On August 28 2012 21:43 Djagulingu wrote: EBWOP: Why not stop with the OMGUS you started on Day 1 against me, marv and shady (or just me and marv)?
Becuase I am breaking you to your knees and it is working. You and marv are showing huge alignments between each other and it showed that in just a few posts before this one. You already confessing yourselves by the way you are reacting to me and my posts.
On August 28 2012 21:39 marvellosity wrote: How could DJ make a mislynch happen on himself?
What's wrong with you??
Stop taking things out of context. I specifically said with YOUR vote as in MARVELLOSITY. That is you correct?
You see town? how aggressive they are and they way they protect each other as I stated in my post previous. There is something very interesting between these too.
Thank you Marv and DJ for proving my point.
thank you for proving my point that you cannot read the thread. it's nothing to do with protecting each other.
Kville, this is just for you, as for some reason you decided not to play newbie games:
On August 28 2012 03:20 marvellosity wrote:
Associative cases - don't bloody do them until someone has flipped. They're bad. Somehow thrawn and YourHarry got tied together during Day 1 and Day 2. And to town's detriment. They were different alignments and yet people were tying them together as the same alignment. Just look at the damage it can cause. It led to the actions of one player being used to indict another player before either have flipped, which is just nonsense. I don't want to say TOO much about it, but remember this?
On August 20 2012 13:25 DarthPunk wrote: OK we are in a terrible situation. I blame myself for being active and building the majority of the case on Thrawn along with Goodkarma. whilst allowing others to contribute nothing at all. I had a very strong scum read on Your harry. But a lot of it was based on being scum with Thrawn and Obvious.
But you weren't away when you posted you statement about keeping your vote. I read becuase that is all there was to read from that last few hours. Why post a statement about being able to change your mind when infact it would have been null anyways, you avoided that you went right through it.
You and DJ happened to throw a post out of michevious suspicions but not a single help from town. All you posted was just declaration of IM VOTING THIS OR ELSE NO LYNCH! Even if there was a 2 page letter of why we should've vote DJ off to lynch you still were not here to change your vote. So why post it if it was null regardless!
On August 28 2012 21:43 Djagulingu wrote: EBWOP: Why not stop with the OMGUS you started on Day 1 against me, marv and shady (or just me and marv)?
Becuase I am breaking you to your knees and it is working. You and marv are showing huge alignments between each other and it showed that in just a few posts before this one. You already confessing yourselves by the way you are reacting to me and my posts.
No, you're basing everything you do, all that "breaking me to my knees" piece of shitty shit on a stupid OMGUS, which leads you to refuse reading whatever I write as the reasons of my actions and blame me and marv like a mad man.
Associative cases - don't bloody do them until someone has flipped. They're bad. Somehow thrawn and YourHarry got tied together during Day 1 and Day 2. And to town's detriment. They were different alignments and yet people were tying them together as the same alignment. Just look at the damage it can cause. It led to the actions of one player being used to indict another player before either have flipped, which is just nonsense. I don't want to say TOO much about it, but remember this?
On August 20 2012 13:25 DarthPunk wrote: OK we are in a terrible situation. I blame myself for being active and building the majority of the case on Thrawn along with Goodkarma. whilst allowing others to contribute nothing at all. I had a very strong scum read on Your harry. But a lot of it was based on being scum with Thrawn and Obvious.
On August 28 2012 21:58 marvellosity wrote: Kville, this is just for you, as for some reason you decided not to play newbie games:
On August 28 2012 03:20 marvellosity wrote:
Associative cases - don't bloody do them until someone has flipped. They're bad. Somehow thrawn and YourHarry got tied together during Day 1 and Day 2. And to town's detriment. They were different alignments and yet people were tying them together as the same alignment. Just look at the damage it can cause. It led to the actions of one player being used to indict another player before either have flipped, which is just nonsense. I don't want to say TOO much about it, but remember this?
On August 20 2012 13:25 DarthPunk wrote: OK we are in a terrible situation. I blame myself for being active and building the majority of the case on Thrawn along with Goodkarma. whilst allowing others to contribute nothing at all. I had a very strong scum read on Your harry. But a lot of it was based on being scum with Thrawn and Obvious.
On August 28 2012 21:58 marvellosity wrote: Kville, this is just for you, as for some reason you decided not to play newbie games:
On August 28 2012 03:20 marvellosity wrote:
Associative cases - don't bloody do them until someone has flipped. They're bad. Somehow thrawn and YourHarry got tied together during Day 1 and Day 2. And to town's detriment. They were different alignments and yet people were tying them together as the same alignment. Just look at the damage it can cause. It led to the actions of one player being used to indict another player before either have flipped, which is just nonsense. I don't want to say TOO much about it, but remember this?
On August 20 2012 13:25 DarthPunk wrote: OK we are in a terrible situation. I blame myself for being active and building the majority of the case on Thrawn along with Goodkarma. whilst allowing others to contribute nothing at all. I had a very strong scum read on Your harry. But a lot of it was based on being scum with Thrawn and Obvious.
Then lets flip one.
#Vote DJ
As long as we're clear - you're voting DJ because of that one comment that he already explained (pretty satisfactorily imo) and because you're desperate that I'm scum defending him and not, shock horror, a townie not wanting to lynch someone he considers another townie?
