Bastard Mafia 2 - Page 3

On June 21 2012 14:51 HiroPro wrote:


Your reaction is not townie. If you were town and the case was bad, then you would say "oh bad case", maybe get annoyed a little, and move on. But instead your response is not only defending yourself, but also painting doubt and suspicion on your accuser without directly calling them mafia. That is a scum tactic. Additionally your response is drastically different from the way that you described it as later "giving Nisani the benefit of the doubt".

On June 21 2012 15:06 Nisani201 wrote:
How the hell is my play this game anything like steamship?

On June 21 2012 15:14 HiroPro wrote:


I have to go work tomorrow and I am going to go to sleep. This is the last thing I am responding to. Your response was not townie. I am not the only person who believes this. This is a direct quote from one of the vets who was in the Wheel of Fortune QT (I don't remember what this person's forum id is, someone who played in Wheel of Fortune probably remembers).

"However, when Ace responds, he acts exasperated, and says he doesn't give out all his reads on Day 1, which is obviously not what Bluelightz was asking for, and then asks what scumhunting Bluelightz himself has done. This moves suspicion off of Ace, and onto Bluelightz, while avoiding addressing Bluelightz's concerns, and can intimidate Bluelightz into not pursuing Ace further. I don't see that as a particularly townie way of replying."

---

Everyone please read my case and xsksc's filter. Do not waste discussion just because we are lynching Nisani today.

On June 21 2012 15:16 DropBear wrote:

I have said repeatedly that you are making more sense to me than anyone and you are the last person I would have lynched, even before your claim.

On June 22 2012 07:15 strongandbig wrote:


That's a really good point actually.

On June 20 2012 13:10 xsksc wrote:
I don't believe FourFace/DropBear's claim's.

On June 22 2012 07:32 talismania wrote:
Proposal:

Nisani wants to be lynched, we want to lynch scum.

We all vote dropbear, and nisani does what KB did and unvote votes to make sure he's the last one voting.

If the game ends because dropbear is the last scum, great.
If the game doesn't end, but dropbear is still scum, then we lynch nisani for possibly having an anti-town wincon (or one of the other 3p players).
If the game doesn't end because dropbear is town and telling the truth, then we've still gotten rid of nisani (and nisani has gotten rid of himself).

___________

All that said I still have a sneaking suspicion the last scum xsksc =/

On June 22 2012 17:45 Acrofales wrote:

Isn't it 9:40 in Scotland?

On June 22 2012 18:29 Acrofales wrote:

It depends a lot on who dies and what they flip what I think of the proposal. If town wins, then your proposal doesn't matter. If Nisani dies then I'm not sure it isn't just safer to roleblock you (if Hyaach is mafia he'll roleblock you anyway and if you're a mafia goon then roleblocking you prevents a NK and catches us a scum).

But lets talk about your roleclaim. I don't automatically agree with Tali that you're scummy for not jumping on 4F (BioSC didn't either), you did say this, after all:


And it was night and revealing a blue role at night is not something you want to do (by day ghost had already said the claim was bullshit). So I don't really think this is a reason to nail you to the cross.

However, BioSC flipped DT and giving town two DTs in a 15player game seems like a very strange setup. Do you have any insight into why we should believe your roleclaim?

On June 23 2012 16:52 Acrofales wrote:
Doubt I can make it at the deadline. In case I die, I think xksksksc is scummier than Hyaach. I think it is in their own best interest to follow the plan if they're town: it can show ghost is scum. If the plan isn't followed, regular scumhunting will prevail!