Looney Lynching Mini Mafia

On October 10 2012 14:18 sandroba wrote:
Hey. Is this to be taken serious? Are you missing the point of the game or making a joke?

On October 10 2012 11:00 kitaman27 wrote:
Day 1

Ladies and gentlemen, you have all been gathered here today to participate in a game of epic proportions! Alien invaders have arrived from Moron Mountain and have challenged you to a high stakes contest. These aliens must be identified before they kidnap you one by one to serve as their entertainment slaves.

On October 10 2012 19:31 Djodref wrote:
According to this, Hiropro and Daoud have made scummy posts so far because it looks like they want to focus the discussion of the lynch rules. Also Daoud first post came off as weird in my eyes. It looks like he's going to prepare an excuse like "I didn't understand today's lynch principle" for later.

@Daoud

What was your motivation for your first post ?

On October 10 2012 20:40 sandroba wrote:
@da0ud Yes, those people are at disavantage. How is that relevant to who is scum or not?

On October 11 2012 01:22 Djodref wrote:
@austin
The feeling I got from them is that they were willing to spend more time discussing the lynch mechanics.
I’ve compared them to sandroba and ET and I felt like those last ones want to close the discussion.
I don‘t think that I have said that discussing lynch mechanics is scummy. What I wanted to say is that we cannot afford to much time doing this. So the people asking for more insight on their views are scummy imo.

On October 11 2012 08:16 austinmcc wrote:
I'm of the opposite mind as prplhz and kush on the double D lynch.

da0ud
I don't think first time scum (at least here) would come in, drop a post that wasn't serious, and then jet forever. I would think he'd be concerned about being found out, do something more.

His first post DOES feel kind of constructed, Hi again guys! and "Daoud" to sign out. But I think it's a post constructed by a townie. Like a scummy constructed post would be in response to a question, or would be pushing someone, or doing SOMETHING. A post that's constructed and does NOTHING doesn't point scum to me. I also think that's an important difference, and just hammering at "constructed = scum" is possibly scummy. Just like "possibly scummy" is scummy for being wishy washy...

I also think that mentioning someone might have planned for scum to be the low numbers in the game is probably not from mafia? That sounds like paranoid townie talk to me.

On October 11 2012 06:46 kushm4sta wrote:
Yeah daoud vs djodref..
I'm on team djodref meaning I vote for daoud to advance.

Daoud's post just seems so awkward. Admittedly a lot of this is probably because English isn't his first language. But the awkwardness goes beyond that.
His alien joke makes no sense I don't care what language he thought up the joke in.

His concern about the bye:
He's right, that getting a bye makes it easier for you to be lynched. But he calls it a "disadvantage." Scum would be more likely to think of it this way. He is not approaching the bracket as an opportunity to catch scum, but as a trial to avoid lynch. He has the natural fear of a scum.

He is my #1 scum read right now and I definitely want him to go through.

On October 11 2012 08:21 austinmcc wrote:

I also do not want to get lynched, and I am town. I view starting one step closer to lynch as a "disadvantage."

Yes, it's kind of weird phrasing, but townies don't want to get lynched either. I don't read that as really pointing one way or the other, whereas I read his comment about wanting to lynch seeds 10, 11, and 12 because they might have rigged the bracket that we have been told by mods was random as a townie thing. It shows...unhealthy paranoia about things that cannot be true?

On October 11 2012 10:36 sandroba wrote:
Yo. I want da0ud to go to the next round. I have a hunch and those have been pretty good historically.

On October 11 2012 13:00 Hopeless1der wrote:

Is this going to change da0ud? Will you usually be here at the deadline or not?

---

Going to bed now.

On October 11 2012 13:14 kushm4sta wrote:
@daoud


so lol. Clarify how he can be using you?

On October 11 2012 13:14 kushm4sta wrote:
so lol. Clarify how he can be using you?

