/in :3
Normal Mini Mafia II
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
/in :3 | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 01 2012 14:04 NoSmurfHere wrote: what's the delay power? It is that the Mafia No-Kills for one night and gets one more KP for the following night. For Example Night 1 The Mafia Delays So, Night 2 The Mafia have 2 kp to use. | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 02 2012 06:05 marvellosity wrote: VE <33333 You will get lynched (because of VE) like in WoF after VE dies.... Lol | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 03 2012 05:03 MsZontar wrote: /in LOL! | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
This guy is an obvious smurf lol (not really idk xD) + Show Spoiler + :D drwiggles was just temp banned for 2 days by Manifesto7. That account was created on 2011-04-08 12:36:54 and had 15 posts. Reason: No picture in the picture thrad. Our thrread warnings arent bullshit. Banned whileni eat dinner. | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 06 2012 11:27 Zephirdd wrote: My opinion is that going "besides everyone's usual fill of Policy Lynch is bad" is cutting on the discussion and reducing the potential subjects for dicussing, thus reducing the potential to scumhunting. Who wants to avoid scumhunters? scum. Bluelightz, you're scum? It's just from my expierience that when someone start's a discussion about policy lynches everyone always think it's bad so therefore I just cut to the chase and get started with scum hunting. | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 06 2012 11:30 Bluelightz wrote: It's just from my expierience that when someone start's a discussion about policy lynches everyone always think it's bad so therefore I just cut to the chase and get started with scum hunting. Adding to this, it also waste's time for discussion of other stuff like plans (which are great contributions if we know shit), or potential lynch targets. | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 06 2012 11:32 Zephirdd wrote: you're not cutting to the chase, having that part of the discussion is great. Even if people agree, the way they do it is what matters. However, if they don't even need to do it, we wouldn't find their "way" and we wouldn't have useful information for scumhunting in the first place. If using Policy lynches for scumhunting is [i]their[/i[ way, well, that's how they scum hunt,is it important that we know "their" way of scumhunting? Explain the bolded part please, I don't see how having that part of the discussion is great. My opinions on that Policy Lynch Discussion: 1. That it waste's time that could be used for scum hunting. 2. That from countless games everyone will probably say "Lynch All Liars sucks, Lynch All Lurkers for day 1!" (but if someone has a opinions please share it) | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 06 2012 11:37 Bluelightz wrote: If using Policy lynches for scumhunting is their way, well, that's how they scum hunt,is it important that we know "their" way of scumhunting? Explain the bolded part please, I don't see how having that part of the discussion is great. My opinions on that Policy Lynch Discussion: 1. That it waste's time that could be used for scum hunting. 2. That from countless games everyone will probably say "Lynch All Liars sucks, Lynch All Lurkers for day 1!" (but if someone has a opinions on LaLiars or LaLurkers please share it) | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 06 2012 12:28 slOosh wrote: ##Vote: drwiggl3s Mr. SloOsh Dr.wiggl3s has not done anything yet why are you voting him? On July 06 2012 11:55 Dangeresque77 wrote: Yea I agree. If we dont find something to talk about then we won't find out Whoes scum. Policies for lynching is as good a topic as any Why do you agree? Why is policy lynches good as any other topic? On July 06 2012 12:10 Dangeresque77 wrote: Basically I just say all that lynch all liers lynch all lurkers etc. But yea it's sircumstantual, I mean im not gonna just condem someone just because he breaks a rule period. What do you mean in this post? Policies are stuff that are enforced (for example A lurks and because we are doing Lynch All Lurkers we lynch A correct)? | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 06 2012 12:51 Dangeresque77 wrote: As response to your first question on me. I don't know what to tell you. I figure that lynching policy is just a good conversation starter. It gets people talking and it helps scum hunt In response to the second. what I ment was that I believe that we can't just kill someone without stopping to think about it first if he broke a policy. 