EPTMovie Star Mini Mafia! - Page 6
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
| ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
| ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
On June 22 2012 14:17 Mattchew wrote: Maybe I am being blinded by something, but I do not see how you can get a read off of Prplhz's posts so far. I can't judge him on the MrZ policy cause I completely agree with it, and I don't see anything in his posts that has an agenda. That being said, his posting is not helping town either, so that needs to shape up immediately Terribly flaky post. On June 23 2012 04:10 Mattchew wrote: This all feels extremely middle of the road, I am ready to jump on a bandwagon but don't want to commit to anything scum play. He also contradicts himself about the talks about Marv, then contradicts his we have 48 hours post, by posting a case that he is pretty deadset on, about risk.nuke. Overall I just feel like Rastaban's posting has been flaky and his case on Risk is bad. To answer his question to the thread, I read his vote switch that he was not confident in a Marv lynch, and that he wanted to pressure a lurker with no content. Also, his first 30ish hour case doesn't take into account that Risk.nuke has played many many games before Which is ironic since that was his whole reason for voting for rastaban. Being wishy-washy is really a null tell for crazy newbs. I don't understand what not including risk's meta has to do with anything. On June 25 2012 15:07 Mattchew wrote: Prplhz's post on zeph came at a really suspicious time. He may as well have asked for a no-lynch because if his case had actually gained traction, thats what would of occurred considering the time and players available. This is terrible terrible reasoning. Why prpl would push for a Zentor lynch all day long and then offer alternates is completely reasonable. We want people to offer their thoughts on more than one person but Mattchew finds that scummy. I answered Snarfs question because it was asked of me. The discussion I believe had shifted away from Marv and he was no longer a lynch candidate. I don't believe that posting anything further about Marv would have helped town at that time. I will however be posting more on him in the next 24 hours while we discuss lynch candidates. Given he started the mess this is the biggest cop out ever. On June 26 2012 12:05 Mattchew wrote: I find this tone (throughout the game) when in conversation with Marv to be strange. He has not ever given a reason for thinking Marv or VE is town, yet constantly lumps them together as townies arguing. All in all, I find the tone of Rastaban's posts to be hesitant and a little off. I find that his lumping of townreads on players suspicious, and he has never really responded to a single case brought up. Instead he has just safely tunneled his forced case on Risk. I want scum Rastaban dead. He barely even defends himself even though he was extremely close to being lynched which shows me he's more scum than bad town (for you prob... <3) This is a really careful case given Mattchew has been pushing rastaban all game. There is nothing new since his first case and it is weak as hell. The language is also really soft. Using pharses like "I find", "never really", "a little off" but suddenly he wants him dead? Never mind how this play with his other reads it is an excuse for a case. | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
On June 27 2012 11:42 VisceraEyes wrote: Wow, you're really gonna come in a matter of minutes before the floor drops and criticize the wagon? Get a life Matt. :/ Don't be mean. Man you can be really spiteful when you want to. Matt, take a look at my post. Your play has been underwhelming despite you excusing your lack of posting as a new "consolidation" style. If you play that style, your contributions should matter. You posted your cases and then disappeared to pop back in 15 minutes before the deadline. Hardly pushing for a lynch. | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
| ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
 Going to grab lunch and then take a look at xsksc. | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
| ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
| ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
On June 27 2012 12:20 rastaban wrote: Care to explain why? You think a no lynch is better than a lynch when unsure? Unless I was sure someone is innocent I would much rather have a lynch. The fence couldn't be farther up your ass if you tried. You agreed completely with his actions to the point that you would do the same but he could be scum  Matt your only chance is to convince people that xsksc is scum. I mean your most active point in the game is right near the deadline of your lynch. Be realistic, we don't have enough people to lynch prpl, or rastaban or anyone other than you or xsksc. Unless you are pushing for a no-lynch what are you doing? | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
| ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
The fence thing is that you are sitting on it. In other words you are not being clear on your position with regards to prpl. You think he might be scum but would do exactly the same thing as him? That only makes sense if you are scum. Anyway, it doesn't matter because I don't think you are mafia. | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
I know we have Rastaban and Mattchew. VE, shraft, marv? | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
| ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
Posting a quote and saying the lynch is a go given he has the most votes and only ten minutes left, is incredibly insightful. Matt you haven't presented anything substantial against xsksc despite me asking multiple times. All you say is that he is bussing his team mate and is afraid to post. You can forgive me for not being overwhelmed with gratitude. | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
| ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
| ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
Like why the fuck you do that so close to the deadline? It has always been his question but you decide that is a valid excuse to unvote NOW. | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
Indeed  | ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
| ||
|
Probulous
Australia3894 Posts
I mean I have repeatedly pointed out that it was Mattchew who asked the question, and I repeatedly commented that he had no response to it eventhough Marv's response was goddawful. I did this all through day 1 but you find his actions somehow townie 2 minutes before deadline? It makes 0 sense. | ||
| ||