On October 11 2012 17:35 thrawn2112 wrote:
"Hunches" aren't good enough explanations for me. And this is the 2nd case where sandroba has a read but he's not willing to go the distance to push his votes. He says prplhz is his top scum read, never votes for him or mentions him again. He wants da0ud to go through based on a hunch, and he puts a lot of weight behind the validity of his hunches. Yet he doesn't put enough votes in to push da0ud through. So that's twice where his stated intentions don't match up with his actions.

On October 11 2012 17:52 thrawn2112 wrote:
No I wanted djodref to go through that's why I voted for him lol. What I was talking about is that sandroba's votes weren't lining up with his words. He put no effort into pushing his top scumread (prplhz) and he didn't have the balls to put enough votes on you to push you through, despite having a hunch after saying that his hunches are usually correct.

On October 10 2012 20:40 sandroba wrote:
@prpl You are my best scum read so far, how do you feel about that <3

@mementoss Don't be stupid. Town# > Mafia# by default. That's the dumbest shit I've read so far and let me tell you there is plenty dumb shit about.

On October 10 2012 20:46 sandroba wrote:
You don't have to vote anyone right now. You have however many votes you want (max 10). You misrepresented ET impossible ratio quote so somehow he knew the mafia number which we don't know yet so you can vote ET. Yes, that's dumb.

On October 10 2012 21:07 sandroba wrote:
I'm mad when I can't distiguish between someone being crazy or trying to make a fake contribution. You can vote for whoever you like as long as your explanation doesn't stink. And as long as the person can even get votes, which ET can't even get this round. Better luck reading the game and the thread next time.

On October 11 2012 10:31 sandroba wrote:
Djoref dude looks town to me. Da0ud could go either way, leaning scum atm. I'm actually surprised he was winning, anyone care to explain it to me? austin?

On October 11 2012 10:36 sandroba wrote:
Yo. I want da0ud to go to the next round. I have a hunch and those have been pretty good historically.

On October 11 2012 11:22 sandroba wrote:
ON why the votes on djoref?

On October 11 2012 00:28 kushm4sta wrote:
I'm putting my votes down now in the voting thread and yes I'm going to vote on every matchup.
I prioritize voting bad people over good people just because I think we are more likely to catch a bad scum than a good scum today, also lynching a good town is way worse than lynching bad town.
I am also prioritizing voting for afks instead of actives.

hopeless1der x1
originalname x1
da0ud x1

On October 11 2012 06:46 kushm4sta wrote:
Yeah daoud vs djodref..
I'm on team djodref meaning I vote for daoud to advance.

Daoud's post just seems so awkward. Admittedly a lot of this is probably because English isn't his first language. But the awkwardness goes beyond that.
His alien joke makes no sense I don't care what language he thought up the joke in.

His concern about the bye:
He's right, that getting a bye makes it easier for you to be lynched. But he calls it a "disadvantage." Scum would be more likely to think of it this way. He is not approaching the bracket as an opportunity to catch scum, but as a trial to avoid lynch. He has the natural fear of a scum.

He is my #1 scum read right now and I definitely want him to go through.

On October 11 2012 13:14 kushm4sta wrote:
@daoud

K I had no idea there was alien theme...I almost never read flavor text! sorry mods.
That does excuse your terrible alien joke though.
Everyone understood what you meant. If you are scum it is clearly a disadvantage to have a bye. If you are town it's not a disadvantage because your aim isn't to survive, it's to hunt scum.

On October 11 2012 19:02 thrawn2112 wrote:


I'm confused, what is this mini-scum stuff you two are talking about and what do you mean by "form an alliance with another townie so soon in the game?"

On October 11 2012 14:38 da0ud wrote:


Well, as he was the only one really supporting me, he could easily get my trust and getting me to follow his lead on who to vote against, etc.
If he was mafia, then that would be another bullet for the mafia team (ie : getting a townie to follow their voting pattern).
Maybe what i say doesn't make sense, but :
* Let say we are 9 townies, 3 mafia.
* One of the mafia supports the "weird" guy (who is the only one who reads the theme of the game :D)
* Let's assume this guy is now 40% following the conviction of the manipulator.
* Town is now made of 3.4 mafia vs 8.6 townies, and the plague is spreading.

But I am not that dumb (or am I ?), I'll make decisions by myself.