99 percent of the time I'll be for it but I like to think about it a little bit before I just vote lynch Okay, thank you for answering, I agree with your thinking about not instantly lynching without thinking because thinking again might lead to new reads or perspectives | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 06 2012 17:49 NoSmurfHere wrote: sup guys I'm vanilla town I go sleep now What the hell? What are you doing? trying to shit up town discussion? tell me a good reason why are you doing this please, I don't know why anyone should claim (except if their name is Kenpachi). | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 06 2012 20:06 Bluelightz wrote: What the hell? What are you doing? trying to shit up town discussion? tell me a good reason why are you doing this please, I don't know why anyone should claim (except if their name is Kenpachi). EBWOP: should claim right now | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
I'm sick and fucking tired of people just stirring up day 1 for no real reason that benefit's us (for example when you claim in WoF VE it wasn't for town purposes right? granted you were scum but yeah that's an example). Thoughts on stuff (like prplhz) soon | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
Let's see, he opens this game with this post: On July 06 2012 20:03 prplhz wrote: ##Vote: slOosh A vote with no reason which is explained with a reason that | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 07 2012 08:46 Bluelightz wrote: [b]prplhz[b] Let's see, he opens this game with this post: A vote with no reason which is explained with a reason that oops....... real post is not this... | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 07 2012 08:48 drwiggl3s wrote: I don't think dangeresque is being weird. I think slOosh gave good reason after his initial post and "ninja vote". I am suspicious of sinensis. MsZontar's actions don't seem out of the ordinary to me. I'd attack you to if I didn't just get out of a game with you where you were playing just like this (but were town). And yes I also think prplhz behavior is scummy. Is any of this enough for a lynch? yes. Is any of it good enough for a sure fire mafia lynch? no. So i want others to talk. why? also why are you piggybacking other's in lynching? if you want to lynch X then go and fucking vote him. You don't wanna take the blame or something? | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
Let's see, he opens this game with this post: On July 06 2012 20:03 prplhz wrote: ##Vote: slOosh A vote with no reason which is explained with a reason that I think is lacking On July 06 2012 22:23 prplhz wrote: when it comes to sloosh my bullshit tolerance level is pretty low marv ignoring me because scum Why is it lacking? Bullshit Tolerance. Bullshit tolerance does not mean anything towards if he thinks X is scum because it is not a valid reason. If prp can't take sloOsh it's not his problem, it's not something that can be used for lynching. Lastly, prplhz also seems scummy because he has not been participating in discussion and just being hostile in all. | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 07 2012 08:52 drwiggl3s wrote: Is any of this enough for a lynch? yes. Is any of it good enough for a sure fire mafia lynch? no. So i want others to talk. I don't want to throw blame around on behalf of weak cases when I'm actually waiting to see more. I was just stating my opinions so far on what's happened D1. Make a strong case then.... On July 07 2012 08:48 drwiggl3s wrote: I don't think dangeresque is being weird. I think slOosh gave good reason after his initial post and "ninja vote". I am suspicious of sinensis. MsZontar's actions don't seem out of the ordinary to me. I'd attack you to if I didn't just get out of a game with you where you were playing just like this (but were town). And yes I also think prplhz behavior is scummy. Is any of this enough for a lynch? yes. Is any of it good enough for a sure fire mafia lynch? no. So i want others to talk. also this post again :D explain the baseless bullshit please | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 07 2012 08:54 drwiggl3s wrote: Well then that tells me two things. 1 your a shitty vig. And 2 you have weak reads if the best you can do at night is shoot another town. ........ Does having weak reads prevent the whole use of being a vig (which is shoot counter-productive people or scum), and marv ddin't even know you were town, you failed to make him believe you were town if he shot you. | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 07 2012 08:55 drwiggl3s wrote: Blue i am saying there's not enough to make a strong case. there's enough to make a weak case, and it's already been made throughout the thread on those players. yes why is there enough to make a weak case and not a strong case? what do you think is a strong case wiggl3s? | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 07 2012 08:57 Bluelightz wrote: [b] yes why is there enough to make a weak case and not a strong case? what do you think is a strong case wiggl3s? answer please | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 07 2012 09:08 NoSmurfHere wrote: *yawn* Wiggl3s whose smurf are you? Unless you're actually decent at this game we can only laugh at you telling marv he was killing townies in his last game. He can probably learn something from it, but being a player and having knowledge are two completely separate things. Thus trying to attack his argument on the assumption that he is bad is simply an exercise in logical fallacy. YOU! On July 06 2012 20:06 Bluelightz wrote: What the hell? What are you doing? trying to shit up town discussion? tell me a good reason why are you doing this please, I don't know why anyone should claim (except if their name is Kenpachi). | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 07 2012 09:34 NoSmurfHere wrote: I don't understand how claiming vanilla town is "shitting up discussion" I never responded to you because your concerns honestly weren't worth responding to in the first place. First, your just making more WIFOM to throw around and discuss (which is kinda worthless cause you posted like what? 3 posts?) and please explain why, I hate baseless bullshit. | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 07 2012 09:43 NoSmurfHere wrote: So do you throw a pointless fit every time Kenpachi claims VT too? Why are you trying to call me scum for something that is alignment-null? Because Kenpachi if fucking annoying. Im not calling you scum I'm asking you to explain your actions. read up the post lol | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 07 2012 10:59 NoSmurfHere wrote: so what was the point of saying that I was shitting up discussion? Is that what happened? I think claiming vanilla is a good way to start a game when there's nothing else to do. Kenpachi rule might be effective, it might not be, but it's completely alignment-irrelevant. Although to toot my own horn as scum I would never do it because it would mean I couldn't fakeclaim later. As scum I plan ahead and having the opportunity to fakeclaim something is imperative. If I claim vanilla town in my first post that's basically thrown out the window. There was policy lynch discussion? I guess your response was good though, I agree because fake-claiming later is basically a no-go if you did that. Now, opinions on prplhz and Sinensis please? | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 07 2012 11:22 Zephirdd wrote: Bluelightz, can you consolidate your reads on prplhz, Dangeresque77, drwiggl3s and Sinensis? Your posts are really spaced out and it's hard to follow your train of thought. Do it all in one post. prplhz: Leaning scum, likeliest vote, reasons explained in my filter (his posts have no substance, his reasons on slOosh is crap) Dangeresque77: umm, some baseless reads, noob town imo, he has provided satisfactory answers to my questions, but I don't understand who he 'thinks' is scummy, but I don't think we should lynch him right now, there are better lynch candidates then him such as orolhz drwiggl3s; I don't like his attitude. He say's that theres only nuff' shit in the thread to make a supposedly weak case but doesn't care to point it out, as well as just wanting to piggyback other people's cases (also doesn't want to make a case). maybe scum. Sinensis: one post, atleast has substance, but I will wait for more post's to get a more accurate read on him. | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
So, right now because of that, I think that drwiggl3s might be scum, reasons in the case below: First, he contradicts himself: On July 07 2012 08:48 drwiggl3s wrote: I don't think dangeresque is being weird. I think slOosh gave good reason after his initial post and "ninja vote". I am suspicious of sinensis. MsZontar's actions don't seem out of the ordinary to me. I'd attack you to if I didn't just get out of a game with you where you were playing just like this (but were town). And yes I also think prplhz behavior is scummy. Is any of this enough for a lynch? yes. Is any of it good enough for a sure fire mafia lynch? no. So i want others to talk. He think's slOosh gave good reason, or did he? On July 07 2012 06:46 drwiggl3s wrote: Not to take any heat off prplhz - I still think he should post something useful. But I think a better scum read would be slOosh. Here's my case against him: His first post isn't actually very suspicious to me. People troll, random