On August 28 2012 21:58 marvellosity wrote: Kville, this is just for you, as for some reason you decided not to play newbie games:
On August 28 2012 03:20 marvellosity wrote:
Associative cases - don't bloody do them until someone has flipped. They're bad. Somehow thrawn and YourHarry got tied together during Day 1 and Day 2. And to town's detriment. They were different alignments and yet people were tying them together as the same alignment. Just look at the damage it can cause. It led to the actions of one player being used to indict another player before either have flipped, which is just nonsense. I don't want to say TOO much about it, but remember this?
On August 20 2012 13:25 DarthPunk wrote: OK we are in a terrible situation. I blame myself for being active and building the majority of the case on Thrawn along with Goodkarma. whilst allowing others to contribute nothing at all. I had a very strong scum read on Your harry. But a lot of it was based on being scum with Thrawn and Obvious.
On August 28 2012 21:58 marvellosity wrote: Kville, this is just for you, as for some reason you decided not to play newbie games:
On August 28 2012 03:20 marvellosity wrote:
Associative cases - don't bloody do them until someone has flipped. They're bad. Somehow thrawn and YourHarry got tied together during Day 1 and Day 2. And to town's detriment. They were different alignments and yet people were tying them together as the same alignment. Just look at the damage it can cause. It led to the actions of one player being used to indict another player before either have flipped, which is just nonsense. I don't want to say TOO much about it, but remember this?
On August 20 2012 13:25 DarthPunk wrote: OK we are in a terrible situation. I blame myself for being active and building the majority of the case on Thrawn along with Goodkarma. whilst allowing others to contribute nothing at all. I had a very strong scum read on Your harry. But a lot of it was based on being scum with Thrawn and Obvious.
Then lets flip one.
#Vote DJ
Do I look like a coin to you?
Yes. o.o.
Do you have a strategy for the 0.5% probability (which is for you) that I flip town?
I will gladly vote for lvdr gratefully, did you have a strategy that if they were both to flip town(lvdr and chez)? Well by then mafia would have taken a huge win so, I guess that was your strategy.
On August 28 2012 22:27 Kville wrote: I will gladly vote for lvdr gratefully, did you have a strategy that if they were both to flip town(lvdr and chez)? Well by then mafia would have taken a huge win so, I guess that was your strategy.
No actually, my strat was rather simple and you may consider it bad too: Push a target into lynch. If town: spot people who had no reason to lynch that target but still bandwagoned in, if scum: celebrate.
Your strategy is though even simpler and even worse: Lynch Djangbi. If scum: celebrate, if town: "Uhh.. well.. I guess that was a misstep". Or that's what I understand from what you're doing.
So you think accosiative cases are bad but accept Djagulingu explanation? Can you please enlighten us on that.
I read it as bull shit. His whole theory hinges on voting trends which makes no sense to me. Mafia have the information advantage they can influence how they look by where they vote.
On August 28 2012 23:25 iamperfection wrote: @ Marvelosity
So you think accosiative cases are bad but accept Djagulingu explanation? Can you please enlighten us on that.
I read it as bull shit. His whole theory hinges on voting trends which makes no sense to me. Mafia have the information advantage they can influence how they look by where they vote.
His point was that is Lvdr was town, Chez has simply been wagoning from townie to townie with little explanation. What is there to dispute here?
On August 28 2012 23:25 iamperfection wrote: @ Marvelosity
So you think accosiative cases are bad but accept Djagulingu explanation? Can you please enlighten us on that.
I read it as bull shit. His whole theory hinges on voting trends which makes no sense to me. Mafia have the information advantage they can influence how they look by where they vote.
His point was that is Lvdr was town, Chez has simply been wagoning from townie to townie with little explanation. What is there to dispute here?
I'm surprised that this is not a newbie game but a normal. Here we go again:
1- I voted on my biggest scum read which was Lvdr, explained why I was doing that. 2- But Lvdr was still 60% scum, tops. There was nobody higher in the ranks though. So if he flips town, I needed something to find who the real scumbags are. 3- Chezinu voted for Lvdr as well, no explanation though. Filter check -> no explanation, no making cases, no explanation of his vote on day 1 either. 4- I called him out. 5- I realized that it was a mistake irl, didn't share it this time though, slept before the deadline, accidentally got myself lynched. 6- Turns out that my "mistake" is not a mistake because then, I see Chezinu bandwagoned on me too. End of D2, all of chezinu's votes were bandwagons on townies (at least 2/3 were), no explanations on votings, no making cases himself, no nothing pro-town. 7- Here I am, with my suspects and shit.
On August 28 2012 23:25 iamperfection wrote: @ Marvelosity
So you think accosiative cases are bad but accept Djagulingu explanation? Can you please enlighten us on that.
I read it as bull shit. His whole theory hinges on voting trends which makes no sense to me. Mafia have the information advantage they can influence how they look by where they vote.
His point was that is Lvdr was town, Chez has simply been wagoning from townie to townie with little explanation. What is there to dispute here?
Oh? He thinks Lvdr was town? You don't say..
as Said by DJ:
##Vote: Lvdr
Nothing about him makes me think that he's a townie.
EPT