On October 12 2012 10:56 Djodref wrote:
Hello guys !

I finally got away from the meeting ^^

I just have caught up with the thread on my phone. First I would like to say that the predictions were a (failed) attempt to make my comments look like a starcraft MU preview. Thank you Kush for understanding me and believing in me

Just a quick post about the people who are going to advance:

• ON hasn't reappeared and still hasn't given any good explanation for voting me. He deserves to advance over Hiro. No need for me to cast more votes on him.
  
• I'm very happy that Hopeless is going to advance. This MU don't need more votes.
  
• I hope that sandroba advancing is going to push him to post more. And I confirm my feeling about Kush playing his "scummy" town meta
  
• I'm kinda pissed off that I'm going to advance partly due to the panic (and unexplained) votes of ON...
  

On October 12 2012 17:57 thrawn2112 wrote:
Apart from saying how they feel about the other matchup, I'd like the lynch candidates to also give their top scumread.

That also goes for everyone else. We've been focusing too much on the mechanics and worrying too much about "well this guy is scummier than that guy" but we need to be discussing our top scumreads. Right now sandroba takes that spot for me so I plan on pushing hard for his lynch.

On October 12 2012 18:06 Djodref wrote:
I think you want to give yourself some presence in the thread by asking everybody if they are here for deadline or not. In reality you just want to know if you can safely do you unvoting cuisine.

On October 12 2012 18:06 Djodref wrote:
What I understood from this answer is that knowing who is present at deadline prevents crazy things from happening. I think that the simplest way from preventing crazy thing to happen is to use your votes and sticking to them. Unvoting like you do results in more possibilities for outcome of MUs to change, something you want to prevent by asking everybody if they are going to be present at deadline or not.

On October 12 2012 21:30 kushm4sta wrote:


@djo why are you assuming you will be voted over sandroba?

On October 12 2012 21:38 kushm4sta wrote:

Why is that? I don't follow.

On October 13 2012 00:12 EchelonTee wrote:

This post is pretty strange from you. You spent a fairly long post (listed above) detailing your opinions on 3 players, in an organized listed manner. But when it comes to 1der vs ON, a matchup that actually is in play right now, you are much more unclear and hesitant.

1. This point doesn't really hold; you say that a townie who is still in the running for a lynch would probably be more active, which is true. But a scum who is up for lynch would also probably be more active, compared to if he wasn't up for lynch. While I have my own reasons for being suspicious of ON, your logic here is a lot less laid out then your previous points.

2. It's not ok to put down an opinion, then say "well I'm not so sure because I'm a newbie". It seems like you're trying to shy away from responsibility for your actions. Especially because you are more assertive in other posts.

If you could make a more definitive stance on 1der/ON, that would be nice.

On October 13 2012 11:00 EchelonTee wrote:
Vote bombing ON, fuck it. I don't want 1der to die and idgaf between ON and sandroba, both should die at this point.

On October 13 2012 11:08 kushm4sta wrote:

what about this quote?

On October 13 2012 11:11 kushm4sta wrote:
haha look at vote thread you got owned et

On October 13 2012 11:12 EchelonTee wrote:

da0ud.

We're killing sandroba. I'm 99% sure 1der is a townie.

On October 13 2012 11:30 EchelonTee wrote:
Sandroba, and a bullet into OriginalName. I would want a double lynch.

On October 13 2012 11:44 austinmcc wrote:
ET. Pretend for a moment that you're ET this game. (Or, if you don't have to pretend, please let us know).

You and your hypothetical scumbuddies are hanging out in QT, discussing how to play out the matchups and how you want to vote and do scummy stuff and whatnot. The following questions come up, as to how each of you wants to do things. How do you respond?

Do you guys make sure to sometimes be on opposite sides of a matchup? Or do you not care if 2 scum players vote together the entire way through D1?

Say in round 1 or round 2 there's a matchup that you want to influence, one of your scumbuddies is neck and neck with a townie. Do you just vote that matchup? Or do you vote that matchup + 1 or 2 that you don't care about, in order to hide the vote you actually want to make in with some that don't make a difference to you?

