we're going to have someone get lynched with like 3 votes, reducing scum's need to assist in the lynchwagon as well as improving scum ability to make sure one of their own cannot be lynched - so we're less likely to find scum today, but equally importantly, we would have less information later in the game (and could cause town to go rabid on itself) We want to consolidate.

I dunno if mods have more replacements lined up, I sure hope so. Having 3 playerdrops happen on day 1 is really depressing to me.


Why should scum assist the "lynchwagon" (it is bandwagon by the way) ? If we are going to lynch a scum today, don't you think that they are going to try to go against the bandwagon ?


Djodref
Profile Joined September 2012
France3332 Posts
October 26 2012 14:22 GMT
#519
On October 26 2012 23:05 sylverfyre wrote:
Early on, Djo, I felt a contradiction from you based on a combination of you criticizing the lurker policy + calling out a lurker. More recently, you've switched gears a lot and been unsatisfied in defenses mounted against your case.

Finally just now claiming "not needing to consolidate" is fishy to me too. If we don't consolidate, we're going to have someone get lynched with like 3 votes, reducing scum's need to assist in the lynchwagon as well as improving scum ability to make sure one of their own cannot be lynched - so we're less likely to find scum today, but equally importantly, we would have less information later in the game (and could cause town to go rabid on itself) We want to consolidate.

I dunno if mods have more replacements lined up, I sure hope so. Having 3 playerdrops happen on day 1 is really depressing to me.


Who are the three players who are going to drop, according to you ?

Are you even reading this thread ?
Djodref
Profile Joined September 2012
France3332 Posts
October 26 2012 14:31 GMT
#522
@sylver

If you were reading the thread, you could see that I have finally addressed Alsn's points against me in this post.
On October 26 2012 14:02 Djodref wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 26 2012 02:40 Alsn wrote:
My reasons for thinking Djodref is slightly scummy so far is that he is asking a lot of questions. That in itself isn't particularly scummy(in fact, done right it's pro-town as it pressures people into sharing their opinions and such).

The problem I have with it so far is that you keep asking people to answer you, yet your own statements so far amount to picking on the people who are being lurky(Ini, Roco) while at the same time criticising Rad for supporting lurker policy lynch?! This makes no sense to me. This in combination with the slip leads me to believe that you are trying to make yourself look good by being active. I can definitely see the possibility of there being town motivations for your actions so far, but I'd just like to point out that I have my eye on you.

So, with that in mind, FoS Djodref.

I'll see if I can't take a look at some of the other things said so far before I go to bed but if not, I'll do it first thing tomorrow as I will have a lot more time then.


@Alsn

The slip I have made was because I was mentioning another game I have been playing with daoud where he was town. I understand it can be seen as a scumslip. It's a valid point but not a strong one in my opinion.

I have asked questions to many people, not only Inig and Roco. This is a misrepresentation of the reality. It's true that I'm focusing a lot on Inig but it's because I think he is scum. That's why I want people to give their thoughts about him.

Criticizing Rad for his support of lurker policy lynch doesn't mean I don't want to lynch a lurker. I don't want to protect the lurkers or anything like that. I just don't want us to use blindly the policy lynch or to rely on it too much. If a lurker is scummy enough (like Inig in my eyes), I would lynch him for being scummy, nor for the policy.

I think your FoS is forced by the way...


and I mention it again in this post

On October 26 2012 20:34 Djodref wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 26 2012 19:36 Alsn wrote:
Just woke up and read through the thread.

First impressions are that Djodref seemed way more defensive than he needed to be towards my accusation. It was merely meant as a prod(which he probably realized) yet he felt the need to resort to insulting me as a way to discredit my points. If nothing else, it has sparked a ton of discussion, so I'm happy about that. To clarify, Djod does still feel slightly scummy to me, yet I'm still not convinced about him being town or scum as his actions can definitely be explained from both perspectives if one tries to. His main redeeming action to me is his willingness to stick to his guns and pressure Inig even though he was under pressure himself. I see that as a more townie move than a scum move, yet with all the other things brought up against him I don't feel that it's enough to clear his name.

