Nah it's just that when I suspect someone there are always minor things I think and feel that I forget or choose not to share because maybe I don't find the right words.

Here's what I think of you.

Klaus was weird. Fist he lurks hard and does finally come out with 1 decent post. Then his standard and activity falls presumably from pressure and he bandwagons Zentor.

As for you. You're shady and you don't seem to have any desire to find mafia. Your scumhunting accomplishments of this game have been a very weak case on rastaban and agreeing and repeating what others thought of rastaban. Which wouldn't be so bad exept he happens to also be the only person you've voiced suspicion on. And you didn't even start it, you just followed it up after Klaus. besides that all you've done is some pecky coment-responses to VE and Marv to keep them going.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

June 26 2012 14:39 GMT

#786

I'm not sure yet. Innocent untill proven guilty.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

June 26 2012 14:48 GMT

#788

On June 26 2012 23:42 marvellosity wrote:

Show nested quote +

you've previously been confident enough to place a vote on him, what changed?

He didn't react the way I thought scum would react to that situation which made me uneasy about him. And I feel like he's beeing bandwagoned.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

June 26 2012 15:00 GMT

#789

Now we play the pretend to be afk game while the clock ticks.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

June 26 2012 16:32 GMT

#811

Like marv gets to be in charge of who he shoots...

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

June 26 2012 17:30 GMT

#841

marv I'm not saying you're wrong about VE, but if you insist on shooting him if you survive I don't think you can be saved. You need to shoot who we tell you to shoot or we'll have no choice but to lynch you. It's our form of control. You're free to try to persuade us to let you shoot VE.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

June 26 2012 19:55 GMT

#876

prplhz that's just beeing overly defensive. There is absolutely no need for a townie replacement to jump into a game and justify his formers reads. I find that deal scummy not contributing. And even it was, what else have he done that made you lean town on him or have you judged his alignment from that alone?

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

June 26 2012 20:05 GMT

#884

On June 27 2012 05:00 prplhz wrote:

Show nested quote +

Why the hell would someone be overly defensive when they replace into a game? He didn't do anything scummy yet because he didn't do anything yet!

+ Show Spoiler +

BECAUSE HE REPLACED A SCUM WHO WAS SCUMMY AND IF THIS TOWN HAD HALF A BRAIN THEY WOULD HAD REALISED THAT. SO WHEN HE REPLACED IN HE WAS SCARED THAT THE TOWN WOULD CATCH ON SOON. THATS WHY HE WOULD BE OVERLY DEFENSIVE

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

June 26 2012 20:18 GMT

#887

Nice scumhunting strategy VE. Encourage people to ignore when they are beeing questioned, if you're trying to look town you're doing it wrong.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

June 26 2012 20:23 GMT

#892

On June 27 2012 05:21 VisceraEyes wrote:

Show nested quote +

Ya, you're doing it wrong if you're TRYING to look town risk - I'm trying to find scum, not look like a townie. It's just a happy side effect of doing so. Now stop pestering prplhz about xsc, he's not the lynch today, marvellosity is...or possibly Mattchew.

So how you confirmed prplhz as town? Because if not what you're doing isn't finding potential scum but sheltering them.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

June 26 2012 20:26 GMT

#894

Contrary, you said why would someone play in a certain way. I responed. You ignored.

Tell me if you were to replace in for someone would you start justifying their reads?

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

June 27 2012 00:00 GMT

#966

Well we got roleblockers I assume in case he absolutely refuse and we still don't want to lynch him.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

June 27 2012 00:07 GMT

#970

On June 27 2012 09:01 Probulous wrote:

Show nested quote +

Who is the we here?

Our jailer was shot overnight

oh yeah, I forgot. Still it's no for sure there isn't a town roleblocker. Especially if they can block nigt kp in this setup.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

June 27 2012 13:39 GMT

#1158

VE you're so full of crap.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

June 27 2012 13:41 GMT

#1159

marv, shoot xskcs please.

risk.nuke

Sweden2825 Posts

June 27 2012 20:06 GMT

#1184

On June 28 2012 02:08 VisceraEyes wrote:
Read xsc's comments when he returned. When he came in, he had an opposing viewpoint regarding you than his predecessor had - yet one of risk's problems with him is that he came into the game and 'immediately tried justifying his predecessor's reads'.

And that's it man, that's the extent of his problem with xsc. xsc hasn't even been a major figure in the game, what's his opinion on others? Do you know? Do you care? Why is he a town read?

He was off-voting last night, and while he's decrying my actions regarding the lynch, his vote was uselessly parked on xsc. You at least were on Mattchew and I DID remove your part of getting the lynch done. Not risk though, he has NO right to be shitty or saying I'm "full of shit" when he can't be arsed to even SHOW UP for the fucking lynch. Twice in a row. I wonder what the excuse is last night, because unless I'm mistaken, midsummer is over.

I can go post by post if you want marvel, but you're smart enough to get the gist of what I'm talking about without it so I'm going to refrain.

the weakest shit I ever read. First you try to prove my point that he's justifying klaus's reads by claiming they've had minorly different opinions on marv. If klaus even mentioned marv that must have been like 4 words or something. You blow that out of proportion and call it facts.

The second part is why I'm not up at 5 am. I'll let you see if you can work that out.

So your case on me is you dislike my case on xsksc and I don't stay up to 5 am deadlines. And based on that rock hard condemning information I absolutely must be scum.