Is there any particular player you think is a likely D1 mislynch, just looking at player list and like...the first couple pages of the game. If so, who?

On October 12 2012 18:06 da0ud wrote:
Trying to get some reads/assocation of people from previous votes.

1) Only ET has been twice voting for someone he would face in the next round. Djo in the first round when he had a BYE and kush in second. If he was a scum, I would them believe Djo and kush are not. Because at first glance it doesnt seem logic to vote for your mate so that one of you for sure would advance to the next round. He is the only one who has ever voted on the next potential opponent.

2) on Mementoss : he seems to be throwing away votes on as many people as possible and of oppisite logic. Already voted for 4 people which is the most of all of us. First round he votes for Djo and kush to make them move to the next round on their respective matches. But when they move on he decides to now vote on none of them but even worse voting for their opponents in the matchups hence actually totally changing his mind on them and now backing them up. Should have voted again for them to follow his initial logic.

3) Austin looks too unconcerned after being saved on the first round, He hasn't voted anyone in the second round. Looks to me more like a scum who now hides to get us to forget about him. To me a townie, even saved should continue to be implicated in the votes in order to gather as much information as possible on other players.

Please let me know your thoughts....

On October 13 2012 12:11 thrawn2112 wrote:
do0ud wtf are you talking about

who are you responding to

On October 14 2012 16:51 thrawn2112 wrote:
yeah the bolded part just screams noob mafia



Ok you voted for sandroba because:

"One first thing on my vote against San is at the time as default choice between two people I found scummy."

but here are the most recent cases of you talking about either of them:





So please show me where you found ON scummy. In fact it seems like you weren't "thinking" ON was scum... your reason for voting him was always policy related:



Oh and I'm not really convinced about memtoss.... I don't buy that he was bussing ON. His votes for ON came at a time when a bus would have been extremely stupid or extremely clever and I doubt he's capable of either. I think he was the first person to actually vote ON. Maybe a scum memtoss would have figured that sand is getting lynched no matter what but I doubt he'd have taken that risk.

On October 13 2012 16:00 sandroba wrote:
I'm not going to fight against this lynch. This is simply too stupid to fight over and I don't feel like it. If you people stopped one second to look at this thread you would come to realise that is simply no way I'm scum purely based on how this situation came to be. Also there is no case against me. I refuse to defend myself against the ignorant uninformed opinion of a bunch of riotters. This is no way to play mafia. You have to look at the intricacies and not follow the mob rule that is usually driven by scum. I leave you sheep to your fate.

My reads so far is that ET austin hiro and kush are town. I honestly don't know anymore about ON cuz I would expect him to try to at least keep apearances as scum.
This djodref is either very dumb or scum. You would never as town (and inteligent) feel that a person that is standing up to you against the majority trying to lynch would be scum. Prpl and mementos are prob scum.

On October 13 2012 22:07 da0ud wrote:
sandroba x9

On October 14 2012 21:51 kushm4sta wrote:

This is first time scum?
Yeah math can be an indication of scum wanting to appear active, but keep in mind this was an explanation that I requested. I don't think first time scum would try to fake this level of newbie paranoia.


Look how eager he is to interact. As scum I would think he'd be more afraid.

On October 15 2012 12:32 thrawn2112 wrote:


Who would you pass it to if we agreed that you don't have to hold it?

On October 15 2012 12:51 Djodref wrote:
@prplhz

Do you have any intent to pass the bomb to me ? I would like to burn my hide but I don't want to really hide...

@daoud

If you really are town, doing it this way would not help us find the scum. They would just go on holidays and wait for you to blow up ^^ The only information we would gather at the end is that you were town (but are you?). If you play the potato game, we may have more discussion and it is going to help us to find the remaining mafia players.

On top of that, nobody can make sure that you are going to be lynched today. If you want to hold the potato until you explode, it's your choice, but I don't think it is a townie decision. It looks more like a caught scum behavior (retaining information for his buddies).

On October 15 2012 13:22 Djodref wrote:
No I'm pretty sure he didn't know about the blues. He's a real total newbie...