vote, etc. all the time. but what follows is what makes me think it was a plan put in place to make him seem pro-town. (rather then an actual desire to lynch me). His follow up posts show great reasoning, and a desire to poke people who are new and or lurking to get a reaction from them. Sure this looks like a great town post, but isn't it too great? Like he starts a mini flare up in posting where everyone's wondering why I have a vote already despite not having posted. And then after a short time he comes back with a flawless reason, thus allowing him to appear pro-town while giving him the opportunity to sit back and not have to post any more. To me at least this seems like the most suspicious action in the thread. Also, in the post where drwiggl3s contradict's himself, he thinks that there is not enough substance to make a fucking (strong) case on someone and doesn't want to do it himself, this is the same as trying to avoid the pressure when prplhz is mislynched (if he is town though). On July 07 2012 08:52 drwiggl3s wrote: Is any of this enough for a lynch? yes. Is any of it good enough for a sure fire mafia lynch? no. So i want others to talk. I don't want to throw blame around on behalf of weak cases when I'm actually waiting to see more. I was just stating my opinions so far on what's happened D1. Why is he waiting to see more? I see no point in 'waiting' for cases while you can just make one yourself. Then he post's some useless post's that don't help anything. + Show Spoiler + On July 07 2012 08:53 drwiggl3s wrote: Ya there was a reason mafia killed me too remember? On July 07 2012 08:54 drwiggl3s wrote: Well then that tells me two things. 1 your a shitty vig. And 2 you have weak reads if the best you can do at night is shoot another town. On July 07 2012 08:55 drwiggl3s wrote: I guess we'll see when that game ends and we see who's scum and who's not right? On July 07 2012 09:07 drwiggl3s wrote: Your first post after townie is lynched. Anyway, just saying you might benefit the town more by saying less and being a little more resistant when it comes to jumping on someone for supposedly scummy actions. Then, he says "theres only enough to make a weak case! there's no way it can't be a strong case!", I think this is stupid because a case is a case, and if the case has a valid reason than is it weak or strong? On July 07 2012 08:55 drwiggl3s wrote: Blue i am saying there's not enough to make a strong case. there's enough to make a weak case, and it's already been made throughout the thread on those players. He doesn't provide reasons/ help making a 'strong' case but just waits to sheep people who care to make a case. So, ##Vote: drwiggl3s | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
Anyway, I'm gonna read up on Sinensis and probably some others too. Since, prplhz is a (claimed) cop, should we try and direct him or just leave him to his own decisions? I think that prplhz should check by himself and claim it like 5 (or 1) minute(s) before the deadline or something, also he should claim the result too, that is if he lives, but this is assuming he is actually a cop. | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 08 2012 07:43 VisceraEyes wrote: Yeah okay. ##Unvote ##Vote Drwiggl3s No reason thur amiright? VE also has a lot of crappy posts which are just deadweight for the thread, an example is the following: On July 08 2012 07:54 VisceraEyes wrote: slOosh is so dreamy. One the plus side though, his aggressive behavior is a normal behavior for VE such as in Sum Of All Fears Mafia IIRC | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 09 2012 11:32 Dangeresque77 wrote: more importantly we have 2 confirmed town atm. ill save some time and make it three im police officer i jailed zephirdd ill include my reasoning as well im basically a medic with a slight drawback(maybe not if used on a mafia member). i think zeph is town and thought he was a reasonable target for mafia, so jailing him seemed to be prudent Umm, Ill just say I believe your claim since Zeph DID claim roleblocked, but why claim now, mafia now just have a free ticket to killing you with no protection :/. Right now I'm thinking VE or Sinensis for today's lynch. | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
