| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
On May 09 2012 14:20 Foolishness wrote: I already gave him approval like a week ago! I told him he could go up to 20! And now he's bothering me again about it! More clutter in my inbox! And I have to repeat myself! Gosh! =P awesome, now make GM add those 5 pointed out earlier and I won't be shot n1 this time :3 | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
On May 09 2012 20:00 Toadesstern wrote: awesome, now make GM add those 5 pointed out earlier and I won't be shot n1 this time :3 Someone will be dayvig and you will die d1 :p | ||
|
Toadesstern
Germany16350 Posts
"YO DUDE, POST YOUR SPREADSHEET. YOU'VE GOT 5 MINUTES TO DO THAT OR I BLOW YOU UP" And you know what the best part about it would be? If you really are a dayvig you know noone else is a dayvig and you can't run into the usual palmerish problems that come with that strategy. That's why I'm going to bring it to perfection. In this game that kind of thing can't happen because there's 1 dayvig tops (which is also the reason VE did not sign up) :p | ||
|
Bluelightz
Indonesia2463 Posts
| ||
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
last five slots are not going to be assigned by signup order. | ||
|
Hassybaby
United Kingdom10823 Posts
 | ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
| ||
|
talismania
United States2364 Posts
| ||
|
[UoN]Sentinel
United States11320 Posts
| ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
I know exactly what number to choose for the draft to get #1. Mwahahaha! | ||
|
slOosh
3291 Posts
On May 10 2012 03:27 [UoN]Sentinel wrote: Wait do we get the numbers people PM'ed as well? I actually want to see how other people picked. Probably not, all the other PYP only show the order, not the numbers picked. | ||
|
talismania
United States2364 Posts
[6,9] [6,20] [1,1] [1,1] And they were ranked as listed above. This doesn't make sense to me from reading how the rules state the draft picks are resolved. My understanding is first you'd pick the 1s, those two would bump to the back. Then the sixes - those two bump behind the ones. Then it's as if because the second digits matched between the ones, they got bumped all the way behind the sixes, when I think it makes more sense for them to retain their position relative to the sixes, but get randomized within those spots, making the order: [1,1] [1,1] [6,9] [6,20] It comes down to this statement in the rules: "In the event players picked the same 2 numbers I will once again reset them to the back of the queue(for the order they are in). " What does "for the order they are in" actually mean here? | ||
|
Risen
United States7927 Posts
Real life stuff has come up. I'd like to /obs if there is an obs QT, though. Thank you  | ||
|
Radfield
Canada2720 Posts
On May 10 2012 04:38 gonzaw wrote: Damn, I wish I played this game. I know exactly what number to choose for the draft to get #1. Mwahahaha! Is it [1,1]? | ||
|
risk.nuke
Sweden2825 Posts
Well I'm taking those and hope noone will doom us both by trying to steal them :p | ||
|
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
On May 10 2012 05:11 talismania wrote: The following number picks occurred in PYP 3: [6,9] [6,20] [1,1] [1,1] And they were ranked as listed above. This doesn't make sense to me from reading how the rules state the draft picks are resolved. My understanding is first you'd pick the 1s, those two would bump to the back. Then the sixes - those two bump behind the ones. Then it's as if because the second digits matched between the ones, they got bumped all the way behind the sixes, when I think it makes more sense for them to retain their position relative to the sixes, but get randomized within those spots, making the order: [1,1] [1,1] [6,9] [6,20] It comes down to this statement in the rules: "In the event players picked the same 2 numbers I will once again reset them to the back of the queue(for the order they are in). " What does "for the order they are in" actually mean here? The more unique a number combination the higher its priority. [1,1] is less unique because there are two of them. In an example, take [1,1] [1,1] [6,9] [6,20] [19,19] First I check the first digits for uniqueness. [19,19] has the most unique first digit, and gets put first. [19,19] [1,1] [1,1] [6,9] [6,20] then I sort by first and second digit, once again checking for how unique the combinations are. Since [1,1] occurs twice, it is less unique than either [6,9] or [6,20] so it gets bumped to the bottom. Also, because someone asked, parity cop *can* check itself. | ||
|
PaqMan
United States1475 Posts
| ||
|
gonzaw
Uruguay4911 Posts
Oh..maybe it is, maybe it isn't. I've done a profund research and came up with the perfect number. I'm not too sure about the 2nd number (the thingy from the right, eg [3,19]) but I have a good idea of what it could be. Hmm, too bad nobody will be able to know which number it is....if only I could play this game this knowledge will come to light. ....>_> | ||
|
talismania
United States2364 Posts
[19,19] [1,1] [1,1] [6,9] [6,20] [7,1] [7,2] [7,2] [7,4] algorithm as posted in the op + Show Spoiler + First digit - start with the 1s. Oh no there's two of them, back of the pack. [19,19] [6,9] [6,20] [7,1] [7,2] [7,2] [7,4] [1,1] [1,1] Then we look for 2s. None of them. Then 3s and so on til sixes. Oh there's two of them. Back to the back of the pack. [19,19] [7,1] [7,2] [7,2] [7,4] [1,1] [1,1] [6,9] [6,20] And then we look at 7s. Oh wow so many. Back to the end of the line. [19,19] [1,1] [1,1] [6,9] [6,20] [7,1] [7,2] [7,2] [7,4] Now... we look at second digits within the groups. Oh no two 1s, back to the back of the entire pack. [19,19] [6,9] [6,20] [7,1] [7,2] [7,2] [7,4] [1,1] [1,1] Continuing on the rest of the way. 6 group - nope both are unique and ordered correctly no problem. 7 group - whoa there we got two 7,2s - back to the back of the pack, leaving the order as [19,19] [6,9] [6,20] [7,1] [7,4] [1,1] [1,1] [7,2] [7,2] ? Just doesn't look right to me, but that's how I read the rules as written. Reading how it's been applied in actuality though (PYP insane, for example), I think all the 7s would end up at the bottom because they are the least unique first digit group, but that rule isn't expressly written. I still think it would be best if it went uniques ranked from lowest to highest groups ranked by first digit from lowest to highest within groups, ranked by second digit lowest to highest. so that even if there were five [1,1]s they all come before two [2,1]s | ||
|
GMarshal
United States22154 Posts
[19,19] [1,1] [1,1] [6,9] [6,20] [7,1] [7,4] [7,2] [7,2] Basically, the uniqueness of the leading number trumps ties in the second number. I think this is a more logical way to handle it, that doesn't require complex rulings. | ||
| ||
|
|
SC Evo League
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
CSO Cup
Sparkling Tuna Cup
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Wardi Open
RotterdaM Event
Replay Cast
WardiTV Summer Champion…
RSL Revival
[ Show More ] |
|
|
EPT
