TL Mafia LV

On May 27 2012 13:22 Blazinghand wrote:
TBH it's a great idea. Grush really needs to die.

On May 27 2012 13:34 jaj22 wrote:
If you're going to policy-lynch someone because they're useless and unreadable, why pick Grush over Kenpachi? I can see why some of you might be bitter from LIV, but at least give people the chance to improve.

@Grush: Making posts longer than one line would be a good start.

Also I'm not voting for Sinensis because I can't read him worth a damn.

On May 27 2012 16:51 EchelonTee wrote:
You're getting over emotional dude, and it's making you look bad.

1. If you're offended, you deserve to be, I agree, but it's starting to look like you're going to build a gigantic, overblown case on him because you got offended. SnB is easy as shit to root out as scum, so I'm not too concerned with him. I'm more so concerned with you, and building a case off of emotion isn't the best plan.

2. No, you didn't post tons of gifs and hats this game. But hey, grush hasn't been a complete anti-town loser this game either. But you want to lynch grush for stuff that he's done in a previous game. Do you see the logical disconnect here?

3. That was a pretty rapid triple post. You're not a scrub so I'm not going to assume that you were actually flustered by my light questioning, but you seem more concerned with proving yourself right and bashing people that you dislike, then actually scum hunting.

On May 27 2012 17:13 EchelonTee wrote:

What exactly are you trying to say in this post?

On May 27 2012 17:25 Blazinghand wrote:
BTW, I'd like to propose a sweet plan: We elect me mayor, and elect Grush57 vice-mayor, and I immediately lynch him. I don't like the Pardoner mechanic and I think this is the easiest way to get rid of the Pardoner and Grush57, both of which are threats to town, neatly in one day. Thoughts?

On May 27 2012 17:31 EchelonTee wrote:

I'm going to make this clear, because hinting doesn't seem to be enough in this case.

I AGREE THAT SNB RUNNING FOR ONLY PARDONER IS WEIRD AND IT'S COOL THAT BH WANTED TO ACCUSE HIM.

I didn't want to make it so obvious because being subtle is important, believe it or not. I also said in that post that "HE DESERVES TO BE OFFENDED FOR BEING CALLED A RETARD", because BH IS NOT A RETARD AND I HAVE NEVER THOUGHT THIS.

Clear enough?

On May 27 2012 17:51 Blazinghand wrote:
I was also considering intentionally voting someone into second place in order to lynch them. That could be dangerously difficult to coordinate, though.

On May 27 2012 20:49 strongandbig wrote:
BH I apologize for calling you retarded.

However I don't see how your questions for me make sense.

I didn't even mention the "keep pardoner power out of scum hands" the first time because that seemed me the obvious motivation for any townie to run for that office, and I was interested in explaining why I specifically was interested in running for that.

I'm interested in hearing where I've been omgus-ing, from whoever it was that accused me of that before; as far as I cam tell I haven't called bh scum, but I could be missing something.

On May 28 2012 09:07 strongandbig wrote:
1. I am not running for mayor. In case that wasn't obvious from my earlier post "don't vote for people who haven't made a case for mayor but only for pardoner". I haven't said anything like "vote for me" since I realized that the runner up for mayor gets the pardoner rather than it being a separate election.

2. Sinensis are you still running for mayor? Do you still want to policy lynch grush? I'm pretty sure BH still does but idk about you.

3. MrWiggles, you've said a lot about pardoner but this is an election for mayor. Also, how do we know if you're town? Obviously the "I'm town" paradigm posted by the subject of suspicion should always be treated with several grains of salt, but it can still be useful to townies making up their minds so I'd like it if you could post one.

On May 28 2012 11:55 VisceraEyes wrote:
What benefits if he's town? The only benefit that moves me when we're talking about a lynch is the benefit of removing a sum from the game...because that is what the lynch is for.

On May 28 2012 12:36 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:

Dat attitude...

Also dat logic failure.

You lynch people for acting scummy, not because they fucked you over in the last game. You threw out a huge red herring there by comparing wiggles to grush. Unless wiggles decides to claim scum, I'd bet every penny I own he won't be lynched today. Why? Because wiggles has been posting clearly, coherently, and in a protown manner. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to realize wiggles is a bad lynch, we're in no danger of "losing him". You're attempting to policy lynch grush (for the record policy lynches are retarded), because he's bad, not because he's scummy. Nobody wants to policy lynch wiggles, thus comparing grush to someone like wiggles is like comparing apples to oranges.

If you want to bring an actual case about why grush is scum then please do, until then both you and blazinghand can drop it.

On May 28 2012 12:54 MajuGarzett wrote:
Why are you so hung up on lynching Grush Sinensis? You seem to neglect that the fact that even if a mislynch is likely on day one it's still better to try to lynch scum than to lynch someone who thus far has been active and seems like town. At least BH conceded that if there was a substantiated target he would lynch them but you haven't done even that. Would you be open to a different lynch or not?

On May 28 2012 12:55 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:

Right back at you bro. You missed my point entirely. Comparing wiggles to grush is a red herring, if you can't see that then I really can't help you.

Also stating
is ridiculous. You lynch someone because they're scummy, not because you don't like them.

Nobody will be voting Sinensis, thank you in advance for your compliance.

On May 28 2012 12:10 Sinensis wrote:
EBWOP: If a mislynch is going to happen, which in all likelyhood it will because that's the nature of day 1 lynches in big games, I would much rather lose grush than someone like, for example wiggles.

On May 28 2012 13:02 MajuGarzett wrote:

Don't be pedantic. I meant that if there is a target generally thought to be mafia would you lynch them.

On May 28 2012 13:28 Meapak_Ziphh wrote:

You just quoted the original post which had the red herring, I can't tell if you're dumb or scum.