Case First, what I find suspicious is that he threw a bunch of stuff to make his vote look more "big" and stuff, On July 07 2012 12:42 Sinensis wrote: Okay, I'm caught up: Prplhz shouldn't be lynched today. No way in hell. He's gotten too much negative attention from too many people, it seems likely to me mafia is pushing for the easy lynch against an aggressive player. And why wouldn't they? prplhz isn't playing as good or as friendly as he could be. This is the last time I defend him against the rest of the angry mob unless he stops with the "LOL SCUM LOL." I am going to go with gut for my day one vote. Zephirdd's posting is the scummiest right now in my opinion. He spends a lot of his time telling other, presumably town players, how to play. Something mafia can't seem to resist doing in most of the games I play. He is stating mostly FACTS (people talking like they know something for certain are suspicious because only mafia have FACTS) and very little speculation. ##vote: Zephirdd As you can see, without the bunch of stuff its very small, also when you look at his reasons, he never explains why facts are scummy, he just says that mafia tend to do it and yada yada yada On July 08 2012 04:48 Sinensis wrote: I could probably swing this vote back onto someone else if I switched but I'm happy to be where I'm at. I'm going to leave it on Zephirdd till the end of the day and see if people are still mad about it. I still think he's scum but I'm the only one that would think that right now, so yeah, not budging. He's being openly hostile and not helping to consolidate the vote which might've led to a no-lynch which is terrible because we lose valuable information (but it is a plus though that he stuck to his own thoughts then sheeping and vote switching like many people did on day 1). On July 08 2012 13:03 Sinensis wrote: Wow I thought I was going to be thrown under the bus for sticking to my gut (as per usual), and you guys go and kill someone completely different on nothing but gut and weak meta? Keep an eye on those that switched votes from me to wiggles in my opinion. That's sloosh, VE, and dangeresque. I would gamble one of them is mafia. Then he points out X,Y, and Z, there's probably scum in between, this is just bullshit because he doesnt explain if X,Y, and Z is scummy (reasonless crap). Those are just my thoughts but feel free to add on, and ##Vote: Sinensis | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
MrZentor - I dislike his open denial of providing information to town because it is clearly a bad thing to do (less information for town to discuss, less information for town to use) therefore I also think he is scum and willing to vote him if need be. Sinensis - Please answer my case. | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 09 2012 09:17 Bluelightz wrote: Well, in the subject of VE , he speds most of the time pocking people and voting people :O, also his vote switch is suspicious too as he just without reason or giving a SHORT reason he just switched. No reason thur amiright? VE also has a lot of crappy posts which are just deadweight for the thread, an example is the following: One the plus side though, his aggressive behavior is a normal behavior for VE such as in Sum Of All Fears Mafia IIRC Another plus though is that VE didn't sheep on Zentor but made up his own reasons for it. | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
1. You voted but you had to post 3 pargraphs of fluff first that's why I crossed it out, but that is a valid reason 2. On the drwiggl3s lynch not on yourself Sinensis, you just stuck up and that might've resulted in a no-lynch. 3. Bro, you didn't explain why switching was scummy, you just said it was scummy = reasonless. | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 10 2012 12:03 Sinensis wrote: While you're here and knowing all about me maybe you could confirm that I am also frequently stubborn, often to a fault. I can confirm that, in SoAF he just gave up and wasn't willing to switch votes iirc. As well as from numerous other games. | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
its me, forgot to log out lol | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
I don't like how he just gave up on addressing Marv's point's rather than defending himself, which makes me ask this question: "Is he town? If he is town why is he not defending himself to convince other that he really is town (which I doubt)". As well with other reason's I have mentioned I will change my vote to VE. ##Unvote ##Vote: VisceraEyes | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 11 2012 09:20 VisceraEyes wrote: Are you serious? I'm town, SCUM AREN'T GOING TO RESIST! THAT'S MY POINT! UGH, fuck this. Lynch me then. I get accused of giving up, so I defend myself. STILL I get accused of giving up, so fuck it. I'm giving up. Enjoy your mislynch and probably your loss. this is your defense? or your huge reads post? | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
-You gave up (but with that Defense I can see you didn't give up, as well as emotion lol >.>) -you didn't explain anything about your day 1 switch (why?) -you have a lot of useless post's. | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