@daoud

If the majority is wrong about you, you have to prove them wrong. If you are really town, you shouldn't hold onto the potato for these reasons:

• it's not helping you
  
• it's not helping us to get some discussion going (don't you agree that your move would help the mafia to retain info?)
  
• it's not going to blow up one mafia
  
• it's not fun
  

That's why I see you wanting to keep the potato as a scum move.

On October 11 2012 02:24 Mementoss wrote:
1.
Mementoss:
Town

2.
OriginalName:
Has been active after the game has started and chose not to participate in any discussion. Other than that nothing. Seems pretty scummy. Already ahead by 3 votes, I have no reason to use a vote on him right now.

On October 12 2012 04:37 Mementoss wrote:
2.
OriginalName
Lurking pretty hard as well. Only has one post with content so far. But it brings up some pretty decent points. Still he needs more activity into the game, looking forward to what his thoughts are on the other players/matchups. Null. Not voting either.

3.
Sandropa:
I don't like his posting at all this game. As others have said, most of his posting has been here are my thoughts and gives no reasoning. ET defends him with his meta in this statement:
"Sandroba is one of those super strong town players who is comparatively abysmal as a mafia player. When he's mafia, his lack of effort and interest becomes abundantly clear very quickly, sort of like Palmar but even moreso, IMO. Therefore, when he plays mafia I find that he runs active disruption to try and make as much chaos as possible until he inevitably gets shot/lynched. "
Which I don't know how ET thinks hes following this, is he reading the same game I am? I think if anything he looks like mafia meta this game, lack of effort and interest seem prevelant in this game, and no attempt to find any scum at all. I would really like him to go through and put some pressure on him to persue some reads. Looks scummy to me. 2 votes.

On October 13 2012 22:53 Mementoss wrote:
Also ET I know you explained it but its still fucking weird that you LAST MINUTE dropped all your votes on ON, after expecting him for a modkill, not having a read on him. And having a scum read on hopeless all of the first 2 cycles, you save him last minute.

Not sure which way I will be voting today yet.

On October 14 2012 00:31 Mementoss wrote:
I will be putting all my votes on ON unless he returns then

On October 11 2012 20:56 Mementoss wrote:
It bothers me that these 3 players have the most power in town

ON
Hopeless
Da0

None of them used any votes officially, and all have 10 votes remaining. Coming down to the wire any one of them as scum could sway the results.

On October 11 2012 21:00 Mementoss wrote:
If they're scum and that's their plan then they're pretty stupid because they'd be put in the spotlight for doing that.

Not all 3, but it is very possible for one of them to be scum, gaining 2 extra votes after the first round could prove to be a great advantage.

On October 11 2012 23:59 Mementoss wrote:
I will not make any deadlines.

And hopeless you look fine with the way you unvoted. I still don't like that particular players will have more influence on the final lynch.

On October 12 2012 20:50 Mementoss wrote:
I have the least amount of votes left. sheit. Everyone else is "saving" there votes, or voting so late that it doesn't matter so they don't have to vote and have all the power at the end.

On October 13 2012 22:52 Mementoss wrote:
prp: 8 Remain
ON: 8 Remain
da0: 9 Remain
Austin: 9 Remain

This^^ this right here is horseshit.
Apathetic voting up towards the last round is unacceptable.
I think everyone should only be using 5 of there votes
3 of these players alone trump the rest of the players in the game. Sandroba doesn't even have anyvotes to defend himself while ON has 9.

Actually, everyone should only be using 1 vote, and we can get some sort of real full out majority going where everyone is involved. For the people with 0 votes left.

##Mementoss vote "Player Name"
and I will use one of my votes towards giving you a voice in this lynch. I have a feeling scum has WAY too much control right now. But there is a possibility its too late anyways, this method should give more information to where people are at in their thought process.

On October 14 2012 03:09 Mementoss wrote:
THIS is what bugs me, your not strongly scummy on either YET you have 9 votes left? HMMM, I guess you shoulda used your votes to get who you thought was scum to the finals. You don't even give a shit.