That being said, my reads so far amount to mostly very slight reads in one way or the other. I think my strongest reads so far are Rad/debears who are looking both pretty towny, simply due to how willing they are to put themselves out there. If nothing else they have given us a lot of things to put into context once people start to flip, which is very good for town.

Right now I'd be in favour of lynching a lurker, simply due to the fact that I don't consider Djodref to be a strong enough of a read to me at this point. To sum up, I feel the benefits of getting rid of a non-contributor such as Roco currently outweighs the chance of Djodref flipping scum. Although Roco if you are still following the thread and haven't given up, posting your own feelings about the topics in the thread so far would go a long way towards eliminating suspicion against you.

I'll take a look at Inig's points regarding Dandel, but unless I missed something extremely incriminating when I read through it the first time I'd still be in favour of lynching a lurker.


@Alsn

As I've said, I was expecting better reasons from you to cast a FoS on someone, given your meta. Moreover, you kept saying things like "it could be scum, it could be town". Hence the half-assed comment.
I didn't realize that you were busy nowadays and I was very wary of your low post counts. Thus I've been provoking you on purpose to see what kind of reaction you would have. I can say that you kept your cool and I appreciate it.
I'm sorry if you felt insulted but I was attacking your "case", not your person.


I'm more interested in your personal reasons for possibly voting for me.

But I'm even more interested right now to know who are the 3 guys who are going to drop, according to you
Djodref
Profile Joined September 2012
France3332 Posts
October 26 2012 14:35 GMT
#524
On October 26 2012 23:29 sylverfyre wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 26 2012 23:22 Djodref wrote:
On October 26 2012 23:05 sylverfyre wrote:
Early on, Djo, I felt a contradiction from you based on a combination of you criticizing the lurker policy + calling out a lurker. More recently, you've switched gears a lot and been unsatisfied in defenses mounted against your case.

Finally just now claiming "not needing to consolidate" is fishy to me too. If we don't consolidate, we're going to have someone get lynched with like 3 votes, reducing scum's need to assist in the lynchwagon as well as improving scum ability to make sure one of their own cannot be lynched - so we're less likely to find scum today, but equally importantly, we would have less information later in the game (and could cause town to go rabid on itself) We want to consolidate.

I dunno if mods have more replacements lined up, I sure hope so. Having 3 playerdrops happen on day 1 is really depressing to me.


Who are the three players who are going to drop, according to you ?

Are you even reading this thread ?

What kind of condescension is this?

1 - Clarity, who has already been modkilled
2 - Roco69, who has not posted since posting some pretty questionable stuff. He was immediately asked questions about it, and never responded.
3 - imcasey, who hasn't posted at all. (Likely player to get replaced, though.)


I'm sorry but I wouldn't call Clarity modkill a player drop. Clarity has made a mistake and has been punished for it. I thought you were referring to Oatsmaster instead of Clarity. I'm very curious how you could have missed that Clarity has been modkilled.
It has been very clear on the filters list for a long time.
Djodref
Profile Joined September 2012
France3332 Posts
October 26 2012 14:37 GMT
#525
On October 26 2012 23:33 sylverfyre wrote:
Day one but you want someone, who is ostensibly town, to have a better reason than "well his post seems kinda fishy" for an FOS?


I know how Alsn plays as town and I'm expecting more from him to cast a FoS on someone. According to him, his post on me was meant as a prode.
Djodref
Profile Joined September 2012
France3332 Posts
October 26 2012 14:42 GMT
#526
@sylver

So do you have even your own reasons for possibly voting me today ?
Or were you just sheeping like a boss ?

Djodref
Profile Joined September 2012
France3332 Posts
October 26 2012 14:48 GMT
#531
On October 26 2012 23:33 sylverfyre wrote:
Day one but you want someone, who is ostensibly town, to have a better reason than "well his post seems kinda fishy" for an FOS?


@sylver

Are you saying that Alsn is ostensibly town ?
Are you serious ? Today, Alsn is the definition itself of a semi-lurker trying to blend in...

Did you really pay attention to how he presented my lynch ?