##Unvote: VisceraEyes ##Vote: slOosh I hate to be sheeping but I will form my own reasons later. | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 11 2012 10:52 slOosh wrote: I'm sick and tired of VE, and I'm sick and tired of a town that is too scared to lynch him. I'm pissed off but I can't just stay silent because it actually seems like he is convincing you guys. VE makes good defense --> I lynch him? VE convinces me about slOosh -> I don't lynch him? slOosh just rages and doesnt defend himself -> I don't lynch him? | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 11 2012 10:54 marvellosity wrote: ##Unvote ? | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 11 2012 10:59 marvellosity wrote: ##Vote: VisceraEyes ... | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 11 2012 11:00 marvellosity wrote: That was the most intense 15 minutes of mafia I've ever had ditto. | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
Zephirdd I don't understand why is Sinensis is on your "confirmed" list of people (not that I think he is scum), there is a CHANCE he is town and there is a CHANCE he is scum, if he does an action that makes people think he is TOWN, that doesn't confirm him yes? | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
Preface: I really thought slOosh was town before the Day 2 Lynch, but after that him sealing VE's fate pissed me off, and the way he insisted it was terrible, this case will be divided into Day 1/Day 2 Sections. DAY 1 First thing that makes me suspicious of him in his Day 1 play is that he says that he want's to lynch prplhz, but then he just forgot everything and made random connections with Sinensis like "dude! Sinensis defended prplhz so he must be scum", he made his initial thoughts on prplhz's terrible first post's then just ditched him. His case on Sinensis: (My points are bolded) On July 08 2012 01:39 slOosh wrote: Thank you marv. I'm been trying to figure out how to built a case on tonality / whatever it is I'm using. So I'll just bullet point things to keep in mind when reading thread / filter. - His hardline defense of prplhz. HARD. In an atmosphere where most of the vocal townies were expressing a desire to lynch prplhz, he hardline defends him. During this he calls us an "angry mob" and also hedges a backout option. Yet he admits that prplhz really isn't worth defending according to his current game play. There is a contradiction in word and action. He wants to be seen opposing the prplhz lynch yet he deems prplhz worth lynching up to that point. Sinensis was DEFENDING prplhz because he thought that the lynch was going too easy (like when MrZentor was lynched in Wheel Of Fortune Mafia). Look at that first point, do you see something terrible? I do. Because, that point is fucking useless and doesn't explain why THAT DEFENSE OF prplhz SCUMMY, it doesn't matter if Sinensis is defending prplhz when everyone else is wanting to lynch prplhz, that's like inviting someone onto a bandwagon. Next point, it doesn't matter if he calls us an angry mob lol. Last point(s). he doesn't deem prplhz worth lynching he say's its the last time hes going to defend him while he is still "LOL SCUM LOL", complete misinterpretation. - His general tone of condescension and misinterpretation He is acting out really defensively but does so in a condescending anti-town manner. No one was bashing him, no one was critiquing him because his posts were well thought out. He is slinging mud around. what is the problem with Sinensis's response? he doesn't point out the "anti-town" manner - He spends his energies on meaningless things to feign activity Note the Zephirdd exchange: against a player he thinks is scummy he seems to think that changing his mind is a good action to pursue. Note his exchange with me, where he accuses me of ??? I address it here. He is conjuring up suspicions and flailing when pushed to explain them. It's what Sinensis is suspicious of..... Doesn't actually use these things for scumhunting. For Zephirdd, he called him scummy before the exchange, and with me, he ignores everything said and done to address prplhz. Umm...... quotes? How does Sinensis being suspicious of Zeph matter here...? I think this is a solid D1 lynch. Truly solid ##Vote Sinensis (for emphasis, my vote was already on him) Next, the two post's I will mention here are terrible and contradict with slOosh's later post's. On July 08 2012 07:35 slOosh wrote: I am here and fine with drwiggl3s "Sup, i'm here and fine with drwiggl3s, im not gonna explain shit but I totally like him as a lynch target" On July 08 2012 07:53 slOosh wrote: ##Unvote ##Vote:drwiggl3s Gotchya. "everyone's switchin