On October 15 2012 13:12 Djodref wrote:
You didn't consider that town and mafia have usually both night decisions to give. There is certainly some town roles with some special powers to activate (or not) during the night. Using your power or not is a decision you have to make during the night.

On October 15 2012 16:28 Djodref wrote:
Would you still follow the majority, even if they don't ask you to give the bomb to Hopeless ?

On October 15 2012 19:58 kushm4sta wrote:


I'm not going to put more efforts on scumhunting because to me this game is already solved. The only mystery left is why haven't scumteam GGed?

On October 15 2012 20:55 kushm4sta wrote:


No prpl that wasn't the deal. We gave you the potato because we think you are scum, not because we trust your opinion.

You keep it until you convince us otherwise. The only person town can agree for you to give it to is daoud.
If you give it to some town you are only prolonging this game because we will lynch the fuck out of you first chance we get.

On October 15 2012 21:00 thrawn2112 wrote:
wat

me look at kush filter? or prplhz filter?

On October 15 2012 21:41 kushm4sta wrote:
@prpl if you are town (you're not) the best thing you can do is hold the bomb and let yourself die. That is what majority town wants. If you don't die now we will have to waste next turn killing you anyway.

On October 15 2012 22:26 thrawn2112 wrote:
In the case that da0 gets lynched and he flips green then this post may be of importance later:

I don't like the way prplhz and memtoss have defended each other in the last couple pages

On October 15 2012 22:38 prplhz wrote:
@EchelonTee Why do you want to give the potato to da0ud when you like his case? Do you think that a scum da0ud would try to sell out a scum Mementoss at this point?

On October 15 2012 23:29 Mementoss wrote:


omg, that third point if your town is horrid. Just because you die that means your reads are correct?

On October 15 2012 23:56 Hopeless1der wrote:


The general consensus (which I agree with) is that one of da0ud or prplhz should be lynched. Personally, I think da0ud is more likely scum. The lynch mechanic itself has too much randomness to it for us to make a proper plan. At this point I have no intention of hiding. If I turn up with the potato, da0ud will be my first choice. Beyond that, I'd be looking for scummy things from other players.

Things like MMT wanting us to ignore ON's flip to prove prplhz or da0ud being scum. They were both out in the first round. Other than the known information of scum flipping, it is extremely difficult to demonstrate scum motive for them when they are already safe from the lynch day1. The bulk of my read on da0ud revolves around his interaction with ON's situation.

On October 16 2012 00:18 kushm4sta wrote:
Memetoss are you third party? trying to spread suspicion all over the place.. to me, to austin.
After daoud and prplhz are gone if the game isn't over yet you are next.

On October 16 2012 08:29 kushm4sta wrote:
lol i feel like such an idiot

On October 16 2012 10:37 Mementoss wrote:


at least I tried to get people off the tunnelling da0d and prplhz all day and wasting the day. I tried to get people to pass the potato around so that this wouldn't happen. I may not have had time to read through everything and flesh out some big thoughts. But I was trying to tell people to get off them and pass the potato. Without the potato passing people didn't have to do anything.

we let hiro do nothing
we let kush do nothing and "plan" the rest of the games lynches
you'd think ET who had a townie status by almost all would do something other than lolz prplhz scum and post a picture

god damn.

The funny thing is in a mini its more than likely all these guys are scum. so anti town.

oh well, lets learn from it and have a better day 2. I will look into hiro and kush specifcally before nights end. I doubt scum will want to kill me. But just incase.

On October 16 2012 11:02 Djodref wrote:

@Hiro
Why were you holding onto the bomb at the beginning on day2 ? And why were you active in the thread only at that time ?
I want you to post MORE.

On October 16 2012 14:19 EchelonTee wrote:
need to lynch da0ud.

On October 17 2012 04:46 austinmcc wrote:
da0ud, I need to ask you about your prplhz read yesterday.

In looking over the D1 votes, you said:

But later in D2, you said:

You don't mention how you went from not being able to see how prplhz could be scum to how you were pretty sure he was scum with mementoss. Why and when did you become convinced prplhz was scum?