On October 26 2012 22:22 Alsn wrote:
/snip

For that reason, I'm going to go with my strongest scum read so far, Djodref. Like I said though, I don't really feel like we have particularly good odds on him(only slightly better than random), but at the very least people have actually committed to taking stances on him and been forced to explain why. We would gain nothing by lynching a possible modkill who has said basically nothing, as no one could really be blamed for wanting them gone.

/snip

##Vote: Djodref

Will be looking over the other cases made so far to see if maybe there are better reasons than my own to be found, but for now I'm not yet convinced by anyone.


I'm passing this to Alsn right now because he could have some serious IRL excuses. But just look at how he is confident that I would flip scum: "only slightly better than random"
Sure Alsn is ostensibly town...
Djodref
Profile Joined September 2012
France3332 Posts
October 26 2012 14:54 GMT
#534
On October 26 2012 23:44 sylverfyre wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 26 2012 23:35 Djodref wrote:
On October 26 2012 23:29 sylverfyre wrote:
On October 26 2012 23:22 Djodref wrote:
On October 26 2012 23:05 sylverfyre wrote:
Early on, Djo, I felt a contradiction from you based on a combination of you criticizing the lurker policy + calling out a lurker. More recently, you've switched gears a lot and been unsatisfied in defenses mounted against your case.

Finally just now claiming "not needing to consolidate" is fishy to me too. If we don't consolidate, we're going to have someone get lynched with like 3 votes, reducing scum's need to assist in the lynchwagon as well as improving scum ability to make sure one of their own cannot be lynched - so we're less likely to find scum today, but equally importantly, we would have less information later in the game (and could cause town to go rabid on itself) We want to consolidate.

I dunno if mods have more replacements lined up, I sure hope so. Having 3 playerdrops happen on day 1 is really depressing to me.


Who are the three players who are going to drop, according to you ?

Are you even reading this thread ?

What kind of condescension is this?

1 - Clarity, who has already been modkilled
2 - Roco69, who has not posted since posting some pretty questionable stuff. He was immediately asked questions about it, and never responded.
3 - imcasey, who hasn't posted at all. (Likely player to get replaced, though.)


I'm sorry but I wouldn't call Clarity modkill a player drop. Clarity has made a mistake and has been punished for it. I thought you were referring to Oatsmaster instead of Clarity. I'm very curious how you could have missed that Clarity has been modkilled.
It has been very clear on the filters list for a long time.

I missed it initially (I was asleep at the time of his modkill) and didn't notice it immediately upon waking up, especially cause nobody had mentioned it. I had just noticed it when I made the "3 drops" comment, and agreed when daoud posted "wow, nobody is talking about this? and my reply to daoud amounted to an "i know right?"

Furthermore, it's not so much me being frustrated at 3 players lurking out of the game, but 3 players vanishing from the game before the end of day 1 is pretty depressing and could easily cause this game to suffer infant mortality.
And your condescending tone towards me and other accusers ("half-assed FOS") is bothering me.



@sylver

I'm sorry for the tone I'm employing. I'm just getting pretty pissed off by people accusing me for weak reasons (like Alsn did).
Right now, I have the feeling that you are just sheeping. Please prove me wrong and I'll be nicer to you ^^
Djodref
Profile Joined September 2012
France3332 Posts
October 26 2012 14:58 GMT
#537
On October 26 2012 23:49 sylverfyre wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 26 2012 23:42 Djodref wrote:
@sylver

So do you have even your own reasons for possibly voting me today ?
Or were you just sheeping like a boss ?


Uh, I've said my reasons. I don't find your defenses/ignorance of accusations adequate, I don't like how you're like BLIND LURKER POLICY IS BAD when NOBODY was advocating blind lurker policy (last resort lurker policy) which pretty much was turning the discussion into a very useless one, then you turn around and start aggressively attacking Ini for lurking. Finally I don't like how you accuse Ini of "not scumhunting" when he makes some well-thought-out town-aligned reads (and some null-reads)


Ini was not scumhunting at all. Only two questions asked to other people, no pressure at all.
Once again, please tell me what do you have against me. Stop saying accusations, be specific.