Imma do it too, with no reason of course " Then drwiggl3's was mislynched, also note that slOosh just hopped of Sinensis happily w/ no reason. DAY 2 Day 2, what really ticks me off. His interaction and defense when we "tried" to switch to slOosh. On July 11 2012 10:36 slOosh wrote: Think critically. Sit tight and watch a lying scum flip. Look at that, he points out VE voted first, but who voiced his suspicion with no reason first? slOosh. On July 08 2012 07:35 slOosh wrote: I am here and fine with drwiggl3s Next, look at his defense, he doesn't do shit about VE's accusations but go immediately emotional and doesn't respond to the points VE, as well as me made (feel free to request any quotes but its on page 3 of slOosh's filter). Summary: This case, coupled with slOosh's insistence of a VE lynch during the last minutes of Day 2, as well as VE & Marv's point makes slOosh my lynch target tommorow. | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 12 2012 11:35 Dangeresque77 wrote: ill probably die tonight anyway, but heres who i think is scum SlOosh. mrzentor. bluelightz heres my case on sloosh sloosh- basically i agree with most of the points brought up by zeph and marv the only people he has been accusing in the last 2 pages of his filter are zephrid, and prphlz both of these players are thought of as confirmed town. a scum would of course want to cast suspicion on two members who have a good rep right here is is screaming at us to switch back to Ve. and then later he claim to self vote so we can get a lynch. hes trying to shove the suspicion somewhere else(onto a townie) and he is claiming self sacrfice for the town sacrificing yourself sounds townie but doing it while trying to shove suspicion onto someone else is downright scummy once he is fighting to lynch a player who is town i dont like how after he came under suspicion he just exploaded. its ok to defend yourself but 80 percent of page 4 in his filter are things like this this is not helpful in the slightest to the town and ended up in getting one of us lynched after he survived he came right out of the gate and tried to get zeph and prphlz lynched my last note on him is that almost all of his points on "why zeph is scum" dont involve him explaining why its scummy if you look at his reasons as to why he is scummy none of them would actually make me think he is scummy.( this means he is grasping at straws trying to get zeph lynched) for expample. when he calls zeph out for switching to mrzentor and "discrediting" marv. he berates zeph for scum-hunting basically and not wanting to follow a hunch. he is trying to warp zephs wards so that he sounds more scummy i dont have time becuase i might die in 5 minutes so ill give my quick reasons for the others i think mr zentor is scum because of all the reasons that were brought up when we were about to kill him. we had a good case on him. he has been very quite in the past day. i think he is trying not to screw anything up and he thinks that he can get away with being a tad lurkky. my last member of the scum team was between bluelightz and sinensis. a few of his posts about slOosh convinced me that he was more likly to be scum right here he is trying to not get slOosh lynched. right here though he condones to lynching sloosh but he doest compltely give in i feel like from a scum stand point right here is where he realized that SlOosh was not going to get lynched becuase we did not have enough people to switch over. so he jumped on the wagon so he did not look like he was defening the man who was trying to get a town player lynched. and then his last post accusing slOosh i feel is scummy as well. right now i feel as though he is trying to do the opposite in this post as he was trying to do in his other ones with sloosh. now he know that slOosh will be lynched and that 80 percent of people have scum reads on him. as scum he would be foolish to be the only person not on that wagon. but he is one of the last to have jumped on it. if he was town his mind should have been harder to sway. he wouldnt have voted sloosh unles he actually thought he was scum not by just saying "i support a switch i guess" ........ If I fucking believed that VE was town after his defense I should vote VE......? The first post you pointed out, I'm asking VE what to do, problem? | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
