EPTBureaucracy Mafia! - Page 169
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
| ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
On July 25 2012 18:52 risk.nuke wrote: Supersoft what kind of argument is that? Kill MZ because if every sensible person dies he's going to manipulate the town if he's scum. What's with the damn unwillingness to lynch actuall scum. We got people I've felt like nearly everyone agrees are scummy, like zealous or rastaban but somehow they don't die. I'm going to vote Zealous now and everyone who's interested in killing scum should join in. ##Vote Zealous that's not the reason why i want to lynch him. that's the reason why i want to lynch him first. Why I want to lynch him can be found here: + Show Spoiler + On July 25 2012 16:59 supersoft wrote: btw. You're a good player, too. But i couldn't see that this game. That's one main allegation. You're not town, simply because you didn't reach your own standart. On July 25 2012 17:14 supersoft wrote: if you somehow didn't catch it, meapak :-D On July 25 2012 17:21 supersoft wrote: Second allegation: Gamebalance and math: alive: 11. Supersoft town 15. syllogism town 7. VisceraEyes killed scum very unlikely scum when Prob is scum 10. Meapak_Ziphh 8. Bill Murray townread (can't be executive) 18. Chezinu town 4. Probulous killed scum very unlikely scum when VE is scum dead 25. RebirthofLegend town 19. Kurumi town 13. Wherebugsgo town 3. Sandroba town 16. GGQ town 26. Palmar scum 6. Foolishness scum Third allegation: you have no abilitys. We have 2 executives missing. Foolishness CEO flip indicates, that good players are in key positions. Fourth allegation: Foolishness refused to mention you, even though you were discussed day1. Syllo attacked you day1 and got attacked by foolish and palmar. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
| ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
On July 25 2012 19:48 marvellosity wrote: i'm not voting gonzaw today and i'm certainly not voting to kill anyone because of a mirror theory I'm 3/3 so far with people who I have called confirmed mafia and I'm calling gonzaw confirmed. Do I actually have to keep providing reasons or why not just take my word for it instead? I was hit last night and I had said I intended to push for layabout lynch today. Chairman decides who gets lynched and layabout was his minion. Please don't make the game harder than it needs to be. Regarding mirror roles: Visceraeyes, as you can see, so far mafia mirror roles have had different names from their presumably town counterparts. They were as far as we know provided only VT role claims. WBG was Judge Palmar Lawyer BH Hired Hitman Supersoft Suicidal Salaryman Kurumi America, RoL Macedonia Layabout Canada posing as America or something Probulous claimed the exact same role and role name as you VE and before you did. It's obviously not conclusive, but it certainly makes sense for him to be town just based on that. Help me lynch Gonzaw today. | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On July 25 2012 19:54 syllogism wrote: I'm 3/3 so far with people who I have called confirmed mafia and I'm calling gonzaw confirmed. Do I actually have to keep providing reasons or why not just take my word for it instead? See this is what I was talking about earlier? You know why Palmar survived so long in Liar game? Because YOU had an incorrect townread on him. That was the only reason. So yes, it would be just dandy if you provide good and persuasive reasons. | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
todays lynch is between these two. the gonzawcase is also rocksolid. @marvel, I really am wondering what further reasoning you're expecting from syllo. Read through his filter... | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
I don't see how you can look at his filter, his activity and who he has defended and think he is town. Look at his case post today and the guilty "wow i forgot layabout is in this game lol" (after he had just defended/talked to him on day 3!) post after layabout was king lynched. Look at his promises to be more active once the other games he was in ended. Look at his behavior yesterday when we were trying to brute force palmar lynch. When it was a foregone conclusion that palmar would be lynched, he said this On July 24 2012 06:30 gonzaw wrote: Well shit, Palmar's claim doesn't make much sense actually. If he was Copycat he'd get Rol's role like other people said; if he could choose which role to get it'd be very powerful, and he would have likely chosen Kurumi's role instead (once Kurumi died), since he knew Kurumi had a nuke since D1. His posting on D2 doesn't see like a scum Palmar to me, would a scum Palmar put effort like that? Him just giving up right now is not making things any easier. I'll likely change my vote to him to consolidate, but I won't just sheep a vote on someone I'm not sure is scum so I want some more explanations first. And then On July 24 2012 08:04 gonzaw wrote: I expected someone to answer me by now :/ @Prob: Will you answer what I posted before? *sigh* You guys better be right, I don't have a good feeling about this ##Unvote: Zealos ##Vote: Palmar I'm going to the gym now and I think I'll be back right before the deadline. His vote wasn't needed, but this reads like a post of someone who feels he has to switch to avoid suspicion and tries, feebly, look town in the process. Probulous/VE/Supersoft help me brute force this | ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
I suppose I'll go over gonzaw's filter again with timings in mind. I'd really much rather lynch mz/austin/zealos/(rastaban) | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
On July 25 2012 20:30 syllogism wrote: I've been wrong numerous times in this game and still am about some things I'm sure, but I'm fairly confident about this. Nothing wrong with re-evaluating based on new evidence or evidence you hadn't considered before. I admit that I'm never really 100% sure despite sometimes appearing extremely confident in the thread. It's refreshing to hear that. What do you think of my candidates given? why does it have to be gonzaw? | ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
| ||
|
marvellosity
United Kingdom36156 Posts
| ||
|
syllogism
Finland5948 Posts
When things are less clear and more information is needed, discussion is good. Otherwise sheeping is fine and nothing is stopping is from discussing other candidates even though we lynch gonzaw today. | ||
|
supersoft
Germany3729 Posts
i propose that everyone decides between these two persons in the next 10 hours. after that the votes from the one who got a lesser amount of votes have to be moved to the other guy. | ||
| ||
)