Please show me where in my filter I have said that "blind lurker policy is bad".
Djodref
Profile Joined September 2012
France3332 Posts
October 26 2012 15:07 GMT
#540
On October 26 2012 23:54 Alsn wrote:
Djod, just quoting my post and then writing something after it doesn't mean you addressed it. In fact, your response is illogical. You state a truth "I have most certainly asked questions of more than just Roco/Inig!" yet that truth was irrelevant to my criticism of you. My criticism was that you indeed asked a lot of questions but the only people you actually shared your own thoughts about were to cast suspicion on Roco/Inig, for reasons of them being lurky. Yet at the same time you criticised Rad for being in favour of lurker lynching.

I'm not sure if you're purposefully trying to distract the issue or if you genuinely misunderstood my criticism of you but I'm inclined to let my vote stay for now. However, I will definitely be checking the thread for the next 5-6 hours to see if there's any reason for me to change it.

I'd just like to remind everyone that I can not be here for lynch like I stated during pre-game. Exam starts tomorrow at 8:30 local time and lynch is at 02:00. At the very latest I'll be here until ~3 hours before lynch.


@Alsn

I didn't attack them for lurking, I have attacked them because
- Roco was posting nonsense
- Inig was not showing any scumhunting in his posts, only fluff

I didn't find something as suspicious as that in other players posts. Maybe the role-fishing question from sylver but that's all.
Nevertheless, I understand your criticism better now. I would have appreciated if you have made this post before.

And there is a difference between applying a policy and trying to find what is scummy. Even in lurker's posts.
Prev 1 4 5 6 7 8 17 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 3h 42m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
Nina 310
Livibee 76
trigger 38
StarCraft: Brood War
Rain 2887
actioN 600
Leta 214
Snow 178
ggaemo 112
PianO 63
yabsab 35
Noble 14
Dota 2
monkeys_forever693
XBOCT473
League of Legends
JimRising 766
Counter-Strike
Stewie2K1110
Heroes of the Storm
Khaldor150
Other Games
summit1g7950
C9.Mang0912
WinterStarcraft347
Mew2King245
Maynarde149
Organizations
Other Games
gamesdonequick774
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
sctven
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• intothetv
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
League of Legends
• Doublelift4835
• Lourlo1192
• Rush969
• Stunt348
• HappyZerGling87
Upcoming Events
GSL Code S
3h 42m
herO vs Zoun
Classic vs Bunny
The PondCast
4h 12m
OSC
15h 12m
Replay Cast
18h 12m
OSC
18h 12m
WardiTV Invitational
1d 5h
OSC
1d 7h
Korean StarCraft League
1d 21h
SOOP
2 days
sOs vs Percival
CranKy Ducklings
2 days
[ Show More ]
WardiTV Invitational
2 days
Cheesadelphia
2 days
CSO Cup
2 days
GSL Code S
3 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
3 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Wardi Open
4 days
Replay Cast
4 days
Replay Cast
5 days
RSL Revival
5 days
Cure vs Percival
ByuN vs Spirit
RSL Revival
6 days
herO vs sOs
Zoun vs Clem
Replay Cast
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

CSL Season 17: Qualifier 2
BGE Stara Zagora 2025
Heroes 10 EU

Ongoing

JPL Season 2
BSL 2v2 Season 3
BSL Season 20
KCM Race Survival 2025 Season 2
NPSL S3
Rose Open S1
CSL 17: 2025 SUMMER
2025 GSL S2
BLAST.tv Austin Major 2025
ESL Impact League Season 7
IEM Dallas 2025
PGL Astana 2025
Asian Champions League '25
BLAST Rivals Spring 2025
MESA Nomadic Masters
CCT Season 2 Global Finals
IEM Melbourne 2025
YaLLa Compass Qatar 2025
PGL Bucharest 2025
BLAST Open Spring 2025

Upcoming

Copa Latinoamericana 4
CSLPRO Last Chance 2025
CSLPRO Chat StarLAN 3
K-Championship
SEL Season 2 Championship
Esports World Cup 2025
HSC XXVII
Championship of Russia 2025
Murky Cup #2
Esports World Cup 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall 2025
BLAST Bounty Fall Qual
IEM Cologne 2025
FISSURE Playground #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2025 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.