"i feel like from a scum stand point right here is where he realized that SlOosh was not going to get lynched becuase we did not have enough people to switch over. so he jumped on the wagon so he did not look like he was defening the man who was trying to get a town player lynched." Your logic: Me --> Not nuff' people to switch --> jump on wagon on slOosh? My Logic: VE I think is town --> Marv, Me & VE support a switch on slOosh --> I switch because I'm not going to vote for someone who I think is town. Explain more pls | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 11 2012 09:16 Bluelightz wrote: VisceraEyes I don't like how he just gave up on addressing Marv's point's rather than defending himself, which makes me ask this question: "Is he town? If he is town why is he not defending himself to convince other that he really is town (which I doubt)". As well with other reason's I have mentioned I will change my vote to VE. ##Unvote ##Vote: VisceraEyes On July 09 2012 09:17 Bluelightz wrote: Well, in the subject of VE , he speds most of the time pocking people and voting people :O, also his vote switch is suspicious too as he just without reason or giving a SHORT reason he just switched. No reason thur amiright? VE also has a lot of crappy posts which are just deadweight for the thread, an example is the following: One the plus side though, his aggressive behavior is a normal behavior for VE such as in Sum Of All Fears Mafia IIRC Then I voted him. VE addressed my points: On July 11 2012 10:26 VisceraEyes wrote: Sentiment was heavily against me coming into today. When the votes started falling, yes, I'll admit to having a moment of despair. BUT - considering the way slOosh has been playing, my read on him has changed to the point where I no longer think he's town pushing me mistakenly, but is scum maliciously taking advantage of town sentiment, I've found renewed fervor in my own defense. My D1 switch was based on a couple of things. First of all, at the time I was reading slOosh as town, and a town slOosh is someone I can get behind. When I saw his support of the DrWiggles wagon, and after rereading the guy myself, I was totally fine with him as a lurker lynch since no one seemed interested in lynching prplhz or Sinensis (my preferred lynches at the time). If you're referring to the prplhz switch, that was emotionally motivated. The guy was basically trolling the thread, and then out of nowhere came in with a case on me. When people OMGUS on me, I get pissed...especially when my suspicion on them is completely justified. I have "a lot of useless posts"? I have a filter of THREE pages man, and I'd wager to say that MAYBE 10% of them are contentless and useless. Most of my posts have contained my opinions on the happenings in the thread and my reads/thoughts on players. And if you think I have a lot of posts in THIS game, you should read some of my other games. :/ The points proved satisfactory for me as each explanation was reasonable. WHEN I UNVOTED THEN VOTED SLOOSH: wanted people to join cause: were you even fucking there? there wasn't anyone else online besides me ve sloosh marv, no no one was fucking there nad you say "i should do blablabla so poeple join the cause yaddayadda" WHAT THE HELL COULD I DO? SCREAM IN SOMEONE'S EARS? AND MAKE HIM VOTE SLOOSH?. I SAID VE LOOKED LESS SCUMMY 5 MINUTES BEFORE THE DEADLINE? WHERE? WHERE? WHERE THE FUCK IS THE QUOTES? I DIDNT DEFEND VE (truth be told) BUT I BELIEVED HE WAS TOWN SO I DIDN'T VOTE HIM. | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 12 2012 12:19 slOosh wrote: Last scum is D77 not MrZentor. Medic do not claim. Scum used delay. Lynch me fine - we can still win this if we have a medic / vet. why is d77 the last scum sloosh? | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 14 2012 11:08 MrZentor wrote: -.- Zeph is dead. its over tonight if mafia get a kill Zentor ;; | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 14 2012 23:58 MrZentor wrote: There were tons of cases against Sinensis, and I was directing you toward those to find why he's scummy. Why should I have to make my own case? Pointing out other case's = too lazy to make own reason to contribute. | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + GM, thank's for hosting as well as the scoring(rofl), my thought process when I play scum is just do whatever lol >.>, a Town Bluelightz would also be swayed by that VE defense, I just did what I would do as town lol (not saying that would've been a good thing to do as town do lolol :p). Dear Townies in this game, This is Bluelightz, some serious advice, don't switch on someone only 2 people support on day 1 please (lolol me and wbg), you guys had our role cop in the bag........ until the last 20 minutes Lots of love (<333333333333333333333), Bluelightz P.S more love for lynching slOosh, that dude was totally scum ^^ | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On July 16 2012 00:34 GMarshal wrote: ok, updated. Is there such thing as a town mvp? | ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
| ||