On October 17 2012 12:18 Hopeless1der wrote:
Have you read da0ud's filter? Or understood the Day 1 lynch mechanics? Austin pulls 3 SEQUENTIAL posts out of da0ud's filter (page 2). Guess he just left out the scummy bits. The level of flipflopping is unbelievable. I'll refrain from the rest of his filter for now. Lets start with ONE post above where austin did:

-> da0ud wanted ON. Me and Djodref can't both be scum. Cool.
FIVE MINUTES LATER
(Austin's "defense" started here)

EchelonTee votebombs at the last possible minute. So far so good, he's maintained his stance that he wanted ON and is happy I didn't get advanced.


Defending ET...buddying townie? (WIFOM)

Is this him being sad/upset? He's panicing now that things went awry.
END AUSTIN'S DEFENSE


Wait...+ Show Spoiler +
Sandroba #1 to die. And I'm super duper town? Yeah right...(I am town...just not at the level he's blindly agreeing)


ON and Sandroba cannot both be scum. Based on what he's said so far, I'm 99% town and sand is 99% scum. (or is my reading comprehension failing me?)


Somehow that 99% sandroba scum read is no longer valid because...I disappeared? We KNOW sandroba flipped town and OriginalName flipped scum. Does this not strike you as a strange change of heart based on the past series of quotes?

This entire series of quotes occured over less than a half hour. Moral of the story? Austin's defense of da0ud can suck it. Kill me first if you need to, I'll gladly trade 1-1.

On October 17 2012 12:48 Hopeless1der wrote:
da0ud, you were correct, but when it was me vs sandroba, you were all but ready to pull the trigger on sandroba, at least that's how I interpret this quote:



When the votes were finalized and it changed to ON vs sandroba:

You were no longer so certain. I don't get how you could have such a drastic change in scumreads as town or lose your conviction to kill sandroba just because his opponent changed. I really could have just posted these two quotes as my counter to austin's defense of you.

On October 17 2012 13:10 kushm4sta wrote:

Are we playing the same game??
Why is thrawn so town? Because he doesn't act retardedly? That's enough to make you town now?
Read his filter. He has contributed nothing. His only case was a bad one on SANDROBA, confirmed town, which he went back on extremely easily.
Frankly I am baffled by this thrawn dickride. I want you to explain. If you do not explain adequately I will support your lynch. gogo.

Keep in mind this: the people who seem the scummiest probably aren't scum. That is because they don't care about stopping themselves from looking scummy. They are just going to act however they want to act. Scum, however, will go out of their way to act town.

@daoud explain your thrawn dickride

On October 14 2012 11:06 thrawn2112 wrote:
guys hurry up with the night actions I'm eager to learn about the new lynch mechanics

On October 16 2012 21:11 thrawn2112 wrote:


no I haven't (unless you count sk) so I have no idea. I'd either ask my mafia bros for advice the entire time or I'd just tell them to bus the shit out of me D1. or I might bus the shit out of them the whole game.

On October 19 2012 14:12 Djodref wrote:
That's why we need absolutely to lynch one mafia member tomorrow. On the opposite, mafia has to kill the players with the most town cred (provided they are not mafia themselves) to increase their chances to lead to a mislynch.

On October 20 2012 12:14 Djodref wrote:


Seriously guys, this is a perfect example why I think daoud is town. I admit that playing the newbie could be a strategy to survive but there is a limit to what you could be able to forge...

On October 21 2012 19:20 Djodref wrote:
Are you going to be around tonight daoud ?

What about deadline also ?

On October 21 2012 19:21 kushm4sta wrote:
stfu about friend votes. put them on yourself and forget about them. Them we all vote same person.

On October 21 2012 21:35 kushm4sta wrote:
1der: after we kill thrawn, the last mafia will nk djodref.
People left: daoud, you,VE,me. Who do you think is scummiest out od those people right now?

On October 21 2012 21:28 kushm4sta wrote:
This is my latest theory on the pardoner:
thrawn is scum pardoner. He can't pardon himself though. So.last night he pardoned the scummiest looking town to fuck with our heads.